In solid geometry, a face is a flat surface (a planar region) that forms part of the boundary of a solid object. For example, a cube has six faces in this sense.

In more modern treatments of the geometry of polyhedra and higher-dimensional polytopes, a "face" is defined in such a way that it may have any dimension. The vertices, edges, and (2-dimensional) faces of a polyhedron are all faces in this more general sense.[1]

Polygonal face

edit

In elementary geometry, a face is a polygon[2] on the boundary of a polyhedron.[1][3] (Here a "polygon" should be viewed as including the 2-dimensional region inside it.) Other names for a polygonal face include polyhedron side and Euclidean plane tile.

For example, any of the six squares that bound a cube is a face of the cube. Sometimes "face" is also used to refer to the 2-dimensional features of a 4-polytope. With this meaning, the 4-dimensional tesseract has 24 square faces, each sharing two of 8 cubic cells.

Regular examples by Schläfli symbol
Polyhedron Star polyhedron Euclidean tiling Hyperbolic tiling 4-polytope
{4,3} {5/2,5} {4,4} {4,5} {4,3,3}
 
The cube has 3 square faces per vertex.
 
The small stellated dodecahedron has 5 pentagrammic faces per vertex.
 
The square tiling in the Euclidean plane has 4 square faces per vertex.
 
The order-5 square tiling has 5 square faces per vertex.
 
The tesseract has 3 square faces per edge.

Number of polygonal faces of a polyhedron

edit

Any convex polyhedron's surface has Euler characteristic

 

where V is the number of vertices, E is the number of edges, and F is the number of faces. This equation is known as Euler's polyhedron formula. Thus the number of faces is 2 more than the excess of the number of edges over the number of vertices. For example, a cube has 12 edges and 8 vertices, and hence 6 faces.

k-face

edit

In higher-dimensional geometry, the faces of a polytope are features of all dimensions.[4][5] A face of dimension k is sometimes called a k-face. For example, the polygonal faces of an ordinary polyhedron are 2-faces. The word "face" is defined differently in different areas of mathematics. For example, many but not all authors allow the polytope itself and the empty set as faces of a polytope, where the empty set is for consistency given a "dimension" of −1. For any n-dimensional polytope, faces have dimension   with  .

For example, with this meaning, the faces of a cube comprise the cube itself (a 3-face), its (square) facets (2-faces), its (line segment) edges (1-faces), its (point) vertices (0-faces), and the empty set.

In some areas of mathematics, such as polyhedral combinatorics, a polytope is by definition convex. In this setting, there is a precise definition: a face of a polytope P in Euclidean space   is the intersection of P with any closed halfspace whose boundary is disjoint from the relative interior of P.[6] According to this definition, the set of faces of a polytope includes the polytope itself and the empty set.[4][5] For convex polytopes, this definition is equivalent to the general definition of a face of a convex set, given below.

In other areas of mathematics, such as the theories of abstract polytopes and star polytopes, the requirement of convexity is relaxed. One precise combinatorial concept that generalizes some earlier types of polyhedra is the notion of a simplicial complex. More generally, there is the notion of a polytopal complex.

An n-dimensional simplex (line segment (n = 1), triangle (n = 2), tetrahedron (n = 3), etc.), defined by n + 1 vertices, has a face for each subset of the vertices, from the empty set up through the set of all vertices. In particular, there are 2n + 1 faces in total. The number of k-faces, for k ∈ {−1, 0, ..., n}, is the binomial coefficient  .

There are specific names for k-faces depending on the value of k and, in some cases, how close k is to the dimension n of the polytope.

Vertex or 0-face

edit

Vertex is the common name for a 0-face.

Edge or 1-face

edit

Edge is the common name for a 1-face.

Face or 2-face

edit

The use of face in a context where a specific k is meant for a k-face but is not explicitly specified is commonly a 2-face.

Cell or 3-face

edit

A cell is a polyhedral element (3-face) of a 4-dimensional polytope or 3-dimensional tessellation, or higher. Cells are facets for 4-polytopes and 3-honeycombs.

Examples:

Regular examples by Schläfli symbol
4-polytopes 3-honeycombs
{4,3,3} {5,3,3} {4,3,4} {5,3,4}
 
The tesseract has 3 cubic cells (3-faces) per edge.
 
The 120-cell has 3 dodecahedral cells (3-faces) per edge.
 
The cubic honeycomb fills Euclidean 3-space with cubes, with 4 cells (3-faces) per edge.
 
The order-4 dodecahedral honeycomb fills 3-dimensional hyperbolic space with dodecahedra, 4 cells (3-faces) per edge.

Facet or (n − 1)-face

edit

In higher-dimensional geometry, the facets of a n-polytope are the (n − 1)-faces (faces of dimension one less than the polytope itself).[7] A polytope is bounded by its facets.

For example:

Ridge or (n − 2)-face

edit

In related terminology, the (n − 2)-faces of an n-polytope are called ridges (also subfacets).[8] A ridge is seen as the boundary between exactly two facets of a polytope or honeycomb.

For example:

Peak or (n − 3)-face

edit

The (n − 3)-faces of an n-polytope are called peaks. A peak contains a rotational axis of facets and ridges in a regular polytope or honeycomb.

For example:

Face of a convex set

edit
 
The two distinguished points are examples of extreme points of a convex set that are not exposed points. Therefore, not every face of a convex set is an exposed face.

The notion of a face can be generalized from convex polytopes to all convex sets, as follows. Let   be a convex set in a real vector space  . A face of   is a convex subset   such that whenever a point   lies strictly between two points   and   in  , both   and   must be in  . Equivalently, for any   and any real number   such that   is in  ,   and   must be in  .[9]

According to this definition,   itself and the empty set are faces of  ; these are sometimes called the trivial faces of  .

An extreme point of   is a point   such that   is a face of  .[9] That is, if   lies between two points  , then  .

For example:

  • A triangle in the plane (including the region inside) is a convex set. Its nontrivial faces are the three vertices and the three edges. (So the only extreme points are the three vertices.)
  • The only nontrivial faces of the closed unit disk   are its extreme points, namely the points on the unit circle  .

Let   be a convex set in   that is compact (or equivalently, closed and bounded). Then   is the convex hull of its extreme points.[10] More generally, each compact convex set in a locally convex topological vector space is the closed convex hull of its extreme points (the Krein–Milman theorem).

An exposed face of   is the subset of points of   where a linear functional achieves its minimum on  . Thus, if   is a linear functional on   and  , then   is an exposed face of  .

An exposed point of   is a point   such that   is an exposed face of  . That is,   for all  . See the figure for examples of extreme points that are not exposed.

Competing definitions

edit

Some authors do not include   and/or   as faces of  . Some authors require a face to be a closed subset; this is automatic for   a compact convex set in a vector space of finite dimension, but not in infinite dimensions.[11] In infinite dimensions, the functional   is usually assumed to be continuous in a given vector topology.

Properties

edit

An exposed face of a convex set is a face. In particular, it is a convex subset.

If   is a face of a convex set  , then a subset   is a face of   if and only if   is a face of  .

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Matoušek 2002, p. 86.
  2. ^ Some other polygons, which are not faces, have also been considered for polyhedra and tilings. These include Petrie polygons, vertex figures and facets (flat polygons formed by coplanar vertices that do not lie in the same face of the polyhedron).
  3. ^ Cromwell, Peter R. (1999), Polyhedra, Cambridge University Press, p. 13, ISBN 9780521664059.
  4. ^ a b Grünbaum 2003, p. 17.
  5. ^ a b Ziegler 1995, p. 51.
  6. ^ Matoušek (2002) and Ziegler (1995) use a slightly different but equivalent definition, which amounts to intersecting P with either a hyperplane disjoint from the interior of P or the whole space.
  7. ^ Matoušek (2002), p. 87; Grünbaum (2003), p. 27; Ziegler (1995), p. 17.
  8. ^ Matoušek (2002), p. 87; Ziegler (1995), p. 71.
  9. ^ a b Rockafellar 1997, p. 162.
  10. ^ Rockafellar 1997, p. 166.
  11. ^ Simon, Barry (2011). Convexity: an Analytic Viewpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-1-107-00731-4. MR 2814377.

Bibliography

edit
edit