Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-12
review-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-12-genart-lc-korhonen-2024-11-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2024-11-11 | |
| Requested | 2024-10-21 | |
| Authors | Loa Andersson , Stewart Bryant , Matthew Bocci , Tony Li | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-11-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -06
by Toerless Eckert
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -11 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Catherine Meadows (diff) Genart Last Call review of -12 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Catherine Meadows (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Joerg Ott (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/orKWggHZLS4IHzUUTtbFs3qH2ow | |
| Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2024-11-11 |
review-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-12-genart-lc-korhonen-2024-11-11-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-?? Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 2024-11-11 IETF LC End Date: 2024-11-11 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Document is ready and I do not have any major issues with it. It was even readable for someone not too familiar with MNA before starting to read the document (and the associated requirements RFC). Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: What I would like to see as a non-MNA person are few illustrations of label stack how different elaborated aproaches would look like. Those would make the document a lot more readable/informational.