Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sports

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Sports. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Sports|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Sports. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

See also: game-related deletions


Sports

edit
Spencer Ross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. The one source used only has one sentence of coverage of the subject.4meter4 (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ari Louis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This individual does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. He has not received significant coverage in reliable sources and sources independent of the subject. Most of the references either do not mention individual, mention individual in passing only, or are links to blogs, social media posts, or subject's YouTube page. Firecat93 (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

2001 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2002 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2003 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2004 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2005 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2006 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2007 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2008 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2009 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2011 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2012 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2013 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2014 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Non-notable figure skating competition. Recommend deletion or redirect to Swiss Figure Skating Championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Savannah Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former college basketball player (only appeared to play off the bench for ~3 seasons). Fails WP:GNG as notability WP:NOTINHERITED from Chris Christian (father). Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Betland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Only 1 source is WP:GNG worthy. A WP: Before also revealed nothing than source farming of puff pieces. this, this, this and this were published in the same month and did nothing than to praise the owner with unverified claims. Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, delete it. ONLY YOU nominated all my articles, why did you omit the ones I wrote on journalism in Nigeria? please add it and delete that too. you are enemy of progress. I have nothing to gain or earn writing articles for Wikipedia. It's out of share love for reading and writing. Your malicious intents to discourage me and prospective writers is noted. you can go ahead in your evil enterprise. delete the article, there is no trophy to be won in writing articles on Wikipedia. I have nothing to gain, so please your evil conscience, delete it. Akowe1975 (talk) 11:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
JCC Maccabi Youth Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to parent org Maccabi World Union, where it is better contextualized. Youth version of the notable Maccabiah Games. Longhornsg (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (highly selectively) into Jewish Community Center. I do not see it mentioned at the target so the proposed redirect is not really an option. Plus, it's basically a program of the Jewish Community Centers, in collaboration with Maccabi. No objection to delete either. gidonb (talk) 03:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different Redirect/Merge target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Walls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sportscaster. Deletion suggested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Spain. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

edit
edit

none at present


American football

edit
Birkelbach Field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

High school/low-level college football stadium with no indication of notability. A possible redirect target is Southwestern Pirates football. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NCAA Division II football win–loss records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to have the requisite coverage to meet the WP:NLIST, as the only source is from the NCAA and a cursory search turned up no non-database sources. Article was undeleted at REFUND after it was deleted at PROD but there has been no sources added since. Let'srun (talk) 01:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BUNDLE, I'm nominating the following article for deletion due to the same reason
NCAA Division III football win–loss records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Let'srun (talk) 01:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per WP:NLIST, "one accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". NCAA DII & DIII schools are often discussed as a group by reliable sources, and the schools themselves and NCAA D2/D3 are all independently notable. Not sure why WP:NOTSTATS was mentioned, it fairly clearly does not apply here. glman (talk) 16:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Glman: You are correct that NCAA DII & DIII schools are often discussed as a group by reliable sources, but to me that is a justification for List of NCAA Division II football programs and List of NCAA Division III football programs, not this article. From what I understood, NOTSTATS is relevant here because this could be considered an "excessive listing of unexplained statistics"; the topic of this list is not explicitly stated in prose in the article at all (however obvious it may be from the title of the article, the title of the table, or the contents of the table itself), and the list is not given any context. The numbers are just laid out with nothing added to make it more valuable than some database source website somewhere. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, the fact that the DIII list contains only 20 teams (and the No. 1 ranked team is a school that has apparently played a whopping one game) sort of undermines the "group or set" argument since the vast majority of said group is absent from the list. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure win–loss records are excessive or confusing. Nationwide opinion polling for the 2012 United States presidential election is the example given at NOTSTATS that was moved to its own article. Also, MOS:AVOIDBOLD says "If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the first sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it." Thanks, ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that they are not confusing, just that the wording of NOTSTATS seems to agree with the state of this article. The statistics listed in this article are, indeed, unexplained, and they're given no context or background information, which is not the case for the polling article you linked. I have no issue with the fact that there's no bold text at the start of the article, my issue is the total lack of context whatsoever (the "lead paragraph" of each article gives no indication as to what the article is about). The whole list is sourced to a single NCAA document which was published in 2017, meaning that the list is lazily sourced (read: unsourced) at best and OR at worst. The D3 article is even worse, since its one and only source links to a table which, without other user input, displays only "No data available in table". PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 23:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
List of NFL quarterbacks by teams beaten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NLIST from my perspective, and comes across as WP:Fancruft/trivia. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • You may find it more WP:interesting, but that's not what Wikipedia is based on. Sources! Where are your sources? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If sources were the only criterion, then we would have hundreds of times more articles than we do now. I was featured in my hometown newspapers covering my Eagle Scout project, so should I have a Wikipedia article? The answer is no, because I do not meet WP:GNG despite the fact I can provide sources. At what point do we stop adding names to these lists? Your argument, to me, seems more along the lines of WP:ILIKEIT than putting forward any policy-based or guideline-based argument. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 19:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your example, an article in a local paper about a local person/event, does not qualifiy as a Wikipedial source. You are confusing verifiability with notability. [Pet peeve alert: Why do you and others keep typing "::*:", "*::", etc., when the asterisk does nothing unless it is at the end?] Clarityfiend (talk) 09:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Clarityfiend: You asked about my sources, so I provided a hypothetical to show that I can find sources for someone not notable (I specifically said I do not meet GNG). In reference to the pet peeve, I'm not typing the colons and asterisks. That is Wikipedia's "Reply" function probably just adding a colon to the end of whatever indenting text already exists. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 23:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sports writers have written about QBs with wins against all teams as a group (I'm stretching just to include the two who beat the 28 then-existing teams), as demonstrated by WikiOriginal-9. None have written about all but one, with or without weird qualifiers/conditions, as a group (sorry, Collins). Clarityfiend (talk) 04:26, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The strongest arguments thus far are for a merger or a trimmed version, but I'm simply not seeing consensus on any of the options. Given the specific options proposed, it would be useful for future !voters to engage with them specifically.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Clarityfiend: It is certainly less arbitrary than the current situation, with up to four teams listed. For reasons set forth in the discussion above, it makes sense to list those who have only failed to defeat one team because that will include those who spent their entire career with the one team that was therefore not defeated. It is no burden on the encyclopedia to list those who have defeated all but two teams just the same. BD2412 T 18:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete In my view, the fact that there is a sports news article every time someone newly meets one of this article's criteria isn't enough to establish WP:NLIST; they all just fall under WP:ROUTINE. Obscure statistics frequently appear in ROUTINE references; we can still take an intellectual assessment of the arbitrariness or cruftiness of the list and decide that it's not worthy of encyclopedic record. Aspirex (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:ROUTINE is a guideline connected to events, which doesn't apply here. Let'srun (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Wedding announcements, sports scores, crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine." Coverage about statistical marks being broken in the moment can very much be interpreted as falling under sports scores routine. Aspirex (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I still do not see a consensus here. My instinct is to go with the Merge suggestion but there are quite a few editors arguing strongly for a Keep so I'm relisting this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Amongst the differing views for this AfD, I see the rationale for deletion and keep being solid. However, that happens with WP:TRIVIA. This is trivia that may or may not cross the GNG threshold. I do not think the merge target really works since the record for Most NFL teams defeated at least once, career is already there, but at the same time deleting for the sake of cruft or lack of GNG may work. That being said, perhaps a no consensus may be what is determined. I would rather this article be trimmed, and written to fit some other obscure stats that probably have GNG. Conyo14 (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Simply put, there are enough articles on it from a variety of different sources to make it eligible for a stand-alone article. If there needs to be a merge or editorial discussion, that can happen elsewhere. SportingFlyer T·C 00:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This is quite clearly trivia from my perspective and the one possible notable portion is someone having beaten all teams but the one they played for. Sites often mention trivia, it doesn't make it notable to just be a fun fact. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Per TRIVIA, A trivia section is one that contains a disorganized and unselective collection of facts or examples. This is clearly not the case here, it's clearly a very discriminate statistic. SportingFlyer T·C 03:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad that is only an opinion. I do not wish to vote on this one simply due to how this article is written and open-ended the sources are. Conyo14 (talk) 07:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @SportingFlyer: Regardless of any Wiki policy or writing, this is pretty clearly just a "fun fact" / trivia. It's not something anybody actually cares about or notes in a serious capacity. It's not an accolade that's added to player record or info sections. It's just something that you go "huh, neat" to any move on from. You know why? Because wins are a team stat, not something specific to quarterbacks. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Again, opinions are not policy. SportingFlyer T·C 19:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I could see keeping the article as "List of NFL quarterbacks who defeated every team" and trimming it to those quarterbacks and possibly those who defeated all but one (since if you played only for one team you obviously couldn't beat that team and I have no doubt that there would be sources that such quaterbacks defeated every other team). But how is something like "quarterbacks who defeated all but four teams" anything but OR? Rlendog (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That's an editorial argument, not a notability argument. I wouldn't have any problem with trimming the list. SportingFlyer T·C 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't understand why we would need a whole article for two stats when it could go in the List of NFL individual records. Conyo14 (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think this qualifies for a third relisting. There seems to be a weak consensus against keeping this as a standalone article (despite some editors presenting legitimate evidence for notability) but definitely not a consensus for deletion and no consensus on how to handle some degree of merging. Closing this as no consensus seems like closing against consensus and so perhaps a third relist will provide clarity on a merge/rename/plan.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion review

edit

Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.

  • None

Files proposed for deletion

edit
  • None

Templates for deletion

edit
  • None

Categories

edit
  • None


Baseball

edit

Articles for deletion

edit
Chad Chop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He's a career minor league baseball player who later got low-profile jobs with a couple of Major League teams, neither accomplishment being notable. Sourcing is wholly inadequate. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Baseball, and California. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: While he was more than a minor league player, the other roles are largely in the periphery, part of the "back offices" that make a baseball team work. Batting practice pitcher is not notable, nor is video replay analyst. This is about the only sourcing I can find directly about this individual [8]. What's in the article is either a primary source, or secondary coverage where this person is mentioned. Oaktree b (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree that the topic fails WP:GNG. Countless individuals have played in the minor leagues and been on the staff of MLB teams. Chad Chop doesn't seem to stand out in any notable way. Some of the sources aren't even about him but merely mention him incidentally. Tepkunset (talk) 17:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions (WP:PROD)

edit

Do not comment on these articles here. If you agree with the proposed deletion, you don't have to do anything. If you think the article merits keeping, the remove the {{prod}} template and make an effort to improve the article so that it clearly meets the notability and verifiability criteria.

Templates for discussion

edit

Categories for discussion

edit

Requested moves

edit


Basketball

edit
Dutch Gaitley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV of this assistant basketball coach. JTtheOG (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Comets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to NBL1 East as I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra Nationals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to NBL1 East as I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 20:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers head coaches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a contested bold merge, so I am seeking an AfD consensus to redirect of this page to Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers#Head coaches. There is no independent secondary source coverage of this basketball team's head coaches as a subject, thus failing WP:NLIST, and the content is easily contained in the target article, thus failing the test for a standalone page under WP:GNG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articles of head coaches in NBA teams are still created for recording the coaches' record and achievement. Does these articles also need to coverage as a subject of these basketball teams articles? Or removing the subject of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers#Head coaches and not deleting List of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers head coaches will be the better way to record the information? 安狄 (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You've offered no evidence that this subject clears WP:NLIST. Wikipedia is not a place for recording the coaches' record and achievement since it is WP:NOTDATABASE. The only way this can be a standalone article is if there is significant coverage of these coaches as a group. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reinforcing what Dclemens said, emphasizing, Wikipedia is about being anclyclopedia, covering enclyclopedic topics via enclyclopedic articles. So creating 'record" of anything is not per se an objective not a rationale for the existence of an article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or re-direct would also be OK) Does not meet wikipedia's requirements for existence of a separate article based on wp:notability, wp:not and list guidelines. I did a merge to the team article during NPP and it was reversed. I suggest a delete rather than a re-direct but a re-direct would also be OK. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as its content differs from that of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers#Head coaches. Merging would allow the written paragraph content to be kept in the new section. LemonberryPie (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inner West Bulls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to NBL1 East as I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Savannah Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former college basketball player (only appeared to play off the bench for ~3 seasons). Fails WP:GNG as notability WP:NOTINHERITED from Chris Christian (father). Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

edit

Categories

edit

for occasional archiving


Bodybuilding

edit


Boxing

edit

Articles for deletion

edit

Proposed deletions

edit

Categories

edit

Cricket

edit

Articles for deletion

edit
List of cricket writers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list does nothing that Category:Cricket writers doesn't do as well, plus the category is much more complete. Furthermore, looking at Category:Lists of writers and Lists of writers, I don't see lists for any other sport. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I.m.o. since there is the Category:Cricket writers this list is not really necessary. Lotje (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Euro T20 Slam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

The tournament is defunct without holding one season and in January 2025 it was replaced by the European T20 Premier League WP:GNG. Csknp (Talk) 14:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Traveen Mathew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, who fails WP:GNG. Has only played in T10 cricket, not any FC, List A or T20 competition which can often help increase significant coverage. This article was moved to draftspace and then moved back despite minimal insufficient improvements, which is why this AFD is necessary. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2019 European Cricket League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
2022 European Cricket League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Don't need separate season articles for this minor cricket tournament, all of the reasons for merge and redirecting 2023 and 2024 seasons (2023 AFD and 2024 AFD) apply to the 2019 and 2022 seasons as well. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Balmain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still fails NATH. JayCubby 09:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. As well as outlining an unusually successful brief cricket career for the period, when complete team innings seldom reached three figures, the article provides a sound basis and incentive for future expansion. It is informative and interesting as far as it goes, and it is as worst harmless. Sammyrice (talk) 09:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Lack of significant coverage. A 1-match career is notable only in the most exceptional of cases. Geschichte (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the length of career cannot be relied upon to provide an indication of the notability of the career of a sportsperson. This has been discussed a number of times, both in relation to cricket and other sports, and formed at least some of the discussion around the revision to NSPORTS a couple of years ago. A variety of quantifiable limits were proposed at various times and non were deemed to be acceptable. Balmain's notability rests with whether to not he is notable, nothing else.
In this case, there is clearly some notability and some sources exist which tell us things about him. I suspect that there are more – I'm not certain where McCarron has found him to be a soldier from, but that would indicate that other sources can be presumed to exist. Are those sources enough to show notability? Not sure – there are other passing references to him in PapersPast, including some nice little quotes, but the limited amount of time he appears to have spent in New Zealand means that there aren't many. Fwiw, I declined the initial PROD, partly because I wasn't awfully happy that the nomination had been made seriously, partly because I wasn't sure that a search of PapersPast had taken place, and partly because I wanted to work on List of Nelson representative cricketers, which now exists. That provides an obvious ATD, allowing the article to be redirected to there if it's considered not to be notable. Much of the prose content of the article could be the basis for a note applied to Balmain' list entry, rather like the notes added at List of Otago representative cricketers, for example. Certainly redirection would appear to be the worst case outcome. I can see merit in keep; I don't see a reason to delete given the ATD. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Nelson representative cricketers. I found this article interesting and searched for some time to try and find content to bolster it but alas without success. Purely on a policy basis it probably fails the significant coverage test but I would prefer to follow @Blue Square Thing in their suggestion of redirecting with the prose content added as a note on the target page.
Shrug02 (talk) 22:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete good sourcing, seriously? One source is database which is behind a paywall. Another is a news article from 1881 which doesn't mention the subject. The book is just a one line mention and in no way SIGCOV. The remaining sources are WP:ANCESTRY.
I don't know how one might expect this to develop if you give it more time. The guy died over a century ago and no SIGCOV appears to exist. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge candidates

edit

Proposed deletion candidates

edit

Cue sports

edit
Ashley Wright (snooker player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable success in pro game. Very short career. Fails GNG. Canary757 (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Johl Younger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and SPORTBASIC. Canary757 (talk) 17:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jenson Kendrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Snooker player who fails GNG and SPORTBASIC, No notable success during short career. Canary757 (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom
Firecat93 (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Cycling

edit
Gaudreau brothers cycling incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:REDUNDANTFORK of Johnny Gaudreau#Death. The Kip (contribs) 06:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cycling Proposed deletions

edit

Deletion Review

edit
For American football, see WikiProject Deletion sorting/American football


Primary listing for deletion nominations is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves. Items may be cross-listed here to allow automated archiving. (as of 2007-11-22)

Football

edit
Birkelbach Field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

High school/low-level college football stadium with no indication of notability. A possible redirect target is Southwestern Pirates football. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mishbah Al-Mashuri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indonesian footballer appears to fail WP:GNG/WP:NSPORT; I can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this player (searching under both "Mishbah" and "Misbah"). Only stats pages, routine match coverage and brief transfer coverage is coming up. If you find anything else please ping me. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Hallard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously signed to League Two side AFC Wimbledon, now playing regional football with Three Bridges. Never made a league appearance, the highest level they played was Tier 6, and unsurprisingly coverage is WP:ROUTINE not WP:SIGCOV. CNC (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Armson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROD was overturned as User:Telfordbuck said that the player had not played in a professional league, which User:Spiderone removed, interpreting it as a reference to the defunct WP:NFOOTY. I've seen hundreds of articles made by User:Das osmnezz, and what I've noticed is that they are often vague on why a player should be considered notable and seem to put the WP:BURDEN on others to do the legwork and investigate minor figures. What we've got from the page is that a local newspaper considered him one of the most important players at the mighty Nuneaton Borough, then he signed for Solihull Moors, then one season later Brackley Town. He won the FA Trophy at Brackley, a competition for teams in the fifth to eighth levels of English football. A handicap tournament excluding the best 92 teams. No sources have been provided for if he was an exceptional individual part of that success. I think we need exceptional coverage to establish notability for someone whose highest level of football was the fifth level, and who has spent the last decade in the sixth. That hasn't been provided and I can't find it. There's BBC coverage of a hat-trick against Gillingham, [14] a bigger but not exactly massive club, in 2016 but surely that's WP:BLP1E as 15 minutes of fame in an ordinary career. BBC local radio (not national) have this article on a man of the same name in the local area who runs a youth charity, but it doesn't identify him as a footballer, and I don't think social workers asking for donations pass WP:GNG [15] Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plus if we are going on the logic he was an exceptional player at his previous club, that is obviously open to interpretation based on the observer.
If that is the case, where do we stop? You could have thousands of pages created but would not be kept up to date. This one is an example as he moved to AFC Telford over 6 months ago.
Telfordbuck (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Paolo Rossi (footballer, born 1982) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This AfD might be the same issue as Juan Alberto Ramírez that was nominated back in November. Even by searching for his name in combination of clubs he played for, I did not find any significant coverage of Paolo Rossi (footballer, born 1982) to meet WP:GNG. He only played one match for Torino in 2001/02 season, one of the professional football clubs in Italy, before moving to amateur leagues then disappeared for over two decades. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kyoya Yamada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kyoya Yamada has recently retired (https://www.fagiano-okayama.com/news/202412281600/), and so with four J2 appearances, unfortunately fails GNG RossEvans19 (talk) 02:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksiy Zenchenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like others from this same team, I can't find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV on this player. The article is WP:REFBOMBed, but nothing meets the standards of WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Artem Lutchenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only thing I can find is this, which is about (maybe?) him as a national guardsman and mentions exactly nothing about his football career—indeed, it's not entirely clear that this is even the same guy as the footballer. Otherwise, there appears to be no WP:SIGCOV about him as a footballer. Anwegmann (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jozef Brudňak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brudňak only played 21 football matches before disappearing in 2013. He later became a pastry chef, a job that is hardly notable in my opinion. Regarding secondary sources, I found SME but it doesn't seem to be enough. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 12:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Collins (footballer, born 2003) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One EFL league match. Fails GNG, routine articles only Canary757 (talk) 12:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Genki Ishisaka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted at AFD. Doesn't meet WP:SPORTCRIT or WP:GNG this time either. Japanese Wikipedia only contains primary sources, a squad list and a blog piece. Creator is globally locked. Geschichte (talk) 08:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Max Glasser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am I missing something here? I can find a lot of announcements and "local" coverage, either from USL, FC Naples, or UC Davis, but there doesn't seem to be any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but still seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miche-Naider Chéry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several searches have not uncovered any WP:SIGCOV of this player. None of the sources cited in the article meet those standards as well. This player, then, seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Is coverage from fox sports not enough coverage? Shmego (talk) 14:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is just video of his goals in one match because it was an upset by his team over an MLS club, not WP:SIGCOV about him. So no, it is nowhere near enough. Anwegmann (talk) Anwegmann (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jake Lent-Koop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Everything that comes up, both in searches and in the references, is either WP:LOCAL or databases/signing announcements. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 03:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal Women 2–3 Wolfsburg Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not meet WP:NSPORTSEVENT (the specific notability guideline for a single match) nor any general notability guidelines. This is because it is not an individually notable match in itself, as just one of a series of knockout games in regular competition, and because it does not appear to have much media coverage that is not WP:ROUTINE. It therefore does not meet any of the four criteria for NSPORTSEVENT, and the lack of non-primary sourcing prevents it from meeting GNG. Kingsif (talk) 03:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Lyndis Parlour: The sources you have linked (without actually adding any article content, just the sources) are, top to bottom: a non-RS that is a player interview mentioning the game in passing (see SIGCOV), an Arsenal fan blog than lauds the game's attendance (see SPS), and a simple list of match attendance figures (see DATABASE). None of these are suitable for use in the article (which I think you actually know, just putting them in as external links), let alone establishing notability. Kingsif (talk) 08:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nominator. I was waiting for someone to try and present notability-establishing sources; the article's advocate has made an attempt but seems to know they can't. Kingsif (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Football, Germany, and England. WCQuidditch 07:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This match is very notable and represents a historic moment in the history of women's football in England. This is also reflected in the links and references provided with the article that comment from a range of reputable sources. The article was written to detail the history and to provide information about the game both from UEFA, media outlets and players to provide historical context to the events that occurred. I have now added even more links. This game is far more significant than any standard game of football and any consideration that is isn't suggests that that person is not well informed on women's football - a chronically underreported sport and poorly represented on Wikipedia. Which of the reference sources from itv, ESPN, the Guardian, the New York Times, and BBC sport aren't considered notable by @Kingsif? As noted in this "Some games or series are likely or almost certain to be considered notable, including but not limited to the following:" the list given are just examples. In the history of Women's football, this game is a match of note. The coverage alone makes that clear. The quotes from the players about the match also made that clear but they were deleted from the article. Notability is often so subjective with articles on this platform and too many people have an agenda to devalue perfectly notable articles because of their subject matter. Perhaps @Kingsif is not familiar with what is considered routine coverage at this point in time in the women's game to note the difference. Evmoon (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You do not have any sources that say the match either represents a historic moment in the history of women's football in England or is far more significant than any standard game of football. UEFA match reports, and match reports from RS outlets, are still WP:ROUTINE coverage, which I implore you to actually read and understand before asserting that others don't know what routine coverage is. What you personally think is notable is not the same as Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
    Stop with the bad faith accusations. There is a difference between making sure we create and maintain N-compliant articles focused on women's topics and (something too many people try to do now:) making stubby articles about non-notable women's topics just to boost the quantity without care for quality, overall harming the intention of gender parity in Wikipedia coverage.
    As this discussion is about N-compliant sources, I will assess the sources you have added. These three; two for saying the match was the first time Arsenal W.F.C. had sold out the main stadium (TBF, a logical assumption) - one of these being a press release from the club itself (see PRIMARY) - and the other a passing mention that due to ticket sales in this and other matches, the main stadium would continue to be used. Look, I am sure it is possible to find the minimum of three non-routine, non-SPS, SIGCOV, RS sources about the match if you really try. The question is to ask yourself: does this a standalone article warrant. Or is the actual notable content that can be gleaned from those sources simply better suited as a "they set the attendance record for a women's club football game in England and sold out the Emirates" mention at the 2022–23 Arsenal W.F.C. season article. Kingsif (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The fact that's it's the best attended women's football match in England would be a reason to mention that in a list article about attendences if one existed. However, it does not make the match itself automatically notable as some people above are trying to do. No WP:SUSTAINED coverage, so doesn't need a separate article. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    FYI List of women's association football attendance records - which actually shows that two more recent club matches in England had larger attendance, too. The record is currently held by Chelsea F.C. Women and Manchester United W.F.C. Kingsif (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Subject does not meet WP:NSPORTSEVENT nor WP:GNG due to a lack of coverage. Let'srun (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have added more sources to demonstrate the coverage. It is also worth noting that there is not a black and white rule for the specific notability guideline for a single match (WP:NSPORTSEVENT). Considering the historic lack of coverage of some topics over others, careful judgement must be used when considering impact. Such a sporting event should be considered in the context of the competition it is in (this case the UWCL), the history of the sport/the event/ and the country it occurred in. In this case this match represented a record for the club, the competition in the UK and an attendance record in the UK for all of Women's football at the time it occurred. It was a significant event that had consequences for subsequent matches and the business of women's football beyond this period. The additional source demonstrate the widespread acceptance by main stream sources at the significance of this record. Evmoon (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Your "additional sources" were both published on or before (The Guardian's quote piece) the day the match was played, so I don't know where you get the boldness to say they demonstrate widespread acceptance by main stream sources at the significance that was beyond this period. One of them just quotes the manager saying it's great they sold out, and the other is yet another match report. And please stop using AI to write your replies. You keep saying there's nothing cut-and-dry about NSPORTSEVENT, and yet even before the "it should be a final or incredibly notable" list, the guideline outright says coverage needs to be WP:SUSTAINED no matter what. I only keep replying because you do not bring sources in this discussion for them to be judged, it'd be easier for us both if you did. Kingsif (talk) 08:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I must say the rudeness on this platform is quite astounding. The barriers to contribute are high and people are mean. Nothing on this page has been made up and AI was not used to write the reply. You really need to check your assumptions. Every example you give is still a subjective metric. Evmoon (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: - Fails both WP:NSPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG. One of a number of matches that held attendance records for a relatively short while. I don't see any evidence that it was a significant event that had consequences for subsequent matches and the business of women's football beyond this period but rather it was an illustration of the rapid increase in popularity of womens football. --John B123 (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rachid Ghanimi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been rejected as a draft and deleted already. This its third incarnation, and I still can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this player. The player still appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per above. Shmego (talk) 14:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jacob Randolph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only thing approaching WP:SIGCOV that I could find is this, but it is from the student newspaper of one of his colleges, and it was published while he was a student at UNC–Wilmington. So it is WP:LOCAL. As a result, this player appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This player made a professional debut, had a notable college career, and has just extended his contract with his current club. I feel like deleting this would be unfair. Shmego (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NSPORTS2022, making a professional debut is meaningless toward notability and so is a college career. Anwegmann (talk) 23:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't participating in said discussion, but have to say the reason to reject automatic notability is because not all generations of football players receive significant coverage, even if they play(ed) at professional level. This might be just a theory. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not a bad theory, and I think you're right, but it doesn't change the fact that a player simply making his/her professional debut without accompanying WP:SIGCOV fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Greg Monroe (soccer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This player appears to fail WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Everything I could find was either passing, "local" by his college, club, or league, or database/signing announcement—nothing of significant, meaningful coverage. Anwegmann (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Creek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Perhaps it's a matter of WP:TOOSOON, as he is in the beginning of his career and has seen the field a few times, but right now, he seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All-time Tampa Bay Rowdies roster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to lack notability under WP:LISTN due to a lack of sourcing. PROD was removed with the claim that this grouping is notable, but no sources have been added since so I'm bringing this to AfD. Let'srun (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Southwestern University Soccer Field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Southwestern University#Athletics. No evidence of independent notability for this NCAA Division III-level soccer field. JTtheOG (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Savchenko (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been deleted twice before. There doesn't seem to be any meaningful improvement over the last two deletions. Still appears to fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Article also appears to be a victim of WP:REFBOMBing. I suggest a WP:SALT for this one. Anwegmann (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mikihito Arai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restored after a previous PROD deletion. Still no evidence of a WP:GNG pass. In my own searches, I found Gekisaka and Ameba, but neither of these are sufficient. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eduard Halstyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Chernihiv player who appears to fail WP:GNG. Several searches in English and Ukrainian brought up nothing approaching WP:SIGCOV, and all the sources in the article are passing or database. Anwegmann (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Using that name, I can find some decent coverage of Eduard Spertsyan but nothing about Halstyan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Andriy Veresotskyi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likewise, this player brings up nothing approaching WP:SIGCOV in English or Ukrainian. Everything is databases or local—and even in the latter, as far as I can find, there is nothing meaningful. Fails WP:GNG, as far as I can tell. Anwegmann (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andriy Lakeyenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like with others, nothing meaningful came up in either English or Ukrainian searches, much less anything that hinted at WP:SIGCOV. As such, this player fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So Kataoka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP article of an athlete on Rockdale Ilinden FC that has incomplete sections. A google search yields no indication of notability. For the record, there may be a COI issue here as Tp767, who created the Thomas Petrovski article, has several edits here. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, while I am not yet nominating them for deletion, other possibly non-notable athletes on Rockdale Ilinden FC have poorly sourced articles or articles that are otherwise in bad shape that use excessive primary sources, including but not limited to Mathieu Cordier, Blake Ricciuto (decent shape but lots of unsourced info), Ricardo Rizzo, Bai Antoniou, and Alec Urosevski (decent shape but lots of primary sources). KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 16:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Morrison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only WP:ROUTINE coverage and last years signining to Solihill Moors documented in Solihull Observer as WP:BLP1E, there is no WP:SIGCOV for WP:GNG.   Note: Not to be confused with the Gaelic footballer of the same name. CNC (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keitaro Koga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Retired in 2014 after 7 appearances in J3, unfortunately fails GNG RossEvans19 (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiroya Iwakabe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced BLP with no claim to notability. I found Gekisaka and Ameba, but these count for little more than database sources. No evidence of having the significant coverage for WP:GNG and doesn't seem to have kicked a ball since 2017. Japanese Wikipedia has nothing to offer. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tomoki Kamioka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG - has not played since 2016 RossEvans19 (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fatima Kome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested draftify but with no apparent improvement. WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC both require multiple sources showing significant coverage. The only decent source that I can find is Allez Les Lions, which is a fairly standard transfer announcement regarding her move to the second French tier. I am not sure if Allez Les Lions is WP:RS as I couldn't find evidence of fact checking or professional journalism. Aside from that, I found Feca Foot, Chretiens and La Depeche, all of which are clearly trivial mentions. Since all we have is one borderline source, I can't see how this meets the notability criteria. Turkish Wikipedia had no decent coverage. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I found all of these in my searches but didn't consider them for source analysis as they are all trivial mentions, for example La Depeche is just a passing mention in a match report followed by two squad listings. Some of them are only squad list mentions, like this. I'm not subscribed to Cameroon Tribune but none of the reports look like they address Kome in any significant depth (i.e. multiple sentences about Kome). Which of these sources show SPORTBASIC is met? I'll @GiantSnowman: in any case as more sources have been added. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, which sources are meant to be significant coverage? GiantSnowman 19:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman and @Spiderone WP:SPORTBASIC:Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.. The article about the transfer is solely about her. One BBC article mentioned she received a red card during a game. There are also plenty of databases sources because she is a FIFA recognised senior international who played for Cameroon during major tournaments. I have improved the article with above sources and more.
Given her age, you might argue it’s too soon but regular international football players articles are typically kept. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability (not a policy) FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is well established that transfer coverage is considered WP:ROUTINE - and the essay you cite clearly states that it "has been superseded by WP:Notability (sports)". GiantSnowman 20:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I mentioned it is not a policy but I have never a saw an article about a senior international FIFA being deleted. I understand women football is not as popular but 19 mentions is alot of mentions even according to WP:SPORTBASIC also not sure how 19 sources are routine including 3 beloved BBC.FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Marcelino Da Costa Fernandes was deleted only a few months ago and he had 3 senior FIFA caps. Even 100 trivial mentions doesn't necessarily equal one piece of significant coverage. BBC is great but the sources are a trivial mention of getting sent off, with no further elaboration, a squad list mention and another squad list mention. None of these articles explore Kome in detail and, in each case, there are several, several other players mentioned at various points in the article. At no point is Kome singled out for special coverage. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NSPORTS2022 paved the way for a change in the notability criteria whereby having caps and/or playing in a professional league was no longer a 'free pass'. Since then, there have been several articles deleted in which a player has been capped. For example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Zaki, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allyson Jolicoeur, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcelino Da Costa Fernandes and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamberto Gama. Every week, footballer articles are deleted that contain nothing better than transfer announcements or match reports in which the footballer is briefly reported as scoring a goal, getting a yellow/red card, giving away a penalty etc. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate you being consistent but dismissing 19 sources as trivia and routine is a bit unfair. I also understand that players who do not play in the Western world can be hard to find sources for, unless you dig in their native language but that is why we have this debates so people can provide evidence.
I provided 19, I will leave it to that. FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2017–18 FC Chernihiv season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another season article with no prose on a season so far down the Ukrainian pyramid that it is highly unlikely to have any notability per WP:GNG. In the unlikely event that something noteworthy did actually happen in this season, it could be summarised at FC Chernihiv, which currently lacks meaningful prose. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 FC Chernihiv season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A season 'article' with no claim to notability. Chernihiv played in an amateur, regional league during this season. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG has been presented by the article's creator. Long-term AfD consensus on Wikipedia has always been that we do not have articles on seasons at this level unless there is clear evidence of significant coverage. Even if something noteworthy did happen this season, it could easily be summarised at FC Chernihiv instead, an article that currently has almost no meaningful prose. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vladyslav Panko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Played only 5 minutes of football in the second tier of Ukraine before disappearing. None of the references come close to meeting WP:GNG. The best source found in my own searches was Cheline, a routine contract announcement, most of which is copied from his club's Facebook page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It could but PROD is only a soft delete and I would prefer a hard delete. This user persistently recreates Chernihiv articles - see, for example, Oleksandr Rudenko. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Denis Bališ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He only played one professional match for Spartak Trnava before disappearing over ten years ago. News sources from my search motivated him from being the son of a former footballer, falling under WP:NOTINHERITED. The articles of his football relatives (father Igor and brother Boris) also have not provided significant coverage since those were created, so if there is no consensus, I would suggest either "redirect to Igor Bališ" or "delete". ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Igor Bališ appears to be a notable former Trnava player. We can simply mention that his sons Denis and Boris are also footballers in the family section of his article. Newklear007 (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Giorgi Parpalia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting WP:GNG. He played 1 match in the second tier league, the Ukrainian First League, before spending the rest of his career in the second tier of Georgia. Searches in Ukrainian (Гіоргі Парпалія) and Georgian (გიორგი ფარპალია) failed to yield anything significant, which is unsurprising as he barely had a professional career. All I could find was coverage on similarly-named players, like Giorgi Papava and Giorgi Kvilitaia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Théo Emmanuelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Player made one five-minute Ligue 2 appearance in 2021. I found some coverage here, transfer coverage here, and here, but no real significant coverage. Player just transferred to fourth-division side Granville at age 24. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Note: since this nomination (or the same morning at least) there has also been this press release and this passing mention. It doesn't amount to sigcov, but it might be worth draftifying with two new references this week. @Paul Vaurie @GiantSnowman CNC (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Routine transfer news of a player leaving one National club to go to another. GiantSnowman 16:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2023–24 Moldovan Youth League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youth football season with no indication of notability. Pretty much every yearly edition of this article is sourced only to primary sources. I don't see a possible redirect target, either, as no article for the youth league itself exists. JTtheOG (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Vovk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to other Chernihiv players, I can't find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this player after several searches in both English and Ukrainian. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems as though this player also fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Petrovski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost identical to Draft:Thomas Petrovski which was declined due to a lack of sources. Creator has a clear COI, since they also created Paul Petrovski, and they appear to have a particular interest in people with this surname. CycloneYoris talk! 21:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - promo article, atrociously sourced, COI issues. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - can you please provide further details regarding it being atrociously sourced’? Tp767 (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Directory listings or other primary sources, don't help show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CycloneYoris - I have added sources in the Reference Tab. Is this not sufficient enough? They are from official sporting organisations. Tp767 (talk) 00:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For a BLP article especially, the subject must be covered in-depth by multiple in-depth secondary, independent, reliable sources. See WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:N for more information. The editing must also be done by neutral editors with no connection to the subject. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 12:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - several sections completely unreferenced and fails WP:SPORTBASIC. Footballer is a semi-pro. Every single reference provided thus far is a database source like Transfermarkt, Sofascore, Flashscore and Tuttocampo with zero prose coverage. I was unable to find any news articles on Thomas Petrovski in a WP:BEFORE search. The article is filled with WP:OR from top to bottom and the creator has failed to respond to requests to disclose WP:UPE and/or WP:COI. Strong delete. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 00:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi - I've just added additional sources to justify the pending requests. They're primary sources that give a definitive response to my profile - player and character. Could you please confirm if this is sufficient enough and if not give me a better answer then 'denied' Tp767 (talk) 03:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Please read Wikipedia's policies including WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:N. These sources do not establish notability of the subject. Also read WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI as well. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This is very important - if you are Thomas Petrovski or are a close associate of his, please declare your conflict of interest and refrain from doing any direct edits to this article. You may suggest edit requests through the talk page or perform an uncontroversial edit per WP:COI. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 04:30, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also see WP:BLPSELFPUB - an article should NOT be based primarily on self-published sources like your own website, Transfermarkt, FlashScore etc. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Saber Hassanpour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. JTtheOG (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hayato Nishinoue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Falls short of WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Only played 2 minutes in Japan's third league, which is very far from notable. Article has been expanded but I don't believe the coverage meets WP:SIGCOV, which I will outline here. Source assessment:

  1. The longest, but I believe it is not secondary. It has wording like ""During my university days, I worked part-time"
  2. Primary source
  3. Primary source
  4. Primary source
  5. Very short, not significant
  6. Literally one sentence, not significant
  7. Don't think this is very significant either, describes the game on an amateur level
  8. Not about him, WP:PASSING
  9. Database
  10. Database
  11. Database Geschichte (talk) 15:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Re your own source assessment. The first source is a LONG profile on him, and is definitely a secondary source, the “I” in the automatic translation is reported speech from inside quotes given to the journalist as part of the article (which is not an interview either, those are specific quotations, not part of a longer question and answer session/transcript). The seventh source is likewise a two page profile specifically on him (not sure if you noticed that was page 2 of two, separated by hyperlinks at the bottom of the page), whether you think the intellectual standard of the analysis in the article is up to snuff, the article itself is inarguably a SIGCOV worthy source, being an independent secondary source focused solely on the subject of the article. This[19] source looks likely to be significant too, being billed as a serialised special feature on those three players specifically… though I can’t get through the paywall to be 100% sure. Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mathis Touré (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable footballer and former child actor. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NSPORT with maybe only a single piece of WP:SIGCOV, a blog/commentary piece in a Corsican paper. The rest is routine transfer coverage. Fails WP:NACTOR with only one role that could be described as significant (the coverage of it is all trivial mentions). Please ping me if I missed anything. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimír Balát (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Balát played 114 minutes of professional league before transferring to lower leagues and disappearing. Other than two dead references provided, which are routine announcements, I cannot find enough significant coverage for this article to meet WP:GNG. The closest latter case is Nový čas. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saheb (1981 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. 🇧🇩 ZayanMr Bangladesh71 (Talk)

Dominik Smékal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG. The sources mainly refer to his hat trick, which helped his third-league Hlučín eliminate Viktoria Plzeň from the Czech Cup. He played only 8 games at the professional league level, 6 in 2017 and 2 in 2021. FromCzech (talk) 10:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ryo Nakamura (footballer, born 1989) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Light years away from meeting WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Geschichte (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP, but merge with corrections — this article seems like a duplication of the already-existing Reo Nakamura (footballer, born 1990) and hence a merge into the existing article may be more appropriate, once the errors have been corrected. It seems like the author of the article has made a spelling error, instead of “Reo” (the correct first name) they have put “Ryo” as the name of the subject and (for some reason) changed their DoB from 1990 to 1989.
The article's own source shows the name of the subject as “Reo”, not “Ryo” (as the author has put) and the correct DoB of the subject as 1990, not 1989 (as the author has put). The reason the others (CC: @GiantSnowman, @CommunityNotesContributor, @QEnigma) could not verify/find sources was because the author wrote the incorrect information on the Wikipedia article. The career statistics section, especially, I feel could be merged into the already existing article.
~~~~ Nyxion303💬 Talk 19:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well spotted - but where is the significant coverage of this person? GiantSnowman 19:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For Reo Nakamura (correct name), I was able to find some through this Google search and this one1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 just to name a few.
At the moment, it appears the player plays for Ezra F.C., in the Pepsi Lao League 1.
~~~~ Nyxion303💬 Talk 19:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, your sources consist of match reports, database profiles and primary sources. Nothing come close to significant and independent coverage of the player. Geschichte (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In your opinion, would you say the player qualifies as being notable under WP:FOOTYN? Nyxion303💬 Talk 11:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FOOTYN is an essay, not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, and has no relevance in AfD's. The subject must pass WP:GNG with multiple significant sources from publications independent of the subject. Alvaldi (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In any event, "The player section of this notability guidance has been superseded by WP:Notability (sports)". GiantSnowman 21:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte: Of the seven sources, only the fifth one signals significant coverage on Nakamura as it tells about his personal life. However, one SIGCOV is not enough; the whole GNG needs multiple instead. Transfermarkt is obviously unnecessary to be added to Wikipedia articles as it is claimed unreliable. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there are still any valid arguments to Keep or Merge with another article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look likely as Reo Nakamura is currently at a 5-0 delete Geschichte (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep 5-1 surely? With @Nyxion303‘s keep vote, and 5-2 now… not that this is meant to be a vote I thought 😊 Anyway, as you pointed out @Geschichte, the fifth of Nyxion’s sources was SIGCOV, and I have another couple to add. this[22] and this[23]. For me the three taken together seem like enough. Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTAVOTE. GiantSnowman 21:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes, that was rather my point. Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ziya Taner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged 7 years ago as unsourced. I checked a couple of the sources on the Turkish article but not sure they are enough - for example they don’t support the first sentence here saying he was born in Macedonia Chidgk1 (talk) 13:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I looked through the Cumhuriyet online archive (only subscribers can view actual scans of the pages, but a text conversion is available here: [24]), and there are a few articles from the 1970s and 1980s that provide some coverage of Taner's managerial career. I expanded the article a little based on a few of the hits, and I believe there is enough in this online archive to suggest other offline Turkish-language media sources exist that would be enough to provide SIGCOV. Jogurney (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Istanbul Professional League 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged almost a decade ago as unsourced and article does not exist in Turkish so probably not notable Chidgk1 (talk) 07:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm not sure that a redirect would be appropriate given that the topic is not mentioned in the proposed target page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Pulver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV from third-party sources for this American soccer player. JTtheOG (talk) 19:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as arguments are divided between Draftifying or Redirection.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify, per Evans Reader of Information (talk) 15:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Golf

edit

Articles for deletion

edit

Proposed deletions

edit

Categories

edit


Handball

edit

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Handball

Deletion review

edit
  • none

Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.

Files proposed for deletion

edit
  • None

Templates for deletion

edit
  • None

Categories

edit
  • Current vacant


Ice hockey

edit
Gaudreau brothers cycling incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:REDUNDANTFORK of Johnny Gaudreau#Death. The Kip (contribs) 06:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Capitals–Rangers rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:BEFORE yielded only their multiple series matchups as well as the Tom Wilson fight from 2021. There is also Bleacher Report article that may or not be reliable. No mention of a rivalry nor team series overview. Note that I am the original author of this article, but since there have been several additions to this article, I am proceeding with this route. If not delete, then trim and merge to List of NHL rivalries#New York Rangers vs. Washington Capitals Conyo14 (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Medvedev (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unscourced BLP for a player who never played in a major league and does not meet guidelines at WP:SPORTBASIC. Kimikel (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Martial arts

edit

Articles for deletion

edit
Mukesh Mishra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Karate coach, no coverage in reliable sources. Declined by Bonadea see [29] and just after the decline the Draft was moved to mainspace by the creator, see [30]. Previous deletions can be checked here, [31]. Taabii (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It does appear to be a likely COI. More importantly, I can't find what I would call significant independent coverage of him by independent sources. I found no mentions of him at the WKF website or in the results of any major adult karate competition--not Commonwealth, continental, or world championships. I see no evidence of him meeting any WP notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

edit

After a deletion discussion it was decided to merge Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Motorsports into this page. For the archive of WikiProject Deletion sorting/Motorsports, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Motorsports/archive.

Motorsport

edit

Articles for deletion

edit

Proposed deletions

edit

Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.

Categories

edit


Rugby league

edit
Alex Lobb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A before search shows nothing to pass GNG or SPORTBASIC. Klinetalkcontribs 01:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Rugby union

edit
List of 2014–15 Aviva Premiership Academy promotions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All are covered in List of 2014–15 Premiership Rugby transfers. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Templates for discussion

edit


Softball

edit

Proposed deletions (WP:PROD)

edit

Do not comment on these articles here. If you agree with the proposed deletion, you don't have to do anything. If you think the article merits keeping, the remove the {{prod}} template and make an effort to improve the article so that it clearly meets the notability and verifiability criteria.

Templates for discussion

edit

Categories for discussion

edit


Tennis

edit
Nels Van Patten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:GNG. He is only mentioned in passing in the articles currently used. His father and brother are notable. Appears to be a case of WP:NOTINHERITED.4meter4 (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Glennon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tennis player never ranked inside top 900. Some stuff on gotigersgo regarding his collegiate career but failing GNG. Canary757 (talk) 17:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kemer Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for a year as unsourced and when I click the external link it blocks me Chidgk1 (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Candiotto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Fails notability criteria. Shrug02 (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Wrestling

edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople