User talk:KylieTastic

It is approximately 10:29 PM where this user lives (Cambridge, UK).

If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Click this to start a New Question here

AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random...

Current Backlog: 1,341 pending submissions

Archives

2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Regarding "Bagri Kumhar" Article

While citing a book on Wikipedia, is the page number of the book or the page number of the PDF required? Tizzythewhale (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tizzythewhale, good question. To be honest I've seen both, but I;ve mostly seen and I've always used myself the actual page marked if they have one as others may have a physical copy or the digitised version can sometimes be updated. I usually have the marked page number in the page= parameter and link to the pdf/digitised version page in the url (if possible) as you can do with archive.org books. I would like to give a firm source guideline for that, but can't find one so if you want I would ask at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 12:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and when it will be reviewed by wikipedia? Tizzythewhale (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tizzythewhale, all submitted articles are reviewed by volunteers in no particular order so you'll just have to be patient. However just a couple of months ago the backlog was 3500+ and up to 4 months, but recently we have it down to 1500 and only 150 have been waiting 3 months. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you Tizzythewhale (talk) 12:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the article "Bagri Kumhar"

I have cited Raj era sources in the article, with proper disclaimer, is it correct. Please Check the article. Tizzythewhale (talk) 16:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are talking about the comment about "Raj era sources" and WP:RAJ. I have not been aware of WP:RAJ before as it is not an area I generally edit. I note it is a Wikipedia essay rather than a policy: sometimes essays are clear and correct explanations of the current consensus other times more individuals opinions. As I'm not familiar with the topic area or essays creator I can't really comment. I would suggest either asking the editor who made the comment (Bonadea) or ask in a more general forum such as the Wikipedia:Teahouse to get possible input from lots of experienced editors some who should be familiar with this topic area. Other than the Wikipedia:Teahouse I guess Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics would be a good place to find people more familiar with the subject and best suited to give advice. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woody Norman

Stop changing my revisions. I am Woodys relative Highgateboy (talk) 22:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Highgateboy yes so you have an undisclosed WP:Conflict of interest. Wikipedia articles are written with independent reliable sources not by subjects or people who know them. KylieTastic (talk) 22:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:King Sis

Hello, I noticed you declined my article draft submission for creation. I would love to know what to do in order to make it approved in terms of adding significances. I have a couple of facts I am thinking of adding, but I don’t know if they are enough to make this article set for approval. If you could either explain to me what to add to improve my article or contribute to it to fix what needs improvement, I would be more than grateful. Thanks! Have a good night. Musicbladesuitbox (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Musicbladesuitbox, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). In this case also see Wikipedia:Notability (music). Your article Draft:King Sis has two sources both are interviews which are not an independent reliable sources so do not help show any notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Could you please do me a favour and search for sources that are genuinely reliable by Wikipedia guidelines? I’d be happy to accept edits from anyone at anytime, with an exception being vandalism, of course :) Musicbladesuitbox (talk) 21:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I have my own lists of hundreds of articles to work on as well as reviewing submissions. I also just noticed that it has recently been deleted by AfD see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Sis so people already looked for sources and failed to find enough. Maybe just WP:TOOSOON for this subject. KylieTastic (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't deleted at AfD; it was speedy deleted, so the AfD never completed.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, opps! Thanks for the spot and clarification. KylieTastic (talk) 08:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pacific High School (Pacific, Missouri)

Hello, KylieTastic. You have new messages at Banaticus's talk page.
Message added 23:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Draft:Abid Ali Mir (Kashmiri)

I have worked hard to compile a biography of an author, Abid Ali Mir, who has been featured in over 8 news media channels. However, the article was rejected without any in-depth research or consideration. I believe this deserves a closer review to ensure accuracy and fairness. Avinycomm (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is pure promotion, the same as when it was Draft:Abid Ali Kashmiri from you wit the account you are not block evading. Wikipedia is not for you to promote (yourself). KylieTastic (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]