Talk:Narendra Modi
Warning: active arbitration remedies
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 13 April 2021 |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Narendra Modi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Narendra Modi. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Narendra Modi at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Narendra Modi has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Order of Mubarak Al-Kabeer
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Upon his arrival, Modi was presented with the symbolic "Key to the City" of Abuja by Minister Nyesom Wike, a gesture symbolising trust and honour from the people of Nigeria." to "Upon his arrival, Modi was presented with the symbolic "Key to the City" of Abuja by Minister Nyesom Wike, a gesture symbolising trust and honour from the people of Nigeria. In December 2024, Prime Minister Narendra Modi was awarded the Wisam Mubarak al-Kabeer, or the Order of Mubarak the Great, by Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Amir of Kuwait,"
#Zakham
@valaree Half cut1 (talk) 08:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
@Manasbose:
- @Dougweller @black kite Half cut1 (talk) 08:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ultraodan (talk) 12:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The request isn't the clearest, but I assume it was a request to add Modi's recent honor: I've gone ahead and done so. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Honorary suffix
editList of awards and honours received by Narendra Modi page mentions several post nominal suffix of state honours recieved by him. Starting a discussion here to assess whether they should be mentioned in the infobox or not. Xoocit (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Shouldn't per WP:NCIN. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, it should be mentioned. 152.58.21.130 (talk) 15:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-nominals are hard to read at the best of times. Modi has received approximately 20 state honours; including post-nominals for all of them would render the infobox unreadable. The titles are mentioned in the awards section, as is appropriate. Also: there isn't much logic to which honors have recognized post-nominal abbreviations, and which ones don't. Based on our list, is it reasonable to include the orders from Fiji, Guyana, and Dominica in the infobox, but not the ones from Russia, the US, and France? Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, it should be mentioned. 152.58.21.130 (talk) 15:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 January 2025
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change democratic backsliding. It has no direct evidence to back it up. 103.4.222.252 (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done: It has a variety of sources backing it. Kindly check citations mentioned. The AP (talk) 17:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- India is having a "democratic backsliding" is a concoted, biased, narrative against India. There is no such thing.
- https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/europe-west-being-fed-negative-stories-about-india-british-journalist-124051900271_1.html 14.139.114.222 (talk) 08:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- The "democrating backsliding," which has been used to describe a decline in democratic principles, draws upon the work of an author(amongst other), Soundarya Chidambaram. An examination of their academic output reveals a limited publication record with only 12 research papers listed on Google Scholar since 2020, with an h-index of meagre 4.
- Furthermore, 12 out of 12 research appears to focus on critical analyses of India, particularly BJP (while author Soundarya Chidambaram being an Assistant Professor, Political Science, Bucknell University). This concentrated focus on criticism of India raises concerns about potential bias and the possibility of their work being selectively utilized to construct a negative narrative about India.
- From this it seems highly probable that Chidambaram's work is "planted" by vested interests and utilized by Wikipedia to propagate a negative agenda and a deliberate and coordinated effort to manipulate information and shape public perception."
- Given below in the goosgle scholar link of Chidambaram
- https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Qqt6KhMAAAAJ&hl=en 14.139.114.222 (talk) 08:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Even if we take your claim at face value, there are six other citations in the text (two in the lead, five in the notes) discussing "democratic backsliding". Black Kite (talk) 08:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I will do dissections of other sources too. If you take my arguments at face value, You would like to delete the biased referance of Soundarya too :) ?14.139.114.222 (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Additionally, I will let Soundarya know that WP has discredited your biased "research paper" if you happen to do that. 14.139.114.222 (talk) 09:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I will certainly not be deleting it; if you believe the source to be unreliable there is a noticeboard for that at WP:RS/N. Black Kite (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Additionally, I will let Soundarya know that WP has discredited your biased "research paper" if you happen to do that. 14.139.114.222 (talk) 09:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I will do dissections of other sources too. If you take my arguments at face value, You would like to delete the biased referance of Soundarya too :) ?14.139.114.222 (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Even if we take your claim at face value, there are six other citations in the text (two in the lead, five in the notes) discussing "democratic backsliding". Black Kite (talk) 08:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
There is pretty much no criticism or anything that doesn't praise him
editOk 2409:40F3:109E:FD67:71CB:96D1:8325:7E7D (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
To have edit
editRemove DMK never against during gujarat cm add telegu desam. I will give references soon. RajasPudu (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Ask is unclear. Could you please elaborate your request/ query? Thank you.-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 16:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)