Talk:Quirks mode

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet High‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

1

Section 3.1

In the table of section 3.1, shouldn't there be some sort of key like what A means what Q means etc. Anish9807 (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the text above the table? mabdul 14:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hasn't Internet Explorer 10 fixed the problem that a comment before the DOCTYPE triggers the quirks mode?

As far as I am concerned, yes. (I am using IE 10 consumer preview in Windows 8 consumer preview.) Sky6t (talk) 11:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but do you have a reference for that? Otherwise this fact is original research and we can't include it. mabdul 11:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I have.[1] But I am not so good at English. I wish someone to fix the bug.Sky6t (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not WP:OR. You know, anyone can repeat this with an Internet Explorer 10. So it could not be an original research. It is a repeatable experiment. Sky6t (talk) 05:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Um, that's clearly OR. Nil Einne (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatable experiment has nothing to do with it. Facts, regardless of how obvious they are, must be supported by a reputable source. Zeldafanjtl (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this obsolete? What about modern browsers like Edge?

Equinox ◑ 10:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]