User talk:Dedhert.Jr

NOTE! It is recommended to use English to create a new discussion, in order to give a chance to other users to give another reply after reading this. Foreign languages is not recommended and it should be discussed on Wikipedia with that own language.

Archive
Discussion : 1, 2

Triangle

In your sandbox/1, "a triangle in which one of its angle is less than that angle is acute angle" should be "... all of its angles are less ...". And in the caption, you have a redlink due to a typo. Regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This is just beginning, and I have not expanded yet. Fixed. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ 2.50.123.100 (talk) 14:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Composite polyhedron has been accepted

Composite polyhedron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 17:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Great article on composite polyhedrons! I can see you have been putting time into writing good articles, and we appreciate it! Cheers :) OnlyNano^talk 17:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pentagonal pyramid

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pentagonal pyramid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Randomstaplers -- Randomstaplers (talk) 20:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deltahedron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convex.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pentagonal pyramid

The article Pentagonal pyramid you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pentagonal pyramid and Talk:Pentagonal pyramid/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Randomstaplers -- Randomstaplers (talk) 03:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Triangular bipyramid copyedit

Hello, Dedhert.Jr. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Triangular bipyramid at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 18:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added ibox same as Rhombic dodecahedron

I added the ibox in Rhombic triacontahedron page. Ask now for help. GAMERBOY102 (talk) 04:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

null

WP:CONFIRMWP:CONFIRM 46.213.192.214 (talk) 02:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pentagonal pyramid

The article Pentagonal pyramid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pentagonal pyramid for comments about the article, and Talk:Pentagonal pyramid/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Randomstaplers -- Randomstaplers (talk) 14:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 Hey, congratulations on the GA promotion. I apologize for not responding back in December - I was really burned out back then.

Still wondering why my username was grabbed by ChristieBot... ⸺(Random)staplers 06:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Randomstaplers No problem. If you ever feel you can't take a review, you can ask other editors to take it over. Period. Speaking of the bot adding your name, that is probably just how the system works. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 14:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if Ldm1954 got the credit, that's all. It's easy to easy to miss a template parameter here. ⸺(Random)staplers 00:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Randomstaplers thanks for the thought about credit. I am OK about not getting any, I did not do that much. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Input related to polyhedra

I would be interested in your input/suggestions from a topography and/or math viewpoint on a couple of articles I am working on. The most obvious one is icosahedral twins which can have some (I think) different Johnson shapes for variations in the surface energy for different facets. I am wondering if there is more that could be added about the topography, perhaps as a separate paragraph later.

The other article is extended Wulff constructions where maybe less can be added. The equation forms I use are "right", but I don't know how conventional they are. Probably there is no useful topology that can be added for the other shapes, but I thought I would ask anyway. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not really good at these subjects, but I think I can help with the cleanup instead. I would say the article is already in good shape, but you can ask for peer review or ask the WikiProjects. And I see you already nominated the second one. But for the sake of the GACR, I might have to say there are many out-of-context images on each paragraphs, and what it has to do with them? This is just one of the criterias. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 04:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the edits, I am not as good a proof reader as I should be. I only changed one or two. I did add a little more specific connection to the different figures, and also added anchors to link to the specific figure if the reader is unclear.

I may ask on WT:Physics for second opinions, but these are areas where I am rather well known so except for clarity for others the technical side is OK. I will ask a couple of people outside of WP who also know the topic of the one I nominated for GAR. The other one is not ready yet. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I'm concerned, most technical articles may have background explanations before the main topic in order to make the non-science readers understand. Mathematics GA articles have those, but I have no idea about the science ones. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I made the first paragraph gentler. (N.B., many math articles at NPP don't have non-technical intros.) Ldm1954 (talk) 18:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Triangular bipyramid

The article Triangular bipyramid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Triangular bipyramid for comments about the article, and Talk:Triangular bipyramid/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CosXZ -- CosXZ (talk) 01:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Free kitten for contributing to mathematics articles. I'm obsessed over mathematics too.

Somerandomguy55 (talk) 03:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

Hi, Dedhert.Jr. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Johnson solids – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:24, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question

You did not get a response to this question which I just saw in the archives. Did you find what you needed somewhere else?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I got nothing. But the problem has already solved, I suppose. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polyhedron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isogonal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Regular icosahedron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elementary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]