Jump to content

User talk:Rsjaffe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Could you please stop removing my entry, do you have a bias?

[edit]

necrophilia is described as having a sexual fascination with corpses. The quote I provided says he wants to "f**k her dead body". His fascination to write this is quite famous now and a part of history. If you read other content in the necrophilia sections this belongs here by definition Unless you have a heavy bias towards this celebrity and don't think necrophilia of women is necrophilia, could you stop removing my entry. Injusticewtf (talk) 19:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Injusticewtf, I only removed it the first time and requested you add a reference, since that is a controversial issue regarding a living person (see WP:BLP). Any removals after that were done by other editors, and I suggest you discuss this with them. Also, please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Stating Unless you have a heavy bias towards this celebrity and don't think necrophilia of women is necrophilia is highly inappropriate. People are probably concerned about the WP:BLP policy, which sets a high standard for stating negative things about living people. Please discuss the deletions with them, collegially.
I also note that your edit has been reverted by three different people. Open up a discussion on Talk:Incidents of necrophilia if you feel that your addition is needed, as repeated edits that keep on getting reverted also may be edit warring, which is not permitted. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Candidate instructions

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Instructions for candidates

Thank you for choosing to run in the October 2024 administrator elections. This bulletin contains some important information about the next stages of the election process.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 15–21: SecurePoll setup phase
  • October 22–24: Discussion phase
  • October 25–31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–?: Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the SecurePoll setup phase. Your candidate subpage will remain closed to questions and discussion. However, this is an excellent opportunity for you to recruit nominators (if you want them) and have them place their nomination statements, and a good time for you to answer the standard three questions, if you have not done so already. We recommend you spend the SecurePoll setup phase from October 15–21 getting your candidate page polished and ready for the next phase.

The discussion phase will take place from October 22–24. Your candidate subpage will open to the public and they will be permitted to discuss you and ask you formal questions, in the same style as a request for adminship (RfA). Please make sure you are around on those dates to answer the formal questions in a timely manner.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. Anyone can see who has voted, but not who they voted for. You are permitted and encouraged to vote in the election, including voting for yourself. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see your tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RfA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, you must have received at least 70% support, calculated as support ÷ (support + oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("'crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation as a candidate, and best of luck.

You're receiving this message because you are a candidate in the October 2024 administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Our Admin Election Test

[edit]

Hello there. As we're preparing to move from one stage to the next, this is just a quick note from one member of the test group to another, wishing you well in the process of this new alternative to RfA. It seems that there are more of us in this group than some in the community anticipated, so i hope that doesn't make the experience any the worse for all of us. Whatever our individual results, i thank you, along with the rest, for stepping up and testing this process; happy days, ~ LindsayHello 07:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]
Here's your shirt

On your election as a new admin! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belated congratulations from me, but speaking of this, it's great having my revdel requests be handled so quickly. Thanks for jumping right in! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That was my primary goal in becoming an admin, improving responsiveness. I wish all the copyright revdels were so easy. I just punted one revdel request as being way beyond my paygrade: Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems#Ruben_I_complex_copyvio_case.
And thanks for the thanks on the edit. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Admin Bâtonnets

[edit]
I may not be able to offer you the baton, but I hope you can savour these bâtonnets as you study all the new admin buttons! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A baton for you!

[edit]
The new admin baton
SilverLocust has passed the baton to me and, after a few moments of enjoyment, I am passing it on to you! Congrats on winning your election and make sure to pass a baton on to the next admin once you're done! Sincerely, ThadeusOfNazereth :)

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 12:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the adminship.

[edit]
Keep playing with the shinny new buttons. Wikibear47 (talk) 18:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"He who does not keep peace shall lose his hand."

[edit]
The axe of responsibility
Shiny new tools might be used to mete out justice, mercy or a dose of reality. Let us commit to not losing our cool when using them. Our only armor is the entire community's trust. We wear it for each other, each new contributor, and each new generation to come. May you ever be the community's champion.
BusterD (talk) 14:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was the content?

[edit]
Rsjaffe talk contribs deleted page Improbable Fables, or a Jorney to the Center of the Earth

Please in the future don't do such single-handed deletions without notifying the page editors. It was wikilinked, hence there was some purpose. A typo in the title must be handled more cleverly. People make typos all the time.

Now, what was the content of the page ? --Altenmann >talk 01:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted Improbable Fables, or a Jorney to the Center of the Earth, which was not an article, rather a redirect to Improbable Fables, or a Journey to the Center of the Earth at the request of the person who originally made the misspelling. The redirect occurred because the author originally misspelled the title, then moved it to the correct title, but left behind an implausible misspelled redirect that should be deleted.
I didn't delete any content. I should, however, have fixed the spelling on any incoming links to point to the correct one. Was this an incoming link? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When you are deleting a page, you have to fix the links that you have broken. It is good that only one page was affected. But what if you delete a page that links to a dozen of other ones? Now can people possibly know what was correct title? They will probably get rid of the redlink and the information is lost. --Altenmann >talk 01:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:2600:1700:25D0:3B60:B59A:C8E2:CFC7:B020

[edit]

Hi

Just to let you know a user that you blocked is continuing to abuse their own talk page so you might want to remove that from them.

Thanks - TLJ7863 (talk) 08:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academic journals) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Hopson

[edit]

Sophie1043 has reintroduced the copyright violation on Jay Hopson. They seem to be a single-purpose account; there's an entirely separate issue with them edit-warring to reinsert non-neutral language and they're never used a talk page. I'm involved or I'd consider a block. Mackensen (talk) 02:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and rev-del'd. I also think there's some competence issue as they keep on reintroducing the old rev-del request template in their edits. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, much appreciated. It's not the last college football coach article that I'd expect that kind of behavior, but pretty close. Mackensen (talk) 03:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
Thank you for going through my revdel requests of copyvios. Your help is greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of Talk:Hyperbole/Archives/2013

[edit]

I simply wanted to let you know that Talk:Hyperbole/Archives/2013 is the 2013 archive for the talk page of Hyperbole, as opposed to the talk page for the deleted Hyperbole/Archives/2013. I ask that you undelete it. JJPMaster (she/they) 03:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I’ve undeleted it. I’m trying to track down who requested deletion so they know, too, but am currently unable to do so. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure it was deleted automatically when you deleted Hyperbole/Archives/2013 with Twinkle. I was the one who {{db-error}} tagged that page, but you G7'd it, meaning that it presumably was blanked by its author first. JJPMaster (she/they) 10:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice removed

[edit]

Hi! I noticed that a recently blocked user removed their notice, is that allowed whilst it's still active? I've seen it once or twice before and thought that was a no-no? Blue-Sonnet (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Blue-Sonnet (talk page watcher) (Non-administrator comment) I also thought that was a "no-no." However, I can't seem to find the policy to back that up. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 19:56, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can't remove declined block appeals, but you can remove block notices. Wikipedia:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for the clarification. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification also, I shall endeavour to never get blocked and have the opportunity to put that into practice! Blue-Sonnet (talk) 04:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you declined my Wikipedia Article. Please help

[edit]

I think you declined my article, I just wanted to know why?

I'm doing this article as a part of my task from my employer. It's totally a work not just a paid-to-create article.

Please help me out.

This is my Article. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ruelsky311/sandbox/Justin_C_McMillion

Hoping for a positive response. God bless. Ruelsky311 (talk) 05:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruelsky311 (talk page watcher) I just looked at the page history of the draft, and it looks like Rsjaffe just moved the draft from your userpage to a sandbox. There was no decline involved.
I realize that you probably weren't specifically hired to write this article. However, according to the term of use of Wikipedia, you are still what's called a 'paid editor,' and need to disclose that on your user page. You can read more here, here, and here. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 06:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, will my draft be flagged? do you think it will be approved to be posted here on wikipedia? Ruelsky311 (talk) 12:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruelsky311 Your draft might be flagged with {{COI}}, yes. You did declare a conflict of interest when initiating the conversation. Not sure if or when the draft will be posted. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 13:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of ballinagar gaa

[edit]

you deleted my page Ballinagar Gaa could you undelete the page or give me access to view a copy of the deleted page so i can see what the issues were that caused it to be deleted Budisgood (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a copyright violation of https://www.offalyexpress.ie/news/local-news/953729/the-man-behind-the-wire-ballinagar-s-magical-year-an-inspiration-to-all-small-clubs-in-offaly.html , where there wasn't sufficient text left after removing the violation for there to be a viable page. Your edits at the beginning were copies of the article in this link. I can provide you a fragment that doesn't have copyvio issues. I have moved it to Draft:Ballinagar_GAA. Do not copy text when writing an article. See the information on copyright that was left on your page. If you have more questions, feel free to ask me or others on Wikipedia. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:2603:6000:D2F0:3680:30CD:A07C:D1EF:3725

[edit]

Please block this ip asap, as this ip is now making personal attacks on his talk page. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G3

[edit]

Hi Rsjeffe, I don't see how User:Sydney ham/sandbox falls under G3. It was very clearly a test page, and at a sandbox, where new users are expected to create test pages. CMD (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was submitted for review under articles for creation. Submitting a nonsense article was the problem. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Testing the AfC system is not vandalism. Expecting a new user to understand that experimenting in their sandbox is not okay in specific cases is a very high bar, and that bar is still not WP:VANDALISM. CMD (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I see your point that it was user experimenting. I’ll put it back but remove the article submission header. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I have applied for AfC, to maybe help chip into the backlog such tests cause. CMD (talk) 05:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikita Romanov

[edit]
Notice

The article Nikita Romanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved 15 years. Much of this essay makes no sense.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian, Not my article! — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Bearian (talk) 19:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the joy of automated tools. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More deletions of sockpuppet articles

[edit]

I saw you deleted pages like Bujin Tongil, which was created by User:Korean National History (blocked for sockpuppeting). Could you also delete Left-wing nationalism in South Korea? They also created this article and I'm the only other major contributor on that page. I cleaned it up a lot, but it's still not a great article, some WP:OR going on. I don't really want to reward their behavior by leaving their writing up. seefooddiet (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For helping deal with a nasty case of racist, anti-semitic vandalism. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 05:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Yeah, very ugly. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note

[edit]

Good block (I'd have blocked for vandalism), but I think the people he was going after are long dead. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I changed it as BLP doesn’t apply. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ScifaxEditor block

[edit]

Hello Rsjaffe, I see what you’re doing with the bit. Great job so far and thank you for volunteering. But I am questioning the block on ScifaxEditor for username policy violation. Users like OxervEditor or even WikipediaEditor11 and every other usernames that have WikipediaEditor in them were not blocked for a username policy violation. In my opinion, this is not a violation. Want to discuss? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The person stated they were from “Scifax Technology and Publishing Private Limited” and wrote a promotional article on the company. I blocked because I interpreted the username to be a role account for the company. Was that incorrect? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 07:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Usernames are not allowed on Wikipedia if they only contain the names of companies, organizations, websites,… blah blah blah Emphasis mine. This username does not contain only the name of the organisation. Hence I’d consider the block incorrect. Actually, I have seen so many of these from the queue and didn’t report. For this case, the user kindly told us that they’re from Scifax, they literally disclosed it. Maybe a deletion of the promotional material they created and a warning would have sufficed, IMO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I took that from Usernames that are solely the names of posts, positions, roles, or job titles within organizations, such as Secretary of the XYZ Foundation, are not permitted, as such posts or positions may be transferred or held by different persons at different times. is that incorrect in this case? I’ll happily unblock if I interpreted that incorrectly. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 07:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you did honestly, reason being the editors I mentioned above would have been blocked on this basis if that applies to this context. Also being that Editorofthewiki would have been blocked for a username policy violation. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, now I see, “editor” is too generic to be considered a role at a company. Correct? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 08:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That’s it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unblocked. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 08:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thumbs up icon Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I'd have made that block as well when considering the promo editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There’s no doubt that it is true, they would have probably been blocked for spam or advertising, etc. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And now there’s a bunch of confusion at UAA Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention#User-reported. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The promo wasn’t bad enough on its own, to be block-worthy. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That’s why I did a soft block. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn’t saying they should rather be blocked for promo, I was only saying if they should be blocked at all then it should be when they edit promotionally. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small thanks

[edit]

Hey, thanks for doing the deletions on my now-unneeded userspace pages. I know it's a small thing, but wanted to let you know you are appreciated!

JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 04:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for your kind words. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My page been deleted

[edit]

Hello Rsjaffe, I would like to appeal for my page back as I aim confused as to how my page has anything to do with advertising or any kind of propaganda all I mention was my artist name a bit about me and my album and some external link. if you check again you would see nothing at any point relating to advertising my music. I do not wish to go back and fourth all im kindly asking for is for you to help me un delete it and approve it please thank you. XRAYNEOFFICIAL (talk) 19:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.
A Wikipedia article is formed from secondary independent sources, which your article had none of. Not everyone is suitable for including in Wikipedia. A person has to be notable. See WP:GNG for a start to understanding notability.
We also strongly discourage people from writing about themselves. If you are notable enough for inclusion, someone else will know of you and write an article.
I suggest if you think you are notable, you can restart your article in your user sandbox (User:XRAYNEOFFICIAL/sandbox), using secondary sources like newspaper articles. If you are able to get something going like that, I can pick out the userbox from the deleted article and give it to you to add. The rest of the deleted article is not coming back. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rsjaffe&oldid=1259553260"