Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Finance & Investment
Home | Discussion | Feeds & open tasks | Requests | Assessment | Resources | Templates | Participants | Mailing list | Drives |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Finance & Investment and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 45 days ![]() |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | On 10 December 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance and Investment. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Can somebody please add reliable sources to this stub? It's been unsourced for 15 years. Bearian (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Is it a notable topic? I did a quick search and couldn't find sources discussing "non-corporate credit" as a category, only using the phrase in passing. The examples mentioned in the article all seem to fit into the category of Government debt. Maybe a PROD would be appropriate. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- There appear to be lots of scholars who at least mention the topic. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Go ahead and prod it - it's not my area of expertise. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Kvng has removed the PROD tag. Maybe he can explain why he thinks it's notable? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 21:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- I saw the same thing as Bearian in my quick WP:BEFORE search. I'm not convinced that it meets our notability standards but I'm convinced that it is notable enough to require an AfD. Prod is for uncontroversial deletions and this is no slam dunk. ~Kvng (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm actually in agreement. Bearian (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- I saw the same thing as Bearian in my quick WP:BEFORE search. I'm not convinced that it meets our notability standards but I'm convinced that it is notable enough to require an AfD. Prod is for uncontroversial deletions and this is no slam dunk. ~Kvng (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Kvng has removed the PROD tag. Maybe he can explain why he thinks it's notable? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 21:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Go ahead and prod it - it's not my area of expertise. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- There appear to be lots of scholars who at least mention the topic. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 19:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Please update this article with reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Forward exchange rate
[edit]Forward exchange rate has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reassessment of Swap Spread
[edit]A couple years ago, there was a major rewrite of Swap Spread. However, it was reverted as the formatting was wrong. The editor never returned, so I took it into my hands to format it correctly. This article is now beyond stub class, but I don't have the finance background to know how good it actually is now. I would love for one of you to update the article's rating.
Thanks, I can do stuff! (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Underwriting profit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged as Unreferenced and unimproved for 15 and 1/2 years. This term hasn't been used widely in the literature since the mid-20th century.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Adding further information to the Investcorp Wikipedia page
[edit]Hi all, I’m from Kekst CNC, a global communications agency that works with Investcorp to manage its communications.
We're engaging as a member of the Wikipedia community having signed the official agency/Wikipedia agreement set out here Wikipedia:Statement_on_Wikipedia_from_participating_communications_firms. This means we follow guidelines, most importantly understanding we have COI, meaning we let members of the Wikipedia community decide (or not decide) to make changes for us.
I've added some suggested edits to the Investcorp page in the talk section, and ask if anyone here would be able to review and possibly action my suggested edits? Thanks! AmeliaP KCNC (talk) 08:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)