Public pension disclosure
This article does not receive scheduled updates. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia. Contact our team to suggest an update.
Public pension disclosure can refer to the names of pension benefit recipients, the amount of benefits these individuals receive, or performance data for public pension funds, such as rate of return. The Ohio News Organization reported that at least 21 states consider financial benefits for retirees to be public records, including New York, Florida and Illinois, but at least 26 states prohibit the release of such information.[1]
Performance data
Forbes reported in 2008 that 13 states had secrecy laws closing off pension fund performance to disclosure.[2] These were:[3]
- California
- Colorado
- Florida
- Illinois
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Pennsylvania
- South Carolina
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
Performance data were largely under wraps until 2001, when the California Public Employees' Retirement System voluntarily published returns on its website --sparking a firestorm among its outside money managers.[3]
Massachusetts keeps hidden all commercial or financial data whose revelation could cause competitive harm.[3] South Carolina's freedom of information law now excludes "proprietary" information from the state's venture capital program but, strangely, includes rates of return.[3] In Alaska, despite broad open-records laws, the $39 billion Permanent Fund has no obligation to disclose performance data for any of its investments in private equity funds.[3]
Disclosure law and precedent comparison
State sunshine laws sometimes explicitly state that pension information is public records. Other times, court cases determine whether pension information is public. There are two categories (excluding pension performance) of pension data that are disclosable: the names of recipients and the amount that recipients receive. Each state can have multiple pension funds, and disclosure rulings are typically specific to one fund. The chart below notes when a ruling or law states that public pension information is public record, but may be specific to one fund in the state.
The information below is based primarily on state pension policy handbooks and specific state sunshine laws. A number of states below received a "yes" absent an affirmative statement that certain information is exempt in either the policies or in the information laws. In some cases, it is likely that a clear policy does not exist because no individual/organization has requested those specific pension records from the state.
Pension disclosure laws | ||
---|---|---|
State | Names | Pension data |
Alabama | Yes[4] | Yes[5] |
Alaska | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[6] | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[7] |
Arizona | Yes[8] | Yes[9] |
Arkansas | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[10] | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[11] |
California | Yes[12][13] | Yes[14] |
Colorado | No[15] | No[16] |
Connecticut | Yes[17] | Yes[18] |
Delaware | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[19] | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[20] |
Florida | Yes[21] | Yes[1] |
Georgia | Yes (TRS),[22] No (ERS)[23] | No[24] |
Hawaii | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[25] | Yes, provided no violation of right to privacy[26] |
Idaho | No[27] | No[28] |
Illinois | Yes[1] | Yes[1] |
Indiana | No[29] | No[30] |
Iowa | Yes[31] | Yes[32] |
Kansas | No[33] | No[34] |
Kentucky | No[35] | No[36] |
Louisiana | No[37] | No[38] |
Maine | Yes[39] | Yes[40] |
Maryland | Yes[41] | Yes[42] |
Massachusetts | Yes[43] | Yes[44] |
Michigan | Yes[45] | Yes[45] |
Minnesota | Yes[46][47] | Yes[48][47] |
Mississippi | No, without written consent[49] | No, without written consent[50] |
Missouri | Yes[51] | Yes[52] |
Montana | Yes[53] | Yes[53] |
Nebraska | No[54] | No[54] |
Nevada[55] | ||
New Hampshire | Yes[56] | Yes[56] |
New Jersey | Yes[57] | Yes[57] |
New Mexico | No[58] | No[58] |
New York | No[59] | Yes[1] |
North Carolina | Yes[60] | Yes[60] |
North Dakota | Yes[61] | Yes[61] |
Ohio | Yes[62] | No[62] |
Oklahoma | Yes[62] | Yes[62] |
Oregon | Yes[63] | Yes[63] |
Pennsylvania | Yes[64] | Yes[64] |
Rhode Island | Yes[65] | Yes[65] |
South Carolina | No[66] | No[66] |
South Dakota | No[67] | No[67] |
Tennessee | Yes[62] | Yes[62] |
Texas | No[62] | No[62] |
Utah | No[62] | No[62] |
Vermont | Yes[68] | Yes[68] |
Virginia | No[62] | No[62] |
Washington | Yes[69] | Yes[69] |
West Virginia | ||
Wisconsin | No[62] | No[62] |
Wyoming | Yes[70] | Yes[70] |
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 The Cleveland Plain Dealer "Ohio public retirement systems refuse to release records to newspapers analyzing benefits and possible abuses" Aug. 8, 2010
- ↑ " Pension Investment Records Become Increasingly Difficult to Access," Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, July 7, 2008
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 "A Code of Silence," Forbes Magazine, July 21, 2008
- ↑ and forms/ERS Pubs/ERS Member Handbook.pdf, RSA Handbook (dead link)
- ↑ and forms/ERS Pubs/ERS Member Handbook.pdf, RSA Handbook (dead link)
- ↑ Alaska Code
- ↑ Alaska Code
- ↑ AZ 39.121 Public Records
- ↑ AZ 39.121 Public Records
- ↑ AR FOIA (dead link)
- ↑ AR FOIA (dead link)
- ↑ "County pensions are public record, court rules," San Francisco Chronicle, May 12, 2011
- ↑ "Pension Information Ordered To Be Made Public," May 17, 2011
- ↑ Calif. court rules pension info must be disclosed, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, June 29, 2011
- ↑ CRS Policy
- ↑ CRS Policy
- ↑ 1-210.htm Conn. FOIA, Sec.1-210 (dead link)
- ↑ 1-210.htm Conn. FOIA, Sec.1-210 (dead link)
- ↑ Title 27, Chpt 100
- ↑ Title 27, Chpt 100
- ↑ "Ohio public retirement systems refuse to release records to newspapers analyzing benefits and possible abuses," cleveland.com, August 8, 2010
- ↑ TRS Policy
- ↑ ERS Policy
- ↑ O.C.G.A. 45-1-4
- ↑ HI 92F-12
- ↑ HI 92F-12
- ↑ ID PERSI Policy
- ↑ ID PERSI Policy
- ↑ H.B.1285
- ↑ H.B.1285
- ↑ Iowa Code 22.7
- ↑ Iowa Code 22.7
- ↑ KSA 74, Art.49
- ↑ KSA 74, Art.49
- ↑ Kentucky FOIA 61.872
- ↑ Kentucky FOIA 61.872
- ↑ La.R.S.44:15
- ↑ La.R.S.44:15
- ↑ Ch.421, Sec. 17057
- ↑ Ch.421, Sec. 17057
- ↑ 10-611(g)
- ↑ 10-611(g)
- ↑ Public Records G.L.c 4, 7(26)
- ↑ Public Records G.L.c 4, 7(26)
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 Pension payouts are public records, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, December 22, 2005
- ↑ 2011 Minn.St. 353.27
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 Minnesota Data Practices Act
- ↑ 2011 Minn.St. 353.27
- ↑ Miss.Code 25-11-119 (3)
- ↑ Miss.Code 25-11-119 (3)
- ↑ Miss. Code 70.605
- ↑ Miss. Code 70.605
- ↑ 53.0 53.1 Attorney general upholds opinion on making pension information public, Montana Watchdog, September 21, 2011
- ↑ 54.0 54.1 Nebraska Statutes 84-712.05(7)
- ↑ Public Employees Retirement System v. Reno Newspapers, Inc., Nevada Supreme Court, filed April 25, 2012
- ↑ 56.0 56.1 N.H. high court upholds release of pension information, RCFP, November 4, 2011
- ↑ 57.0 57.1 "Personnel Records," New Jersey Open Government Guide, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
- ↑ 58.0 58.1 "Why isn't there a Sunshine Portal for Public Pensioners?" New Mexico Watchdog, May 6, 2012
- ↑ "Releasing Public Pension Data Stalls In Senate," WGRZ.com, June 19, 2012
- ↑ 60.0 60.1 "Large payouts strain state pension system," NewsObserver.com, June 13, 2010
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 "A Summary of North Dakota's Open Meetings and Open Records Law," Office of the Attorney General, August, 2011
- ↑ 62.00 62.01 62.02 62.03 62.04 62.05 62.06 62.07 62.08 62.09 62.10 62.11 62.12 62.13 Confidentiality of Member Data, WikiPension.com, Updated May, 2012
- ↑ 63.0 63.1 "Oregon's public employee retirement system changes rules to allow public disclosure," The Oregonian, November 18, 2011
- ↑ 64.0 64.1 Open Records Pennsylvania
- ↑ 65.0 65.1 Title 38, Public Records, State of Rhode Island General Assembly
- ↑ 66.0 66.1 S.C. law hides pension records, The Post and Courier, March 4, 2012
- ↑ 67.0 67.1 South Dakota Sunshine Law, Sunshine Review
- ↑ 68.0 68.1 "Judges, state troopers earn highest Vermont pensions," Burlington Free Press, April 3, 2011
- ↑ 69.0 69.1 Public Records Act- Exemptions from Disclosure, Open Government Internet Manual, Washington State Office of the Attorney General
- ↑ 70.0 70.1 Laramie County School District v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc., State of Wyoming Supreme Court, Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press, March 29, 2011
|