Jump to content

User talk:Guessitsavis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives (Index)

Coinrule review

[edit]

Hi Guessitsavis. I was looking at the Coinrule article just now when I noticed you marked it as reviewed a few hours ago without further tagging. It did not seem like it met the standard for organisations and companies to me, and I was planning to either draftify or nominate it for deletion after I've had time for a proper BEFORE (depending on the results), but as you have reviewed it I wanted to get your opinion before proceeding, and confirm whether you've found some suitable references. Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha3031
Hey there. On my initial once over I thought I saw sufficient independent sources to suggest notability, but after I gave it a good review, I agree with you. Once of the main sources was user-sourced (Forbes), which I didn't notice when I saw it. Thanks for catching that! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 11:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice!

[edit]

I had to notice that on this page, Draft:Resuvonia, You have declined the article. I did NOT make this page, but when I was editing this page, you declined the article. I am not saying that this article is worthy, but I am just informing that I added a reference and added maintenance tags. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the references still do not support the notability of the subject, hence it was declined. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 11:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thank you! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Guessitsavis for accumulating at least 100 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to edit requests

[edit]

Hi! Thank you for your efforts in reducing the backlog of requested edits. Remember to change ans=no to ans=yes in the template code, so requests that are answered or pending user input won't fill up the backlog. User scripts like User:Jackmcbarn/editProtectedHelper and User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool can help you do so automatically. Best, NotAGenious (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful advice

[edit]

Thank you for the advice on my new page on Draft:Portrait of George Griffin Stonestreet. I was foolishly trying to help a non-Wikipedian friend and took his basic text and formatted it. I will try to clean it up in in a non-plagiaristic way. StewE17 (talk) 14:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sounds good! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 17:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

[edit]

Hi Guessitsavis. Thank you for your work on Werapong Prapha. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

You should not mark a page as reviewed if you nominate it for CSD.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts: My apologies, I think Twinkle just automatically marked it when I CSD'd it, and it completely slipped my memory to unreview it. Thanks for telling me! Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 22:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's a box you can uncheck in Twinkle preferences to prevent automatically marking pages as patrolled when placing a CSD tag. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 22:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I just found that while digging through my preferences. Not sure how it got turned on though. Thanks again! Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 22:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC) (edited 22:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

[edit]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 11:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Critical itinerary of Gasparo Cairano for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Critical itinerary of Gasparo Cairano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical itinerary of Gasparo Cairano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mach61 20:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declining drafts for lack of reliable sources

[edit]

Hi there, here from Draft:Jocelyn Saunders (nee Muir), which got asked about on the help desk. I can see why you gave this the WP:RS decline, but if you're going to do this for something that doesn't have explicitly non-rs sources, can you make sure you give a more substantial personalized decline reason for the submitter? All they can do is look at this and think "but these are reliable sources", so they're just going to be confused. -- asilvering (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, unfortunately my memory has been completely shot lately, but looking over it, I think it was more of an ILC and notability problem. Irregardless, I'll definitely try my best to explain my declinments of drafts in the future. Thank you for letting me know! Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 02:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a notability problem, make sure you use the regular notability decline rather than the unreliable sources decline (which implies that the subject is notable, but the sources are crap). Cheers! And thanks for reviewing. -- asilvering (talk) 02:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Guessitsavis, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 16:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Florencio Pla Meseguer

[edit]

Hi, Guessitsavis, I'll be adding the sources tomorrow. Ninud (talk) 18:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks for your followup. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 18:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the sources to the early life. if you have a minute, could you have a look?
I'm not sure if I chose the right format/templates.
ty! Ninud (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the later sections still appear to be unsourced. Do you have sources for those sections? Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 12:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
working on it :)
(it'll take me some time...) Ninud (talk) 07:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i've included all the sources, expanding a bit some parts, and republished the article.
i'll add external links and info about some publications made around his live (books, docus, etc.) tomorrow... Ninud (talk) 12:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

[edit]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Top AfC Editor

[edit]
The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor
In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Guessitsavis&oldid=1265075546"