User:Ethanpet113

(Refresh)

Instead of doing something useful, You have been staring at this page since 06:05 Wednesday, December 4, 2024 UTC.

Wikipedia:Babel

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

fr-4Cet utilisateur parle français à un niveau comparable à la langue maternelle.

ja-1この利用者は初級の日本語ができます。

es-1Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.

Search user languages

This user is an advanced mathematician. BScThis user has a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science. BScThis user has a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics. This user is a random page patroller. CSThis user is a participant in WikiProject Computer science. This user is a member of WikiProject Mathematics. This user participates in WikiProject Cryptography. This user is a member of WikiProject Systems. This user participates in WikiProject Citation cleanup. This user is a member of WikiProject Cleanup. This user is a participant in WikiProject Spam. This user is a participant in WikiProject Education in Canada. This user is a participant in WikiProject Internet culture. This user is using this award because it's sparkly, not because they actually deserve it.If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it. This editor is a Grand High Togneme Laureate and is entitled to display the Book of All Knowledge: 3rd Edition and attach the library barcode.

Oh hai! I'm in ur article fixing ur logic.

I hate weasel words, and will do my best to violently edit articles so they conform to the following principles:

• Reductionism
• Cohesion

If you're an editor who has found their way here, sorry in advance, I like to do a lot of WP:Cleanup since, it's way easier to tag incorrect or biased statements than it is to cite a more trustworthy source. I administer the Bad Citation Bot

I don't like to accept information just because it's in vogue, sometimes this means I stir the pot with my edits. I would appreciate if you make an effort to modify my edits instead of reverting them wholesale, I like Wikipedia to have a variety of opinions, and sometimes this means my edits are overzealous, but I don't have all kinds of time to make them perfect. I've taken to running some experiments, to test the editorial process of the wiki, whether it can be trusted as neutral, and to what extent it allows weaker evidence. I would never create an article I believed to contain outright falsehood, but conveniently history is stranger than fiction so there's plenty of strange phenomenon, which is not well documented, but can said to have some encyclopedic value. In other words I like creating articles which I expect to be kept, but which are likely to have strong discussion.

Oooh sparkly

Moar Userbox

This user knows that
Truth Matters.

This user knows that
Reason Matters.

This user knows that
Science Matters.

This user knows that
Facts Matter

This user wants to make Wikipedia verifiable again.

This user thinks you can learn a lot by editing an Encyclopedia.

deluThis editor is a delusionist.

exclThis editor is an exclusionist.

immThis editor is an immediatist.

This user wants to compile and preserve the sum of all human knowledge.

Everyone has points of view with inherent cultural biases - recognition is the first step to achieving NPOV.

This user wants YOU to properly cite your sources!

This user enjoys tagging pages for problems.

This user dislikes policy creep and understands that some consider it a big reason for Wikipedia's decline in participation.

This user prefers citation templates.

Grossman MisquoteThis user is aware that complex problems have simple, easy to understand wrong answers.

Katz's LawThis user knows that men and women will act rationally when all other possibilities have been exhausted.

This user doesn't invoke conspiracy as explanation, when ignorance and incompetence will suffice.

This user is a skeptic.

$\Diamond x\!\!\rightarrow \!\!\Box x$

This user lives in a mathematical universe.

Benford's LawThis user believes that passion is often inversely proportional to the amount of real information available.^†

Okrent's LawThis user believes that the pursuit of balance can create imbalance because sometimes something is true.

ℚThis user employs rationality.

This user believes that the meaning of life is to live a happy life.

This user believes in logic.

This user is a rationalist who believes "common sense" is a worthless delusion and prefers to use reason.

This user believes science, practiced through the scientific method, is the
most reliable way of determining the
nature of reality.

This user is an empiricist who believes knowledge is subject to continued revision and falsification.

This user is a pessimist.

This user is interested in economics.

cgs-SIThis user measures in metric system and Imperial units.ft-lb