Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collins Slip
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Collins Slip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced orphaned article that fails to assert notability. Suspected hoax article according to CAT:SHA. Snowager-Talk 07:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- (Speedy) Delete Created nearly nine years ago by a WP:SPA. Fails WP:V. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Still no references after ten years, and there are none to be found. Agree with the assessment that this page is a hoax.TheBlueCanoe 13:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not seeing the hoax. Sounds not notable, but could certainly be a term used in local pharmacies in that region. So more WP:MADEUP. Either way, no verifiable notability asserted. --Gaff (talk) 17:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax. Collins Slip could conceivably be a term used by an individual, but the article goes further and alleges an actual incident resulting in an actual death. If such an event had really happened in Ohio in 1983, it would have resulted in widespread media attention (such as the Akron Beacon-Journal) and likely a lawsuit, all of which would be documented. Instead, there's nothing on either the subject or the reputed incident leading to its invention. Calamondin12 (talk) 21:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks references.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No WP:RS. At best it's unsourced and not able to be sourced, at worst a hoax. Either way, Delete. --Jersey92 (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.