Talk:Ghadr-110

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ghadr-110 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A hoax?

A simple google search [1] shows that this is a hoax. Just look at all first 10 results and you'll find that the only source is [2] and all the others refer to wikipedia article. There are also some unreliable reports there. It seems it's hoax made by People's Mujahedin of Iran (designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, the European Union, Canada, and Iran)(note that National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) is formed by PMO(refer to PMO article)).

Iranian Resistance group alleges Tehran is developing new medium-range ballistic missile

It seems that hoax shouldn't remain in Wikipedia. --Hossein.ir 19:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC) I modified the article to -at least- show the unreliable nature of the information --MQWM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.242.5.107 (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These are well cited references. The first one is from Farsnews quoting it has 2000Km range. Then you claim it's a hoax by people's Mujahedin? From when Farsnews is agency of People's Mujahedin? user "hossein", what do you consider reliable? An official news agency has quoted this. Sarmadys 13:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax

Multiple news stories are sufficient to believe that this is a real development. I've removed the note at the top, and combined three instances of the same ref in the ref name format. AKRadecki^Speaketh 19:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ghadr translation

Ghadr translates into English more accurately as 'to the extent' or 'range', for example to say 'in ghadr ke man mitonam' is to say more or less 'to the extent that I can' . Intensity does not really make sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.113.143 (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ghadr-110. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206172134/http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8606310435 to http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8606310435

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]