Bicameralism
In government, bicameralism (bi, "two" + camera, "chamber") is the practice of having two legislative or parliamentary chambers. Thus, a bicameral parliament or bicameral legislature is a legislature that consists of two chambers or houses. Bicameralism is a defining feature of the idea of mixed government.
With the exception of Nebraska, which operates with a unicameral legislature, every state in the United States of America is bicameral.
Historical review
Traditionally, when a nation used a bicameralism system, the first, or lower, chamber was intended to represent the lower classes of the citizenry. Members of this chamber were often elected from the populace. The second, or upper, chamber was intended to be representative of the wealthy elite and national power-holders. These types of chambers could have direct elections, but members could also be appointed or elected indirectly. In this type of bicameral situation, the second chamber held immense power. It could veto all legislation passed by the first chamber and was responsible for making policy decisions. This veto power was later restricted with the rise of widespread voting rights for all citizens.[1]
Bicameralism in the U.S.
When the federal government was initially constructed, a system of two separate legislatures was designed. In this system, the seats in the lower house (United States House of Representatives) are allocated solely based on population. In the upper house (United States Senate), seats are evenly divided among the states, regardless of population (two seats per state). In what was known as the "Great Compromise," it was agreed to have both methods of seat allocation in Congress.
The following is an excerpt from John Adam's "Notes on Debates in Congress" as the issue was being debated:
| “ | If We vote by Colonies, this Method will be liable to great Inequality and Injustice, for 5 small Colonies, with 100,000 People in each may outvote 4 large ones, each of which has 500,000 Inhabitants. If We vote by the Poll, some Colonies have more than their Proportion of Members, and others have less. If We vote by Interests, it will be attended with insuperable Difficulties, to ascertain the true Importance of each Colony.--Is the Weight of a Colony to be ascertained by the Number of Inhabitants merely--or by the Amount of their Trade, the Quantity of their Exports and Imports, or by any compound Ratio of both. | ” |
| —John Adams[3] | ||
There was also a basic desire to have two separate legislative bodies rather than one. As outlined by James Madison in The Federalist No. 63:
| “ | The people can never willfully betray their own interests; but they may possibly be betrayed by the representatives of the people; and the danger will be evidently greater where the whole legislative trust is lodged in the hands of one body of men, than where the concurrence of separate and dissimilar bodies is required in every public act. | ” |
| —James Madison, Federalist 63[4] | ||
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Oxford Bibliographies, "Bicameralism in Stable Democracies," accessed February 7, 2015
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ The Founders' Constitution, "Bicameralism," accessed August 4, 2014
- ↑ The Federalist No. 63, "The Senate," March 1, 1788
