Talk:Otto Gessler

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Gessler → Otto Geßler —

The initial creater of this article did not use the correct German spelling bender235 (talk) 14:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This will probably warrant discussion. Is his name primarily rendered in English with the eszet? For instance, Britannica doesn't use it. Parsecboy (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is the English Wikipedia, not German, so we use English spellings. TJ Spyke 21:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not a valid reason to oppose the move. We follow English usage; if the man is primarily referred to in English language sources with the eszet, then we should use it too. I doubt this is the case, but we should still consider the evidence. Parsecboy (talk) 03:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is not the German Wikipedia, proper German spelling has nothing to do with English. Therefore no valid rationale for moving the article has been presented. 76.66.192.206 (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - WP:UE is unambiguous on this. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per WP:UE. Pretty straight forward.oknazevad (talk) 02:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Otto Gessler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/biografien/GesslerOtto/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minister of War

At least two sources (Geßler's Encyclopaedia Britannica article (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gessler-Otto), and a book I'm reading by JCG Rohl (from the University of Sussex) called 'From Bismarck to Hitler' (p. 105) state that Geßler was a Minister of WAR, not a Minister of Defence. Unless I (and the aforementioned sources) am mistaken, the article should probably be changed to reflect that. I'd do it myself but I'm too lazy, it's a wonder I can even put in the effort to breathe. 95.150.85.35 (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]