Jump to content

Talk:Actinism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re-stubbed

[edit]

Not sure why this article was re-'stubbed'... I messaged the editor that re-applied stub label and got no response so, removing stub label again. If anyone has info they would like worked into the article just message me. Jonathan888 22:30, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

After researching further, externally, am I correct in reaching the conclusion that the use of "Actinic" was meant to convey - "Sensitivity to a specific wavelength (or zone) within the visible light spectrum"?

If so, maybe a similar statement should be added to this article for ease of understanding. 60.240.181.62 (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aquarium?

[edit]

What exactly is an actinic light for aquariums? Is that the only definition, that it 'gives off a bluish tint'? Or does it have UV light too? Is it called actinic because it tries to cause photochemical reactions (i.e. growth) in coral? --24.46.164.83 03:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Actinic Light into Actinism Klbrain (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Actinic light be merged into this page. I think that a section on this page would be best for explaining actinic light, as opposed to having a separate article. Also, these two articles are clearly related, but neither links to the other leading to an unnecessary bifurcation in coverage of this topic. SarrCat ∑;3 00:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Sarrcat's merger proposal, it makes more sense to have a complete explanation on one page. I came to Actinism through a link in a reference to Actinic Light in the aquaculture section of Colour Temperature:- Applications. In this situation the Actinic Light stub made very little sense... until I noticed this merger proposal link... and ventured to the Actinism page. 60.240.181.62 (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge:agree. Klbrain (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Actinism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Actinism&oldid=1197945870"