Discussion
Sat Jul 13
08:50
Stefano Spezia: You are welcome
Discussion
Sat Jul 13
08:21
Bill McEachen: @Stefano I understand. Thank you, done
Discussion
Wed Jul 10
13:27
Michel Marcus: (p+2)^2-4 = p^2+4*p+4 - 4 = p^2+4*p = p*(p+4)
15:46
Bill McEachen: @Michel Can you just revert this edit completely? Not so useful
Sat Jul 13
03:09
Stefano Spezia: We could not revert since we will keep Michel edit (formula move). If you desire, you could delete your formula and to wait for review
COMMENTS
a(n) is a member of the following (n>1): gcd(m^2-4 , 30)==1, with m an odd >3. Precisely twenty percent of such m^2-4 meet this criteria due to a cycle of 15. - Bill McEachen, Jul 06 2024
Discussion
Wed Jul 10
12:57
Bill McEachen: @Michel I just switched to simpler formula ...
Discussion
Tue Jul 09
14:51
Michel Marcus: for m=221, gcd(m^2-4 , 30) gives 3, so it is not 1; what am I missing ??
16:35
Bill McEachen: @Michel for 221, m=15. 15^2-4=13*17. Gcd(221,30)==1. Sorry if I'm not explaining well
Wed Jul 10
08:57
Michel Marcus: What about ? It appears that a(n) is of the form k^2-4; and for n>1 a(n) is coprime to 30.
COMMENTS
Conjecture: a(n) is a member of the following (n>1): gcd(m^2-4 , 30)==1, with m an odd >3. Precisely ten twenty percent of such m^2-4 meet this criteria, implying infinitude due to a cycle of cousin primes15. - Bill McEachen, Jul 06 2024
Discussion
Tue Jul 09
07:42
Bill McEachen: I realized it was straightfwd to prove ...
Discussion
Sun Jul 07
06:07
Bill McEachen: @Michel this seq is subset of the superset
06:08
Bill McEachen: @Michel: please wait, rechecking ...
06:18
Bill McEachen: @Michel: 221=15^2-4 and looks to satisfy the gcd test ? 13*17
COMMENTS
a(n) = A023200(n)*A046132(n);
intersection Intersection of A143203 and A001358.
Conjecture: a(n) is a member of the following (n>1): gcd(m^2-4 , 30)==1, m>3. Precisely ten percent of m^2-4 meet this criteria, implying infinitude of Cousin cousin primes. - Bill McEachen, Jul 06 2024
Discussion
Sun Jul 07
03:40
Michel Marcus: 221 does not satisfy gcd(m^2-4 , 30)==1, so your comment does not seem to work ?