User talk:MasterQuestionable

Catalog

!Misc

-

Formatting

|*| Hyphen-Traumas
|*| MoS (<Wikipedia:Manual of Style>) related
|*| William's writing

Wikimedia

|*| [20220914] Sandbox activity? ("Manual revert" testing)
|*| [20220922] Explanation on commit 1111664872
|*| [Bug] MediaWiki cannot properly handle references in references
|*| [Suggestion] Feedback on talk page design
|*| MoS (<Wikipedia:Manual of Style>) related
|*| Questionable events on Wiktionary
|*| Template-free expression shall be preferred in general

Welcomes

|*| Paine Ellsworth's Welcome

Comments

    To add comments, go to [ ./pool ].

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MasterQuestionable! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 00:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

MasterQuestionable, would you mind explaining what it is that you are doing to improve our encyclopedia? For now I just see subpages with unclear functions, and somewhat inscrutable talk page messages about style--I think. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

MasterQuestionable, can you please answer the question? And please don't hide talk page comments in these layers of subpages--I am trying to understand what you are doing and why. This moving of stuff makes it impossible for other editors to keep track of things--and I don't think you actually answered the question. You have 400 edits, only 8 of which to articles, and you have no fewer than 24 subpages under this talk page. Why? What is User talk:MasterQuestionable/!Misc/Paine Ellsworth's Welcome for? Thank you, Drmies (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

---

    Have you checked [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MasterQuestionable/9 ]?
    And I doubt having everything thoughtlessly piled together could be anyhow superior...

    I believe the edits selves explain. (read the edit summary, check the content; also note the edit timestamp)

- MasterQuestionable (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

• No they don't. Here, and I'll post this on subpage 9 also, in case you miss it. Drmies (talk) 20:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MasterQuestionable (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Blocked for being dissident? What's the real purpose of such block? - MasterQuestionable (talk) 09:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not blocked for being "dissident"--you're blocked because we cannot see what you are possibly doing here that is in any way useful, though some of us actually do not believe you are competent to edit the encyclopedia. Drmies (talk) 02:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Multiple arguments your Excellencies provided are seriously fallacious, meanwhile having me straightly blocked from giving any direct reply: merely with the intention to suppress? - MasterQuestionable (talk) 06:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

What's even more ridiculous is that some of your Lords specifically added an IP-block for me in addition... Would that really work? - MasterQuestionable (talk) 06:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

• Everything you say confirms the block was correct. And since you now have time to read, rather than write, please see Wikipedia:Autoblock. As for our Excellencies's fallacious reasoning, we blocked you because you aren't doing anything useful here. Pity. Drmies (talk) 12:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)