Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic Reach
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 22:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Atomic Reach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of why this software, nearly 10 years old, is notable. No recent coverage. Website redirects to another company. Stephen 22:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, and Websites. Stephen 22:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Several Gsearch links to a sponsored post by a company with the same name from 2019, not sure if it's even related to this one. I find nothing for this software otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 23:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Could not find any sources that are both 1. not sponsored post and 2. not a listing (sigcov). The sources on the article do not have significant coverage of the software and it looks like betakit does not distinguish sponsored posts. Looks like the AI sponsored posts are the same thing. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 02:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.