User:Lionelt/Foobar/Assessment
< User:Lionelt | Foobar
Article assessment involves determining the quality and importance of articles of interest to WikiProject Conservatism. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.The article review processes provide constructive criticism which is used by editors to improve articles. We're happy to assess your new article as well as developed articles.
Request assessment
[edit]To request an assessment of your new or developed article click here:
If you would like an outside opinion on a new quality and/or importance rating for your article, please feel free click the button. This will result in an assessment rating of Stub, Start, C or B.
Overview
[edit]The assessment system used by the WikiProject Conservatism to rate article quality consists of two parallel quality scales; one scale is used to assess regular prose articles, while the other is used to assess lists and similar non-prose articles.
| Prose article | List article | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stub | The first stage of an article's evolution is called a stub. A stub is an extremely short article that provides a basic description of the topic at best; it includes very little meaningful content, and may be little more than a dictionary definition. At this stage, it is often impossible to determine whether the topic should be covered by a prose article or a list, so this assessment level is shared between the two scales. | |||||||
 |
 |
|||||||
| Start | List | A stub that undergoes some development will progress to the next stage of article evolution. An article at this stage provides some meaningful content, but is typically incomplete and lacks adequate references, structure, and supporting materials. At this stage, it becomes possible to distinguish between prose articles and lists; depending on its form, an article at this level will be assessed as a Start-Class prose article or a List-Class list.
| ||||||
 |
| |||||||
| C | As the article continues to develop, it will reach the C-Class level. At this stage, the article is reasonably structured and contains substantial content and supporting materials, but may still be incomplete or poorly referenced, but not both. As articles progress to this stage, the assessment process begins to take on a more structured form, and specific criteria are introduced against which articles are rated. The article meets at least one of the B-Class criteria.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| B | An article that reaches the B-Class level is complete in content and structure, adequately referenced, and includes reasonable supporting materials; overall, it provides a satisfactory encyclopedic presentation of the topic for the average reader, although it might not be written to the standard that would be expected by an expert. Articles at this stage commonly undergo peer review to solicit ideas for further improvement. B-Class is the final assessment level that can be reached without undergoing a formal review process, and is a reasonable goal for newer editors.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
 GA
|
After reaching the B-Class level, an article may be submitted for assessment as a good article. Good articles must meet a set of criteria similar to those required for the B-Class assessment level, and must additionally undergo the formal good article review process.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
 A
|
AL
|
A good or B-Class article that has undergone additional improvement may be considered for the A-Class assessment level. An A-Class article presents a complete and thorough encyclopedic treatment of a subject, such as might be written by an expert in the field; the only deficiencies permissible at this level are minor issues of style or language. To receive an A-Class rating, a candidate article must undergo the formal A-Class review process. The A-Class rating is the highest assessment level that may be assigned by an individual WikiProject; higher assessment levels are granted only by Wikipedia-wide independent assessment processes.
| ||||||
|
| |||||||
 FA
|
FL
|
The featured article and featured list ratings represent the pinnacle of article evolution and the best that Wikipedia has to offer; an article at this level is professional, outstanding, and represents a definitive source for encyclopedic information. Featured status is assigned only through a thorough independent review process; this process can be grueling for the unprepared, and editors are highly advised to submit articles for A-Class review prior to nominating them for featured status.
| ||||||
- Importance
| Importance | Criteria | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to the Conservatism topic area. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within Conservatism. Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. Subject is a candidate for {{Conservatism}}. | |
| High | Subject is extremely notable within the Conservatism topic area, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. Subject is a candidate for a country-specific sidebar e.g. {{Conservatism US}}. | |
| Mid | Subject is only notable within the Conservatism topic area and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | |
| Low | Subject is of the lowest level of relevance or significance to Conservatism topic area. | |
| NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:Conservatism |
| ??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | See: Category:Unknown-importance Conservatism articles |
How to assess an article
[edit]- Assess the article using the quality and importance schemes above.
- Once assessed add
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=|importance=}}to the Talk page with the correct parameters. - Edit the Talk page to add a comment about why you rated the article the way you did. Please sign and date your comment with ~~~~.
See below for assessing specific quality types
- Stub
Stubs are assessed using Individual Review, and the author is free to assess the article. If the article is assessed better than a stub but it has a stub template, remove the stub template(s) from the article. Currently there are no conservatism stub templates, identification of stubs is accomplished by setting class=stub in the banner. This categorizes article talk pages into Category:Stub-Class Conservatism articles. Politics stub templates can also be useful. The stub for a politician is {{Poli-bio-stub}} and a political organization is {{poli-org-stub}}. See WP:WikiProject Conservatism/Templates for more stubs.
- C-Class
C-Class articles are assessed using Individual Review, and the author is free to assess the article.
- B-Class
B-Class articles are assessed using Individual Review, rating is typically left to an independent editor; requests for an independent assessment may be made here.
- GA-Class
The good article nomination process is an independent review mechanism through which an article receives a "good article" quality rating. The process involves a detailed review of the article by an independent examiner, who determines whether the article meets the good article criteria. Full instructions for requesting a good article review are provided on the good article review page.
- A-Class
The WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review process is the most thorough and demanding assessment of article quality done by the WikiProject Conservatism. An article that undergoes this process must be reviewed by at least two independent examiners, each of whom must agree that the article meets all of the A-Class criteria. Full instructions for requesting an A-Class review are provided on the A-Class review page.
- FA-Class
The featured article candidacy and featured list candidacy processes are an independent, Wikipedia-wide quality assessment mechanism; these processes are the only way an article can receive a "featured" quality rating. The process involves a comprehensive review of the article by multiple independent examiners, all of whom must agree that the article meets the featured article or list criteria. Full instructions for submitting a featured article or list candidacy are provided on the corresponding candidacy page. Editors are advised to carefully review the submission instructions; failing to follow them correctly may cause the submission to be rejected.
Article tagging FAQ
[edit]- Q: An article was erroneously tagged by a member of this project.
- A: Do not remove the banner. Ask the member why they tagged it, or post a message at the project talk page (below). Note: the banner does not imply that the subject has a conservative or right-wing ideology, has no relevance to neutral POV, nor that WikiProject Conservatism owns the article.[1]
- Q: I'm a member and the banner I added to an article talk page was removed.
- A: From PROGGUIDE: You may not force them to remove the banner. No editor may prohibit a group of editors from showing their interest in an article. This warning {{WPRYT Uw-banner}} can be used to notify an editor of the guideline.
- Q: Can non-members tag articles?
- A: Yes, but if a member removes the banner do not replace it.[1]
- Q: The quality or importance rating of an article is incorrect.
- A: Anyone can change the rating. Make sure to consult the assessment scale here. Ratings are subjective, importance ratings in particular can be controversial. Disputes will be resolved by project members at the project talk page (below).[2][3]
- Q: What is the scope of this WikiProject?
- A: As stated on the main page of this project, we are dedicated to improving articles related to conservatism, not limited to any particular form or national variety of conservatism.
Assessment log
[edit]
December 5, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Bharatiya Janata Party (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Top-Class. (rev · t)
- Christian right (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Jack Posobiec (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Matt Gaetz (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:User conservative (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Template-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Category:FM-Class Conservatism pages (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Hindu nationalism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Top-Class. (rev · t)
- Hindutva (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Top-Class. (rev · t)
- Integral humanism (India) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
- Narendra Modi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Top-Class. (rev · t)
- Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Top-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:Crane Flies of Massachusetts (talk) removed.
- Category:FM-Class Conservatism articles (talk) removed.
December 4, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Alpha and beta male (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Kemi Badenoch (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- File:Chester A. Arthur by Abraham Bogardus.jpg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as FM-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- David Tse-Chien Pan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Russell Berman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
December 3, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Chronicles (magazine) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Dick Cheney (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- James R. Whelan (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Alfred Kohlberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Arlington House Publishers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Balázs Orbán (politician) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Bruce Bartlett (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Chris Williamson (TV personality) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Department of Government Efficiency (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
- Donald Lambro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Guenther Reinhardt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Henning Eichberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Human Diversity (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Isaac Don Levine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- JA21 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Jerry Pournelle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Joint Committee Against Communism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Joost Eerdmans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Kevin Phillips (political commentator) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Larry Gadon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Lew Rockwell (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mariano Ospina Rodríguez (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Multiculturalism and Islam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Nadine-Josette Chaline (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Party of Young People (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Reagan (2024 film) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ronald Sørensen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- The Centrists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- The Nurture Assumption (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- The Origins of the Second World War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Thomas Pangle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Vaughan Smith (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:Birth of Man series (talk) removed.
December 2, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Political appointments by Donald Trump in his second term renamed to Political appointments of the second Trump administration.
Assessed
[edit]- Political appointments of the first Trump administration (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Political appointments of the second Trump administration (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Political appointments by Donald Trump (talk) removed.
December 1, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Daniel C. Searle (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Ilan Berman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Progressive Canadian Party (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- The Kenyon Observer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
November 30, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Alliance of Patriots of Georgia, United Opposition renamed to Alliance of Patriots of Georgia.
- List of awards and honors received by Helmut Kohl renamed to List of awards and honours received by Helmut Kohl.
Reassessed
[edit]- Charles Moore, Baron Moore of Etchingham (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Dan Roodt (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Göran Hägglund (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Jerry Doyle (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert Batherson (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Stephen Balch (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- The Centurion (magazine) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Călin Georgescu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Ewa Thompson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- List of awards and honours received by Helmut Kohl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
November 29, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Family Coalition Party of Ontario candidates in the 2007 Ontario provincial election (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Patrick Bet-David (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Section 28 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- The Trump Economic Miracle (talk) reassessed. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Statistics
[edit]| Quality assessment: 99.6% complete | ||
| Importance assessment: 87% complete | ||
| Conservatism articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
| FA
|
3 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 49 | ||
| FL
|
1 | 1 | |||||
| FM
|
23 | 23 | |||||
| A
|
1 | 1 | |||||
| GA
|
5 | 10 | 26 | 77 | 1 | 119 | |
| B | 27 | 86 | 232 | 507 | 105 | 957 | |
| C | 35 | 133 | 347 | 1,251 | 1 | 240 | 2,007 |
| Start | 15 | 93 | 451 | 2,304 | 642 | 3,505 | |
| Stub | 12 | 84 | 851 | 304 | 1,251 | ||
| List | 2 | 7 | 28 | 101 | 4 | 142 | |
| Category | 1 | 1,006 | 1,007 | ||||
| Disambig | 23 | 23 | |||||
| File | 199 | 199 | |||||
| Portal | 137 | 137 | |||||
| Project | 43 | 43 | |||||
| Redirect | 2 | 4 | 13 | 73 | 308 | 400 | |
| Template | 225 | 225 | |||||
| NA | 3 | 4 | 7 | ||||
| Other | 27 | 27 | |||||
| Assessed | 89 | 356 | 1,196 | 5,190 | 1,996 | 1,296 | 10,123 |
| Unassessed | 3 | 13 | 24 | 40 | |||
| Total | 89 | 356 | 1,199 | 5,203 | 1,996 | 1,320 | 10,163 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 36,169 | Ω = 4.58 | |||||
Index · Statistics · Log
Former recognized content
[edit]Former Featued articles and lists are good candidates for A-Class review.
 | This is a list of recognized content, updated weekly by JL-Bot (talk · contribs) (typically on Saturdays). There is no need to edit the list yourself. If an article is missing from the list, make sure it is tagged (e.g. {{WikiProject Conservatism}}) or categorized correctly and wait for the next update. See WP:RECOG for configuration options. |
- Former featured articles
Anarcho-capitalism • Paul Bremer • Bricker Amendment • Tom Brinkman • Constitution of the United States • Gerald Ford • Frankfurt School • Bruce Johnson (Ohio politician) • Liberal Movement (Australia) • Libertarianism • John Major • Bob McEwen • Original sin • Political correctness • Read my lips: no new taxes • Nancy Reagan • Theodore Roosevelt • Nicolas Sarkozy • Jean Schmidt • Margaret Thatcher • Daniel Webster • Zionism
- Former featured lists
List of chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party
- Former featured pictures
-
Commercial-LBJ1964ElectionAdDaisyGirl
- Former good articles
Edmund Burke • George H. W. Bush • George W. Bush • David Cameron • Capitalism • Robert Stewart, Viscount Castlereagh • Mike Cierpiot • Cold War • College Republicans • Death panel • Falun Gong • Foundation for Economic Education • Ayaan Hirsi Ali • Alan Keyes • Liaquat Ali Khan • Marcel Lefebvre • Rush Limbaugh • McCarthyism • Michigan Republican Party • Patrick Henry College • Ron Paul • Rape and pregnancy statement controversies in the 2012 United States elections • Condoleezza Rice • Ellen Roberts • Larry Sanger • Michael Savage • Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump • UMNO • Unitary executive theory • The Wall Street Journal • Geert Wilders • Wildrose Party • Michael Yon