User talk:Mrspivvy
|
Bedford CA
[edit]I don't know if you've ever yet started up a new article. If you have - even if you haven't - the Bedford CA van still has no wiki entry of its own. It deserves one (I think). It set the pattern, at least redarding the UK market, in several important respects for the Ford Transit which has definined the UK light van sector since the 1960s (polishing off the Bedford CF in the process). You look as though you might have access to wikitype info about the Bedford CA. Just thought I'd float the thought at you .... maybe catching you on a day off. Happy Year. Charles01 (talk) 08:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Bedford VAL
[edit]A tag has been placed on Bedford VAL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 04:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)