Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femke Huijzer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 22:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Femke Huijzer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and has been written as WP:PROMO. The content has been cited by primary sources and lack reliable sources. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Current sources have been cleaned up. None are primary sources and promo seems to be mostly gone (or can be edited out if not). That just leaves WP:GNG. It looks like the original page creator added this article in Vogue after the AfD nomination. I would say an article in Vogue is fairly significant, especially since she is the main subject. But I'm not sure if that's enough. - Whisperjanes (talk) 08:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – bradv🍁 16:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. The article in Vogue is instructive. Bearian (talk) 19:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a model with an article in Vogue seems fairly notable to me. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:51, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The current article and its sources pass WP:GNG thanks to the work that has been done.IphisOfCrete (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.