Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sports
Points of interest related to Sports on Wikipedia: Outline – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Sports. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Sports|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Sports. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
watch |
See also: game-related deletions
Sports
edit- Spencer Ross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. The one source used only has one sentence of coverage of the subject.4meter4 (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Added two in-depth sources which should help to sort things out. With how much sports media there is in and around New York, you had to know there'd be something. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Radio, Television, Sports, Florida, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ari Louis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This individual does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. He has not received significant coverage in reliable sources and sources independent of the subject. Most of the references either do not mention individual, mention individual in passing only, or are links to blogs, social media posts, or subject's YouTube page. Firecat93 (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The consensus in the original AfD discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ari Louis) was to delete the page. Firecat93 (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @The Blade of the Northern Lights Shouldn't this page have been deleted following the result of the first AfD? Firecat93 (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I deleted it in 2012, so it was. This was recreated in 2014, at this point it's different enough that G4 no longer applies. If it's deleted again, some salt may be in order. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- @The Blade of the Northern Lights Shouldn't this page have been deleted following the result of the first AfD? Firecat93 (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 8. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, Judaism, Sports, Israel, and Arizona. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Not enough references. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 21:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and do not salt per nom. Fails GNG due to lack of independent, significant coverage. If there is consensus to delete from this AFD, two deletions spaced out by over 12 years is not anywhere close to grounds for protection against recreation. Frank Anchor 14:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2000 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
- 2001 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2002 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2003 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2004 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2005 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2006 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2007 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2008 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2009 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2010 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2011 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2012 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2013 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2014 Swiss Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non-notable figure skating competition. Recommend deletion or redirect to Swiss Figure Skating Championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, Skating, and Switzerland. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Here is my problem with these stand-alone articles. All four disciplines are often not contested. There are often not enough competitors to award a bronze medal, and in some cases, even a silver medal. Many of these competitions featured no more than two or three participants. And most of the competitors who are listed are redlinked or unlinked (ie. themselves not notable). The competition results and scores are included (or should be included) on a skaters' individual article. The medal results are included on the parent article (in this case, Swiss Figure Skating Championships). But these nations with small national championships are just not worth trying to maintain individual articles for each competition. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all per nomination. No sources or in-depth coverage for over a decade since creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect all per nom. No sigcov. Reasonable search term. Frank Anchor 15:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect All - Wikipedia is not a sports results database. No SIGCOV, also not notable per WP:NSPORTSEVENT --John B123 (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect all to Swiss Figure Skating Championships. No need for individual articles when the only salient points, ie the medalists, are covered in the parent article and there is no significant coverage of the individual events.
- Shrug02 (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Savannah Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable former college basketball player (only appeared to play off the bench for ~3 seasons). Fails WP:GNG as notability WP:NOTINHERITED from Chris Christian (father). Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sports, Basketball, and Texas. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Was unable to find anything of significance during a search og Google and Newspapers.com. Her basketball career doesn't indicate any likelihood of her having received any significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 10:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable, fails significant coverage criteria and, as has already been pointed out above, notability is not inherited so who her father is does not matter for these purposes
- Shrug02 (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Betland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Only 1 source is WP:GNG worthy. A WP: Before also revealed nothing than source farming of puff pieces. this, this, this and this were published in the same month and did nothing than to praise the owner with unverified claims. Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Sports, Ghana, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Go ahead, delete it. ONLY YOU nominated all my articles, why did you omit the ones I wrote on journalism in Nigeria? please add it and delete that too. you are enemy of progress. I have nothing to gain or earn writing articles for Wikipedia. It's out of share love for reading and writing. Your malicious intents to discourage me and prospective writers is noted. you can go ahead in your evil enterprise. delete the article, there is no trophy to be won in writing articles on Wikipedia. I have nothing to gain, so please your evil conscience, delete it. Akowe1975 (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please read WP:NPA -1ctinus📝🗨 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Go ahead, delete it. ONLY YOU nominated all my articles, why did you omit the ones I wrote on journalism in Nigeria? please add it and delete that too. you are enemy of progress. I have nothing to gain or earn writing articles for Wikipedia. It's out of share love for reading and writing. Your malicious intents to discourage me and prospective writers is noted. you can go ahead in your evil enterprise. delete the article, there is no trophy to be won in writing articles on Wikipedia. I have nothing to gain, so please your evil conscience, delete it. Akowe1975 (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Go ahead, delete it. ONLY YOU nominated all my articles, why did you omit the ones I wrote on journalism in Nigeria? please add it and delete that too. you are enemy of progress. I have nothing to gain or earn writing articles for Wikipedia. It's out of share love for reading and writing. Your malicious intents to discourage me and prospective writers is noted. you can go ahead in your evil enterprise. delete the article, there is no trophy to be won in writing articles on Wikipedia. I have nothing to gain, so please your evil conscience, delete it. Akowe1975 (talk) 11:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails NCORP as references do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. However, I believe this can be speedy closed as creator is agreeing to deletion per their statement above. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- JCC Maccabi Youth Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redirect to parent org Maccabi World Union, where it is better contextualized. Youth version of the notable Maccabiah Games. Longhornsg (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism, Sports, Olympics, Israel, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Merge (highly selectively) into Jewish Community Center. I do not see it mentioned at the target so the proposed redirect is not really an option. Plus, it's basically a program of the Jewish Community Centers, in collaboration with Maccabi. No objection to delete either. gidonb (talk) 03:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different Redirect/Merge target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Dave Walls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable sportscaster. Deletion suggested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Spain. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Television, Sports, and Virginia. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing in the article establishing notability about an unremarkable broadcasting career. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 06:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Sports-related Proposed Deletion nominations
editSports-related Categories for discussion
editnone at present
American football
edit- Birkelbach Field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
High school/low-level college football stadium with no indication of notability. A possible redirect target is Southwestern Pirates football. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football, Football, and Texas. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject appears to lack the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Considering this stadium is the home for multiple teams, I oppose a redirect. Let'srun (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find anything that gets us to GNG, though it's not impossible - it's a 12,000 seat high school football/lower division college football stadium, so there may be coverage in newspapers I didn't uncover. SportingFlyer T·C 01:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Southwestern Pirates football - Subject fails GNG due to lack of SIGCOV. This is the most notable tenant (as a college and not a high school) so it makes the most sense as a target. However, a retargeting discussion can take place if others believe a different article makes more sense. Having multiple good redirect targets is not a valid reason to delete instead of redirect. Frank Anchor 02:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- NCAA Division II football win–loss records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to have the requisite coverage to meet the WP:NLIST, as the only source is from the NCAA and a cursory search turned up no non-database sources. Article was undeleted at REFUND after it was deleted at PROD but there has been no sources added since. Let'srun (talk) 01:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Lists. Let'srun (talk) 01:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per WP:BUNDLE, I'm nominating the following article for deletion due to the same reason
- Let'srun (talk) 01:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTSTATS. They didn't event get all the D3 teams. Smh. Conyo14 (talk) 03:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Conyo. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - per WP:NLIST, "one accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". NCAA DII & DIII schools are often discussed as a group by reliable sources, and the schools themselves and NCAA D2/D3 are all independently notable. Not sure why WP:NOTSTATS was mentioned, it fairly clearly does not apply here. glman (talk) 16:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Glman: You are correct that
NCAA DII & DIII schools are often discussed as a group by reliable sources
, but to me that is a justification for List of NCAA Division II football programs and List of NCAA Division III football programs, not this article. From what I understood, NOTSTATS is relevant here because this could be considered an "excessive listing of unexplained statistics"; the topic of this list is not explicitly stated in prose in the article at all (however obvious it may be from the title of the article, the title of the table, or the contents of the table itself), and the list is not given any context. The numbers are just laid out with nothing added to make it more valuable than some database source website somewhere. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC) - Also, the fact that the DIII list contains only 20 teams (and the No. 1 ranked team is a school that has apparently played a whopping one game) sort of undermines the "group or set" argument since the vast majority of said group is absent from the list. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure win–loss records are excessive or confusing. Nationwide opinion polling for the 2012 United States presidential election is the example given at NOTSTATS that was moved to its own article. Also, MOS:AVOIDBOLD says "If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the first sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it." Thanks, ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that they are not confusing, just that the wording of NOTSTATS seems to agree with the state of this article. The statistics listed in this article are, indeed, unexplained, and they're given no context or background information, which is not the case for the polling article you linked. I have no issue with the fact that there's no bold text at the start of the article, my issue is the total lack of context whatsoever (the "lead paragraph" of each article gives no indication as to what the article is about). The whole list is sourced to a single NCAA document which was published in 2017, meaning that the list is lazily sourced (read: unsourced) at best and OR at worst. The D3 article is even worse, since its one and only source links to a table which, without other user input, displays only "No data available in table". PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 23:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure win–loss records are excessive or confusing. Nationwide opinion polling for the 2012 United States presidential election is the example given at NOTSTATS that was moved to its own article. Also, MOS:AVOIDBOLD says "If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the first sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it." Thanks, ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Glman: You are correct that
- List of NFL quarterbacks by teams beaten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:NLIST from my perspective, and comes across as WP:Fancruft/trivia. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and American football. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Article literally copies off one source to present the information, and this is usually only a headline superlative rather than something really followed closely. Nate • (chatter) 17:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Passes NLIST. [1][2][3][4][5] ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be a copy of a single source, and is arbitrarily cut off at "all teams but four". PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Clarityfiend's merge proposal also sounds very reasonable to me, so I'd be cool with either. No opinion on how much the list should be trimmed if we ultimately go with merge. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep if renamed List of NFL quarterbacks who have beaten every team in the league and trimmed. (Also remove the criterion "beaten every team he faced at least once", which is just made up.) It satisfies NLIST, but only for every team, not every team but n (n=1, 2, 3, etc.). This is a rare achievement which requires a QB to go to another team and then beat his former team. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively merge to List of NFL individual records#Quarterback wins, but just the half dozen QBs who have done it all. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'd support a trim and merge. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- I personally don't believe the list should be trimmed to just those six players. The sources discuss a lot more players than just those six. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to trim list, it should include the six who beat all teams plus the qbs who stayed with one team throughout their career and beat all other teams (Bradshaw, Elway, ect.) Spparky (talk) 20:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively merge to List of NFL individual records#Quarterback wins, but just the half dozen QBs who have done it all. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Where are the sources that support this addition? I don't see any. (The closest I can find is that Mahomes is the youngest to beat all 31 other teams, and that's a different kettle of fish.) Otherwise, this is just an unwarranted stretching of the boundary. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Trim and merge to List of NFL individual records#Quarterback wins. Specifically, I would add a bullet for those retired QBs who have beaten all but one team if they spent their entire career with one team. This would remove Ken Stabler, Alex Smith and Kerry Collins because they played for multiple teams. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Kerry Collins is listed in three of the sources above though. Here is an excerpt: "Oddly, one other quarterback, Kerry Collins, beat 31 teams, but the team Collins never beat, the Dolphins, wasn’t one of the teams he played for. Collins actually started against the Dolphins four times while playing for four different teams, but lost all four games." ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- I find it more notable that a QB spent their entire career with one team and beat every other team in the league (31/31) than being traded and still not beating every team in the league (31/32). Collins wouldn't be on the list of "all but one" if he had never been traded since he never beat the Dolphins. In the end, that will be a decision to be made by the closing administrator. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Kerry Collins is listed in three of the sources above though. Here is an excerpt: "Oddly, one other quarterback, Kerry Collins, beat 31 teams, but the team Collins never beat, the Dolphins, wasn’t one of the teams he played for. Collins actually started against the Dolphins four times while playing for four different teams, but lost all four games." ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- You may find it more WP:interesting, but that's not what Wikipedia is based on. Sources! Where are your sources? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- If sources were the only criterion, then we would have hundreds of times more articles than we do now. I was featured in my hometown newspapers covering my Eagle Scout project, so should I have a Wikipedia article? The answer is no, because I do not meet WP:GNG despite the fact I can provide sources. At what point do we stop adding names to these lists? Your argument, to me, seems more along the lines of WP:ILIKEIT than putting forward any policy-based or guideline-based argument. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 19:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your example, an article in a local paper about a local person/event, does not qualifiy as a Wikipedial source. You are confusing verifiability with notability. [Pet peeve alert: Why do you and others keep typing "::*:", "*::", etc., when the asterisk does nothing unless it is at the end?] Clarityfiend (talk) 09:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Clarityfiend: You asked about my sources, so I provided a hypothetical to show that I can find sources for someone not notable (I specifically said I do not meet GNG). In reference to the pet peeve, I'm not typing the colons and asterisks. That is Wikipedia's "Reply" function probably just adding a colon to the end of whatever indenting text already exists. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 23:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sports writers have written about QBs with wins against all teams as a group (I'm stretching just to include the two who beat the 28 then-existing teams), as demonstrated by WikiOriginal-9. None have written about all but one, with or without weird qualifiers/conditions, as a group (sorry, Collins). Clarityfiend (talk) 04:26, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your example, an article in a local paper about a local person/event, does not qualifiy as a Wikipedial source. You are confusing verifiability with notability. [Pet peeve alert: Why do you and others keep typing "::*:", "*::", etc., when the asterisk does nothing unless it is at the end?] Clarityfiend (talk) 09:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- You may find it more WP:interesting, but that's not what Wikipedia is based on. Sources! Where are your sources? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This has enough discussion in secondary sources to allow us to have an article on it. The issues above all seem like editing issues, not notability issues. SportingFlyer T·C 20:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Trim and merge per Clarityfiend. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FANCRUFT WP:NOTSTATS. Excessive niche statscruft sourced by a single outlet. Ajf773 (talk) 22:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- The sourcing currently in the article is an editing issue, there are plenty of different sources above. SportingFlyer T·C 04:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Four of five of WikiOriginal-9's sources above discuss these "32-win" QBs as a group, so NLIST is satisfied. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, there is only one source currently in the article, and it's a database website, but this is clearly notable. The editing just needs to be cleaned up. Other sources include [6] [7] SportingFlyer T·C 04:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The souces provided in this discussion, particularly the CBS Sports, NBC Sports, and Sporting News articles each cover the list as a grouping for WP:NLIST to be met. Let'srun (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The strongest arguments thus far are for a merger or a trimmed version, but I'm simply not seeing consensus on any of the options. Given the specific options proposed, it would be useful for future !voters to engage with them specifically.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- I frankly don't think "Quarterback beat all teams but three" (or four) merits mention in an encyclopedia at all. I would merge everything above two into quarterback records. However, given the size of List of NFL individual records, and the key role played by quarterbacks in the game, I would split out a separate List of NFL quarterback records. BD2412 T 20:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- That is an arbitrary cutoff not supported by the sportswriters. Guys who are at 31 are mentioned, if at all, merely in passing and not as a group. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Clarityfiend: It is certainly less arbitrary than the current situation, with up to four teams listed. For reasons set forth in the discussion above, it makes sense to list those who have only failed to defeat one team because that will include those who spent their entire career with the one team that was therefore not defeated. It is no burden on the encyclopedia to list those who have defeated all but two teams just the same. BD2412 T 18:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete In my view, the fact that there is a sports news article every time someone newly meets one of this article's criteria isn't enough to establish WP:NLIST; they all just fall under WP:ROUTINE. Obscure statistics frequently appear in ROUTINE references; we can still take an intellectual assessment of the arbitrariness or cruftiness of the list and decide that it's not worthy of encyclopedic record. Aspirex (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ROUTINE is a guideline connected to events, which doesn't apply here. Let'srun (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Wedding announcements, sports scores, crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine." Coverage about statistical marks being broken in the moment can very much be interpreted as falling under sports scores routine. Aspirex (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ROUTINE is a guideline connected to events, which doesn't apply here. Let'srun (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- You're kidding, right? How can quarterback win records ever be construed as sports scores? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I also want to make sure to note this is clearly, clearly not WP:ROUTINE. It's a list of statistics which have been covered by many different outlets. SportingFlyer T·C 01:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- You're kidding, right? How can quarterback win records ever be construed as sports scores? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I still do not see a consensus here. My instinct is to go with the Merge suggestion but there are quite a few editors arguing strongly for a Keep so I'm relisting this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Amongst the differing views for this AfD, I see the rationale for deletion and keep being solid. However, that happens with WP:TRIVIA. This is trivia that may or may not cross the GNG threshold. I do not think the merge target really works since the record for
Most NFL teams defeated at least once, career
is already there, but at the same time deleting for the sake of cruft or lack of GNG may work. That being said, perhaps a no consensus may be what is determined. I would rather this article be trimmed, and written to fit some other obscure stats that probably have GNG. Conyo14 (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)- Simply put, there are enough articles on it from a variety of different sources to make it eligible for a stand-alone article. If there needs to be a merge or editorial discussion, that can happen elsewhere. SportingFlyer T·C 00:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is quite clearly trivia from my perspective and the one possible notable portion is someone having beaten all teams but the one they played for. Sites often mention trivia, it doesn't make it notable to just be a fun fact. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per TRIVIA,
A trivia section is one that contains a disorganized and unselective collection of facts or examples.
This is clearly not the case here, it's clearly a very discriminate statistic. SportingFlyer T·C 03:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)- I'm glad that is only an opinion. I do not wish to vote on this one simply due to how this article is written and open-ended the sources are. Conyo14 (talk) 07:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SportingFlyer: Regardless of any Wiki policy or writing, this is pretty clearly just a "fun fact" / trivia. It's not something anybody actually cares about or notes in a serious capacity. It's not an accolade that's added to player record or info sections. It's just something that you go "huh, neat" to any move on from. You know why? Because wins are a team stat, not something specific to quarterbacks. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Again, opinions are not policy. SportingFlyer T·C 19:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- I could see keeping the article as "List of NFL quarterbacks who defeated every team" and trimming it to those quarterbacks and possibly those who defeated all but one (since if you played only for one team you obviously couldn't beat that team and I have no doubt that there would be sources that such quaterbacks defeated every other team). But how is something like "quarterbacks who defeated all but four teams" anything but OR? Rlendog (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's an editorial argument, not a notability argument. I wouldn't have any problem with trimming the list. SportingFlyer T·C 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't understand why we would need a whole article for two stats when it could go in the List of NFL individual records. Conyo14 (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's an editorial argument, not a notability argument. I wouldn't have any problem with trimming the list. SportingFlyer T·C 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I could see keeping the article as "List of NFL quarterbacks who defeated every team" and trimming it to those quarterbacks and possibly those who defeated all but one (since if you played only for one team you obviously couldn't beat that team and I have no doubt that there would be sources that such quaterbacks defeated every other team). But how is something like "quarterbacks who defeated all but four teams" anything but OR? Rlendog (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Again, opinions are not policy. SportingFlyer T·C 19:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per TRIVIA,
- This is quite clearly trivia from my perspective and the one possible notable portion is someone having beaten all teams but the one they played for. Sites often mention trivia, it doesn't make it notable to just be a fun fact. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Simply put, there are enough articles on it from a variety of different sources to make it eligible for a stand-alone article. If there needs to be a merge or editorial discussion, that can happen elsewhere. SportingFlyer T·C 00:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think this qualifies for a third relisting. There seems to be a weak consensus against keeping this as a standalone article (despite some editors presenting legitimate evidence for notability) but definitely not a consensus for deletion and no consensus on how to handle some degree of merging. Closing this as no consensus seems like closing against consensus and so perhaps a third relist will provide clarity on a merge/rename/plan.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Deletion review
editComment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.
- None
Files proposed for deletion
edit- None
Templates for deletion
edit- None
Categories
edit- None
Baseball
editArticles for deletion
edit- Chad Chop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
He's a career minor league baseball player who later got low-profile jobs with a couple of Major League teams, neither accomplishment being notable. Sourcing is wholly inadequate. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Baseball, and California. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: While he was more than a minor league player, the other roles are largely in the periphery, part of the "back offices" that make a baseball team work. Batting practice pitcher is not notable, nor is video replay analyst. This is about the only sourcing I can find directly about this individual [8]. What's in the article is either a primary source, or secondary coverage where this person is mentioned. Oaktree b (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that the topic fails WP:GNG. Countless individuals have played in the minor leagues and been on the staff of MLB teams. Chad Chop doesn't seem to stand out in any notable way. Some of the sources aren't even about him but merely mention him incidentally. Tepkunset (talk) 17:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Do not comment on these articles here. If you agree with the proposed deletion, you don't have to do anything. If you think the article merits keeping, the remove the {{prod}} template and make an effort to improve the article so that it clearly meets the notability and verifiability criteria.
Templates for discussion
editCategories for discussion
editRequested moves
edit
Basketball
edit- Dutch Gaitley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV of this assistant basketball coach. JTtheOG (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Basketball, and Pennsylvania. JTtheOG (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sydney Comets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redirect to NBL1 East as I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Australia. JTtheOG (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Canberra Nationals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redirect to NBL1 East as I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 20:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Australia. JTtheOG (talk) 20:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- List of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers head coaches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a contested bold merge, so I am seeking an AfD consensus to redirect of this page to Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers#Head coaches. There is no independent secondary source coverage of this basketball team's head coaches as a subject, thus failing WP:NLIST, and the content is easily contained in the target article, thus failing the test for a standalone page under WP:GNG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Basketball, and Taiwan. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- The articles of head coaches in NBA teams are still created for recording the coaches' record and achievement. Does these articles also need to coverage as a subject of these basketball teams articles? Or removing the subject of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers#Head coaches and not deleting List of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers head coaches will be the better way to record the information? 安狄 (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- You've offered no evidence that this subject clears WP:NLIST. Wikipedia is not a place for
recording the coaches' record and achievement
since it is WP:NOTDATABASE. The only way this can be a standalone article is if there is significant coverage of these coaches as a group. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC) - Reinforcing what Dclemens said, emphasizing, Wikipedia is about being anclyclopedia, covering enclyclopedic topics via enclyclopedic articles. So creating 'record" of anything is not per se an objective not a rationale for the existence of an article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- You've offered no evidence that this subject clears WP:NLIST. Wikipedia is not a place for
Delete (or re-direct would also be OK) Does not meet wikipedia's requirements for existence of a separate article based on wp:notability, wp:not and list guidelines. I did a merge to the team article during NPP and it was reversed. I suggest a delete rather than a re-direct but a re-direct would also be OK. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Merge as its content differs from that of Hsinchu Toplus Lioneers#Head coaches. Merging would allow the written paragraph content to be kept in the new section. LemonberryPie (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Inner West Bulls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redirect to NBL1 East as I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Australia. JTtheOG (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Savannah Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable former college basketball player (only appeared to play off the bench for ~3 seasons). Fails WP:GNG as notability WP:NOTINHERITED from Chris Christian (father). Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sports, Basketball, and Texas. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Was unable to find anything of significance during a search og Google and Newspapers.com. Her basketball career doesn't indicate any likelihood of her having received any significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 10:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable, fails significant coverage criteria and, as has already been pointed out above, notability is not inherited so who her father is does not matter for these purposes
- Shrug02 (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Proposed deletions
editCategories
editfor occasional archiving
Bodybuilding
edit
Boxing
editArticles for deletion
editProposed deletions
editCategories
editCricket
editArticles for deletion
edit- List of cricket writers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This list does nothing that Category:Cricket writers doesn't do as well, plus the category is much more complete. Furthermore, looking at Category:Lists of writers and Lists of writers, I don't see lists for any other sport. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I.m.o. since there is the Category:Cricket writers this list is not really necessary. Lotje (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Lists of people, and Cricket. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: having a category isn't a reason to delete a list, but as for this one; it fails WP:NLIST. Vestrian24Bio 05:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Euro T20 Slam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
The tournament is defunct without holding one season and in January 2025 it was replaced by the European T20 Premier League WP:GNG. Csknp (Talk) 14:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 5. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete.It's already mentioned at European T20 Premier League, and nothing more is needed. Athel cb (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, Ireland, Netherlands, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Merge with European T20 Premier League, the ties don't seem super strong, but it seems (at least according to this RTÉ article) that the new league - which doesn't have as much information is available on the Euro T20 Slam page - is a somewhat direct successor of Euro T20 Slam. While I don't think it's noteworthy to have a standalone page, it is noteworthy enough to be included in its successor page. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 11:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per Epluribusunumyall. Vestrian24Bio 01:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to European T20 Premier League#History. No merge is required as it is explained there already (and we don't need a detailed list of every cancellation at that article). Joseph2302 (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect as per @Joseph2302
- Shrug02 (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Merge. These articles provide a shared history. No need to waste that. gidonb (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Traveen Mathew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable cricketer, who fails WP:GNG. Has only played in T10 cricket, not any FC, List A or T20 competition which can often help increase significant coverage. This article was moved to draftspace and then moved back despite minimal insufficient improvements, which is why this AFD is necessary. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Cricket, and Sri Lanka. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep He has played two First Class matches, 12 List A matches and four T20 matches. He also represented Sri Lanka at the Under-19s Asian Cup. I have added more information and sources including two from The Papare which focus heavily on him. Lookslikely (Talk 18:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- i have added further information and another reference which features him as the main focus and in the article title. From my reading of the GNG rules this addition, along with the ones I previously made and are mentioned above, mean this article definitely passes the required SIG COV specification. Lookslikely (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the improvements, but I'm still not convinced he is notable, so I wish to continue this AFD to get consensus. Of the sources, [9], [10] are passing mentions in tournament squad lists, [11] is one paragraph of basic stats, [12] is from SLC so not independent coverage (and so does not contribute to WP:GNG, [13] is a match report with a bit of basic information about him. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I tried. Lookslikely (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the improvements, but I'm still not convinced he is notable, so I wish to continue this AFD to get consensus. Of the sources, [9], [10] are passing mentions in tournament squad lists, [11] is one paragraph of basic stats, [12] is from SLC so not independent coverage (and so does not contribute to WP:GNG, [13] is a match report with a bit of basic information about him. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- i have added further information and another reference which features him as the main focus and in the article title. From my reading of the GNG rules this addition, along with the ones I previously made and are mentioned above, mean this article definitely passes the required SIG COV specification. Lookslikely (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep He has played two First Class matches, 12 List A matches and four T20 matches. He also represented Sri Lanka at the Under-19s Asian Cup. I have added more information and sources including two from The Papare which focus heavily on him. Lookslikely (Talk 18:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2019 European Cricket League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- 2022 European Cricket League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Don't need separate season articles for this minor cricket tournament, all of the reasons for merge and redirecting 2023 and 2024 seasons (2023 AFD and 2024 AFD) apply to the 2019 and 2022 seasons as well. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, and Spain. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep as both do have WP:SIGCOV from a number of international sources for them. They also fulfil WP:GNG therefore should not be deleted. Furthermore the rationales for the other seasons being deleted are not relevant to these two as 2024's ruling was on the grounds of no RS's (which the two here have loads of) and 2023's was on the grounds of a lack of SIGCOV (which both here have several demonstratively) and for being poorly source (see above for why that's not relevant here as both are well sourced). As an aside as well, AFD is the wrong forum to be proposing a merge. That's what WP:PM is for. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Merge: no need for stand-alone season articles. Vestrian24Bio 01:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Louis Balmain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still fails NATH. JayCubby 09:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and New Zealand. JayCubby 09:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. As well as outlining an unusually successful brief cricket career for the period, when complete team innings seldom reached three figures, the article provides a sound basis and incentive for future expansion. It is informative and interesting as far as it goes, and it is as worst harmless. Sammyrice (talk) 09:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Lack of significant coverage. A 1-match career is notable only in the most exceptional of cases. Geschichte (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment the length of career cannot be relied upon to provide an indication of the notability of the career of a sportsperson. This has been discussed a number of times, both in relation to cricket and other sports, and formed at least some of the discussion around the revision to NSPORTS a couple of years ago. A variety of quantifiable limits were proposed at various times and non were deemed to be acceptable. Balmain's notability rests with whether to not he is notable, nothing else.
- In this case, there is clearly some notability and some sources exist which tell us things about him. I suspect that there are more – I'm not certain where McCarron has found him to be a soldier from, but that would indicate that other sources can be presumed to exist. Are those sources enough to show notability? Not sure – there are other passing references to him in PapersPast, including some nice little quotes, but the limited amount of time he appears to have spent in New Zealand means that there aren't many. Fwiw, I declined the initial PROD, partly because I wasn't awfully happy that the nomination had been made seriously, partly because I wasn't sure that a search of PapersPast had taken place, and partly because I wanted to work on List of Nelson representative cricketers, which now exists. That provides an obvious ATD, allowing the article to be redirected to there if it's considered not to be notable. Much of the prose content of the article could be the basis for a note applied to Balmain' list entry, rather like the notes added at List of Otago representative cricketers, for example. Certainly redirection would appear to be the worst case outcome. I can see merit in keep; I don't see a reason to delete given the ATD. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Nelson representative cricketers. I found this article interesting and searched for some time to try and find content to bolster it but alas without success. Purely on a policy basis it probably fails the significant coverage test but I would prefer to follow @Blue Square Thing in their suggestion of redirecting with the prose content added as a note on the target page.
- Shrug02 (talk) 22:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Per Sammyrice. Good sourcing for now, would be surprised if more didn't exist. AA (talk) 20:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak keep almost notable and if we give it more time to develop then it will pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 16:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete good sourcing, seriously? One source is database which is behind a paywall. Another is a news article from 1881 which doesn't mention the subject. The book is just a one line mention and in no way SIGCOV. The remaining sources are WP:ANCESTRY.
- I don't know how one might expect this to develop if you give it more time. The guy died over a century ago and no SIGCOV appears to exist. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Proposed merge candidates
editProposed deletion candidates
editCue sports
edit- Ashley Wright (snooker player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notable success in pro game. Very short career. Fails GNG. Canary757 (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cue sports, and England. Canary757 (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Johl Younger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG and SPORTBASIC. Canary757 (talk) 17:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cue sports, and Australia. Canary757 (talk) 17:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails basic GNG. Should not be included here, if not drafted properly with good sources. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 19:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jenson Kendrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Snooker player who fails GNG and SPORTBASIC, No notable success during short career. Canary757 (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cue sports, and England. Canary757 (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to 2022 Q School as ATD.
- Shrug02 (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)- Delete per nom
- Firecat93 (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Cycling
edit- Gaudreau brothers cycling incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:REDUNDANTFORK of Johnny Gaudreau#Death. The Kip (contribs) 06:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey, Sportspeople, Crime, and New Jersey. The Kip (contribs) 06:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, the Johnny Gaudreau article already covers the incident in enough detail, no need for a stand alone article. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Johnny Gaudreau#Death per nom. The main article has more detail than this one Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Johnny Gaudreau#Death: Per nom, there is no reason for a WP:REDUNDANTFORK. Let'srun (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Let'srun (talk) 14:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Johnny Gaudreau#Death per nom. Definitely no need to provide an article that has fewer details than the main. Conyo14 (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Cycling Proposed deletions
editDeletion Review
edit- For American football, see WikiProject Deletion sorting/American football
Primary listing for deletion nominations is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves. Items may be cross-listed here to allow automated archiving. (as of 2007-11-22)
Football
edit- Birkelbach Field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
High school/low-level college football stadium with no indication of notability. A possible redirect target is Southwestern Pirates football. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football, Football, and Texas. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject appears to lack the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Considering this stadium is the home for multiple teams, I oppose a redirect. Let'srun (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find anything that gets us to GNG, though it's not impossible - it's a 12,000 seat high school football/lower division college football stadium, so there may be coverage in newspapers I didn't uncover. SportingFlyer T·C 01:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Southwestern Pirates football - Subject fails GNG due to lack of SIGCOV. This is the most notable tenant (as a college and not a high school) so it makes the most sense as a target. However, a retargeting discussion can take place if others believe a different article makes more sense. Having multiple good redirect targets is not a valid reason to delete instead of redirect. Frank Anchor 02:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mishbah Al-Mashuri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Indonesian footballer appears to fail WP:GNG/WP:NSPORT; I can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this player (searching under both "Mishbah" and "Misbah"). Only stats pages, routine match coverage and brief transfer coverage is coming up. If you find anything else please ping me. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Indonesia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 21:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 07:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Josh Hallard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously signed to League Two side AFC Wimbledon, now playing regional football with Three Bridges. Never made a league appearance, the highest level they played was Tier 6, and unsurprisingly coverage is WP:ROUTINE not WP:SIGCOV. CNC (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. CNC (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 21:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- James Armson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:PROD was overturned as User:Telfordbuck said that the player had not played in a professional league, which User:Spiderone removed, interpreting it as a reference to the defunct WP:NFOOTY. I've seen hundreds of articles made by User:Das osmnezz, and what I've noticed is that they are often vague on why a player should be considered notable and seem to put the WP:BURDEN on others to do the legwork and investigate minor figures. What we've got from the page is that a local newspaper considered him one of the most important players at the mighty Nuneaton Borough, then he signed for Solihull Moors, then one season later Brackley Town. He won the FA Trophy at Brackley, a competition for teams in the fifth to eighth levels of English football. A handicap tournament excluding the best 92 teams. No sources have been provided for if he was an exceptional individual part of that success. I think we need exceptional coverage to establish notability for someone whose highest level of football was the fifth level, and who has spent the last decade in the sixth. That hasn't been provided and I can't find it. There's BBC coverage of a hat-trick against Gillingham, [14] a bigger but not exactly massive club, in 2016 but surely that's WP:BLP1E as 15 minutes of fame in an ordinary career. BBC local radio (not national) have this article on a man of the same name in the local area who runs a youth charity, but it doesn't identify him as a footballer, and I don't think social workers asking for donations pass WP:GNG [15] Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Plus if we are going on the logic he was an exceptional player at his previous club, that is obviously open to interpretation based on the observer.
- If that is the case, where do we stop? You could have thousands of pages created but would not be kept up to date. This one is an example as he moved to AFC Telford over 6 months ago.
- Telfordbuck (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 21:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - Clearly significant player in English lower leagues with sources and the youth charity person is the same person as the footballer. Telfordbuck's logic does not make sense because most players who played their career in non-league do not have much sources. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Plays at a minor level, we need extensive sourcing... One decent article, the rest are simply confirmation of charity work or the like. I don't see notability, based on the lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Paolo Rossi (footballer, born 1982) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This AfD might be the same issue as Juan Alberto Ramírez that was nominated back in November. Even by searching for his name in combination of clubs he played for, I did not find any significant coverage of Paolo Rossi (footballer, born 1982) to meet WP:GNG. He only played one match for Torino in 2001/02 season, one of the professional football clubs in Italy, before moving to amateur leagues then disappeared for over two decades. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Italy. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak keep – The fact that he is a homonym hinders the search, but it is still possible to confirm the athlete's career at the first levels of Italian football. [16], [17], [18]. Svartner (talk) 18:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Sources above from Svartner are 2 x database and 1 x profile from the league he played in. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 21:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- ilcalcio provides detailed information, but I agree that more informative sources are missing. Svartner (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Kyoya Yamada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kyoya Yamada has recently retired (https://www.fagiano-okayama.com/news/202412281600/), and so with four J2 appearances, unfortunately fails GNG RossEvans19 (talk) 02:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Might be coverage in JP sources, but I can't find any coverage we can use, not much of anything really. Does not meet notability. The one link used now in the article isn't enough. Oaktree b (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep see Asahi Shimbun, Mainichi Shimbun and probably the bunch of coverage from Sanyo Shimbun and I suggest a translation of ja:山田恭也 (I don't know football). Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 06:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – Per sources presented by Miminity. Svartner (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per sources above which (AGF) appear to show notability. GiantSnowman 18:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I'm glad I thought to Afd this as I was unsure if this was notable. Will add these sources when I get a moment. Thank you to Miminity for the sources! User:RossEvans19 talk 20:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oleksiy Zenchenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Like others from this same team, I can't find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV on this player. The article is WP:REFBOMBed, but nothing meets the standards of WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Artem Lutchenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only thing I can find is this, which is about (maybe?) him as a national guardsman and mentions exactly nothing about his football career—indeed, it's not entirely clear that this is even the same guy as the footballer. Otherwise, there appears to be no WP:SIGCOV about him as a footballer. Anwegmann (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jozef Brudňak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Brudňak only played 21 football matches before disappearing in 2013. He later became a pastry chef, a job that is hardly notable in my opinion. Regarding secondary sources, I found SME but it doesn't seem to be enough. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 12:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 12:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ted Collins (footballer, born 2003) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One EFL league match. Fails GNG, routine articles only Canary757 (talk) 12:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. Canary757 (talk) 12:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – He never played at professional level so I don't see it as a potential draft. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Colchester are a pro club but its one league game only.Canary757 (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 21:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Genki Ishisaka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously deleted at AFD. Doesn't meet WP:SPORTCRIT or WP:GNG this time either. Japanese Wikipedia only contains primary sources, a squad list and a blog piece. Creator is globally locked. Geschichte (talk) 08:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and SALT - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Max Glasser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Am I missing something here? I can find a lot of announcements and "local" coverage, either from USL, FC Naples, or UC Davis, but there doesn't seem to be any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but still seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Draftify/Merge - I had created Draft:Max Glasser back in 2023 (relevant to this discussion it was moved back to draft space in March 2023) but no one had edited it since August 2024. It seems that the creator of this article may have missed the draft article, so while this version we're commenting on can't technically be moved back into the draft space as it didn't exist there previously as far as I can tell, I do think that merging this draft with the preexisting one to be fleshed out with more content and most importantly more independent sources would be for the best. Christiangamer7 (talk) 07:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I would support draftifying this article. Shmego (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future. GiantSnowman 20:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Draftify – Per above. Svartner (talk) 03:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Draftify: Per above, not yet notable and there is a draft already. CNC (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Miche-Naider Chéry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Several searches have not uncovered any WP:SIGCOV of this player. None of the sources cited in the article meet those standards as well. This player, then, seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Haiti. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question - Is coverage from fox sports not enough coverage? Shmego (talk) 14:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GiantSnowman not sure if this qualifies for WP:SIGCOV but this: Chery on target as Violette make history vs. Austin FC comes from the CONCACAF website and details his goals and performance in one game. Only problem is, it's one game Shmego (talk) 21:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not SIGCOV to me. GiantSnowman 21:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GiantSnowman not sure if this qualifies for WP:SIGCOV but this: Chery on target as Violette make history vs. Austin FC comes from the CONCACAF website and details his goals and performance in one game. Only problem is, it's one game Shmego (talk) 21:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jake Lent-Koop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Everything that comes up, both in searches and in the references, is either WP:LOCAL or databases/signing announcements. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 03:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and New Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Arsenal Women 2–3 Wolfsburg Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of this article does not meet WP:NSPORTSEVENT (the specific notability guideline for a single match) nor any general notability guidelines. This is because it is not an individually notable match in itself, as just one of a series of knockout games in regular competition, and because it does not appear to have much media coverage that is not WP:ROUTINE. It therefore does not meet any of the four criteria for NSPORTSEVENT, and the lack of non-primary sourcing prevents it from meeting GNG. Kingsif (talk) 03:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Still holds the record as the match with the biggest attendance in women's club football on English soil. I added some non-routine coverage. --Lyndis Parlour (talk) 06:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Lyndis Parlour: The sources you have linked (without actually adding any article content, just the sources) are, top to bottom: a non-RS that is a player interview mentioning the game in passing (see SIGCOV), an Arsenal fan blog than lauds the game's attendance (see SPS), and a simple list of match attendance figures (see DATABASE). None of these are suitable for use in the article (which I think you actually know, just putting them in as external links), let alone establishing notability. Kingsif (talk) 08:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. I was waiting for someone to try and present notability-establishing sources; the article's advocate has made an attempt but seems to know they can't. Kingsif (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Football, Germany, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- This match is very notable and represents a historic moment in the history of women's football in England. This is also reflected in the links and references provided with the article that comment from a range of reputable sources. The article was written to detail the history and to provide information about the game both from UEFA, media outlets and players to provide historical context to the events that occurred. I have now added even more links. This game is far more significant than any standard game of football and any consideration that is isn't suggests that that person is not well informed on women's football - a chronically underreported sport and poorly represented on Wikipedia. Which of the reference sources from itv, ESPN, the Guardian, the New York Times, and BBC sport aren't considered notable by @Kingsif? As noted in this "Some games or series are likely or almost certain to be considered notable, including but not limited to the following:" the list given are just examples. In the history of Women's football, this game is a match of note. The coverage alone makes that clear. The quotes from the players about the match also made that clear but they were deleted from the article. Notability is often so subjective with articles on this platform and too many people have an agenda to devalue perfectly notable articles because of their subject matter. Perhaps @Kingsif is not familiar with what is considered routine coverage at this point in time in the women's game to note the difference. Evmoon (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- You do not have any sources that say the match either
represents a historic moment in the history of women's football in England
oris far more significant than any standard game of football
. UEFA match reports, and match reports from RS outlets, are still WP:ROUTINE coverage, which I implore you to actually read and understand before asserting that others don't know what routine coverage is. What you personally think is notable is not the same as Wikipedia's notability guidelines. - Stop with the bad faith accusations. There is a difference between making sure we create and maintain N-compliant articles focused on women's topics and (something too many people try to do now:) making stubby articles about non-notable women's topics just to boost the quantity without care for quality, overall harming the intention of gender parity in Wikipedia coverage.
- As this discussion is about N-compliant sources, I will assess the sources you have added. These three; two for saying the match was the first time Arsenal W.F.C. had sold out the main stadium (TBF, a logical assumption) - one of these being a press release from the club itself (see PRIMARY) - and the other a passing mention that due to ticket sales in this and other matches, the main stadium would continue to be used. Look, I am sure it is possible to find the minimum of three non-routine, non-SPS, SIGCOV, RS sources about the match if you really try. The question is to ask yourself: does this a standalone article warrant. Or is the actual notable content that can be gleaned from those sources simply better suited as a "they set the attendance record for a women's club football game in England and sold out the Emirates" mention at the 2022–23 Arsenal W.F.C. season article. Kingsif (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- You do not have any sources that say the match either
- This match is very notable and represents a historic moment in the history of women's football in England. This is also reflected in the links and references provided with the article that comment from a range of reputable sources. The article was written to detail the history and to provide information about the game both from UEFA, media outlets and players to provide historical context to the events that occurred. I have now added even more links. This game is far more significant than any standard game of football and any consideration that is isn't suggests that that person is not well informed on women's football - a chronically underreported sport and poorly represented on Wikipedia. Which of the reference sources from itv, ESPN, the Guardian, the New York Times, and BBC sport aren't considered notable by @Kingsif? As noted in this "Some games or series are likely or almost certain to be considered notable, including but not limited to the following:" the list given are just examples. In the history of Women's football, this game is a match of note. The coverage alone makes that clear. The quotes from the players about the match also made that clear but they were deleted from the article. Notability is often so subjective with articles on this platform and too many people have an agenda to devalue perfectly notable articles because of their subject matter. Perhaps @Kingsif is not familiar with what is considered routine coverage at this point in time in the women's game to note the difference. Evmoon (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete The fact that's it's the best attended women's football match in England would be a reason to mention that in a list article about attendences if one existed. However, it does not make the match itself automatically notable as some people above are trying to do. No WP:SUSTAINED coverage, so doesn't need a separate article. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- FYI List of women's association football attendance records - which actually shows that two more recent club matches in England had larger attendance, too. The record is currently held by Chelsea F.C. Women and Manchester United W.F.C. Kingsif (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject does not meet WP:NSPORTSEVENT nor WP:GNG due to a lack of coverage. Let'srun (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have added more sources to demonstrate the coverage. It is also worth noting that there is not a black and white rule for the specific notability guideline for a single match (WP:NSPORTSEVENT). Considering the historic lack of coverage of some topics over others, careful judgement must be used when considering impact. Such a sporting event should be considered in the context of the competition it is in (this case the UWCL), the history of the sport/the event/ and the country it occurred in. In this case this match represented a record for the club, the competition in the UK and an attendance record in the UK for all of Women's football at the time it occurred. It was a significant event that had consequences for subsequent matches and the business of women's football beyond this period. The additional source demonstrate the widespread acceptance by main stream sources at the significance of this record. Evmoon (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Your "additional sources" were both published on or before (The Guardian's quote piece) the day the match was played, so I don't know where you get the boldness to say they demonstrate
widespread acceptance by main stream sources at the significance
that wasbeyond this period
. One of them just quotes the manager saying it's great they sold out, and the other is yet another match report. And please stop using AI to write your replies. You keep saying there's nothing cut-and-dry about NSPORTSEVENT, and yet even before the "it should be a final or incredibly notable" list, the guideline outright says coverage needs to be WP:SUSTAINED no matter what. I only keep replying because you do not bring sources in this discussion for them to be judged, it'd be easier for us both if you did. Kingsif (talk) 08:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)- I must say the rudeness on this platform is quite astounding. The barriers to contribute are high and people are mean. Nothing on this page has been made up and AI was not used to write the reply. You really need to check your assumptions. Every example you give is still a subjective metric. Evmoon (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Your "additional sources" were both published on or before (The Guardian's quote piece) the day the match was played, so I don't know where you get the boldness to say they demonstrate
- I have added more sources to demonstrate the coverage. It is also worth noting that there is not a black and white rule for the specific notability guideline for a single match (WP:NSPORTSEVENT). Considering the historic lack of coverage of some topics over others, careful judgement must be used when considering impact. Such a sporting event should be considered in the context of the competition it is in (this case the UWCL), the history of the sport/the event/ and the country it occurred in. In this case this match represented a record for the club, the competition in the UK and an attendance record in the UK for all of Women's football at the time it occurred. It was a significant event that had consequences for subsequent matches and the business of women's football beyond this period. The additional source demonstrate the widespread acceptance by main stream sources at the significance of this record. Evmoon (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: - Fails both WP:NSPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG. One of a number of matches that held attendance records for a relatively short while. I don't see any evidence that it was
a significant event that had consequences for subsequent matches and the business of women's football beyond this period
but rather it was an illustration of the rapid increase in popularity of womens football. --John B123 (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Rachid Ghanimi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been rejected as a draft and deleted already. This its third incarnation, and I still can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this player. The player still appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NOLYMPICS. It was deleted as WP:TOOSOON but then he won an Olympic medal. StAnselm (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Haven't searched for sources yet, but note that he passes WP:NOLYMPICS as a medalist at the 2024 Summer Olympics; he'd be the sole 2024 medalist without an article, I think, if deleted. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I note the French article has 26 references - we can safely assume there are lots of sources in Arabic. This is precisely why we have WP:NOLYMPICS. StAnselm (talk) 03:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Haven't done a comprehensive review of the Arabic sources, but the references I viewed didn't contain any WP:SIGCOV of Ghanimi specifically. While the subject was on the team for the Olympics and won a medal, he didn't appear in any matches from what I can tell. Still undecided here. Let'srun (talk) 03:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Olympics. Let'srun (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – This time is enough WP:SIGCOV to estabilish the article. Svartner (talk) 04:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - per above. Shmego (talk) 14:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per arguments above which show notability. GiantSnowman 20:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Passes WP:NOLY. - The9Man Talk 14:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jacob Randolph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only thing approaching WP:SIGCOV that I could find is this, but it is from the student newspaper of one of his colleges, and it was published while he was a student at UNC–Wilmington. So it is WP:LOCAL. As a result, this player appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Louisiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - This player made a professional debut, had a notable college career, and has just extended his contract with his current club. I feel like deleting this would be unfair. Shmego (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per WP:NSPORTS2022, making a professional debut is meaningless toward notability and so is a college career. Anwegmann (talk) 23:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't participating in said discussion, but have to say the reason to reject automatic notability is because not all generations of football players receive significant coverage, even if they play(ed) at professional level. This might be just a theory. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a bad theory, and I think you're right, but it doesn't change the fact that a player simply making his/her professional debut without accompanying WP:SIGCOV fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't participating in said discussion, but have to say the reason to reject automatic notability is because not all generations of football players receive significant coverage, even if they play(ed) at professional level. This might be just a theory. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per WP:NSPORTS2022, making a professional debut is meaningless toward notability and so is a college career. Anwegmann (talk) 23:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Professional debut is irrelevant. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Greg Monroe (soccer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This player appears to fail WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Everything I could find was either passing, "local" by his college, club, or league, or database/signing announcement—nothing of significant, meaningful coverage. Anwegmann (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Michael Creek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Perhaps it's a matter of WP:TOOSOON, as he is in the beginning of his career and has seen the field a few times, but right now, he seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Missouri. Shellwood (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 04:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- All-time Tampa Bay Rowdies roster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject appears to lack notability under WP:LISTN due to a lack of sourcing. PROD was removed with the claim that this grouping is notable, but no sources have been added since so I'm bringing this to AfD. Let'srun (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Football, Lists, and Florida. Let'srun (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable for having a standalone article. Lorstaking (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Southwestern University Soccer Field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redirect to Southwestern University#Athletics. No evidence of independent notability for this NCAA Division III-level soccer field. JTtheOG (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Texas. JTtheOG (talk) 20:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 01:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect as above. GiantSnowman 20:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Southwestern University#Athletics.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect per above. Heart (talk) 03:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Roman Savchenko (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been deleted twice before. There doesn't seem to be any meaningful improvement over the last two deletions. Still appears to fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Article also appears to be a victim of WP:REFBOMBing. I suggest a WP:SALT for this one. Anwegmann (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Is Andriyrussu your alternative account? You have very similar names. It took me a few minutes to realize that this article was not created by you. SolxrgashiUnited (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. I'm a bit taken aback that you would even ask. Anwegmann (talk) 18:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- What a bizarre accusation. JoelleJay (talk) 01:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Let's stick to subject discussion. CNC (talk) 01:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Is Andriyrussu your alternative account? You have very similar names. It took me a few minutes to realize that this article was not created by you. SolxrgashiUnited (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and SALT to prevent further recreation. Oh dear... Not again... ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 16:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and salt – As GiantSnowman had already suggested in the last AfD. Lost cause. Svartner (talk) 17:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and SALT - which I suggested last time... GiantSnowman 18:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and SALT - before it comes back to haunt us again. CNC (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mikihito Arai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Restored after a previous PROD deletion. Still no evidence of a WP:GNG pass. In my own searches, I found Gekisaka and Ameba, but neither of these are sufficient. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:30, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 14:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Eduard Halstyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another Chernihiv player who appears to fail WP:GNG. Several searches in English and Ukrainian brought up nothing approaching WP:SIGCOV, and all the sources in the article are passing or database. Anwegmann (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - despite 48 appearances in the lower professional leagues of Ukraine, I can't find any SIGCOV. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Playing a few minutes, whether at top or low level, is still a weak claim to notability. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - has anyone tried searching for results by his name in Armenian? Translation gave me this: Էդուարդ Հալստյան. Google search provided around 440 results. If anyone finds a greater amount of WP:N within this search then I'd slightly lean to Keep and improve. Archives908 (talk) 15:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Using that name, I can find some decent coverage of Eduard Spertsyan but nothing about Halstyan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Didn't find any SIGCOV for GNG. CNC (talk) 21:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Andriy Veresotskyi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Likewise, this player brings up nothing approaching WP:SIGCOV in English or Ukrainian. Everything is databases or local—and even in the latter, as far as I can find, there is nothing meaningful. Fails WP:GNG, as far as I can tell. Anwegmann (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't have any SIGCOV that I can see. I found a squad list mention in Sport Arena but nothing better. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Found no coverage for GNG. CNC (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Andriy Lakeyenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Like with others, nothing meaningful came up in either English or Ukrainian searches, much less anything that hinted at WP:SIGCOV. As such, this player fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - agree with the nominator. I can find a few bits of match coverage and some 'Team of the Week' stuff but nothing that merits an article. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Found nothing notable for GNG. CNC (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- So Kataoka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP article of an athlete on Rockdale Ilinden FC that has incomplete sections. A google search yields no indication of notability. For the record, there may be a COI issue here as Tp767, who created the Thomas Petrovski article, has several edits here. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- For the record, while I am not yet nominating them for deletion, other possibly non-notable athletes on Rockdale Ilinden FC have poorly sourced articles or articles that are otherwise in bad shape that use excessive primary sources, including but not limited to Mathieu Cordier, Blake Ricciuto (decent shape but lots of unsourced info), Ricardo Rizzo, Bai Antoniou, and Alec Urosevski (decent shape but lots of primary sources). KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 16:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Kyle Morrison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is only WP:ROUTINE coverage and last years signining to Solihill Moors documented in Solihull Observer as WP:BLP1E, there is no WP:SIGCOV for WP:GNG. Note: Not to be confused with the Gaelic footballer of the same name. CNC (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Football, and England. CNC (talk) 16:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keitaro Koga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Retired in 2014 after 7 appearances in J3, unfortunately fails GNG RossEvans19 (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Creator is globally locked. Geschichte (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability for GNG. CNC (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hiroya Iwakabe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced BLP with no claim to notability. I found Gekisaka and Ameba, but these count for little more than database sources. No evidence of having the significant coverage for WP:GNG and doesn't seem to have kicked a ball since 2017. Japanese Wikipedia has nothing to offer. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 13:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm glad more people are looking into the heap of Japanese football substubs. Geschichte (talk) 22:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete This seems to obviously fail notability. Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: No reliable sources, fails GNG. CNC (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Tomoki Kamioka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG - has not played since 2016 RossEvans19 (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 13:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Not worth a 7 day discussion. Geschichte (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Nothing notable about this player per GNG. CNC (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fatima Kome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested draftify but with no apparent improvement. WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC both require multiple sources showing significant coverage. The only decent source that I can find is Allez Les Lions, which is a fairly standard transfer announcement regarding her move to the second French tier. I am not sure if Allez Les Lions is WP:RS as I couldn't find evidence of fact checking or professional journalism. Aside from that, I found Feca Foot, Chretiens and La Depeche, all of which are clearly trivial mentions. Since all we have is one borderline source, I can't see how this meets the notability criteria. Turkish Wikipedia had no decent coverage. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Cameroon. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 13:49, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Not enough WP:BEFORE was done especially under Fadimatou Kome for this nom as the subject is an international Cameroonian player who plays for a team in the Turkish Women's Football Super League. According to the BBC (and here and here) she competed in the Women's Africa Cup of Nations in 2022. She is mentioned in other local sources including Cameroon Tribune (here and here, here), as well as in La Dépêche du Midi (here). FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I found all of these in my searches but didn't consider them for source analysis as they are all trivial mentions, for example La Depeche is just a passing mention in a match report followed by two squad listings. Some of them are only squad list mentions, like this. I'm not subscribed to Cameroon Tribune but none of the reports look like they address Kome in any significant depth (i.e. multiple sentences about Kome). Which of these sources show SPORTBASIC is met? I'll @GiantSnowman: in any case as more sources have been added. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, which sources are meant to be significant coverage? GiantSnowman 19:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GiantSnowman and @Spiderone WP:SPORTBASIC:
Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.
. The article about the transfer is solely about her. One BBC article mentioned she received a red card during a game. There are also plenty of databases sources because she is a FIFA recognised senior international who played for Cameroon during major tournaments. I have improved the article with above sources and more. - Given her age, you might argue it’s too soon but regular international football players articles are typically kept. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability (not a policy) FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is well established that transfer coverage is considered WP:ROUTINE - and the essay you cite clearly states that it "has been superseded by WP:Notability (sports)". GiantSnowman 20:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I mentioned it is not a policy but I have never a saw an article about a senior international FIFA being deleted. I understand women football is not as popular but 19 mentions is alot of mentions even according to WP:SPORTBASIC also not sure how 19 sources are routine including 3 beloved BBC.FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Marcelino Da Costa Fernandes was deleted only a few months ago and he had 3 senior FIFA caps. Even 100 trivial mentions doesn't necessarily equal one piece of significant coverage. BBC is great but the sources are a trivial mention of getting sent off, with no further elaboration, a squad list mention and another squad list mention. None of these articles explore Kome in detail and, in each case, there are several, several other players mentioned at various points in the article. At no point is Kome singled out for special coverage. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I mentioned it is not a policy but I have never a saw an article about a senior international FIFA being deleted. I understand women football is not as popular but 19 mentions is alot of mentions even according to WP:SPORTBASIC also not sure how 19 sources are routine including 3 beloved BBC.FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- WP:NSPORTS2022 paved the way for a change in the notability criteria whereby having caps and/or playing in a professional league was no longer a 'free pass'. Since then, there have been several articles deleted in which a player has been capped. For example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Zaki, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allyson Jolicoeur, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcelino Da Costa Fernandes and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamberto Gama. Every week, footballer articles are deleted that contain nothing better than transfer announcements or match reports in which the footballer is briefly reported as scoring a goal, getting a yellow/red card, giving away a penalty etc. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I appreciate you being consistent but dismissing 19 sources as trivia and routine is a bit unfair. I also understand that players who do not play in the Western world can be hard to find sources for, unless you dig in their native language but that is why we have this debates so people can provide evidence.
- I provided 19, I will leave it to that. FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is well established that transfer coverage is considered WP:ROUTINE - and the essay you cite clearly states that it "has been superseded by WP:Notability (sports)". GiantSnowman 20:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I found all of these in my searches but didn't consider them for source analysis as they are all trivial mentions, for example La Depeche is just a passing mention in a match report followed by two squad listings. Some of them are only squad list mentions, like this. I'm not subscribed to Cameroon Tribune but none of the reports look like they address Kome in any significant depth (i.e. multiple sentences about Kome). Which of these sources show SPORTBASIC is met? I'll @GiantSnowman: in any case as more sources have been added. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2017–18 FC Chernihiv season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another season article with no prose on a season so far down the Ukrainian pyramid that it is highly unlikely to have any notability per WP:GNG. In the unlikely event that something noteworthy did actually happen in this season, it could be summarised at FC Chernihiv, which currently lacks meaningful prose. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Ukraine. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 12:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete—Clearly stated reasoning. Lacks meaningful prose and is attached to a stub article to begin with. Anwegmann (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Fail to reach WP:GNG (WP:SPORTCRIT / WP:NTEAM) criteria. QEnigma talk 18:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2018–19 FC Chernihiv season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A season 'article' with no claim to notability. Chernihiv played in an amateur, regional league during this season. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG has been presented by the article's creator. Long-term AfD consensus on Wikipedia has always been that we do not have articles on seasons at this level unless there is clear evidence of significant coverage. Even if something noteworthy did happen this season, it could easily be summarised at FC Chernihiv instead, an article that currently has almost no meaningful prose. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Ukraine. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 12:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete—Clearly stated reasoning. Lacks meaningful prose and is attached to a stub article to begin with. Anwegmann (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Fail to reach WP:GNG (WP:SPORTCRIT / WP:NTEAM) criteria. QEnigma talk 18:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Vladyslav Panko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Played only 5 minutes of football in the second tier of Ukraine before disappearing. None of the references come close to meeting WP:GNG. The best source found in my own searches was Cheline, a routine contract announcement, most of which is copied from his club's Facebook page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Ukraine. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 12:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete—Agreed on all counts. As with many Chernihiv and Chernihiv-adjacent players, this one clearly fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Can this please go through WP:PROD? Geschichte (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- It could but PROD is only a soft delete and I would prefer a hard delete. This user persistently recreates Chernihiv articles - see, for example, Oleksandr Rudenko. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Found no coverage, fails GNG. CNC (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Denis Bališ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
He only played one professional match for Spartak Trnava before disappearing over ten years ago. News sources from my search motivated him from being the son of a former footballer, falling under WP:NOTINHERITED. The articles of his football relatives (father Igor and brother Boris) also have not provided significant coverage since those were created, so if there is no consensus, I would suggest either "redirect to Igor Bališ" or "delete". ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: I did some quick research, and no sources were found to qualify him for a Wikipedia page. I did find this article, but I don't think it would make a difference. Aona1212 (talk) 00:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- That source is just a passing mention on squad list: Krakovany vs. Siladice 0–4. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect Igor Bališ appears to be a notable former Trnava player. We can simply mention that his sons Denis and Boris are also footballers in the family section of his article. Newklear007 (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Giorgi Parpalia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of meeting WP:GNG. He played 1 match in the second tier league, the Ukrainian First League, before spending the rest of his career in the second tier of Georgia. Searches in Ukrainian (Гіоргі Парпалія) and Georgian (გიორგი ფარპალია) failed to yield anything significant, which is unsurprising as he barely had a professional career. All I could find was coverage on similarly-named players, like Giorgi Papava and Giorgi Kvilitaia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Georgia (country). Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete—Agreed on all counts. As with many Chernihiv and Chernihiv-adjacent players, this one clearly fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Fail to reach WP:GNG (WP:SPORTCRIT) criteria. QEnigma talk 18:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable per GNG, found no coverage. CNC (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Théo Emmanuelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Player made one five-minute Ligue 2 appearance in 2021. I found some coverage here, transfer coverage here, and here, but no real significant coverage. Player just transferred to fourth-division side Granville at age 24. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and France. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:58, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Note: since this nomination (or the same morning at least) there has also been this press release and this passing mention. It doesn't amount to sigcov, but it might be worth draftifying with two new references this week. @Paul Vaurie @GiantSnowman CNC (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Routine transfer news of a player leaving one National club to go to another. GiantSnowman 16:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2023–24 Moldovan Youth League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Youth football season with no indication of notability. Pretty much every yearly edition of this article is sourced only to primary sources. I don't see a possible redirect target, either, as no article for the youth league itself exists. JTtheOG (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Moldova. JTtheOG (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, such stub articles are notable. The winner of this competition qualifies to Uefa competition, such articles exists also for Spain , England U18 level,and few more countries. However I completely agree, there is not enough sources, adding seconfpdary sources will be great. Kolya77 (talk) 05:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- What exists in other countries is not really relevant to the notability of this article. Are you able to provide any examples of in-depth coverage from independent sources? JTtheOG (talk) 06:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Morning, there is coverage for sure. Technicaly there are plenty news about this league on websites, social media platforms. I just did a google search and I personally found a lot of them. Matches of this U19 league are regulary on Moldovan TV named - We Sport. Also they are available on youtube platform. This is the link - https://www.fmf.md/home/competitii/juniori/liga-tineret-1723368813?menu=news
- I personally didnt add a lot of this secondary sources just because this was not my goal. The primary source was able to cover the league table and results of each season. However moldovan FA edited their website and unfortunately all the primary source until the season 2021–22 Moldovan Under-19 Division has gone.
- You pointed out the artiifle for the league itself does not exist, just to let you know im planning to make one similar to this one
- League of Ireland U19 Division , but im really short of time this days, plus is a festive period in eastern europe until 14 January.however, i will definetly make one, maybe will less words comparing to Ireland U19 league. Kolya77 (talk) 05:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- The Moldovan FA would not be an independent source, since they organize the Moldovan Youth League. Notice how the Irish article you provided is sourced to publications such as The Irish Times, the Irish Examiner, the Connacht Tribune, the Irish Independent, RTÉ.ie, the Evening Echo and The Mayo News. But yes, creating the league article is a good alternative if you were able to find independent sourcing. JTtheOG (talk) 06:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- What exists in other countries is not really relevant to the notability of this article. Are you able to provide any examples of in-depth coverage from independent sources? JTtheOG (talk) 06:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:34, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Roman Vovk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Similar to other Chernihiv players, I can't find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this player after several searches in both English and Ukrainian. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems as though this player also fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - I found Xsport, which is just a quote with no analysis, and Sport Arena, which is just confirming that he appeared in Team of the Week and has a very brief explanation of why. No real SIGCOV found in spite of the WP:REFBOMB in the article, which gives an illusion of notability. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Also didn't find any coverage when searching, also ping me if I missed anything. CNC (talk) 16:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thomas Petrovski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Almost identical to Draft:Thomas Petrovski which was declined due to a lack of sources. Creator has a clear COI, since they also created Paul Petrovski, and they appear to have a particular interest in people with this surname. CycloneYoris talk! 21:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, North Macedonia, and Australia. CycloneYoris talk! 21:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - promo article, atrociously sourced, COI issues. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi - can you please provide further details regarding it being atrociously sourced’? Tp767 (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Directory listings or other primary sources, don't help show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi - can you please provide further details regarding it being atrociously sourced’? Tp767 (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi CycloneYoris - I have added sources in the Reference Tab. Is this not sufficient enough? They are from official sporting organisations. Tp767 (talk) 00:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- For a BLP article especially, the subject must be covered in-depth by multiple in-depth secondary, independent, reliable sources. See WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:N for more information. The editing must also be done by neutral editors with no connection to the subject. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 12:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - several sections completely unreferenced and fails WP:SPORTBASIC. Footballer is a semi-pro. Every single reference provided thus far is a database source like Transfermarkt, Sofascore, Flashscore and Tuttocampo with zero prose coverage. I was unable to find any news articles on Thomas Petrovski in a WP:BEFORE search. The article is filled with WP:OR from top to bottom and the creator has failed to respond to requests to disclose WP:UPE and/or WP:COI. Strong delete. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 00:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi - I've just added additional sources to justify the pending requests. They're primary sources that give a definitive response to my profile - player and character. Could you please confirm if this is sufficient enough and if not give me a better answer then 'denied' Tp767 (talk) 03:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please read Wikipedia's policies including WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:N. These sources do not establish notability of the subject. Also read WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI as well. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is very important - if you are Thomas Petrovski or are a close associate of his, please declare your conflict of interest and refrain from doing any direct edits to this article. You may suggest edit requests through the talk page or perform an uncontroversial edit per WP:COI. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 04:30, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi - I've just added additional sources to justify the pending requests. They're primary sources that give a definitive response to my profile - player and character. Could you please confirm if this is sufficient enough and if not give me a better answer then 'denied' Tp767 (talk) 03:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also see WP:BLPSELFPUB - an article should NOT be based primarily on self-published sources like your own website, Transfermarkt, FlashScore etc. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: No sourcing found in Google or Gnews, what's now in the article is only directory listings or primary sources. Non-notable player. Oaktree b (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Great looking photo, but still fails in GNG, SIGCOV, and SPORTBASIC. CNC (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't normally wade into sports-related discussions, but the argument that the creator didn't even know we had rules is untenable. In 2025, everyone knows that Wikipedia had a problem with poor quality, autobiographies, and hoaxes that caused us to create a bunch of rules, policies, and guidelines. Bearian (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Saber Hassanpour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. JTtheOG (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Iran. JTtheOG (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Didn't find any SIGCOV. CNC (talk) 15:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hayato Nishinoue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Falls short of WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Only played 2 minutes in Japan's third league, which is very far from notable. Article has been expanded but I don't believe the coverage meets WP:SIGCOV, which I will outline here. Source assessment:
- The longest, but I believe it is not secondary. It has wording like ""During my university days, I worked part-time"
- Primary source
- Primary source
- Primary source
- Very short, not significant
- Literally one sentence, not significant
- Don't think this is very significant either, describes the game on an amateur level
- Not about him, WP:PASSING
- Database
- Database
- Database Geschichte (talk) 15:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Japan, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Re your own source assessment. The first source is a LONG profile on him, and is definitely a secondary source, the “I” in the automatic translation is reported speech from inside quotes given to the journalist as part of the article (which is not an interview either, those are specific quotations, not part of a longer question and answer session/transcript). The seventh source is likewise a two page profile specifically on him (not sure if you noticed that was page 2 of two, separated by hyperlinks at the bottom of the page), whether you think the intellectual standard of the analysis in the article is up to snuff, the article itself is inarguably a SIGCOV worthy source, being an independent secondary source focused solely on the subject of the article. This[19] source looks likely to be significant too, being billed as a serialised special feature on those three players specifically… though I can’t get through the paywall to be 100% sure. Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mathis Touré (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable footballer and former child actor. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NSPORT with maybe only a single piece of WP:SIGCOV, a blog/commentary piece in a Corsican paper. The rest is routine transfer coverage. Fails WP:NACTOR with only one role that could be described as significant (the coverage of it is all trivial mentions). Please ping me if I missed anything. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Sportspeople, Football, and France. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- soft delete The person doesn't appear notable. Agree with nominators notices.
- Taksoh17 (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Corse-Matin is an established daily newspaper founded in 1944. Are regional newspapers insufficient sources anywhere in the world or only in certain regions? Also, there is only one article that could be described as transfer-related, not multiple as the phrasing might suggest. ash (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep He's made the French U19 team (sport) and his film role (acting) was as one of two principal characters around which the story is centered in a popular French comedy. While each career individually might not meet the strictest interpretation of WP:NSPORT or WP:NACTOR, his combined achievements demonstrate impact across multiple fields of public life. ash (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Vladimír Balát (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Balát played 114 minutes of professional league before transferring to lower leagues and disappearing. Other than two dead references provided, which are routine announcements, I cannot find enough significant coverage for this article to meet WP:GNG. The closest latter case is Nový čas. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Didn't find any SIGCOV, only passing mention. CNC (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence of SIGCOV; I could only find passing mentions like transfer announcements and match reports in Polish-language sources like Przegląd Sportowy. Jogurney (talk) 13:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Saheb (1981 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. 🇧🇩 ZayanMr Bangladesh71 (Talk)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. 🇧🇩 ZayanMr Bangladesh71 (Talk)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 3. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Even as it is, the film meets WP:NFIC (important role played by a notable person and a major part of their career) -Mushy Yank. 12:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC) [added 4 sources, including a paper focusing substantially on the film]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 12:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 13:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -Mushy Yank. 13:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I can't do anything sir, there is not enough source which I can provide. But I know everything about the film, sir. If also you need any reliable source, you can see this [1]. You can believe me. Ayaasho (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Aside from you're now blocked as a sock, you are not a reliable source. Don't put things in articles that aren't backed by a good source. If you can't find a source for something, don't just add it and say "trust me". Ravensfire (talk) 21:16, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- I can't do anything sir, there is not enough source which I can provide. But I know everything about the film, sir. If also you need any reliable source, you can see this [1]. You can believe me. Ayaasho (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, the film won 1981 Filmfare Awards East in Best Actor category. It clearly is notable. Mehedi Abedin 12:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per Mehedi Abedin and Mushy Yank. The film is notable and has won a major award.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: The film won a major award, that's enough to keep the article. While created by a now blocked sock, it has had enough edits from good-faith editors. Ravensfire (talk) 03:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Dominik Smékal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:GNG. The sources mainly refer to his hat trick, which helped his third-league Hlučín eliminate Viktoria Plzeň from the Czech Cup. He played only 8 games at the professional league level, 6 in 2017 and 2 in 2021. FromCzech (talk) 10:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 10:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete due to lack of WP:SIRS. The source from Blesk is an interview. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment. In addition to his number of games played, we can look at the number of minutes played during those games, which were only 228. Geschichte (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - is it this footballer?[20][21], if so I'd presume the subject is notable, even if those references don't provide the necessary SIGCOV. I don't have a clue if any of the Czech sources provides that. CNC (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ryo Nakamura (footballer, born 1989) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Light years away from meeting WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Geschichte (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fail to meet WP:GNG (WP:SPORTCRIT / WP:FOOTYN) criteria. Material not available for WP:V. QEnigma talk 15:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:36, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 16:49, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: No significant coverage what so ever. CNC (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP, but merge with corrections — this article seems like a duplication of the already-existing Reo Nakamura (footballer, born 1990) and hence a merge into the existing article may be more appropriate, once the errors have been corrected. It seems like the author of the article has made a spelling error, instead of “Reo” (the correct first name) they have put “Ryo” as the name of the subject and (for some reason) changed their DoB from 1990 to 1989.
- The article's own source shows the name of the subject as “Reo”, not “Ryo” (as the author has put) and the correct DoB of the subject as 1990, not 1989 (as the author has put). The reason the others (CC: @GiantSnowman, @CommunityNotesContributor, @QEnigma) could not verify/find sources was because the author wrote the incorrect information on the Wikipedia article. The career statistics section, especially, I feel could be merged into the already existing article.
- ~~~~ Nyxion303💬 Talk 19:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well spotted - but where is the significant coverage of this person? GiantSnowman 19:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- For Reo Nakamura (correct name), I was able to find some through this Google search and this one — 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 just to name a few.
- At the moment, it appears the player plays for Ezra F.C., in the Pepsi Lao League 1.
- ~~~~ Nyxion303💬 Talk 19:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, your sources consist of match reports, database profiles and primary sources. Nothing come close to significant and independent coverage of the player. Geschichte (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- In your opinion, would you say the player qualifies as being notable under WP:FOOTYN? Nyxion303💬 Talk 11:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- WP:FOOTYN is an essay, not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, and has no relevance in AfD's. The subject must pass WP:GNG with multiple significant sources from publications independent of the subject. Alvaldi (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- In any event, "The player section of this notability guidance has been superseded by WP:Notability (sports)". GiantSnowman 21:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- WP:FOOTYN is an essay, not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, and has no relevance in AfD's. The subject must pass WP:GNG with multiple significant sources from publications independent of the subject. Alvaldi (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Geschichte: Of the seven sources, only the fifth one signals significant coverage on Nakamura as it tells about his personal life. However, one SIGCOV is not enough; the whole GNG needs multiple instead. Transfermarkt is obviously unnecessary to be added to Wikipedia articles as it is claimed unreliable. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- In your opinion, would you say the player qualifies as being notable under WP:FOOTYN? Nyxion303💬 Talk 11:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, your sources consist of match reports, database profiles and primary sources. Nothing come close to significant and independent coverage of the player. Geschichte (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well spotted - but where is the significant coverage of this person? GiantSnowman 19:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - as this person and Reo Nakamura (footballer, born 1990) are the same, we may need to consider sending Reo Nakamura (footballer, born 1990) to AfD if this AfD concludes as 'delete'. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Have done this already: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reo Nakamura (footballer, born 1990). CNC (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there are still any valid arguments to Keep or Merge with another article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)- Doesn't look likely as Reo Nakamura is currently at a 5-0 delete Geschichte (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- *Keep 5-1 surely? With @Nyxion303‘s keep vote, and 5-2 now… not that this is meant to be a vote I thought 😊 Anyway, as you pointed out @Geschichte, the fifth of Nyxion’s sources was SIGCOV, and I have another couple to add. this[22] and this[23]. For me the three taken together seem like enough. Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- WP:NOTAVOTE. GiantSnowman 21:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, yes, that was rather my point. Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- WP:NOTAVOTE. GiantSnowman 21:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- *Keep 5-1 surely? With @Nyxion303‘s keep vote, and 5-2 now… not that this is meant to be a vote I thought 😊 Anyway, as you pointed out @Geschichte, the fifth of Nyxion’s sources was SIGCOV, and I have another couple to add. this[22] and this[23]. For me the three taken together seem like enough. Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Doesn't look likely as Reo Nakamura is currently at a 5-0 delete Geschichte (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ziya Taner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged 7 years ago as unsourced. I checked a couple of the sources on the Turkish article but not sure they are enough - for example they don’t support the first sentence here saying he was born in Macedonia Chidgk1 (talk) 13:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, North Macedonia, and Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If I were to judge purely based on their managerial career – having managed Beşiktaş J.K., one of the three major Turkish football clubs and having led Ankaragücü to a Turkish Cup win – I'd say there's no doubt they are notable. Robby.is.on (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:36, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Robby, this guy is clearly notable, just needs improvement and offline, Turkish language sources. WP:COMMONSENSE needed. GiantSnowman 16:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes you would think with his career that good sources would exist somewhere. Perhaps native speakers of Turkish are not very interested in editing Wikipedia. I would not be surprised, as I find Turkish Wikipedia generally unfriendly and frustrating. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - I looked through the Cumhuriyet online archive (only subscribers can view actual scans of the pages, but a text conversion is available here: [24]), and there are a few articles from the 1970s and 1980s that provide some coverage of Taner's managerial career. I expanded the article a little based on a few of the hits, and I believe there is enough in this online archive to suggest other offline Turkish-language media sources exist that would be enough to provide SIGCOV. Jogurney (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Istanbul Professional League 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged almost a decade ago as unsourced and article does not exist in Turkish so probably not notable Chidgk1 (talk) 07:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Football, and Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to History of Turkish football as possible search term. GiantSnowman 11:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm not sure that a redirect would be appropriate given that the topic is not mentioned in the proposed target page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete uncited for 9 years. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 02:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sydney Pulver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV from third-party sources for this American soccer player. JTtheOG (talk) 19:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, California, Colorado, and Washington. JTtheOG (talk) 19:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of San Diego Wave FC players as possible search term. GiantSnowman 09:41, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify - It's well sourced, it just may be Wikipedia: Too soon. RossEvans19 23:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - there are enough secondary-party sources involved, from The Daily Evergreen, The Spokesman-Review, and Lewiston Morning Tribune. [25][26][27][28] Whether that's enough sigcov in combination per WP:BASIC is another story, but certainly no need for third-party sources here per GNG. There is otherwise coverage beyond WP:ROUTINE, so per WP:SPORTBASIC it's likely there are enough sources for notability, even if not a guarantee. If it's a case of too soon then WP:DRAFTIFY would be a better option here. CNC (talk) 10:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Third-party sources are a requirement for GNG... JoelleJay (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect. The Daily Evergreen is not independent and so does not count. The Spokesman-Review and Lewiston Morning Tribune articles are brief, routine blurbs about her signing lightly refactored (as in, would absolutely fail our close-paraphrasing rules) from the same press release, and additionally are far from the SPORTSCRIT #5 requirement, let alone the SUSTAINED SIGCOV in multiple IRS sources required by GNG. I see zero reason to draftify considering her contract ended in 2022 and there is no evidence she continues to play professionally. JoelleJay (talk) 03:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies, per above I mixed up third-party with tertiary, ie party and person. Agree the student newspaper isn't independent here, and given your reasoning that the subject hasn't been playing since 2022, best to redirect instead. CNC (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of San Diego Wave FC players : Agree with JoelleJay that this subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV from multiple independent, reliable sources needed to meet the WP:GNG. Redirect as a WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 15:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as arguments are divided between Draftifying or Redirection.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)- Draftify, per Evans Reader of Information (talk) 15:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Golf
editArticles for deletion
editProposed deletions
editCategories
edit
Handball
editWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Handball
Deletion review
edit- none
Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.
Files proposed for deletion
edit- None
Templates for deletion
edit- None
Categories
edit- Current vacant
Ice hockey
edit- Gaudreau brothers cycling incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:REDUNDANTFORK of Johnny Gaudreau#Death. The Kip (contribs) 06:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey, Sportspeople, Crime, and New Jersey. The Kip (contribs) 06:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, the Johnny Gaudreau article already covers the incident in enough detail, no need for a stand alone article. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Johnny Gaudreau#Death per nom. The main article has more detail than this one Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Johnny Gaudreau#Death: Per nom, there is no reason for a WP:REDUNDANTFORK. Let'srun (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Let'srun (talk) 14:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Johnny Gaudreau#Death per nom. Definitely no need to provide an article that has fewer details than the main. Conyo14 (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Capitals–Rangers rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A WP:BEFORE yielded only their multiple series matchups as well as the Tom Wilson fight from 2021. There is also Bleacher Report article that may or not be reliable. No mention of a rivalry nor team series overview. Note that I am the original author of this article, but since there have been several additions to this article, I am proceeding with this route. If not delete, then trim and merge to List of NHL rivalries#New York Rangers vs. Washington Capitals Conyo14 (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey, New York, and Washington, D.C.. Shellwood (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Merge into List of NHL rivalries#New York Rangers vs. Washington Capitals per nom.
- Delete - These types of articles are too trivial. GoodDay (talk) 04:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Alexander Medvedev (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unscourced BLP for a player who never played in a major league and does not meet guidelines at WP:SPORTBASIC. Kimikel (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I couldn't find any sourcing on him aside from prospect sites. Conyo14 (talk) 21:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Ice hockey, and Russia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Possible keep. His Eurohockey profile indicates he played 25 years professionally. Surely there are sources in foreign languages? For example: Polish Wikipedia, Russian Wikipedia, Ukrainian Wikipedia Searching in Russian for hockey-related articles is a bit difficult due to the businessman Alexander Medvedev's involvement in hockey. Alexander Medvedev (ice hockey) also coached the U18 national team for Iceland. Did anyone search in a foreign language? It's rather frustrating that nobody has mentioned what was searched. Providing more details is helpful for working together. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 14:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I tried searching in English articles as well as Icelandic. I did a basic search on the Belarusian Telegraph Agency and it yielded nothing. Plus the other wikis don't have sources that attribute to a WP:BLP article anyways. Conyo14 (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Martial arts
editArticles for deletion
edit- Mukesh Mishra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable Karate coach, no coverage in reliable sources. Declined by Bonadea see [29] and just after the decline the Draft was moved to mainspace by the creator, see [30]. Previous deletions can be checked here, [31]. Taabii (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Games, India, and Bihar. Taabii (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, smells like a bit of COI, or a vanity article. Nswix (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:BIO and looks like a vanity piece. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete It does appear to be a likely COI. More importantly, I can't find what I would call significant independent coverage of him by independent sources. I found no mentions of him at the WKF website or in the results of any major adult karate competition--not Commonwealth, continental, or world championships. I see no evidence of him meeting any WP notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete seems like a vanity page and notability is not established as per WP:BIO or WP:SIGCOV. Lekkha Moun (talk) 07:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails to meet WP:GNG (WP:NBIO / WP:SPORTCRIT). This article was rejected twice in the AfC process; however, the editor moved it to the mainspace regardless. QEnigma talk 14:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Proposed deletions
editAfter a deletion discussion it was decided to merge Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Motorsports into this page. For the archive of WikiProject Deletion sorting/Motorsports, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Motorsports/archive.
Motorsport
editArticles for deletion
editProposed deletions
editComment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.
Categories
edit
Rugby league
edit- Alex Lobb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A before search shows nothing to pass GNG or SPORTBASIC. Kline • talk • contribs 01:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby league, and Australia. Kline • talk • contribs 01:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Rugby union
edit- List of 2014–15 Aviva Premiership Academy promotions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All are covered in List of 2014–15 Premiership Rugby transfers. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby union and Lists. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Lists of people. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Templates for discussion
edit
Softball
editDo not comment on these articles here. If you agree with the proposed deletion, you don't have to do anything. If you think the article merits keeping, the remove the {{prod}} template and make an effort to improve the article so that it clearly meets the notability and verifiability criteria.
Templates for discussion
edit- Template:Softball Boxscore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Softballbox7 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Categories for discussion
edit
Tennis
edit- Nels Van Patten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:GNG. He is only mentioned in passing in the articles currently used. His father and brother are notable. Appears to be a case of WP:NOTINHERITED.4meter4 (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 20:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Tennis and New York. Shellwood (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Connor Glennon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tennis player never ranked inside top 900. Some stuff on gotigersgo regarding his collegiate career but failing GNG. Canary757 (talk) 17:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and England. Canary757 (talk) 17:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Kemer Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for a year as unsourced and when I click the external link it blocks me Chidgk1 (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Tennis and Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't find anything about a tennis event, there seems to be a soccer event with a similar name that pops up in Turkish sources. The one source now in the article is primary, so not helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep It is usually just called the ITF Istanbul but is also called the Kemer Cup. Mid level payout minor league event at the time. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ana Candiotto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed PROD. Fails notability criteria. Shrug02 (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Tennis and Brazil. Shrug02 (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – I see WP:SIGCOV in the sources already presented (Globoesporte, Gazeta Esportiva, O Tempo), the player herself is not very famous but meets the criteria for the article. A quick Google search also turns up a lot of content. Svartner (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is coverage of both her singles and doubles career on several major Brazilian sports portals: [32] [33] [34] Svartner (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per Svartner. Article needs a lot of work on subjective language. There have been several PRODS and AI generated tags put on its creator's other articles this week.Canary757 (talk) 08:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I accept coverage has now been found but I stand by the point that she is non-notable and the article itself is like a fan page full of Peacocking and puff and very little by way of actual facts. Shrug02 (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I've made a tentative start to address the peacock tag Shrug02, will do a thorough one later.Canary757 (talk) 13:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I accept coverage has now been found but I stand by the point that she is non-notable and the article itself is like a fan page full of Peacocking and puff and very little by way of actual facts. Shrug02 (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per Svartner. Article needs a lot of work on subjective language. There have been several PRODS and AI generated tags put on its creator's other articles this week.Canary757 (talk) 08:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is coverage of both her singles and doubles career on several major Brazilian sports portals: [32] [33] [34] Svartner (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Women. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)