Élysée Accords
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Vietnamese. (February 2020) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
The Elysée Accords were an international treaty to give independence and unification for Vietnam as an associated state within the French Union on 8 March 1949.[1][2] This was a turning point in Vietnamese history because France no longer considered Vietnam a colony while Vietnam reunified its two protectorates (Annam and Tonkin) and regained Cochinchina. The Accords signed at the Élysée Palace by ex-Vietnamese emperor Bảo Đại and French President Vincent Auriol on 8 March 1949 to establish the State of Vietnam. The Élysée Accords took effect when Bao Dai and the French High Commissioner in Indochina exchanged letters in Saigon on 14 June 1949. The Accords received final ratification by the French National Assembly on 29 January 1950, and were completed when they were signed by French President Vincent Auriol on February 2. The Élysée Accords included three documents: 1) Letter from the President of France, sent to Bao Dai, talking about the issues of unification, diplomacy, internal affairs, justice, culture, military, economics, and finance of Vietnam within the French Union; 2) Bao Dai's letter to the French president confirming receipt and agreement on the content of the above letter; 3) Letter from the French president to Bao Dai following Bao Dai's request to add points related to the issue of Vietnam's unification, diplomatic issues and the exchange of ambassadors. The Accords were the result of pressure from the United States and native anti-communists as well as domestic left while communism was rising and France needed US help to defeat the Viet Minh and needed another indigenous government to replace the communists ("Bảo Đại Solution"). Vietnam completed regained Cochinchina on 4 June 1949. In general, as part of decolonization after World War II and during the Cold War, the French colonial regime gradually became much softer and more progress.[3] The accords gave Vietnam all the necessary independence rights, but the State of Vietnam was still not a sovereign state completely but only an associated one within France's empire.[4][5][1] Despite the gradual transfer of management functions to the State of Vietnam; the French arrangement on 8 March 1949 only afforded Vietnam a limited degree of internal and external sovereignty (for example, it was allowed to enter into diplomatic relations with a small number of countries), for the most part reserved for France effective control over foreign relations, as well as military, judicial, administrative, and economic activities.[6][7] The state was temporarily a semi-constitutional monarchy headed by former emperor Bao Dai before it could become a liberal democracy. However, in its Domain of the Crown, Bảo Đại still held the position of emperor. From June to November 1950, the State of Vietnam and France met in Pau (France) to discuss the transfer of management functions on immigration, diplomatic relations, foreign trade, customs and finance for the State of Vietnam. Finance was the most controversial issue including controlling profits from foreign exchange operations. As a result, all of the above functions were transferred to the State of Vietnam by France.[8] The French government agreed to give the State of Vietnam complete independence with the Matignon Accords on 4 June 1954, but the Accords had never been completed because they had never been ratified by the heads of both countries.[9][10] After the French Union lost the war, Vietnam gained independence from France with the Geneva Accords but was divided on 21 July 1954. The Republic of Vietnam (the successor of the State of Vietnam) in South Vietnam withdrew from the French Union on 9 December 1955.[11]
Within the framework of the French Union, France also granted independence to the other nations in Indochina, the Kingdoms of Laos and Cambodia. The agreement led to the U.S. moving from a position of neutrality to supporting the French colonial empire in their Indochina and Bảo Đại's state.[4]
Content
[edit]The agreement was compared to the British Commonwealth of Nations, though fell short in many aspects. Vietnam was empowered to control its own finances and the path was paved for the creation of the Vietnamese National Army. Vietnam was granted the right to appoint diplomats to China, Thailand, and the Vatican City, whilst the remainder of Vietnamese foreign policy remained under French control.[5][1]
Effects
[edit]Whilst intending to prevent further nationalist sentiment in the war against Vietnamese communists who were being in the name of Việt Minh, the Elysée Accords had the opposite effect - showing Vietnamese nationalists that the French were unwilling to compromise their interests in Indochina. Ngô Đình Diệm, a conservative and anti-communist nationalist who initially supported Bao Dai, rejected an offer of Prime Minister in the new Vietnam, saying "The national aspirations of the Vietnamese people will be satisfied only when our nation obtains the same status India and Pakistan enjoy."[5]
The United States initially did not help France because it did not want to be known for helping colonialism so the establishment of the State of Vietnam as an independent and unified country was a turning point. After the Accords were completed one day, Americans eventually abandoned their policy of neutrality regarding the political dispute in Indochina when recognizing the State of Vietnam of Bảo Đại on 3 February 1950 and later giving military aid to the French Union army during the war as part of their anti-communist foreign policy.[4] Meanwhile, China became a great aid provider to the communists in Vietnam.
See also
[edit]- Fontainebleau Agreements
- 1954 Geneva Conference
- Communist Party of Vietnam
- Cần Lao Party
- Việt Nam Quốc Dân Đảng
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Duiker, William (1994-07-01). U.S. Containment Policy and the Conflict in Indochina. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-6581-7.
- ^ Philippe Franchini, Les Guerres d'Indochine, vol. I, Pygmalion - Gérard Watelet, Paris, 1988, pp. 399-406
- ^ Simpson, Alfred William Brian (2004). Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention. Oxford University Press. p. 285. ISBN 0199267898.
- ^ a b c Bragg, Christine (2005). Vietnam, Korea and US Foreign Policy. Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-435-32708-8.
- ^ a b c SarDesai, D. R. (1968). Indian Foreign Policy in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, 1947-1964. University of California Press.
- ^ Igarashi, Masahiro (2002). Associated Statehood in International Law. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. p. 24. ISBN 90-411-1710-5.
- ^ "UQAM | Guerre d'Indochine | Associated States of Indochina". indochine.uqam.ca.
- ^ "The Pentagon Papers, Chapter 2, "U.S. Involvement in the Franco-Viet Minh War, 1950-1954", U.S. POLICY AND THE BAO DAI REGIME". Archived from the original on 2011-08-06. Retrieved 2011-07-23.
- ^ "A picture taken on ngày 4 tháng 6 năm 1954 shows Vietnamese Prime Minister Buu Loc and French council president Joseph Laniel (R) preparing to sign two Franco-Vietnamese treaties by which France recognised Vietnam as an independent state at the Hotel Matignon in Paris, on ngày 4 tháng 6 năm 1954. These signatures took place one month after the defeat of Dien Bien Phu and a few days before the fall of Laniel's government". Archived from the original on 2014-07-26. Retrieved 2014-07-19.
- ^ The Indochinese Experience of the French and the Americans: Nationalism and Communism in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. Arthur J. Dommen. Indiana University Press, 20-02-2002. P 240. Trích: The question remains of why the treaties of independence and association were simply initialed by Laniel and Buu Loc and not signed by Coty and Bao Dai… Many writers place the blame for the non-signature of the treaties on the Vietnamese. But there exists no logical explanation why it should have been the Vietnamese, rather than French, who refused their signature to the treaties which had been negotiated. Bao Dai had arrived in French in April believing the treaty-signing was only a matter of two or three weeks away. However, a quite satisfactory explanation in what was happening in Geneva, where the negotiations were moving ahead with suprising rapidity.… After Geneva, Bao Dai’s treaties was never completed
- ^ "Pentagon Papers Part IV A 3" (PDF). National Archives and Records Administration. 1954–1960. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-04-05.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help)