Talk:2016 Ivorian parliamentary election

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ivory Coast.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Hardly coverage

There seems to be hardly any recent media coverage of this outside the country. But I suppose we will get some post-election coverage. I did some research on it, but the gaps are too big to write anything. Compared to the interest in the referendum its remarkably how much this has been ignored.--Batmacumba (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting system

How does FPTP in multi-member constituencies work? If there are six seats, does the winning party gets all six?--Batmacumba (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the candidate list (see e.g. p48, a six-seat constituency), it appears to be bloc voting – i.e. voters only get one vote for a list of X candidates, who then get all the seats. I hadn't realise that any countries retained this system (it was very common in French colonies during the Territorial Assembly era). Number 5 7 14:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suspected as much based on the necessity of keeping RHDP together (obviously a marriage of convenience). It should be specified in the text.--Batmacumba (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Added. Number 5 7 20:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

The +163 for the governing coalition doesn't make sense. We should go by participating parties.--Batmacumba (talk) 21:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've corrected it. My bad. Number 5 7 21:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]