Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms
draft-scheffenegger-congress-rfc5033bis-00
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Scheffenegger , Sally Floyd, Mark Allman | ||
| Last updated | 2023-08-21 (Latest revision 2023-02-17) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-ccwg-rfc5033bis | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ccwg-rfc5033bis | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The IETF's standard congestion control schemes have been widely shown to be inadequate for various environments (e.g., high-speed networks). Recent research has yielded many alternate congestion control schemes that significantly differ from the IETF's congestion control principles. Using these new congestion control schemes in the global Internet has possible ramifications to both the traffic using the new congestion control and to traffic using the currently standardized congestion control. Therefore, the IETF must proceed with caution when dealing with alternate congestion control proposals. The goal of this document is to provide guidance for considering alternate congestion control algorithms within the IETF.
Authors
Richard Scheffenegger
Sally Floyd
Mark Allman
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)