User contributions for DerAnsager

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

21:43, 24 October 2016 EdJohnston talk contribs blocked DerAnsager talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Disruptive editing: Adding badly sourced defamatory material to an article about a living person, Markus Gabriel. Poor response to feedback)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:4218:42, 24 October 2016 diff hist +2 User talk:DerAnsager →October 2016
18:4218:42, 24 October 2016 diff hist +359 User talk:DerAnsager →October 2016
18:1518:15, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel It's not a negative claim, it is just a objective report based upon objective sources, all other wikis mention it also, especially the german one
18:1218:12, 24 October 2016 diff hist −1,652 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
18:0718:07, 24 October 2016 diff hist +184 User talk:DerAnsager →Markus Gabriel
18:0518:05, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel unbased revision because it is well sourced by an official paper
17:0017:00, 24 October 2016 diff hist +95 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
16:5316:53, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel What counts as a reliable source [...] The type of the work (some examples include a document, an article, or a book) Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy
16:5116:51, 24 October 2016 diff hist +409 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
16:1416:14, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel The investigation of the ombudsman is the secondary reliable source you're looking for and if a public institution is involved in a case, it becomes a public issue and is worth mentioning
16:1116:11, 24 October 2016 diff hist +169 User talk:DerAnsager →Markus Gabriel

01:2801:28, 18 October 2016 diff hist −1 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
01:2701:27, 18 October 2016 diff hist +98 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
01:2601:26, 18 October 2016 diff hist +446 User talk:DerAnsager →Markus Gabriel
00:0300:03, 18 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel from a neutral point of view, we should at least mention that the controversy occurred and that the discussion still goes on. The sources cited are objective (both sides) and reliable (Official public paper). I think they meet the standards

23:3723:37, 17 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel Undid revision 744871328 by EricEnfermero (talk) it is an ongoing debate between an accredited philosopher and a renowned university
23:0623:06, 17 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel Added the section "Controversy" including sources

05:3405:34, 19 July 2016 diff hist +141 m Liam Hemsworth Present picture of Liam Hemsworth added

00:2600:26, 13 July 2014 diff hist −391 m Intelligent design "pseudoscientific" is a judgemental word. hypothesis is a more neutral term

16:0916:09, 19 March 2014 diff hist +386 Markus Gabriel http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gvacariu/Did%20Markus%20Gabriel%20plagiarized%20my%20ideas.pdf and a youtube video of him youtube.com/watch?v=WLpzaaSE8L8
16:0016:00, 19 March 2014 diff hist 0 Markus Gabriel the philosophy of Markus Gabriel shares significant similarities with Naïve realism

02:1302:13, 28 February 2014 diff hist +18 N User:DerAnsager ←Created page with 'Ish bin ain anzaga' current
02:0902:09, 28 February 2014 diff hist −118 Markus Gabriel No edit summary
02:0902:09, 28 February 2014 diff hist +940 N Markus Gabriel translation of the german articel http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Gabriel