Talk:Andrew Tate

Kickboxing

Hello I would like to add sourced information into his kickboxing career and record Alcapone211 (talk) 08:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Separate article for Tristan Tate

When searching Tristan Tate on Wikipedia it redirects to the article of Andrew Tate. But Tristan is a separate person and popular media influencer and deserves a separate article. In fact, a separate article for Tristan Tate is as important as Andrew Tate's article. So, let's make a separate article for Tristan Tate. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Tristan Tate article was deleted at AfD in March 2024, that's why there is no article. See talk. CNC (talk) 20:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Its an atypical close though, its extremely technical and does not preclude recreation with higher quality sources "This means we do not have the liberty to simply leave the offending page in place until better sources surface." Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

@Horse Eye's Back: the close came down to sources, which isn't particularly atypical especially for a BLP. Has better sourcing emerged since the AFD? My recollection at the time was there there were lots of trivial mentions but no depth of coverage in RS. VQuakr (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

The close (according to the closer) came down to WP:PERP and WP:SUSPECT, the coverage of the various trials is in-depth coverage in RS but much of it falls within this special BLP protection. This was essentially a TNT close on BLP grounds, it was no consensus after all not not a consensus to delete. WP:PERP in particular indicates that we could make a subpage for the court cases without making one for Tristan Tate specifically, so there are a few options here... Not just a stand-alone Tristan Tate. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

The close was definitively delete not no consensus. If no new, substantial sources are available since the closure then further discussion seems unnecessary. VQuakr (talk) 23:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

This is the entirety of the close: "The result was delete. Once you discard the !votes not based on policy or guidelines, views seem evenly split between Keep and Delete. Normally, that would result in a No consensus close. But this isn't a normal situation, as we're dealing with a BLP that falls under the auspices of WP:PERP and WP:SUSPECT, as some here correctly noted. This means we do not have the liberty to simply leave the offending page in place until better sources surface. The deletion is without prejudice against turning the page into a redirect to Andrew Tate, the appropriateness of which can be reviewed at RfD if disputed." so you are clearly wrong. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

That's a delete closure, like I said. Not a no consensus closure. So no, I don't see anything that would result in me being "clearly wrong". I also (still) haven't seen any sources presented that would alter the outcome of that discussion. VQuakr (talk) 03:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

"Normally, that would result in a No consensus close. But this isn't a normal situation" and you don't seem to have offered an opinion on the options offered by the BLP page even through the closer mentions them explicitly, are we not supposed to follow WP:PERP and WP:SUSPECT? You also appear to have been involved in the close, so you lack the objectivity to evaluate it... I don't. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Ok, so we now agree this was closed as delete, good. I was not involved in the close. I was involved in the discussion. Not that it matters. Anyways, since you're unable/unwilling to provide sources this appears to be a dead issue. VQuakr (talk) 18:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

If you contributed to the discussion then you are involved in the close, you appear to lack the objectivity to evaluate it which is why you are now attacking me. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

That's not what "involved in the close" means. You don't get to choose who participates in a discussion. No one is "attacking" you. VQuakr (talk) 21:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Theres an awful lot of aggression being directed my way by you if you do not mean to be attacking me. You've made this extremely personal and haven't actualy addressed policy or guideline here unless I'm missing something. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

No, there isn't. If you have behavioral concerns move to my talk page, please, rather than distracting from my policy-based concerns that have been ignored thus far. VQuakr (talk) 21:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

What policy based concerns have you raised which have been ignored? I will address them as best as I am able. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

For the 4th time: sources. VQuakr (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

We aren't lacking significant coverage, remember that all the stuff about the civil cases counts... Its only the criminal case coverage which doesn't. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Can we get specific please? What specific secondary sources discuss Tristan Tate in depth and have come out since the last AFD, that might indicate that the subject now merits a stand-alone article? VQuakr (talk) 21:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Why would they have needed to come out since the last AFD? It wasn't deleted for lack of coverage last time, it was deleted on a technicality. There is no consensus that the topic lacks the necessary coverage to be notable which would need to be overcome. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Huh? BLP is a core content policy not a technicality. If there are no new sources since last time, then it's logical to assume that there still isn't adequate sourcing for a stand-alone article. VQuakr (talk) 22:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

There was never a consensus that there wasn't adequate sourcing for a stand-alone article. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Tate (2nd nomination). VQuakr (talk) 22:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome to quote where you see that consensus in the closing statement, I don't. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes. Most of the people voted to keep the article of Tristan Tate in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Tate (2nd nomination). Still it was deleted. It seems undemocratic. Instead of deletion it could be sent to draft for further improvement. Tristan Tate is a notable online personality (social media influencer) along with his brother Tristan Tate. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Take it to the talk page, that's what it's there for. There is even a source list to work on, ie feel free to edit just leave a signature if you do. That's why I archived the discussion initially, as it has nothing directly to do with this page. CNC (talk) 11:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Given that we're discussing either a joint page for the brothers or breaking off the joint legal problems into their own article this is the right talk page. Please stop making these bold moves which you should know will be objected to. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

My first thought was that the other Tate brother's notability was entirely dependent on this one's... But from a quick google I think that they almost certainly are notable, much of the coverage of the two does treat them as an item ("the Tates" "the Tate brothers" etc) so the two ways I can see us going with this are deciding that they're best covered together on a joint Tate brothers page (which this more or less currently is) or making a main page for each brother and a combined one for the combined legal issues. Due to the immense amount of coverage we have I would have a hard time arguing that multiple pages aren't due. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Notification: AfD nomination

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legal affairs of the Tate brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal affairs of the Tate brothers until a consensus is reached. CNC (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Andrew Tate Quotes: A Glimpse into His Controversial Philosophy

Andrew Tate is a figure whose statements have sparked intense debate and polarized opinions worldwide. Known for his bold, unapologetic style, Tate’s quotes often reflect his beliefs about masculinity, success, relationships, and the state of modern society. Whether one sees him as a modern-day philosopher or a provocative figure pushing harmful ideologies, his words undeniably resonate with many of his followers. In this article, we will explore some of Andrew Tate's most notable quotes, highlighting the core principles of his controversial philosophy.

Related Post: Andrew Tate Age

1. "Arrogance is the best tool. Confidence comes next, but arrogance is the king."

This quote encapsulates one of the central tenets of Andrew Tate’s worldview: confidence is crucial, but he takes it a step further by advocating for arrogance. Tate believes that to succeed in life, particularly as a man, one must exude a sense of superiority. In his eyes, this doesn’t just mean being confident, but being assertively self-assured to the point of arrogance. This view speaks to his broader belief that men should dominate their environments and relationships, displaying a form of unwavering certainty in all things they do.

Related Post: Andrew Tate Height

2. "Don’t waste your time with people who have nothing to offer."

Andrew Tate often emphasizes the importance of surrounding oneself with like-minded, ambitious individuals who can contribute to your success. In this quote, he advocates for a ruthless approach to personal relationships, advising people to cut ties with anyone who doesn’t elevate them or add value to their lives. This outlook reflects Tate's focus on self-improvement and achieving success through practical, no-nonsense principles.

3. "The temporary satisfaction of ego is not worth the lasting pain that comes from destroying relationships."

Though Andrew Tate is often associated with promoting a brash, unapologetic view of masculinity, this quote suggests a more introspective side to his philosophy. Here, he acknowledges the importance of relationships and warns against acting impulsively to satisfy one's ego. It seems to reflect his understanding that while confidence and assertiveness are key, they should not come at the cost of meaningful connections with others.

Related Post: Andrew Tate Real Name

4. "The battle is never over. Once you start a journey, you never stop. That’s how you become a high-value man."

Tate believes in constant self-improvement, and this quote emphasizes the never-ending nature of personal development. According to him, being a “high-value man” isn’t something that can be achieved once and for all; it's a lifelong pursuit. Whether in terms of wealth, status, or physical fitness, Tate’s philosophy demands continual growth and pushing beyond one’s limits, which resonates with many who seek a clear roadmap for success in all areas of life.

5. "I’m not a nice guy, and I don’t care. Being nice doesn’t get you ahead."

Tate’s rejection of being “nice” as a means of getting ahead is one of his more controversial beliefs. He often argues that niceness is a form of weakness, one that prevents people from asserting their true power or reaching their goals. For Tate, being direct, dominant, and unapologetic is far more effective than trying to please others. This quote reflects his belief that success is often achieved through assertiveness, rather than diplomacy.

Related Post: Andrew Tate Net Worth

6. "Money is not the key to happiness, but happiness is the key to success."

While Tate is often seen as obsessed with wealth and luxury, this quote reveals a more nuanced aspect of his philosophy. He suggests that happiness—specifically the freedom and satisfaction derived from achieving personal success—is a key component of a fulfilling life. However, he frequently ties happiness to external achievements, especially financial independence, which he believes is essential to leading a life of freedom and autonomy.

7. "You cannot be a good man unless you are a great man first."

In this statement, Andrew Tate emphasizes the idea that greatness is necessary for moral virtue. According to Tate, individuals must first achieve personal success—whether in business, physical fitness, or personal growth—before they can become "good" in a moral or ethical sense. This quote reflects his belief in prioritizing self-empowerment and mastery over one’s life, viewing greatness as a prerequisite for any kind of positive social contribution.

8. "In a world full of followers, be a leader."

Tate often critiques the current state of modern society, where he believes many people simply follow the herd rather than thinking for themselves or taking charge of their destinies. This quote reflects his emphasis on leadership and personal responsibility. For him, leadership isn’t just about being in charge; it’s about standing out, having the courage to make independent decisions, and leading by example in every aspect of life.

9. "You need to wake up and realize you are not special. The world is ruthless. It doesn’t care about you."

This quote showcases Tate's belief in the harsh realities of life. Rather than offering an optimistic view of the world, he underscores that the world does not owe anyone anything. In his view, success comes from acknowledging this truth, working relentlessly, and refusing to make excuses. This perspective can be empowering for some, but for others, it may seem harsh and lacking in compassion.

10. "It’s not about how much money you make, it’s about how much freedom you can achieve."

Andrew Tate often talks about the importance of financial independence, but not in the typical sense of simply acquiring wealth for wealth's sake. For Tate, money is merely a tool to gain freedom—the freedom to live life on one's own terms without being beholden to a boss, society, or anyone else. This quote reflects his broader philosophy that personal autonomy is the ultimate goal, and wealth is just the means to that end.

11. "Don’t cry about it. Be about it."

Tate frequently champions action over words, and this quote is a prime example of his belief in being a doer rather than a complainer. He dismisses victimhood and encourages people to take responsibility for their lives, emphasizing that results come from action, not from dwelling on problems. This sentiment aligns with his broader approach to life, where personal responsibility and relentless effort are key to overcoming challenges.

---

Conclusion

Andrew Tate’s quotes often reflect his no-holds-barred philosophy that mixes self-help with controversial, sometimes polarizing ideas about masculinity, wealth, and success. While many admire his blunt, direct approach and the empowerment they derive from his message, others criticize him for perpetuating toxic ideals and harmful behavior. Regardless of where one stands on his views, there’s no denying that his words have ignited discussions across the globe, making Andrew Tate one of the most polarizing figures of his time. Whether you agree with him or not, his quotes undoubtedly resonate with many and continue to influence the discourse on modern masculinity and success. 103.127.4.21 (talk) 19:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)