This template is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
I tried to add to this template as it only had a few stations on it (the 11 state run ones). After adding the TV stations that I could find to it I checked the revision history and found that between this [1]version and this one [2] the template had been renamed, most channels removed from it and the markup altered so you it didn't render properly (showed HTML). As a result of renaming it, when you clicked the "edit" link it sent you to edit Template:Russia TV (RTR) instead of this template, which someone had then created (as a copy of this broken template). It was all very, very crazy so I've reverted it back to the last sane version. Please add to this template rather than creating another one, renaming it (or if you're going to rename it, do it properly I suppose) or trashing it and creating your own. Ha! (talk) 22:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
this was... strange. It's not motivated and it's not clear why this red link is not ok while the other ones from the same group are there. This is a regularly used sources also on enwikipedia, I am checking its use and it needs some context. I will put it back there when I am done with my draft. I am not in a hurry so they have all the time to say what's the problem here.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]