User talk:Kavkas

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chechnya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ingush, Ottoman and American

Balkars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ingush

History of Kabardino-Balkaria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ingush

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khaibakh massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Screenshot of ingushetiya.ru.png

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of ingushetiya.ru.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caucas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ingush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kefir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Medieval Ingush symbols, triskelion symbol and swastika in form of eagle heads. Ingushetia, Dzheirakhovski district, Targim.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Medieval Ingush symbols, triskelion symbol and swastika in form of eagle heads. Ingushetia, Dzheirakhovski district, Targim.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks in edit summaries

A really bad idea, especially when they are just silly, such as " Its not InQush its InGush. Shows how much you really know about the topic." - that is obviously a typo and it is certainly not by me. YouTube is not a reliable source, and the use of Nichols would be fine if it were used properly, but the statement as it stands doesn't put across well what she is saying. You should also not add words to quotations such as 'world'. Dougweller (talk) 12:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RSN

See WP:RSN#Are these reliable sources for the origins of an ethnic population?. Dougweller (talk) 14:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chechnya may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

settled in Chechen-Ingush ASSR on the permanent basis and were able to survive the famine.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rferl.org/content/chechnya-ukraine-holodomor-survivors/25177285.html</ref>
[[File:Mass grave in Chechnya.jpg|thumb|240px|A [[Chechnya_mass_graves|mass grave]] in Chechnya (2000)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ingushetia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ingushetia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Dagestan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to User:RashersTierney. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chechnya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Beck

I didn't say he was wrong, and I'm not disputing the factual accuracy of the quote. What I'm saying is that Glenn Beck is not a reliable source of information, and his words have no place in that article. All of that information can be found in history books written by academics, and that's what should be used. People associate his name with lunacy, and will do likewise with his words. LokiiT (talk) 09:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Getagazhev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Y-DNA haplogroups in European populations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Caucasian and European. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ingushetia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on East Prigorodny Conflict. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abrek, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Ossetian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kavkas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Magomet Sagov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magomet Sagov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magomet Sagov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 12:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 16:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kavkas, you've now reached 3RR on one page and WP:4RR on Ingushetia here [[1]] (I'm counting the IP because we all know that's you, not sure I've heard of any Ingush diaspora in your IP's location but I guess you learn something new every day :) ). You can get banned for that. Also don't edit the user pages of editors like this [[2]], please instead use their talk pages -- i.e. here for not Dave or here for me. Technically you can be banned if anyone reports you, unless you revert yourself right now on either Chechnya or Ingushetia right now-- just saying. Cheers.--Yalens (talk) 21:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ingushetia

What are you trying to accomplish in your edits on that page? Power~enwiki (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC) I am providing references from German, American, Georgian, and Russian sources. Your Nazi Abkhazian buddy is trashing the page.[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kavkas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kavkas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingushetia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ingush and Dolomite. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingushetia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kabardian and Ingush.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

youtube reference

Please refrain from adding links to youtube videos as youtube is considered an unreliable source (WP:RSP). Regarding other changes, please explain your reasoning at the talkpage of the Ingushetia article. Alaexis_¿question? 16:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, youtube is the source of information its a radio broadcast by Professor Yevgeny Satanovsky president of the Institute for Israeli and Middle Eastern Studies. You are not an anti-Semite are you my anti-Ingush friend? Show me one CONTRIBUTION to the Ingushetia you made. None, now you can leave. I am not going to let you vandalize the page.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Alaexis_¿question? 07:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The more the anti-Ingush Nazis remove the referenced material, the more referenced/truthful material is going to be published by me.

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 h for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue display battleground behavior, calling your opponents "enemies" and "enemies of the people", you are not going to stay here for long.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry where do you see words "enemies" or "enemies of the people"?--Kavkas

Anti-Ingush Nazis above is worse.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Ingush Nazis is not "enemies" or "enemies of the people".--Kavkas

Пиши по русски я не понял что ты хотел сказать под "враг" и "враг народа". "Врагами народа" называли ингушей после высылки в 1944 г. --Kavkas

This is English Wikipedia, and we are using English here. What I wanted to say that you should stop personal attacks/ If you fail to do this, the next block will come soon and will be for a longer duration.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only personal attack I see here is by Alaexis against Wikipedia Ingushetia page. We have over 160 references here added because he questions everything without any contribution to the page. The user cuts referenced materials bit by bit. Please see the history.--Kavkas

You do not seem to get the point. May be someone else would be more successful that I explaining it to you, but for the time being I do not see a way forward for you to edit the English Wikipedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thats OK comrade --Kavkas

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vainakh tower architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingush people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chechen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ingushetia into Ingush people. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Form of nationalist disruptive editing on Ingush people and Ingushetia

Hello, I would like to point to you out that your edits on Ingush people can be considered a form of nationalist editing and goes against the consens. You have also completely changed the last correct version. Please revert it to the last correct version. I kindly ask you to stop your disruptive edits. Thank you. Reiner Gavriel (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already invited the admins. We will see who the disruptive nationalist is.Kavkas (talk) 03:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed a report, please see under Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Reiner Gavriel (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can file reports all my sources are referenced and you trashed the pageKavkas (talk) 12:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vigesimal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ingush.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been banned several times for running edit wars

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your recent editing history at Ingush people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Given your previous block history, if you are blocked for disruptive editing here, you will likely not be able to return for quite a while. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:42, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people—usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group—in whole or in part" You are involved in supporting Chechen propagandists who want to exterminate Ingush people as a nation Kavkas (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please provide me with contributions, the Chechen you support, did for the development of the Channel? All he is doing deleting the material. Kavkas (talk) 17:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks above and serious competence issues (in particular, edit-warring restoring material only sourced to social media, calling it "referenced material").--Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We will see about that Kavkas (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kavkas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The English page of "Ingush people" was attacked by Russian and Chechen trolls including the ones who have moderator privileges. I've contributed countless hours and researches to Wikipedia. Ingush people are the most oppressed people in Russia. I've added UNBIASED NON-INGUSH sources of information. The Chechen trolls multiple times edited and added the false information about the Ingush none of these sources was ever deleted, including the lie that Ingush worshipped phallic monuments. None of these lies were edited out. The so called Ichkerian and Kadyrovtsi Chechens carry our one mission to destroy Ingushetia and Ingush people, grab the history, land, architecture, culture, language etc. I understand that Ingush people have no allies, but we will remember who helped to participate in the Ingush genocide. We have a long memory

Decline reason:

"The English page of "Ingush people" was attacked by Russian and Chechen trolls including the ones who have moderator privileges" is as far as I got reading your appeal. Calling editors and admins who disagree with you trolls is a form of personal attack and such appeals are declined outright. Please review WP:NOTTHEM and WP:GAB prior to making another request. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Main point: Caution

Dear friend and brother, I am Ingush by nationality, I would like to warn you that you would not enter into provocations, and in the event of edit wars, urge admins to resolve the conflict. Be carefull. Niyskho (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]