Welcome to the community!

I personally want too see if the dynamic relationship of dunk and egg has any similarities in the book as well as the other characters…

This hypothetical explores an alternate scenario where the Night King or another leader of the White Walkers turns every Stark into a White Walker, creating a powerful dynasty. Given the Starks' ancient ties to the North, their transformation would solidify the White Walkers' dominance. As undead beings, the Stark dynasty could unify the North under their control, leveraging their historical knowledge, leadership abilities, and the magical connection between the Starks and the land (e.g., the weirwood trees and direwolves).

This dynasty might fundamentally reshape Westeros, with the Night King using the Starks as figureheads or allies to extend his influence southward. It raises intriguing questions about loyalty, identity, and whether the Stark legacy would endure or be consumed by the White Walkers' icy agenda. The story would explore themes of power, corruption, and the cost of survival in the face of supernatural forces.

What is your opinion

• First off please do not yell at me for my opinion! Respect my opinion and I will accept yours, thank you! :) Now here's my take:

I think Rhaenyra wasn’t the rightful heir to the Iron throne, but she should’ve been. First off the line of succession seems to follow male primogeniture. Just because King Viserys I had lords swear an oath to her doesn’t change it. Male children always have a preference and up against the female children in ASOIAF universe. If Viserys truly wanted Rhaenyra to be heir he should have had them swear to her and change the rules with women inheritance to it being absolute primogeniture. I’m not 100% sure if it’s even a law of primogeniture (I do not think so), but it’s a belief/custom that had existed like a law and had been followed for so long, so I believe he still should have done it just to set it into law. As it being male over female simply just makes me angry and it’s honestly just misogynistic. I absolutely love Rhaenyra and think she should’ve been queen. I think the throne was rightfully hers, but lawfully and/or customary it wasn’t. I wish Viserys just would’ve made it absolutely clear to all that Rhaenyra was heir though she was a woman. Since when the Lords swore was BEFORE Aegon and Aemon were born, therefore she had no competition beforehand. Making her future seem less clear after their birth. As for Aegon I don’t think people can blame him for stealing her throne, as through the eyes of Westeros history, the throne was rightfully his. This all being said, personally I would rather have Rhaenyra as my Queen than Aegon as my King. As personality wise I do not think Aegon was fit to rule, while Rhaenyra was fit to rule. I also just think that Rhaenyra would've genuinely been a good and just queen, though I may be biased as she's one of my favorite characters lol.

Rhaenyra finally taking the iron throne, seeing daeron finally, meeting ormund, more of war…

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQokjapaLqO2sdQ39HaqsBAyRTmCx3v2o&si=3xWaOpBfH96mso

https://youtu.be/nPZLhJ_IZF4?si=KgpLoLUIhtPhL0DE

My opinion Arthur Dayne killed Mountain.

What is your opinion