Talk:Lithium–sulfur battery

References

References cited in this article are mostly outdated. Many are more than 10 years old and are no longer relevant representatives. The references should be updated to include up-to-date status of the field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.254.80.165 (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A recent reference: Expansion-tolerant architectures for stable cycling of ultrahigh-loading sulfur cathodes in lithium-sulfur batteries published Jan 3, 2020. Apparently, Shaibani et al. have found a partial solution to the very few charge-recharge cycles of these batteries. Instead of about 5 or 10, theirs does more than 200. Still a bit short of what you'd like to see in a battery you own, but, hey, there's talk of phones lasting five days and EV going over 1200km on a charge. Somebody who knows more than I do about the chemistry should add this new development to the page! Quixote9 (talk) 05:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charge/discharge reaction mechanism

Is the reaction mechanism really known or is the reaction pathway in this article rather speculative? Is it really analogous to the Na/S battery (which operates at about 300 °C, i.e. in a different region of the phase diagram)? There is no detailed reaction mechanism in the Na/S battery Wikipedia article anyway. It would be great if someone could provide a reference for that claim. Also, the reactions seem to be incorrect or incomplete, since the reactants of the charge process are different from the products of the discharge process (and vice versa). Wimvandorst, I really appreciate the article, but I suspect that at least parts of it are not recognized knowledge. -- (David) 131.243.31.164 (talk) 18:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sulphur/sulfur?

I'm a bit curious why Lithium sulphur battery (with a ph) redirects to Lithium–sulfur battery (with an f), despite the very first words in the article being "The lithium–sulphur battery" (with a ph). 129.67.149.107 (talk) 12:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithium–sulfur battery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130420054932/http://polyplus.com/lisulfur.html to http://polyplus.com/lisulfur.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Research

Hello, i think that research section is not suitable for this wikipedia page because hundreds of scientific papers are published each year on Li-S batteries and lot of thems have remarkable results. As consequence, i suggest to rewrite research section in a general way through classification of approach for improving Li-S battery (carbon-sulfur composite, semi-solid eletrolytes and so on.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egibe (talk • contribs) 12:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]