User contributions for GDallimore

9 November 2014

• 16:4416:44, 9 November 2014 diff hist +1,925 Talk:Fine-tuned universe →Why remove specific information about what might be fine-tuned?
• 16:2016:20, 9 November 2014 diff hist −276 Flowers for Algernon remove as insignificant with no secondary sourcing per WP:IPC
• 09:3809:38, 9 November 2014 diff hist −252 Flowers for Algernon not an adaptation

8 November 2014

• 23:3723:37, 8 November 2014 diff hist +93 Patent troll →Etymology and definition
• 23:3623:36, 8 November 2014 diff hist +573 Patent troll →Etymology and definition: slightly dodgy addition, but maybe a start of a development of this section.
• 23:3023:30, 8 November 2014 diff hist +142 Patent troll →Legal and regulatory history: Source is a total travesty. Misquotes research and takes statistics out of context. 67% are NPEs, which included individual inventors and universities. To label them trolls is just plain wrong.
• 14:1014:10, 8 November 2014 diff hist +2,096 Talk:Fine-tuned universe →Why remove specific information about what might be fine-tuned?
• 11:3311:33, 8 November 2014 diff hist +292 Talk:Fine-tuned universe →Why remove specific information about what might be fine-tuned.
• 00:2100:21, 8 November 2014 diff hist +208 User talk:GDallimore →Category:Images of comics characters

7 November 2014

• 23:5923:59, 7 November 2014 diff hist +339 Talk:Fine-tuned universe →Why remove specific information about what might be fine-tuned.
• 09:4109:41, 7 November 2014 diff hist −1,886 Fine-tuned universe no sensible argument given for revert. First, undue weight to a single source is undue weight whoever the author is. Second, I argued for less detail, not more. Solution: cite this other person and *summarise* both their positions

6 November 2014

• 16:0416:04, 6 November 2014 diff hist −86 Patent not sure what this second definition adds except more words... especially as the concept of "property" can vary wildly, best not to try being precise in that way
• 15:2015:20, 6 November 2014 diff hist −1,525 Fine-tuned universe →Examples: shorten whole section. Just the work of one person and this sort of detailed breakdown gives it undue weight, especially without any apparent peer review
• 15:1315:13, 6 November 2014 diff hist −361 Fine-tuned universe →Examples: not clear what this number is supposed to represent and the source doesn't support the rest of the statement
• 10:4010:40, 6 November 2014 diff hist −176 Electronic harassment Undid revision 632666800 by 50.34.137.215 (talk)

5 November 2014

• 15:1515:15, 5 November 2014 diff hist −82 List of ray tracing software deleted
• 15:1415:14, 5 November 2014 diff hist −81 Optica deleted

30 October 2014

• 16:5316:53, 30 October 2014 diff hist +217 Talk:Priory Hospital →International reputation
• 16:4816:48, 30 October 2014 diff hist +693 Talk:Priory Hospital →International reputation
• 16:4816:48, 30 October 2014 diff hist −161 Priory Hospital consensus on talk page is that "world famous" is unsuitable hyperbole for an encyclopedic article. Just reporting the facts from the news sources without eidtorial.
• 12:1912:19, 30 October 2014 diff hist +3 Cashback (film) uk spelling
• 12:1112:11, 30 October 2014 diff hist −161 Priory Hospital removing hyperbole
• 12:0912:09, 30 October 2014 diff hist +179 Talk:Priory Hospital →International reputation
• 09:3209:32, 30 October 2014 diff hist −259 GIF shorten it

29 October 2014

• 14:3714:37, 29 October 2014 diff hist +787 Talk:Priory Hospital →International reputation: new section

28 October 2014

• 17:5117:51, 28 October 2014 diff hist −106 Radionics not a reliable source

27 October 2014

• 22:5822:58, 27 October 2014 diff hist −34 Priory Hospital →History: closer to what source says
• 22:5422:54, 27 October 2014 diff hist −33 Priory Hospital not what the sources say. They support the following sentence instead.

26 October 2014

• 10:2110:21, 26 October 2014 diff hist −149 4D film swap paras and sentences
• 10:1610:16, 26 October 2014 diff hist −106 4D film don't think this needs saying

23 October 2014

• 15:2615:26, 23 October 2014 diff hist +279 Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 October 23 →Category:Images of comics characters

20 October 2014

• 16:1416:14, 20 October 2014 diff hist +17 Patentable subject matter it's a section about Europe

19 October 2014

• 21:4921:49, 19 October 2014 diff hist +1 Forrest Gump not convinced this belongs in the lead, but put it in a more suitable paragraph at least
• 12:0812:08, 19 October 2014 diff hist +1,665 User talk:Omnisense →Microwave auditory effect: new section current
• 12:0612:06, 19 October 2014 diff hist −40 Microwave auditory effect doesn't matter what the tech says, it's what reliable sources say

15 October 2014

• 08:0408:04, 15 October 2014 diff hist −14 Flowers for Algernon rv further

14 October 2014

• 11:0611:06, 14 October 2014 diff hist −8 Microwave auditory effect not what the sources say. Avoiding use of word "claimed", move word "alleged" tomore appropriate place

13 October 2014

• 18:2518:25, 13 October 2014 diff hist +1,101 User talk:AnnWilliamson2 No edit summary
• 18:2418:24, 13 October 2014 diff hist +52 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 13 Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optica Software
• 18:2418:24, 13 October 2014 diff hist +1,243 N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optica Software Creating deletion discussion for Optica Software
• 18:0918:09, 13 October 2014 diff hist −73 List of ray tracing software no article on the topic, not notable

11 October 2014

• 20:5120:51, 11 October 2014 diff hist −2 GIF us spelling

4 October 2014

• 06:5606:56, 4 October 2014 diff hist +178 Software patent not a suitable link

29 September 2014

• 22:2022:20, 29 September 2014 diff hist −13 Honey, I Shrunk the Audience! move from see also
• 17:1417:14, 29 September 2014 diff hist −11 James Horner →Film and television scoring: roger corman has never produced a "big-budget" film in his life...

27 September 2014

• 17:0617:06, 27 September 2014 diff hist −17 Bump mapping →Bump mapping basics
• 17:0317:03, 27 September 2014 diff hist −2 Bump mapping →Methods
• 17:0217:02, 27 September 2014 diff hist +14 Bump mapping →Bump mapping basics: move out the more involved description from "basics" section
• 17:0017:00, 27 September 2014 diff hist −168 Bump mapping true, but limitations such as this are already mentioned at the end and think it's best to keep them all in one place. Will look into better structure
• 16:5716:57, 27 September 2014 diff hist −63 Fine-tuned universe link was fine as it was. Not sure of purpose of edit, which also had an error