Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadl Attraction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fadl Attraction

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although this pornstar bio has just screamed "LOOK HERE! THIS IS A HOAX", for two years, nobody's paid attention. Apparently there's a horse with the name, though. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: notability not established with third-party reliable sources. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 00:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:V. Only found on Wikipedia and its mirrors. Yes, this just screams "Hoax!" • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it, when hoax articles remain untouched for two years while hordes of deletionist editors ravage and AfD worthwhile articles. Irony on a grand scale. --80.192.1.168 (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but make it about the horse. :-D Kidding, Speedy Delete G3. Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes by one-time editor Special:Contributions/Slurps. The WP:Sleepwalking Gnome edits to the article over the years are amusingly sad. Шизомби (Sz) (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. As for the IP editors comment...just because you feel an article is "worthwhile" doesn't make it so. Save your condescending comments. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.