Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard

Shortcuts

Update this page

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Click here to create a new report

Noticeboard archives
Administrators' (archives, search)
349	350	351	352	353	354	355	356	357	358
359	360	361	362	363	364	365	366	367	368
Incidents (archives, search)
1160	1161	1162	1163	1164	1165	1166	1167	1168	1169
1170	1171	1172	1173	1174	1175	1176	1177	1178	1179
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
473	474	475	476	477	478	479	480	481	482
483	484	485	486	487	488	489	490	491	492
Arbitration enforcement (archives)
329	330	331	332	333	334	335	336	337	338
339	340	341	342	343	344	345	346	347	348
Other links
Talk Sockpuppet investigations Backlog

User:Yashraghuwanshi00 reported by User:Ratnahastin (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

User being reported: Yashraghuwanshi00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

12:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "reverted changes"
12:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"
12:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "reverted changes"
04:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "reverted changes by unknown"
18:19, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"
17:14, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"
17:09, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

12:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Raghuvaṃśa (dynasty)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Constant caste based POV blanking of sourced content, despite being aware of GSCASTE and edit warring warning. Also continuing to edit war on Baliyan (surname) [1] - Ratnahastin (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:223.187.53.246 reported by User:United Blasters (Result: Semi)

User being reported: 223.187.53.246 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

12:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC) "←Removed redirect to Disney+ Hotstar"
12:55, 14 February 2025 (UTC) "←Removed redirect to Disney+ Hotstar"
12:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC) "←Removed redirect to Disney+ Hotstar"
12:45, 14 February 2025 (UTC) "←Removed redirect to Disney+ Hotstar"
Consecutive edits made from 12:37, 14 February 2025 (UTC) to 12:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
1. 12:37, 14 February 2025 (UTC) "←Removed redirect to Disney+ Hotstar"
2. 12:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC) ""
3. 12:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

13:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC) "Final warning: Vandalism on JioHotstar."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Also Sockpuppet of 106.221.188.201, who did the same UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 13:02, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apply WP:BOOMERANG reporting user did the same 223.187.53.246 (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Result: Page semiprotected by another admin per a complaint at WP:RFPP. This seems to be the same dispute as one reported above (article splitting). EdJohnston (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Digg396 reported by User:Simonm223 (Result: Blocked indefinitely as NOTHERE)

Previous version reverted to: [2]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [8]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [9]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [10]

Comments:
Also issues with civility [11] Simonm223 (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked – for a period of indefinitely as NOTHERE EvergreenFir (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:201.122.44.60 reported by User:Sumanuil (Result: )

User being reported: 201.122.44.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

02:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Hijacking articles on Amame (album)."
02:31, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Hijacking articles on Amame (album)."
03:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Hijacking articles on Amame (album)."
03:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Amame (album)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User:Traumnovelle reported by User:Le Blue Dude (Result: Declined)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Traumnovelle&diff=prev&oldid=1273169046

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Traumnovelle&diff=prev&oldid=1275797464

Comments:

Traumnovelle often reverts edits to the Sinfest page before or without discussing these reversions on the talk page. He seems to believe, from his comments on the talk page, and in the reversion notes, that he is some sort of police officer for the page. He will often revert even in the face of significant consensus against him. I’m getting frustrated with him, and he’s at it again, removing twice an added image that has consensus for it, and once well sourced categories for the article. While I’m only displaying the behavior since I warned him to stop reverting so much, this behavior is consistent and long ranging. Le Blue Dude (talk) 04:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Le Blue Dude, the consensus regarding the image addition would need to be very clear to justify your repeated re-addition against others' reverts. The onus to obtain such a consensus is on you, but you may not be able to neutrally determine whether it was reached. Where exactly has that allegedly happened? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:17, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not the one who put on the image, for the record. I added the categories that are supported by a quote within the article. Le Blue Dude (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not to say I don’t agree that the image belongs. I agree with the other two editors who added it that it belongs.

The big thing that Traumnovelle did despite clear consensus was repeatedly removing burninglibrary’s mention of the patron ban, but that was before Traumnovelle’s warning Le Blue Dude (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, "image" was wrong. I was referring to your edit warring. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will just state this is another frivolous report from an SPA against me. [12] [13] Traumnovelle (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frustration and perceived article ownership are not sufficient reasons to file a report for edit warring. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:NortonUSA reported by User:Trailblazer101 (Result: Reported user and sock blocked indefinitely)

User being reported: NortonUSA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Consecutive edits made from 16:08, 15 February 2025 (UTC) to 16:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
1. 16:08, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1275843172 by Trailblazer101 (talk)"
2. 16:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC) ""
08:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1275798894 by Trailblazer101 (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

11:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Matt Shakman."
16:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Matt Shakman."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User appears to have also been reverting logged out (diff) and via an alt account (diff) and has ignored all warnings, showing no sign of ceasing their activities of blatant image copyright violations. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another revert (diff). Far past 3RR at this point. Also see this talk for reference of misunderstanding file usage rights and admitting to editing while logged out. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting User:United Blasters multiple articles 3RR violation and edit warring over disputed content

Page: Star Vijay

Diffs of reverts -

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Vijay&diff=prev&oldid=1275880398 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Vijay&diff=prev&oldid=1275825638 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Vijay&diff=prev&oldid=1275785493

User claims to make paid edits so intention of edit warring may involve paid editing as well

highlighting Page: JioHotstar

@United Blasters and @Arnav Bhate both violated 3RR rules 223.185.50.217 (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paid edits? Any proof? Wikipedia Administrators, It's clear that, this user is trying to block me and Arnav..., This user is that who repeatedly tried to Remove the Redirect page JioHotstar, for it his many IP address and accounts got blocked. Me and Arnav, was against it. It's clear that he is a sockpuppet of User:27.56.79.145 So it's clear. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:2601:642:4F84:1590:C8D:B02D:C9CB:6B91 reported by User:Stickymatch (Result: ) Comment

Page: United States DOGE Service}}
User being reported:User:2601:642:4F84:1590:C8D:B02D:C9CB:6B91

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_DOGE_Service&oldid=1275794921 I apologize, I'm not sure how to insert a diff directly

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2601:642:4F84:1590:C8D:B02D:C9CB:6B91&oldid=1275970342

User is adding a redirect, making it difficult to access the articles talk page. Redirect has been being added before consensus is reached. Please see the below diff, posted to the users talk page which they immediately reverted. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2601:642:4F84:1590:C8D:B02D:C9CB:6B91&oldid=1275971185

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2601:642:4F84:1590:C8D:B02D:C9CB:6B91&oldid=1275971986

Comments: IP User does not seem interested in holding a discussion before making the redirect.Stickymatch 04:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am free to remove comments from my talk page. If someone wants to object to a redirect I'll hear that ojection, but so far it's drive-by reverting. 2601:642:4F84:1590:C8D:B02D:C9CB:6B91 (talk) 04:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would make the most sense to discuss the change before making it, considering it effectively removes all the content of the page without merging the two together. Stickymatch 04:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't intend to stop anyone from integrating information into the target article, and I'm still a little annoyed by a prior experience at cargo cult science where a discussed merge led to an article being hatracked onto another with no integration. 2601:642:4F84:1590:C8D:B02D:C9CB:6B91 (talk) 04:20, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you just please let me know why you want to conduct the redirect? There's distinct content on the United States DOGE Service, especially on how it's original purpose related to the USDS. Stickymatch 04:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

v t e Noticeboards
Wikipedia's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles, content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Wikipedia noticeboards