Talk:East Germany

Minor typos in the Ostalgie subsection

The final paragraph in the "Ostalgie" subsection reads

"In 2023, a poll found that 40% of East Germans identify as East Germans rather then German which was 52%."

I think that it should be changed to something more grammatically correct like

"In 2023, a poll found that 40% of Germans living in the former East Germany identify as East Germans rather than German, which 52% identified as." JonathanArbuckle (talk) 06:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

I have changed this for you. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 18:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2024

To the mods of Wikipedia, greetings. I would like to add the audio file for the national anthem of East Germany, Auferstanden aus Ruinen. I feel it would be useful to future readers of East Germany's page to listen to their national anthem. All other country pages have their national anthem's sound file, so we should bring it to East Germany. Have a good day. Zechchuber (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: If you are aware of a file already on Wikipedia, please link it here and I'll be happy to add it. Otherwise, if you know of a file compatible with Wikipedia's copyright requirements, you can make a request to upload it at WP:FFU, then reopen this request once the file has been accepted. If you don't know of either, I and others can't really help, unfortunately. Tollens (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Richer than West Germany?

According to the numbers given here, the GDR was considerably richer than West Germany in PPP terms in 1990. The GDR had a GDP of $529bn in 1989 and a population of 16.1m. This works out as a GDP per capita at PPP of $32,600 (despite the article saying $42,000). By contrast West Germany had a GDP of $1tn in 1990 and a population of 63.25m, which gives a GDP per capita at PPP of $15,800. Therefore in PPP terms the GDR was more than twice as rich as West Germany. Can this really be the case? LastDodo (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

East German currency was worthless in the real world and had no "international" value, so there was no great way to measure the East Germany economy nor the performance of it's currency, communist economist just made numbers up out of thin air RomanGrandpa (talk) 13:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The 1990 CIA Factbook shows a GNP of $9.679, compared with a GDP of %15,300 for West Germany.[1] But determining a GNP or GDP for non-market economies is always problematic.

The Ostmark was not worthless. The purchasing power for necessities was higher than the Deutschmark, but luxury goods usually could only be bought with Deutschmarks, which were traded at 5:1 to 10:1. Furthermore, the quality of goods in East Germany was usually lower, unless imported.

TFD (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

What westerner would want to be paid in Ostmark's? .....Even the Soviet Union had to trade war ships to buy Pepsi........no company would accept the Ruble, because it had no value outside the Soviet Union. RomanGrandpa (talk) 13:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

CIA Factbook is a standard source for such info so I would suggest that data replace the existing data which comes from the 'World Inequality Database'. LastDodo (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Westerners visiting East Germany would buy Ostmark either through official sources or the black market which they would then use to buy goods and services there. So it wasn't actually worthless in the sense that Confederate money was after the war, just that the market value was far less than the official exchange rate and the currency was not trade in FX markets.

Since the actual method of calculating the value of the Ostmark and the GNP of a non-market economy is disputed, I would like to see a source that explains how it derives its figures.

TFD (talk) 16:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

That's reasonable but since the World Inequality Database doesn't offer any such explanation either, I would still suggest replacing that number with the CIA one for now. LastDodo (talk) 08:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

All these values are heavily dependent on estimates and assumptions which don't stand up too well to scrutiny, but they continue to be important because there are too many occasions when the need to discuss their implications cannot be circumvented. Something is better than nothing. For many purposes "nominal GDP" is more appropriate than "PPP GDP". Your discussion would be more complete if someone were to add and populate the following fields to the infobox:

"| GDP_nominal = $00,000 billion | GDP_nominal_rank = xxst | GDP_nominal_year = 1989 | GDP_nominal_per_capita = $000| GDP_nominal_per_capita_rank = xxst"

That has already been done for most countries. For the infoboxes on East Germany and West Germany in wiki-en those fields are missing, presumably because the data needed to populate them are not so accessible. But if you do have relatively easy access to an appropriate source, how about it? Regards Charles01 (talk) 09:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't I'm afraid. When I google it it comes up with the Wikisource page https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_World_Factbook_(1990)/German_Democratic_Republic and a site called 'theodora.com' that I'm not familiar with. LastDodo (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

I revived this discussion because it remains unresolved. LastDodo (talk) 12:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Government type

The type of government that ruled East Germany should be labeled as “Marxist-Leninist one party socialist republic” rather than simply “socialist republic” due to “socialist republic” being too broad a term and not descriptive enough to describe the government. WildRaptor777 (talk) 01:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Per MOS:IBP, information is meant to be presented in a short format; if you compare the examples in the template documentation for former countries, that's consistent there. The article text exists to provide a more fulsome explanation. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

I disagree. This is too short of a format and doesn't actually showcase the government type properly WildRaptor777 (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Lengthening it would not be consistent with the guideline - the more detailed information should be discussed in the body. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

I wholeheartedly disagree with your assessment here. This much of a shortening of type of government would serve nothing but to limit information presented. On every other Marxist-Leninist state, the government type is stated as such and I see no good reason as to shorten this one specifically. WildRaptor777 (talk) 00:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The existence of other articles with problems is not a reason to introduce problems here. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The point is that your description is too broad and devoid of necessary details. WildRaptor777 (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Details are the function of the body text. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, but you leave out too many than is justified to leave in only the body text WildRaptor777 (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

What is the basis for that claim? As noted, this is consistent with the guidelines and with the template documentation. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

The basis to my claim is based on the fact that there are many different types of “socialist republics” and that simply putting “socialist republic” is too broad. You wouldn’t just put “monarchy” for the modern-day United Kingdom and for feudal Holy Roman Empire. WildRaptor777 (talk) 02:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 Nov 2024

Economy section

"the allied bombing campaigns that decimated cities"

"allied" should be "Allied" (capitalised). It's referring to the WW2 Allies, which is nearly always capitalized, including as an adjective as it is in this case

Thank you 2A02:C7E:2F68:AC00:B043:273:5060:1AC0 (talk) 14:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done RudolfRed (talk) 19:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! 2A02:C7E:2F68:AC00:B043:273:5060:1AC0 (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)