Talk:Kris Kobach

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Photo

Who the heck picked this photo that makes the Attorney General of Kansas look like a sloppy goober? There are many photos that come up on google images where he at least looks decently dressed and professional. 71.206.97.12 (talk) 04:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conservatism in the United States

@StAnselm: Why did you delete w:Category:Conservatism in the United States from this article? It looks like whitewashing to me. ???

Thanks for your work to help create "a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge." DavidMCEddy (talk) 14:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because the category description says "Conservative American people should not be placed in this Category but added to List of American conservatives." i.e. it's not for individuals but for organizations and ideas. St Anselm (talk) 15:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Might you have time to (a) add Kobach to the "Politicians, office holders, and jurists" section of the said, "List of American conservatives", then (b) add a link in this article to "See also: List of American conservatives, and (c) delete this category, as you did? Thanks, again. DavidMCEddy (talk) 16:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's the issue of notability. Looking at that list, it has only the most notable conservatives - the household names. I'm not sure Kobach qualifies, to be honest. St Anselm (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are currently 277 "References" in this article vs. 31 for Arthur Vandenberg, 100 for Robert A. Taft, and 11 for John W. Bricker, the first three "Politicians, office holders, and jurists" in the "List of American conservatives" that you mentioned. I don't know how many references are needed to establish notability for that list, but I would naively think that 277 "References" should count for something in this regard, especially given Kobach's notoriety as former Kansas Secretary of State, current Kansas Attorney General, and the behavior documented in the Wikipedia article on Fish v. Kobach. DavidMCEddy (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done St Anselm (talk) 17:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive length

This article is almost 14,000 words of article text. Per WP:TOOBIG this puts the article in the area where trimming/dividing should happen. The article's text is poorly linked together with much of the information just being individual examples of things that either are redundant to the larger picture or provide excessive detail. This is especially true of the material in his political career section and too a lesser extent in the immigration section. Of course both sections are important but both could be about half as long and still get the core ideas across. Help in trimming this article down would be appreciated. Springee (talk) 12:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewashing Kolfage

@LiwenAristodemos: Why do you say "no RS provided for description" when you changed the description of Brian Kolfage from 'social media "fake news" scion' to 'social media creator'?

The sentence containing the phrase '"fake news" scion' to 'creator" cited an article in the Phoenix New Times which said essentially that. See:

Joyce, Tom (October 19, 2018). "Conservative Veteran Banned by Facebook: 'There Was No Real Reason'". LifeZette. Retrieved May 19, 2019.

In addition, the Wikipedia article on Kolfage provides ample documentation for the claim. I'm reverting your edit. ??? DavidMCEddy (talk) 00:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A sidenote, but LifeZette is not a RS. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]