User talk:Tomatoesarefruit

Tomatoesarefruit, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tomatoesarefruit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic TERF. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — Æµ§œš¹ _{[lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]} 16:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casualty recording has been accepted

Casualty recording, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Casualty recording - history

It's incredible progress that computer/Internet based armed-conflict casualty recording and publication has spread way beyond the original Iraq Body Count project. It's true that 16 years is an eternity in the internet epoch, but it's undoubtedly thanks to the sustained work of many committed people, most who will never get any credit for it, that this has become a reality beyond IBC. There's no reason in today's world to accept that these sorts of killings can be swept under the carpet any more. Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China is probably one of the few ongoing mass killings (obviously a crime against humanity, but not part of an armed conflict, however) that is still avoiding casualty recording. Adding to the History section would be useful - there were presumably smaller scale precedents before the IBC, and a prose description of some of the better known (e.g. Wikipedia-notable) projects, when they were created, which were inspired by which others, why they chose different methods, and so on, would be useful. Software aspects would be interesting, if documented by reliable sources - the more efficient ones such as IBC are probably GNU/Linux and free software based, while many of the later ones are probably GAFAM-based (at their own risk of low efficiency, loss of data and confidentiality of sources). Boud (talk) 23:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arab–Israeli conflict

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Kathleen's bike (talk) 19:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kathleen

I don't understand why you keep removing this reference. It is fully and accurately sourced and refers to his role on a charity board, just as the article also refers to his role at Veterans for Britain and other organisations. It is not a contentious issue or a comment on the conflict.

Use of Charity Commission docs as sources is standard for many other BLP, see for example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Rothschild,_4th_Baron_Rothschild

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stein_(physiologist)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Wainwright#cite_ref-11

Thanks Tomatoesarefruit (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits will be removed regardless because of Wikipedia:Contentious topics. You need 500+ edits and have been editing for more than 30 days before you can edit in this topic area. I strongly suggest you read that link before you find yourself blocked from editing. W C M_email 07:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Richard Kemp and his talk page are violations of our contentious topic’s sanctions

You need to stop, please. Otherwise I will have to block you. . Doug Weller talk 18:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]