Jump to content

Talk:April in Quahog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleApril in Quahog has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 16, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Jason Mraz

[edit]

Mraz did not voice himself. The bit was that Peter saw someone on the street who looked like Mraz and said, "Oh my God, you're Jason Mraz," but the guy says, "No I'm not. I'm just Some Guy with a Hat," but Peter replies, "Yeah, that's who Jason Mraz is." The joke being that it isn't Mraz and yet he is still voiced by Mraz. - Jasonbres (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, who do you suggest what put he was in the episode infobox? CTJF83 chat 21:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant. Gage (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How so? - Jasonbres (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:April in Quahog/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 17:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The is a well written article. I have only a few comments:
Plot
  • "However, he and his children share no common interests and Peter only makes things worse by using the methamphetamine he had wanted to share with Chris." - uses it for what?
Cultural references
  • "Peter is confronted by Brian who reveals that the only reason he was selected was due to the fact that he had only voted in the last election." - does it mean that the only election he ever voted in was the last election?
    • Yes, are you trying to indicate something?
  • "Peter goes on to state that he actually stuffed the ballot box at the Oscars, when the nominees included Grover from Sesame Street, Bluto from Popeye, and Daniel Day-Lewis, among others. Actress Anne Hathaway presented the award." - I don't see the connection.
    • The sequence immediately followed the election comment. There's no more connection present in the article than what was present in the episode. Gage (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Going on to find out that everyone is asked to do jury duty" - does his mean "Learning the everyone is asked to do jury duty..."? How is this like being kicked out of Coldplay?
  • "Further attempting to be kicked out, Peter begins singing the song" - is this referring to jury duty?
    • Fixed.

Otherwise, everything seems fine.

Xtzou (Talk) 17:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: Good
    B. MoS compliance: Complies with basic MoS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: Reliable sources
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: Sets the context
    B. Focused: Remains focused on the subject
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]