View source for Chinese characters

{{Short description|Logographic writing system}}
{{redirect|Hanzi|the Chinese philosopher also known as "Hanzi"|Han Fei|the anthology attributed to him|Han Feizi{{!}}''Han Feizi''}}
{{redirect|Chinese character|the moth species|Cilix glaucata{{!}}''Cilix glaucata''}}
{{good article}}
{{EngvarB|date=September 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}}
{{bots|deny=Citation bot}}
{{CS1 config|mode=cs1}}
{{Infobox writing system
| sample = Hanzi.svg
| caption = "Chinese character" written in [[traditional Chinese characters|traditional]] (left) and [[simplified Chinese characters|simplified]] (right) forms
| imagesize = 220px
| name = Chinese characters
| type = Logographic
| languages = {{cslist|class=inline|[[Chinese languages|Chinese]]|[[Japanese language|Japanese]]|[[Korean language|Korean]]|[[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]]|[[Zhuang languages|Zhuang]]}} {{nwr|''([[Chinese family of scripts|among others]])''}}
| time = {{circa|13th century&nbsp;BCE}}{{snd}}present
| fam1 = ([[Proto-writing]])
| children = {{hlist|[[Bopomofo]]|[[Jurchen script]]|[[Kana]]|[[Khitan small script]]|[[Nüshu]]|[[Tangut script]]|[[Yi script]]}}
| unicode = [https://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U4E00.pdf U+4E00–U+9FFF] {{nwr|CJK Unified Ideographs}} {{nwr|''([[CJK Unified Ideographs#CJK Unified Ideographs blocks|full list]])''}}
| iso15924 = Hani
| direction = {{blist|Left-to-right|Top-to-bottom, columns right-to-left}}
| ipa-note = none
}}
{{Contains special characters|special={{langr|vi|[[chữ Nôm]]}} characters used to write [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]], as well as {{langr|za|[[sawndip]]}} characters used to write [[Zhuang languages|Zhuang]]|fix=Help:Multilingual support (East Asian)}}
{{Infobox Chinese
| order = st
| t = 漢字
| s = 汉字
| l = [[Han Chinese|Han]] characters
| p = Hànzì
| w = {{tonesup|Han4-tzu4}}
| tp = Hàn-zìh
| gr = Hanntzyh
| bpmf = {{bpmfsp|ㄏㄢˋ|ㄗˋ}}
| mi = {{IPAc-cmn|h|an|4|.|zi|4}}
| j = Hon3 zi6
| y = Hon jih
| ci = {{IPAc-yue|h|on|3|-|z|i|6}}
| gan = {{tonesup|Hon5-ci5}}
| h = {{tonesup|Hon55 sii55}}
| poj = Hàn-jī
| tl = Hàn-jī
| teo = {{tonesup|Hang3 ri7}}
| buc = Háng-cê
| mc = xan<sup>H</sup> dzi<sup>H</sup>
| wuu = {{tonesup|5Hoe-zy}}
| kanji = 漢字
| revhep = kanji
| kunrei = kanzi
| hanja = 漢字
| hangul = 한자
| rr = Hanja
| mr = Hancha
| qn = {{ubl|chữ Hán|chữ Nho|Hán tự}}
| chuhan = 漢字
| hn = {{ubl|𡨸漢|𡨸儒}}
| zha = sawgun
| sd = 𭨡倱{{sfn|Guangxi Nationalities Publishing House|1989}}
}}
{{Chinese characters sidebar}}
'''Chinese characters'''{{efn|name=lead}} are [[logograph]]s used [[Written Chinese|to write the Chinese languages]] and others from regions historically influenced by [[Chinese culture]]. Chinese characters have a documented history spanning over three millennia, representing one of the four independent inventions of writing accepted by scholars; of these, they comprise the only writing system continuously used since its invention. Over time, the function, style, and means of writing characters have evolved greatly. Unlike letters in alphabets that reflect the sounds of speech, Chinese characters generally represent [[morpheme]]s, the units of meaning in a language. Writing a language's entire vocabulary requires thousands of different characters. Characters are created according to several different principles, where aspects of both shape and pronunciation may be used to indicate the character's meaning.

The first attested characters are [[oracle bone inscriptions]] made during the 13th century&nbsp;BCE in what is now [[Anyang]], Henan, as part of divinations conducted by the [[Shang dynasty]] royal house. Character forms were originally highly [[pictograph]]ic in style, but evolved over time as writing spread across China. Numerous attempts have been made to reform the script, including the promotion of [[small seal script]] by the [[Qin dynasty]] (221–206&nbsp;BCE). [[Clerical script]], which had matured by the early [[Han dynasty]] (202&nbsp;BCE{{snd}}220&nbsp;CE), abstracted the forms of characters—obscuring their pictographic origins in favour of making them easier to write. Following the Han, [[regular script]] emerged as the result of cursive influence on clerical script, and has been the primary style used for characters since. Informed by a long tradition of [[lexicography]], states using Chinese characters have standardised their forms: broadly, [[simplified characters]] are used to write Chinese in [[mainland China]], [[Singapore]], and [[Malaysia]], while [[traditional characters]] are used in [[Taiwan]], [[Hong Kong]], and [[Macau]].

After being introduced in order to write [[Literary Chinese]], characters were often adapted to write local languages spoken throughout the [[Sinosphere]]. In [[Japanese language|Japanese]], [[Korean language|Korean]], and [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]], Chinese characters are known as [[kanji]], [[hanja]], and {{langr|vi|[[chữ Hán]]}} respectively. Writing traditions also emerged for some of the other [[languages of China]], like the [[sawndip]] script used to write the [[Zhuang languages]] of [[Guangxi]]. Each of these written vernaculars used existing characters to write the language's native vocabulary, as well as the [[Sino-Xenic vocabularies|loanwords it borrowed from Chinese]]. In addition, each invented characters for local use. In written Korean and Vietnamese, Chinese characters have largely been replaced with alphabets, leaving Japanese as the only major non-Chinese language still written using them.

At the most basic level, characters are composed of [[Chinese character strokes|strokes]] that are written in a fixed order. Methods of writing characters have historically included being carved into stone, being inked with a brush onto silk, bamboo, or paper, and being printed using [[woodblock printing|woodblocks]] and [[moveable type]]. Technologies invented since the 19th century allowing for wider use of characters include [[telegraph code]]s and [[typewriter]]s, as well as [[input method]]s and [[text encodings]] on computers.

== Development ==
{{Further|Proto-writing|History of writing}}
{{See also|Ideograph|Rebus}}
Chinese characters are accepted as representing one of four independent inventions of writing in human history.{{efn|Zev Handel lists:{{sfn|Handel|2019|p=1}} {{olist|Sumerian [[cuneiform]] emerging {{circa|3200&nbsp;BCE}}|[[Egyptian hieroglyphs]] emerging {{circa|3100&nbsp;BCE|lk=no}}|Chinese characters emerging {{circa|13th century&nbsp;BCE|lk=no}}|[[Maya script]] emerging {{circa|1&nbsp;CE|lk=no}}}}}} In each instance, writing evolved from a system using two distinct types of ''[[ideograph]]s''. Ideographs could either be ''pictographs'' visually depicting objects or concepts, or fixed ''[[sign (semiotics)|sign]]s'' representing concepts only by shared convention. These systems are classified as [[proto-writing]], because the techniques they used were insufficient to carry the meaning of spoken language by themselves.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=2}}

Various innovations were required for Chinese characters to emerge from proto-writing. Firstly, pictographs became distinct from simple pictures in use and appearance: for example, the pictograph {{hani|大}}, meaning 'large', was originally a picture of a large man, but one would need to be aware of its specific meaning in order to interpret the sequence {{hani|{{linktext|大|鹿}}}} as signifying 'large deer', rather than being a picture of a large man and a deer next to one another. Due to this process of abstraction, as well as to make characters easier to write, pictographs gradually became more simplified and regularised—often to the extent that the original objects represented are no longer obvious.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=3–4}}

This proto-writing system was limited to representing a relatively narrow range of ideas with a comparatively small library of symbols. This compelled innovations that allowed for symbols to directly encode spoken language.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=5}} In each historical case, this was accomplished by some form of the [[rebus]] technique, where the symbol for a word is used to indicate a different word with a similar pronunciation, depending on context.{{sfnm|Norman|1988|1p=59|Li|2020|2p=48}} This allowed for words that lacked a plausible pictographic representation to be written down for the first time. This technique pre-empted more sophisticated methods of character creation that would further expand the lexicon. The process whereby writing emerged from proto-writing took place over a long period; when the purely pictorial use of symbols disappeared, leaving only those representing spoken words, the process was complete.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=11, 16}}

== Classification ==
{{Main|Chinese character classification}}
Chinese characters have been used in several different [[writing system]]s throughout history. The concept of a writing system includes both the written symbols themselves, called ''[[grapheme]]s''—which may include characters, numerals, or punctuation—as well as the rules by which they are used to record language.{{sfnm|Qiu|2000|1p=1|Handel|2019|2pp=4–5}} Chinese characters are ''[[logograph]]s'', which are graphemes that represent units of meaning in a language. Specifically, characters represent the smallest units of meaning in a language, which are referred to as ''[[morpheme]]s''. Morphemes in Chinese—and therefore the characters used to write them—are nearly always a single syllable in length. In some special cases, characters may denote non-morphemic syllables as well; due to this, [[written Chinese]] is often characterised as [[morphosyllabic]].{{sfnm|Qiu|2000|1pp=22–26|Norman|1988|2p=74}}{{efn|According to Handel: "While monosyllabism generally trumps morphemicity—that is to say, a bisyllabic morpheme is nearly always written with two characters rather than one—there is an unmistakable tendency for script users to impose a morphemic identity on the linguistic units represented by these characters."{{sfn|Handel|2019|p=33}}}} Logographs may be contrasted with [[letter (alphabet)|letter]]s in an [[alphabet]], which generally represent ''[[phoneme]]s'', the distinct units of sound used by speakers of a language.{{sfnm|Qiu|2000|1pp=13–15|Coulmas|1991|2pp=104–109}} Despite their origins in picture-writing, Chinese characters are no longer ideographs capable of representing ideas directly; their comprehension relies on the reader's knowledge of the particular language being written.{{sfnm|Li|2020|1pp=56–57|Boltz|1994|2pp=3–4}}

The areas where Chinese characters were historically used—sometimes collectively termed the [[Sinosphere]]—have a long tradition of [[lexicography]] attempting to explain and refine their use; for most of history, analysis revolved around a model first popularised in the 2nd-century ''[[Shuowen Jiezi]]'' dictionary.{{sfnm|Handel|2019|1p=51|2a1=Yong|2a2=Peng|2y=2008|2pp=95–98}} More recent models have analysed the methods used to create characters, how characters are structured, and how they function in a given writing system.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=19, 162–168}}

=== Structural analysis ===
Most characters can be analysed structurally as ''compounds'' made of smaller ''[[Chinese character components|components]]'' ({{zhi|c=部件|p=bùjiàn}}), which are often independent characters in their own right, adjusted to occupy a given position in the compound.{{sfn|Boltz|2011|pp=57, 60}} Components within a character may serve a specific function: ''phonetic'' components provide a hint for the character's pronunciation, and ''semantic'' components indicate some element of the character's meaning. Components that serve neither function may be classified as pure ''signs'' with no particular meaning, other than their presence distinguishing one character from another.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=14–18}}

A straightforward structural classification scheme may consist of three pure classes of ''semantographs'', ''phonographs'' and ''signs''—having only semantic, phonetic, and form components respectively, as well as classes corresponding to each combination of component types.{{sfnm|Yin|2007|1pp=97–100|Su|2014|2pp=102-111}} Of the {{val|3500}} characters that are frequently used in Standard Chinese, pure semantographs are estimated to be the rarest, accounting for about 5% of the lexicon, followed by pure signs with 18%, and semantic–form and phonetic–form compounds together accounting for 19%. The remaining 58% are phono-semantic compounds.{{sfn|Yang|2008|pp=147-148}}

The Chinese palaeographer [[Qiu Xigui]] ({{born-in|1935}}) presents three principles of character function adapted from earlier proposals by {{ill|Tang Lan|zh|唐蘭}} (1901–1979) and [[Chen Mengjia]] (1911–1966),{{sfn|Demattè|2022|p=14}} with ''semantographs'' describing all characters whose forms are wholly related to their meaning, regardless of the method by which the meaning was originally depicted, ''phonographs'' that include a phonetic component, and ''loangraphs'' encompassing existing characters that have been borrowed to write other words. Qiu also acknowledges the existence of character classes that fall outside of these principles, such as pure signs.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=163–171}}

=== Semantographs ===
==== Pictographs ====
{{mim
| direction = vertical | width = 300 | caption_align = center | border = none
| header    = Graphical evolution of pictographs
| image1    = Evo-rì.svg
| caption1  = {{zhc|c=日|l=Sun}}
| image2    = Evo-shān.svg
| caption2  = {{zhc|c=山|l=mountain}}
| image3    = Evo-xiàng.svg
| caption3  = {{zhc|c=象|l=elephant}}
}}
Most of the oldest characters are [[pictograph]]s ({{zhi|c=象形|p=xiàngxíng}}), representational pictures of physical objects.{{sfn|Yong|Peng|2008|p=19}} Examples include {{linktext|日|lang=zh}} ('Sun'), {{linktext|月|lang=zh}} ('Moon'), and {{linktext|木|lang=zh}} ('tree'). Over time, the forms of pictographs have been simplified in order to make them easier to write.{{sfnm|Qiu|2000|1pp=44–45|Zhou|2003|2p=61}} As a result, modern readers generally cannot deduce what many pictographs were originally meant to resemble; without knowing the context of their origin in picture-writing, they may be interpreted instead as pure signs. However, if a pictograph's use in compounds still reflects its original meaning, as with {{zhi|c=日}} in {{zhc|c=晴|l=clear sky}}, it can still be analysed as a semantic component.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=18–19}}{{sfnm|Qiu|2000|1p=154|Norman|1988|2p=68}}

Pictographs have often been extended from their original meanings to take on additional layers of metaphor and [[synecdoche]], which sometimes displace the character's original sense. When this process results in excessive ambiguity between distinct senses written with the same character, it is usually resolved by new compounds being derived to represent particular senses.{{sfn|Yip|2000|pp=39-42}}

==== <span class="anchor" id="Ideographs"></span>Indicatives ====
Indicatives ({{zhi|p=zhǐshì|t=指事}}), also called ''simple ideographs'' or ''self-explanatory characters'',{{sfn|Yong|Peng|2008|p=19}} are visual representations of abstract concepts that lack any tangible form. Examples include {{linktext|上|lang=zh}} ('up') and {{linktext|下|lang=zh}} ('down')—these characters were originally written as dots placed above and below a line, and later evolved into their present forms with less potential for graphical ambiguity in context.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=46}} More complex indicatives include {{linktext|凸|lang=zh}} ('convex'), {{linktext|凹|lang=zh}} ('concave'), and {{linktext|平|lang=zh}} ('flat and level').{{sfnm|Norman|1988|1p=68|Qiu|2000|2pp=185–187}}

==== Compound ideographs ====
Compound ideographs ({{zhi|t=會意|s=会意|p=huìyì}})—also called ''logical aggregates'', ''associative idea characters'', or ''syssemantographs''—combine other characters to convey a new, synthetic meaning. A canonical example is {{zhi|明}} ('bright'), interpreted as the juxtaposition of the two brightest objects in the sky: {{kxr|日}} and {{kxr|月}}, together expressing their shared quality of brightness. Other examples include {{zhc|c=休|l=rest}}, composed of pictographs {{kxr|人}} and {{kxr|木}}, and {{zhc|c=好|l=good}}, composed of {{kxr|女}} and {{kxr|子}}.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=15, 190–202}}
[[File:Compound Chinese character demonstration with 好.gif|frameless|left|upright=0.9|The compound character {{zhi|c=好}} illustrated as its component characters {{zhi|女}} and {{zhi|子}} positioned side by side]]
Many traditional examples of compound ideographs are now believed to have actually originated as phono-semantic compounds, made obscure by subsequent changes in pronunciation.{{sfn|Sampson|Chen|2013|p=261}} For example, the ''Shuowen Jiezi'' describes {{zhc|c=信|l=trust}} as an ideographic compound of {{kxr|人}} and {{kxr|言}}, but modern analyses instead identify it as a phono-semantic compound—though with disagreement as to which component is phonetic.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=155}} [[Peter A. Boodberg]] and [[William G. Boltz]] go so far as to deny that any compound ideographs were devised in antiquity, maintaining that secondary readings that are now lost are responsible for the apparent absence of phonetic indicators,{{sfn|Boltz|1994|pp=104–110}} but their arguments have been rejected by other scholars.{{sfn|Sampson|Chen|2013|pp=265–268}}

=== Phonographs ===
==== Phono-semantic compounds ====
Phono-semantic compounds ({{zhi|p=xíngshēng|s=形声|t=形聲}}) are composed of at least one semantic component and one phonetic component.{{sfn|Norman|1988|p=68}} They may be formed by one of several methods, often by adding a phonetic component to disambiguate a loangraph, or by adding a semantic component to represent a specific extension of a character's meaning.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=154}} Examples of phono-semantic compounds include {{zhc|c=河|p=hé|l=river}}, {{zhc|c=湖|p=hú|l=lake}}, {{zhc|c=流|p=liú|l=stream}}, {{zhc|c=沖|p=chōng|l=surge}}, and {{zhc|c=滑|p=huá|l=slippery}}. Each of these characters have three short strokes on their left-hand side: {{kxr|氵|v=y|name=no}}, a simplified combining form of {{kxr|water}}. This component serves a semantic function in each example, indicating the character has some meaning related to water. The remainder of each character is its phonetic component: {{zhc|c=湖|p=hú}} is pronounced identically to {{zhc|c=胡|p=hú}} in Standard Chinese, {{zhc|c=河|p=hé}} is pronounced similarly to {{zhc|c=可|p=kě}}, and {{zhc|c=沖|p=chōng}} is pronounced similarly to {{zhc|c=中|p=zhōng}}.{{sfn|Cruttenden|2021|pp=167–168}}

The phonetic components of most compounds may only provide an approximate pronunciation, even before subsequent sound shifts in the spoken language. Some characters may only have the same initial or final sound of a syllable in common with phonetic components.{{sfn|Williams|2010}} A [[phonetic series (Chinese characters)|phonetic series]] comprises all the characters created using the same phonetic component, which may have diverged significantly in their pronunciations over time. For example, {{zhc|c=茶|l=tea|p=chá|j=caa4}} and {{zhc|c=途|l=route|p=tú|j=tou4}} are part of the phonetic series of characters using {{zhc|c=余|p=yú|j=jyu4}}, a literary first-person pronoun. The [[Old Chinese]] pronunciations of these characters were similar, but the phonetic component no longer serves as a useful hint for their pronunciation due to subsequent sound shifts.{{sfn|Vogelsang|2021|pp=51–52}}

=== Loangraphs ===
The phenomenon of existing characters being adapted to write other words with similar pronunciations was necessary in the initial development of Chinese writing, and has remained common throughout its subsequent history. Some loangraphs ({{zhi|c=假借|p=jiǎjiè|l=borrowing}}) are introduced to represent words previously lacking another written form—this is often the case with abstract grammatical particles such as {{Linktext|之|lang=zh}} and {{Linktext|其|lang=zh}}.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=261–265}} The process of characters being borrowed as loangraphs should not be conflated with the distinct process of semantic extension, where a word acquires additional senses, which often remain written with the same character. As both processes often result in a single character form being used to write several distinct meanings, loangraphs are often misidentified as being the result of semantic extension, and vice versa.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=273–274, 302}}

Loangraphs are also used to write words borrowed from other languages, such as the Buddhist terminology introduced to China in antiquity, as well as contemporary non-Chinese words and names. For example, each character in the name {{zhc|c=加拿大|p=Jiānádà|l=Canada}} is often used as a loangraph for its respective syllable. However, the barrier between a character's pronunciation and meaning is never total: when transcribing into Chinese, loangraphs are often chosen deliberately as to create certain connotations. This is regularly done with corporate brand names: for example, [[Coca-Cola]]'s Chinese name is {{zhc|s=可口可乐|t=可口可樂|p=Kěkǒu Kělè|l=delicious enjoyable}}.{{sfn|Taylor|Taylor|2014|pp=30–32}}{{sfn|Ramsey|1987|p=60}}{{sfn|Gnanadesikan|2011|p=61}}

=== Signs ===
Some characters and components are pure [[sign (semiotics)|signs]], whose meaning merely derives from their having a fixed and distinct form. Basic examples of pure signs are found with [[Chinese numerals|the numerals]] beyond four, e.g. {{zhc|c=五|l=five}} and {{zhc|c=八|l=eight}}, whose forms do not give visual hints to the quantities they represent.{{sfnm|Qiu|2000|1p=168|Norman|1988|2p=60}}

=== Traditional ''Shuowen Jiezi'' classification ===
The ''[[Shuowen Jiezi]]'' is a character dictionary authored {{circa|100&nbsp;CE|lk=no}} by the scholar [[Xu Shen]] ({{circa|58|148&nbsp;CE|lk=no}}). In its postface, Xu analyses what he sees as all the methods by which characters are created. Later authors iterated upon Xu's analysis, developing a categorisation scheme known as the {{zhl|s=六书|t=六書|p=liùshū|l=six writings}}, which identifies every character with one of six categories that had previously been mentioned in the ''Shuowen Jiezi''. For nearly two millennia, this scheme was the primary framework for character analysis used throughout the Sinosphere.{{sfnm|Norman|1988|1pp=67–69|Handel|2019|2p=48}} Xu based most of his analysis on examples of Qin seal script that were written down several centuries before his time—these were usually the oldest specimens available to him, though he stated he was aware of the existence of even older forms.{{sfn|Norman|1988|pp=170–171}} The first five categories are pictographs, indicatives, compound ideographs, phono-semantic compounds, and loangraphs. The sixth category is given by Xu as {{zhc|c=轉注|p=zhuǎnzhù|l=reversed and refocused}}; however, its definition is unclear, and it is generally disregarded by modern scholars.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=48–49}}

Modern scholars agree that the theory presented in the ''Shuowen Jiezi'' is problematic, failing to fully capture the nature of Chinese writing, both in the present, as well as at the time Xu was writing.{{sfnm|Qiu|2000|1pp=153–154, 161|Norman|1988|2p=170}} Traditional Chinese lexicography as embodied in the ''Shuowen Jiezi'' has suggested implausible etymologies for some characters.{{sfnm|Qiu|2013|1pp=102–108|Norman|1988|2p=69}} Moreover, several categories are considered to be ill-defined: for example, it is unclear whether characters like {{zhc|c=大|l=large}} should be classified as pictographs or indicatives.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=154}} However, awareness of the 'six writings' model has remained a common component of character literacy, and often serves as a tool for students memorising characters.{{sfn|Handel|2019|p=43}}

== History ==
{{Further|Chinese script styles|History of the Chinese language}}
[[File:Comparative evolution of Cuneiform, Egyptian and Chinese characters.svg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram comparing the abstraction of pictographs in cuneiform, Egyptian hieroglyphs, and Chinese characters{{snd}}from an 1870 publication by French Egyptologist [[Gaston Maspero]]{{efn-ua |{{Cite book |last=Maspero |first=Gaston |author-link=Gaston Maspero |url=http://archive.org/details/recueildetravaux27masp/page/244/mode/2up |title=Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à l'archéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes |publisher=Librairie Honoré Champion |year=1870 |location=Paris |page=243 |language=fr}}}}]]
The broadest trend in the evolution of Chinese characters over their history has been simplification, both in graphical ''shape'' ({{zhi|c=字形|p=zìxíng}}), the "external appearances of individual graphs", and in graphical ''form'' ({{zhi|s=字体|t=字體|p=zìtǐ}}), "overall changes in the distinguishing features of graphic[al] shape and calligraphic style, [...] in most cases refer[ring] to rather obvious and rather substantial changes".{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=44–45}} The traditional notion of an orderly procession of script styles, each suddenly appearing and displacing the one previous, has been disproven by later scholarship and archaeological work. Instead, scripts evolved gradually, with several coexisting in a given area.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=59–60, 66}}

=== Traditional invention narrative ===
Several of the [[Chinese classics]] indicate that [[Chinese knotting#Recordkeeping|knotted cords]] were used to keep records prior to the invention of writing.{{sfn|Demattè|2022|pp=79–80}} Works that reference the practice include chapter 80 of the ''[[Tao Te Ching]]''{{efn-ua |{{Cite book |author=Laozi |author-link=Laozi |title-link=Tao Te Ching |year=1891 |language=lzh,en |translator-last=Legge |translator-first=James |script-title=zh:道德經 |trans-title=Tao Te Ching |chapter=80 |author-mask=Laozi |translator-link=James Legge |chapter-url=https://ctext.org/dao-de-jing/ens#n11671 |via=the [[Chinese Text Project]] |trans-quote=I would make the people return to the use of knotted cords (instead of the written characters).}} }} and the "[[Xici]]&nbsp;II" commentary to the ''[[I&nbsp;Ching]]''.{{efn-ua |{{Cite book |title-link=I Ching |year=1899 |language=lzh,en |translator-last=Legge |translator-first=James |script-title=zh:易經 |trans-title=I Ching |script-chapter=zh:係辭下 |trans-chapter=Xi Ci II |translator-link=James Legge |chapter-url=https://ctext.org/book-of-changes/xi-ci-xia#n46944 |via=the [[Chinese Text Project]] |trans-quote=In the highest antiquity, government was carried on successfully by the use of knotted cords (to preserve the memory of things). In subsequent ages the sages substituted for these written characters and bonds.}} }} According to one tradition, Chinese characters were invented during the 3rd millennium&nbsp;BCE by [[Cangjie]], a scribe of the legendary [[Yellow Emperor]]. Cangjie is said to have invented symbols called {{zhc|c=字|p=zì}} due to his frustration with the limitations of knotting, taking inspiration from his study of the tracks of animals, landscapes, and the stars in the sky. On the day that these first characters were created, grain rained down from the sky; that night, the people heard the wailing of ghosts and demons, lamenting that humans could no longer be cheated.{{sfn|Yang|An|2008|pp=84–86}}{{sfn|Boltz|1994|pp=130–138}}

=== Neolithic ===
{{Main|Neolithic symbols in China}}
Collections of graphs and pictures have been discovered at the sites of several [[Neolithic]] settlements throughout the [[Yellow River]] valley, including [[Jiahu]] ({{circa|6500&nbsp;BCE|lk=no}}), [[Dadiwan]] and [[Damaidi]] (6th millennium&nbsp;BCE), and [[Banpo]] (5th millennium&nbsp;BCE). Symbols at each site were inscribed or drawn onto artifacts, appearing one at a time and without indicating any greater context. Qiu concludes, "We simply possess no basis for saying that they were already being used to record language."{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=31}} A historical connection with the symbols used by the late Neolithic [[Dawenkou culture]] ({{circa|4300|2600&nbsp;BCE|lk=no}}) in Shandong has been deemed possible by palaeographers, with Qiu concluding that they "cannot be definitively treated as primitive writing, nevertheless they are symbols which resemble most the ancient pictographic script discovered thus far in China...&nbsp;They undoubtedly can be viewed as the forerunners of primitive writing."{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=39}}

=== Oracle bone script ===
{{Main|Oracle bone script}}
{{mim
| header = Oracle bone script
| width = 60
| caption_align = center
| image1   = 天-oracle.svg
| caption1 = {{lang|zh|天}}<br />{{nwr|'Heaven'}}
| image2   = 馬-oracle.svg
| caption2 = {{lang|zh|馬}}<br />{{nwr|'horse'}}
| image3   = 旅-oracle.svg
| caption3 = {{lang|zh|旅}}<br />{{nwr|'travel'}}
| image4   = 正-oracle.svg
| caption4 = {{lang|zh|正}}<br />{{nwr|'straight'}}
| image5   = 韋-oracle.svg
| caption5 = {{lang|zh|韋}}<br />{{nwr|'leather'}}
}}
{{CSS image crop
| Image = Shang dynasty inscribed scapula.jpg
| bSize = 280
| cWidth = 240
| cHeight = 300
| oTop = 115
| oLeft = 35
| Description = Ox scapula inscribed with characters recording the result of divinations{{snd}}dated {{circa|1200&nbsp;BCE}}
}}
The oldest attested Chinese writing comprises a body of inscriptions produced during the [[Late Shang]] period ({{circa|1250|lk=no}}{{snd}}1050&nbsp;BCE), with the very earliest examples from the reign of [[Wu Ding]] dated between 1250 and 1200&nbsp;BCE.{{sfnm|Boltz|1999|1pp=74, 107–108|Liu et al.|2017|2pp=155–175}} Many of these inscriptions were made on [[oracle bone]]s—usually either ox [[scapula]]e or turtle plastrons—and recorded official [[divination]]s carried out by the Shang royal house. Contemporaneous inscriptions in a related but distinct style were also made on ritual bronze vessels. This [[oracle bone script]] ({{zhi|c=甲骨文|p=jiǎgǔwén<!-- A considered exception to [[MOS:ZH]] -->}}) was first documented in 1899, after specimens were discovered being sold as "dragon bones" for medicinal purposes, with the symbols carved into them identified as early character forms. By 1928, the source of the bones had been traced to a village near [[Anyang]] in [[Henan]]—discovered to be the site of [[Yinxu|Yin]], the final Shang capital—which was excavated by a team led by [[Li Ji (archaeologist)|Li Ji]] (1896–1979) from the [[Academia Sinica]] between 1928 and 1937.{{sfn|Liu|Chen|2012|p=6}} To date, over {{val|150000}} oracle bone fragments have been found.{{sfnm|Kern|2010|1p=1|Wilkinson|2012|2pp=681–682}}

Oracle bone inscriptions recorded divinations undertaken to communicate with the spirits of royal ancestors. The inscriptions range from a few characters in length at their shortest, to several dozen at their longest. The Shang king would communicate with his ancestors by means of [[scapulimancy]], inquiring about subjects such as the royal family, military success, and the weather. Inscriptions were made in the divination material itself before and after it had been cracked by exposure to heat; they generally include a record of the questions posed, as well as the answers as interpreted in the cracks.{{sfn|Keightley|1978|pp=28–42}}{{sfn|Kern|2010|p=1}} A minority of bones feature characters that were inked with a brush before their strokes were incised; the evidence of this also shows that the conventional [[stroke order]]s used by later calligraphers had already been established for many characters by this point.{{sfn|Keightley|1978|pp=46–47}}

Oracle bone script is the direct ancestor of later forms of written Chinese. The oldest known inscriptions already represent a well-developed writing system, which suggests an initial emergence predating the late 2nd millennium&nbsp;BCE. Although written Chinese is first attested in official divinations, it is widely believed that writing was also used for other purposes during the Shang, but that the media used in other contexts—likely [[bamboo and wooden slips]]—were less durable than bronzes or oracle bones, and have not been preserved.{{sfnm|Boltz|1986|1p=424|Kern|2010|2p=2}}

=== Zhou scripts ===
{{See also|Chinese bronze inscriptions|Bamboo and wooden slips|Seal script}}
{{mim
| header = Bronze script
| width = 60
| image1 = 天-bronze.svg
| image2 = 馬-bronze.svg
| image3 = 旅-bronze.svg
| image4 = 正-bronze.svg
| image5 = 韋-bronze.svg
| alt1 = 天
| alt2 = 馬
| alt3 = 旅
| alt4 = 正
| alt5 = 韋
}}
{{CSS image crop
| Image = Shi Qiang pan.jpg
| bSize = 300
| cWidth = 285
| cHeight = 160
| oTop = 30
| oLeft = 6
| Description = The [[Shi Qiang pan|Shi Qiang ''pan'']], a bronze ritual basin bearing inscriptions describing the deeds and virtues of the first seven Zhou kings{{snd}}dated {{circa|900&nbsp;BCE|lk=no}}{{sfn|Shaughnessy|1991|p=1–4}}
}}
As early as the Shang, the oracle bone script existed as a simplified form alongside another that was used in bamboo books, in addition to elaborate pictorial forms often used in clan emblems. These other forms have been preserved in what is called [[bronze script]] ({{zhi|c=金文|p=jīnwén}}), where inscriptions were made using a stylus in a clay mould, which was then used to cast [[Chinese ritual bronzes|ritual bronzes]].{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=63–66}} These differences in technique generally resulted in character forms that were less angular in appearance than their oracle bone script counterparts.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=88–89}}

Study of these bronze inscriptions has revealed that the mainstream script underwent slow, gradual evolution during the late Shang, which continued during the [[Zhou dynasty]] ({{circa|1046|lk=no}}{{snd}}256&nbsp;BCE) until assuming the form now known as [[small seal script]] ({{zhi|c=小篆|p=xiǎozhuàn<!-- A considered exception to [[MOS:ZH]] -->}}) within the Zhou [[state of Qin]].{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=76–78}}{{sfn|Chen|2003}} Other scripts in use during the late Zhou include the [[bird-worm seal script]] ({{zhi|t=鳥蟲書|s=鸟虫书|p=niǎochóngshū}}), as well as the regional forms used in non-Qin states. Examples of these styles were preserved as variants in the ''Shuowen Jiezi''.{{sfn|Louis|2003}} Historically, Zhou forms were collectively referred to as [[large seal script]] ({{zhi|c=大篆|p=dàzhuàn}}), a term which has fallen out of favour due to its lack of precision.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=77}}

=== Qin unification and small seal script ===
{{Main|Small seal script}}
{{mim
| header = Small seal script
| width = 60
| image1 = 天-seal.svg
| image2 = 馬-seal.svg
| image3 = 旅-seal.svg
| image4 = 正-seal.svg
| image5 = 韋-seal.svg
| alt1 = 天
| alt2 = 馬
| alt3 = 旅
| alt4 = 正
| alt5 = 韋
}}
Following [[Qin's wars of unification|Qin's conquest]] of the other Chinese states that culminated in the founding of the imperial [[Qin dynasty]] in 221&nbsp;BCE, the Qin small seal script was standardised for use throughout the entire country under the direction of Chancellor [[Li Si]] ({{circa|280|lk=no}}{{snd}}208&nbsp;BCE).{{sfn|Boltz|1994|p=156}} It was traditionally believed that Qin scribes only used small seal script, and the later clerical script was a sudden invention during the early Han. However, more than one script was used by Qin scribes: a rectilinear vulgar style had also been in use in Qin for centuries prior to the wars of unification. The popularity of this form grew as writing became more widespread.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=104–107}}

=== Clerical script ===
{{Main|Clerical script}}
{{mim
| header = Clerical script
| width = 60
| image1 = 天-clerical-han.svg
| image2 = 馬-clerical-han.svg
| image3 = 旅-clerical-han.svg
| image4 = 正-clerical-han.svg
| image5 = 韋-clerical-han.svg
| alt1 = 天
| alt2 = 馬
| alt3 = 旅
| alt4 = 正
| alt5 = 韋
}}
By the [[Warring States period]] ({{circa|475|lk=no}}{{snd}}221&nbsp;BCE), an immature form of [[clerical script]] ({{zhi|t=隸書|s=隶书|p=lìshū<!-- A considered exception to [[MOS:ZH]] -->}}) had emerged based on the vulgar form developed within Qin, often called "early clerical" or "proto-clerical".{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=59, 119}} The proto-clerical script evolved gradually; by the [[Han dynasty]] (202&nbsp;BCE{{snd}}220&nbsp;CE), it had arrived at a mature form, also called {{zhc|c=八分|p=bāfēn}}. Bamboo slips discovered during the late 20th century point to this maturation being completed during the reign of [[Emperor Wu of Han]] ({{reign|141|87&nbsp;BCE}}). This process, called ''[[libian]]'' ({{zhi|t=隸變|s=隶变}}), involved character forms being mutated and simplified, with many components being consolidated, substituted, or omitted. In turn, the components themselves were regularised to use fewer, straighter, and more well-defined strokes. The resulting clerical forms largely lacked any of the pictorial qualities that remained in seal script.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=119–124}}

Around the midpoint of the [[Eastern Han]] (25–220&nbsp;CE), a simplified and easier form of clerical script appeared, which Qiu terms {{zhl|s=新隶体|t=新隸體|p=xīnlìtǐ|l=neo-clerical}}.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=113, 139, 466}} By the end of the Han, this had become the dominant script used by scribes, though clerical script remained in use for formal works, such as engraved [[stelae]]. Qiu describes neo-clerical as a transitional form between clerical and [[regular script]] which remained in use through the [[Three Kingdoms]] period (220–280&nbsp;CE) and beyond.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=138–139}}

=== Cursive and semi-cursive ===
{{mim
| header = Cursive script
| width = 60
| image1 = 天-caoshu.svg
| image2 = 馬-caoshu.svg
| image3 = 旅-caoshu.svg
| image4 = 正-caoshu.svg
| image5 = 韋-caoshu.svg
| alt1 = 天
| alt2 = 馬
| alt3 = 旅
| alt4 = 正
| alt5 = 韋
}}
[[Cursive script (East Asia)|Cursive script]] ({{zhi|t=草書|s=草书|p=cǎoshū<!-- A considered exception to [[MOS:ZH]] -->}}) was in use as early as 24&nbsp;BCE, synthesising elements of the vulgar writing that had originated in Qin with flowing cursive brushwork. By the [[Jin dynasty (266–420)]], the Han cursive style became known as {{zhc|c=章草|p=zhāngcǎo|l=orderly cursive}}, sometimes known in English as 'clerical cursive', 'ancient cursive', or 'draft cursive'. Some attribute this name to the fact that the style was considered more orderly than a later form referred to as {{zhc|c=今草|p=jīncǎo|l=modern cursive}}, which had first emerged during the Jin and was influenced by semi-cursive and regular script. This later form was exemplified by the work of figures like [[Wang Xizhi]] (303–361), who is often regarded as the most important calligrapher in Chinese history.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=130–148}}{{sfn|Knechtges|Chang|2014|pp=1257–1259}}

{{mim
| header = Semi-cursive script
| width = 60
| image1 = 天-xingshu.svg
| image2 = 馬-xingshu.svg
| image3 = 旅-xingshu.svg
| image4 = 正-xingshu.svg
| image5 = 韋-xingshu.svg
| alt1 = 天
| alt2 = 馬
| alt3 = 旅
| alt4 = 正
| alt5 = 韋
}}
An early form of [[semi-cursive script]] ({{zhi|t=行書|s=行书|p=xíngshū|l=running script}}) can be identified during the late Han, with its development stemming from a cursive form of neo-clerical script. Liu Desheng ({{zhi|劉德升}}; {{circa|147|lk=no}}{{snd}}188&nbsp;CE) is traditionally recognised as the inventor of the semi-cursive style, though accreditations of this kind often indicate a given style's early masters, rather than its earliest practitioners. Later analysis has suggested popular origins for semi-cursive, as opposed to it being an invention of Liu.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=113, 139–142}} It can be characterised partly as the result of clerical forms being written more quickly, without formal rules of technique or composition: what would be discrete strokes in clerical script frequently flow together instead. The semi-cursive style is commonly adopted in contemporary handwriting.{{sfnm|Li|2020|1p=51|Qiu|2000|2p=149|Norman|1988|3p=70}}

=== Regular script ===
{{Main|Regular script}}
{{mim
| header = Regular script
| width = 60
| image1 = 天-kaishu.svg
| image2 = 馬-kaishu.svg
| image3 = 旅-kaishu.svg
| image4 = 正-kaishu.svg
| image5 = 韋-kaishu.svg
| alt1 = 天
| alt2 = 馬
| alt3 = 旅
| alt4 = 正
| alt5 = 韋
}}
[[File:姓解 Digidepo 1287529 00000014(2) (cropped).jpg|thumb|A page from a Song-era publication printed using a regular script style{{efn-ua |{{Cite book |last=Shao |first=Si |url=https://dl.ndl.go.jp/en/pid/1287529/1/2 |title=Explaining Surnames |year=1035 |volume=1 |location=Tokyo |page=1 |language=lzh |script-title=zh:姓解 |doi=10.11501/1287529 |author-mask=Shao Si (邵思) |access-date=30 May 2024 |via=the [[National Diet Library]]}} }}]]
[[Regular script]] ({{zhi|t=楷書|s=楷书|p=kǎishū}}), based on clerical and semi-cursive forms, is the predominant form in which characters are written and printed.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=113, 149}} Its innovations have traditionally been credited to the calligrapher [[Zhong Yao]] ({{circa|151|lk=no}}{{snd}}230), who was living in the state of [[Cao Wei]] (220–266); he is often called the "father of regular script".{{sfn|Chan|2020|p=125}} The earliest surviving writing in regular script comprises copies of Zhong Yao's work, including at least one copy by Wang Xizhi. Characteristics of regular script include the {{zhl|t=頓|p=dùn|l=pause}} technique used to end horizontal strokes, as well as heavy tails on diagonal strokes made going down and to the right. It developed further during the [[Eastern Jin]] (317–420) in the hands of Wang Xizhi and his son [[Wang Xianzhi (calligrapher)|Wang Xianzhi]] (344–386).{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=143}} However, most Jin-era writers continued to use neo-clerical and semi-cursive styles in their daily writing. It was not until the [[Northern and Southern period]] (420–589) that regular script became the predominant form.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=144-145}} The system of [[imperial examination]]s for the civil service established during the [[Sui dynasty]] (581–618) required test takers to write in [[Literary Chinese]] using regular script, which contributed to the prevalence of both throughout later Chinese history.{{sfn|Li|2020|p=41}}

== Structure ==
{{See also|Chinese character strokes}}
Each character of a text is written within a uniform square allotted for it. As part of the evolution from seal script into clerical script, character components became regularised as discrete series of ''[[Chinese character strokes|strokes]]'' ({{zhi|s=笔画|t=筆畫|p=bǐhuà}}).{{sfnm|Li|2020|1pp=54, 196–197|Peking University|2004|2pp=148–152|Zhou|2003|3p=88}} Strokes can be considered both the basic unit of handwriting, as well as the writing system's basic unit of [[graphemic]] organisation. In clerical and regular script, individual strokes traditionally belong to one of eight categories according to their technique and graphemic function. In what is known as the [[Eight Principles of Yong|Eight Principles of ''Yong'']], calligraphers practice their technique using the character {{zhc|c=永|p=yǒng|l=eternity}}, which can be written with one stroke of each type.{{sfnm|Norman|1988|1p=86|Zhou|2003|2p=58|Zhang|2013}} In ordinary writing, {{zhi|c=永}} is now written with five strokes instead of eight, and a system of five basic stroke types is commonly employed in analysis—with certain compound strokes treated as sequences of basic strokes made in a single motion.{{sfnm|Li|2009|1pp=65–66|Zhou|2003|2p=88}}

Characters are constructed according to predictable visual patterns. Some components have distinct ''combining forms'' when occupying specific positions within a character—for example, the {{kxr|刀}} component appears as {{kxr|刂|v=y|name=no}} on the right side of characters, but as {{kxr|⺈|v=y|name=no}} at the top of characters.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=43–44}} The order in which components are drawn within a character is fixed. The [[stroke order|order in which the strokes of a component are drawn]] is also largely fixed, but may vary according to several different standards.{{sfn|Yin|2016|pp=58–59}}{{sfn|Myers|2019|pp=106–116}} This is summed up in practice with a few rules of thumb, including that characters are generally assembled from left to right, then from top to bottom, with "enclosing" components started before, then closed after, the components they enclose.{{sfn|Li|2009|p=70}} For example, {{hani|永}} is drawn in the following order:
<div class="center" style="margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto">
{| class="wikitable" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="3" border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse"
|+ {{sronly|Sequence and placement of the strokes in {{hani|永}}}}
! scope="col" | Character !! colspan="2" scope="col" | Stroke
|-
| scope="rowgroup" rowspan="5" | [[File:永-order.gif|upright=0.4|class=skin-invert|center|frameless|alt=永]]
! scope="row" | 1
| [[File:CJK Stroke D (1).svg|upright=0.125|class=skin-invert|center|frameless|alt=㇔]]
|-
! scope="row" | 2
| [[File:CJK Stroke SG.svg|upright=0.125|class=skin-invert|center|frameless|alt=㇚]]
|-
! scope="row" | 3
| [[File:Cjk m str ht.svg|upright=0.125|class=skin-invert|center|frameless|alt=乛]]
|-
! scope="row" | 4
| [[File:Regular Style CJKV Radical 004 (1).svg|upright=0.125|class=skin-invert|center|frameless|alt=丿]]
|-
! scope="row" | 5
| [[File:Cjk m str p.svg|upright=0.125|class=skin-invert|center|frameless|alt=㇏]]
|}{{pb}}
[[File:永-bw.png|upright=2|class=skin-invert|center|frameless|alt=A sequence showing the results while writing the character 永 as each stroke is added]]
</div>

=== Variant characters ===
{{Main|Variant Chinese characters}}
[[File:Variants of Kangxi radical 213 'turtle'.svg|thumb|Variants of the Chinese character for 'turtle', collected {{circa|1800|lk=no}} from printed sources.{{efn-ua |{{Cite book |last=Morrison |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Morrison (missionary) |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_2va5Ayf9u-sC/bub_gb_2va5Ayf9u-sC/page/n29/mode/2up |title=Urh-chih-tsze-tëen-se-yin-pe-keáou: Being a Parallel Drawn Between the Two Intended Chinese Dictionaries |last2=Montucci |first2=Antonio |publisher=[[Cadell & Davies]], [[Boosey & Hawkes|T. Boosey]] |year=1817 |location=London |page=18}} }} The traditional form {{zhi|t=龜}} (left) is used in Taiwan and Hong Kong. The simplified form {{zhi|s=龟}} (not pictured) is used in China, and the simplified form {{lang|ja|亀}} (top row; third from the right) is used in Japan.|upright=1.4]]
Over a character's history, [[variant character form]]s ({{zhi|t=異體字|s=异体字|p=yìtǐzì<!-- exception to [[MOS:ZH]] -->}}) emerge via several processes. Variant forms have distinct structures, but represent the same morpheme; as such, they can be considered instances of the same underlying character. This is comparable to visually distinct double-storey {{gph|a}} and single-storey {{gph|ɑ}} forms both representing the Latin letter {{angbr|[[A]]}}. Variants also emerge for aesthetic reasons, to make handwriting easier, or to correct what the writer perceives to be errors in a character's form.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=204–215, 373}} Individual components may be replaced with visually, phonetically, or semantically similar alternatives.{{sfn|Zhou|2003|pp=57–60, 63–65}} The boundary between character structure and style—and thus whether forms represent different characters, or are merely variants of the same character—is often non-trivial or unclear.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=297–300, 373}}

For example, prior to the Qin dynasty the character meaning 'bright' was written as either {{lzh|明}} or {{lzh|朙}}—with either {{kxr|日}} or {{lzh|囧}} {{sc|'window'}} on the left, and {{kxr|月}} on the right. As part of the Qin programme to standardise small seal script across China, the {{lzh|朙}} form was promoted. Some scribes ignored this, and continued to write the character as {{lzh|明}}. However, the increased usage of {{lzh|朙}} was followed by the proliferation of a third variant: {{lzh|眀}}, with {{kxr|目}} on the left—likely derived as a contraction of {{lzh|朙}}. Ultimately, {{lzh|明}} became the character's standard form.{{sfn|Bökset|2006|pp=16, 19}}

=== Layout ===
{{Further|Horizontal and vertical writing in East Asian scripts}}
{{See also|Chinese punctuation|Japanese punctuation|Korean punctuation}}
From the earliest inscriptions until the 20th century, texts were generally laid out vertically—with characters written from top to bottom in columns, arranged from right to left. [[Word#Word boundaries|Word boundaries]] are generally not indicated with [[space (punctuation)|space]]s. A horizontal writing direction—with characters written from left to right in rows, arranged from top to bottom—only became predominant in the Sinosphere during the 20th century as a result of Western influence.{{sfnm|Li|2020|1p=54|Handel|2019|2p=27|Keightley|1978|3p=50}} Many publications outside mainland China continue to use the traditional vertical writing direction.{{sfnm|1a1=Taylor|1a2=Taylor|1y=2014|1pp=372–373|Bachner|2014|2p=245}} Western influence also resulted in the generalised use of punctuation being widely adopted in print during the 19th and 20th centuries. Prior to this, the context of a passage was considered adequate to guide readers; this was enabled by characters being easier than alphabets to read when written {{lang|la|[[scriptio continua]]}}, due to their more discretised shapes.{{sfnm|1a1=Needham|1a2=Harbsmeier|1y=1998|1pp=175–176|2a1=Taylor|2a2=Taylor|2y=2014|2pp=374–375}}

== Methods of writing ==
[[File:噹噹茶餐廳2021年7月初的午餐餐牌-tweaked.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|Ordinary handwriting on a lunch menu in Hong Kong. Here, {{zhc|c=反|p=fǎn}} is being used as an unofficial short form of {{zhc|c=飯|p=fàn|l=meal}} by omitting the latter's {{kxr|食}} component.]]
The earliest attested Chinese characters were carved into bone, or marked using a stylus in clay moulds used to cast [[Chinese ritual bronzes|ritual bronzes]]. Characters have also been incised into stone, or written in ink onto slips of silk, wood, and bamboo. The [[history of paper|invention of paper]] for use as a writing medium occurred during the 1st century&nbsp;CE, and is traditionally credited to [[Cai Lun]] ({{died-in|121&nbsp;CE}}).{{sfn|Needham|Tsien|2001|pp=23–25, 38–41}} There are numerous styles, or ''scripts'' ({{zhi|t=書|s=书|p=shū}}) in which characters can be written, including the historical forms like seal script and clerical script. Most styles used throughout the Sinosphere originated within China, though they may display regional variation. Styles that have been created outside of China tend to remain localised in their use: these include the Japanese {{tlit|ja|[[edomoji]]}} and Vietnamese {{lang|vi|[[lệnh thư]]}} scripts.{{sfn|Nawar|2020}}

=== Calligraphy ===
{{Main|Chinese calligraphy}}
[[File:This Letter written by Mi Fei.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Chinese calligraphy of mixed styles by Song poet [[Mi Fu]] (1051–1107)]]
Calligraphy was traditionally one of the [[four arts]] to be mastered by Chinese scholars, considered to be an artful means of expressing thoughts and teachings. Chinese calligraphy typically makes use of an [[ink brush]] to write characters. Strict regularity is not required, and character forms may be accentuated to evoke a variety of aesthetic effects.{{sfn|Li|2009|pp=180–183}} Traditional ideals of calligraphic beauty often tie into broader philosophical concepts native to East Asia. For example, aesthetics can be conceptualised using the framework of [[yin and yang]], where the extremes of any number of mutually reinforcing dualities are balanced by the calligrapher—such as the duality between strokes made quickly or slowly, between applying ink heavily or lightly, between characters written with symmetrical or asymmetrical forms, and between characters representing concrete or abstract concepts.{{sfn|Li|2009|pp=175–179}}

=== Printing and typefaces ===
{{Further|History of printing in East Asia|East Asian typography}}
[[File:監獄體樣本.svg|thumb|upright=0.8 |Sample of [[Prison Gothic]], a sans-serif typeface]]
[[Woodblock printing]] was invented in China between the 6th and 9th centuries,{{sfn|Needham|Tsien|2001|pp=146–147, 159}} followed by the invention of [[moveable type]] by [[Bi Sheng]] (972–1051) during the 11th century.{{sfn|Needham|Tsien|2001|pp=201–205}} The increasing use of print during the [[Ming dynasty|Ming]] (1368–1644) and [[Qing]] dynasties (1644–1912) led to considerable standardisation in character forms, which prefigured later script reforms during the 20th century. This print [[orthography]], exemplified by the 1716 ''[[Kangxi Dictionary]]'', was later dubbed the ''[[jiu zixing]]'' ('old character shapes').{{sfn|Yong|Peng|2008|pp=280–282, 293–297}}
Printed Chinese characters may use different [[typeface]]s,{{sfn|Li|2013|p=62}} of which there are four broad classes in use:{{sfn|Lunde|2008|pp=23–25}}
* [[Ming typefaces|Song]] ({{zhi|s=宋体|t=宋體}}) or Ming ({{zhi|s=明体|t=明體}}) typefaces—with "Song" generally used with simplified Chinese typefaces, and "Ming" with others—broadly correspond to Western [[serif]] styles. Song typefaces are broadly within the tradition of historical Chinese print; both names for the style refer to eras regarded as high points for printing in the Sinosphere. While type during the [[Song dynasty]] (960–1279) generally resembled the regular script style of a particular calligrapher, most modern Song typefaces are intended for general purpose use and emphasise neutrality in their design.
* [[East Asian Gothic typeface|Sans-serif typefaces]] are called {{zhl|t=黑體|s=黑体|p=hēitǐ|l=black form}} in Chinese and 'Gothic' ({{lang|ja|ゴシック体}}) in Japanese. Sans-serif strokes are rendered as simple lines of even thickness.
* "Kai" typefaces ({{zhi|s=楷体|t=楷體}}) imitate a handwritten style of regular script.
* [[Fangsong]] typefaces ({{zhi|s=仿宋体|t=仿宋體}}), called "Song" in Japan, correspond to semi-[[Script typeface|script styles]] in the Western paradigm.

=== Use with computers ===
{{Main|Chinese character IT}}
Before computers became ubiquitous, earlier electro-mechanical communications devices like [[telegraph]]s and [[typewriter]]s were originally designed for use with alphabets, often by means of alphabetic [[text encoding]]s like [[Morse code]] and [[ASCII]]. Adapting these technologies for use with a writing system comprising thousands of distinct characters was non-trivial.{{sfn|Su|2014|p=218}}{{sfn|Mullaney|2017|p=25}}

==== Input methods ====
{{Further|Chinese input method|Japanese input method}}
Chinese characters are predominantly input on computers using a standard keyboard. Many input methods (IMEs) are phonetic, where typists enter characters according to schemes like [[pinyin]] or [[bopomofo]] for Mandarin, [[Jyutping]] for Cantonese, or [[Hepburn romanization|Hepburn]] for Japanese. For example, {{zhc|c=香港|l=Hong Kong}} could be input as {{code|xiang1gang3}} using pinyin, or as {{code|hoeng1gong2}} using Jyutping.{{sfn|Li|2020|pp=152–153}}

Character input methods may also be based on form, using the shape of characters and existing rules of handwriting to assign unique codes to each character, potentially increasing the speed of typing. Popular form-based input methods include [[Wubi method|Wubi]] on the mainland, and [[Cangjie input method|Cangjie]]—named after the mythological inventor of writing—in Taiwan and Hong Kong.{{sfn|Li|2020|pp=152–153}} Often, unnecessary parts are omitted from the encoding according to predictable rules. For example, {{zhc|c=疆|l=border}} is encoded using the Cangjie method as {{code|NGMWM}}, which corresponds to the components {{lang|zh|{{code|弓土一田一}}|italic=no}}.{{sfn|Zhang|2016|p=422}}

Contextual constraints may be used to improve candidate character selection. When ignoring tones, {{zhi|s=大学|t=大學}} and {{lang|zh|大雪}} are both transcribed as {{code|daxue}}; the system may prioritize which candidate should appear first based on the surrounding context.{{sfn|Su|2014|p=222}}

==== Encoding and interchange ====
{{Main|Chinese character encoding}}
{{See also|Han unification|CJK Unified Ideographs}}
While special text encodings for Chinese characters were introduced prior to its popularisation, ''[[The Unicode Standard]]'' is the predominant text encoding worldwide.{{sfn|Lunde|2008|p=193}} According to the philosophy of the [[Unicode Consortium]], each distinct graph is assigned a number in the standard, but specifying its appearance or the particular [[allograph]] used is a choice made by the engine rendering the text.{{efn-ua |{{Citation |title=Technical Introduction |date=22 August 2019 |url=https://www.unicode.org/standard/principles.html |access-date=11 May 2024 |publisher=The Unicode Consortium}} }} Unicode's [[Basic Multilingual Plane]] (BMP) represents the standard's 2<sup>16</sup> smallest code points. Of these, {{val|20992}} (or {{sigfig|32.03125|2}}%) are assigned to [[CJK Unified Ideographs]], a designation comprising characters used in each of the [[Chinese family of scripts]]. As of version {{Unicode version|version=16.0}}, Unicode defines a total of {{val|98682}} Chinese characters.{{efn-ua |{{Cite Unicode |date=31 July 2024 |editor-last=Lunde |editor-first=Ken |editor-last2=Cook |editor-first2=Richard |chapter=Standard Annex #38: Unicode Han Database (Unihan) |chapter-url=https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr38/tr38-37.html#BlockListing |editor-link=Ken Lunde}} }}

== Vocabulary and adaptation ==
{{Further|Chinese family of scripts|Adoption of Chinese literary culture}}
Writing first emerged during the historical stage of the Chinese language known as [[Old Chinese]]. Most characters correspond to morphemes that originally functioned as stand-alone Old Chinese words.{{sfn|Norman|1988|pp=74–75}} [[Classical Chinese]] is the form of written Chinese used in the [[Chinese classics|classic works]] of Chinese literature between roughly the 5th&nbsp;century&nbsp;BCE and the 2nd&nbsp;century&nbsp;CE.{{sfn|Vogelsang|2021|pp=xvii–xix}} This form of the language was imitated by later authors, even as it began to diverge from the language they spoke. This later form, referred to as "Literary Chinese", remained the predominant written language in China until the 20th&nbsp;century. Its use in the Sinosphere was loosely analogous to that of [[Latin]] in pre-modern Europe. While it was not static over time, Literary Chinese retained many properties of spoken Old Chinese. Informed by the local spoken [[vernacular]]s, texts were read aloud using [[literary and colloquial readings]] that varied by region. Over time, sound mergers created ambiguities in vernacular speech as more words became homophonic. This ambiguity was often reduced through the introduction of multi-syllable [[compound (linguistics)|compound words]],{{sfn|Wilkinson|2012|p=22}} which comprise much of the vocabulary in modern varieties of Chinese.{{sfn|Tong|Liu|McBride-Chang|2009|p=203}}{{sfn|Yip|2000|p=18}}

Over time, use of Literary Chinese spread to neighbouring countries, including Vietnam, Korea, and Japan. Alongside other aspects of Chinese culture, local elites adopted writing for record-keeping, histories, and official communications, forming what is sometimes called the [[Sinosphere]].{{sfnm|Handel|2019|1pp=11–12|Kornicki|2018|2pp=15–16}} Excepting hypotheses by some linguists of the latter two sharing a common ancestor, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese each belong to different [[language families]],{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=28, 69, 126, 169}} and tend to function differently from one another. Reading systems were devised to enable non-Chinese speakers to interpret Literary Chinese texts in terms of their native language, a phenomenon that has been variously described as either a form of diglossia, as ''reading by gloss'',{{sfn|Kin|2021|p=XII}} or as a process of translation into and out of Chinese. Compared to other traditions that wrote using alphabets or syllabaries, the literary culture that developed in this context was less directly tied to a specific spoken language. This is exemplified by the cross-linguistic phenomenon of [[brushtalk]], where mutual literacy allowed speakers of different languages to engage in face-to-face conversations.{{sfn|Denecke|2014|pp=204–216}}{{sfn|Kornicki|2018|pp=72–73}}

Following the introduction of Literary Chinese, characters were later adapted to write many non-Chinese languages spoken throughout the Sinosphere. These new writing systems used characters to write both native vocabulary and the numerous [[loanword]]s each language had borrowed from Chinese, collectively referred to as [[Sino-Xenic vocabulary]]. Characters may have native readings, Sino-Xenic readings, or both.{{sfn|Handel|2019|p=212}} Comparison of Sino-Xenic vocabulary across the Sinosphere has been useful in the reconstruction of [[Middle Chinese phonology]].{{sfn|Kornicki|2018|p=168}} Literary Chinese was used in Vietnam during the [[Vietnam under Chinese rule|millennium of Chinese rule]] that began in 111&nbsp;BCE. By the 15th&nbsp;century, a system that adapted characters to write Vietnamese called {{langr|vi|[[chữ Nôm]]}} had fully matured.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=124–125, 133}} The 2nd&nbsp;century&nbsp;BCE is the earliest possible period for the introduction of writing to Korea; the oldest surviving manuscripts in the country date to the early 5th&nbsp;century&nbsp;CE. Also during the 5th&nbsp;century, writing spread from Korea to Japan.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=64–65}} Characters were being used to write both Korean and Japanese by the 6th&nbsp;century.{{sfn|Kornicki|2018|p=57}} By the late 20th&nbsp;century, characters had largely been replaced with alphabets designed to write Vietnamese and Korean. This leaves Japanese as the only major non-Sinitic language typically written using Chinese characters.{{sfn|Hannas|1997|pp=136–138}}

=== Literary and vernacular Chinese ===
{{See also|Reconstructions of Old Chinese|Middle Chinese|Varieties of Chinese}}
[[File:chineseprimer3.png|upright=0.8|thumb|Excerpt from a 1436 primer on Chinese characters{{sfn|Ebrey|1996|p=205}}|alt=Line drawings of various ordinary objects such as books, baskets, buildings, and musical instruments are displayed beside their corresponding Chinese characters]]
Words in Classical Chinese were generally a single character in length.{{sfn|Norman|1988|p=58}} An estimated 25–30% of the vocabulary used in Classical Chinese texts consists of two-character words.{{sfn|Wilkinson|2012|pp=22–23}} Over time, the introduction of multi-syllable vocabulary into vernacular varieties of Chinese was encouraged by phonetic shifts that increased the number of homophones.{{sfn|Norman|1988|pp=86–87}} The most common process of Chinese word formation after the Classical period has been to create compounds of existing words. Words have also been created by appending [[affix]]es to words, by [[reduplication]], and by borrowing words from other languages.{{sfn|Norman|1988|pp=155–156}} While multi-syllable words are generally written with one character per syllable, abbreviations are occasionally used.{{sfn|Norman|1988|p=74}} For example, {{zhc|c=二十|p=èrshí|l=twenty}} may be written as the contracted form {{zhc|c=廿}}.{{sfn|Handel|2019|p=34}}

Sometimes, different morphemes come to be represented by characters with identical shapes. For example, {{hani|行}} may represent either {{zhl|p=xíng|l=road}} or the extended sense of {{zhl|p=háng|l=row}}: these morphemes are ultimately [[cognate]]s that diverged in pronunciation but remained written with the same character. However, Qiu reserves the term ''homograph'' to describe identically shaped characters with different meanings that emerge via processes other than semantic extension. An example homograph is {{hani|铊}}; {{hani|鉈}}, which originally meant {{zhl|l=weight used at a steelyard|p=tuó}}. In the 20th century, this character was created again with the meaning {{zhl|l=[[thallium]]|p=tā}}. Both of these characters are phono-semantic compounds with {{kxr|gold}} as the semantic component and {{hani|它}} as the phonetic component, but the words represented by each are not related.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|pp=301–302}}

There are a number of {{zhl|c=方言字|l=dialect characters|p=fāngyánzì}} that are not used in standard [[written vernacular Chinese]], but reflect the vocabulary of other spoken varieties. The most complete example of an orthography based on a variety other than [[Standard Chinese]] is [[Written Cantonese]]. A common Cantonese character is {{zhc|c=冇|l=to not have|j=mou5}}, derived by removing two strokes from {{zhc|c=有|j=jau5|l=to have}}.{{sfn|Handel|2019|p=59}} It is common to use standard characters to transcribe previously unwritten words in Chinese dialects when obvious cognates exist. When no obvious cognate exists due to factors like irregular sound changes, semantic drift, or an origin in a non-Chinese language, characters are often borrowed or invented to transcribe the word—either ad hoc, or according to existing principles.{{sfn|Cheung|Bauer|2002|pp=12–20}} These new characters are generally phono-semantic compounds.{{sfn|Norman|1988|pp=75–77}}

=== Japanese ===
{{Main|Kanji}}
{{Japanese writing}}
In Japanese, Chinese characters are referred to as {{tlit|ja|kanji}}. Beginning in the [[Nara period]] (710–794), readers and writers of {{tlit|ja|[[kanbun]]}}—the Japanese term for Literary Chinese writing—began employing a system of reading techniques and annotations called {{tlit|ja|kundoku}}. When reading, Japanese speakers would adapt the syntax and vocabulary of Literary Chinese texts to reflect their Japanese-language equivalents. Writing essentially involved the inverse of this process, and resulted in ordinary Literary Chinese.{{sfn|Li|2020|p=88}} When adapted to write Japanese, characters were used to represent both [[Sino-Japanese vocabulary]] loaned from Chinese, as well as the corresponding native synonyms. Most kanji were subject to both borrowing processes, and as a result have both Sino-Japanese and native readings, known as {{tlit|ja|[[on'yomi]]}} and {{tlit|ja|[[kun'yomi]]}} respectively. Moreover, kanji may have multiple readings of either kind. Distinct classes of {{tlit|ja|on'yomi}} were borrowed into Japanese at different points in time from different varieties of Chinese.{{sfn|Coulmas|1991|pp=122–129}}

The [[Japanese writing system]] is a mixed script, and has also incorporated syllabaries called {{tlit|ja|[[kana]]}} to represent phonetic units called [[mora (linguistics)|mora]]s, rather than morphemes. Prior to the [[Meiji era]] (1868–1912), writers used certain kanji to represent their sound values instead, in a system known as {{tlit|ja|[[man'yōgana]]}}. Starting in the 9th century, specific {{tlit|ja|man'yōgana}} were graphically simplified to create two distinct syllabaries called {{tlit|ja|[[hiragana]]}} and {{tlit|ja|[[katakana]]}}, which slowly replaced the earlier convention. Modern Japanese retains the use of kanji to represent most [[word stem]]s, while {{tlit|ja|kana}} syllabograms are generally used for grammatical affixes, particles, and loanwords. The forms of {{tlit|ja|hiragana}} and {{tlit|ja|katakana}} are visually distinct from one another, owing in large part to different methods of simplification: {{tlit|ja|katakana}} were derived from smaller components of each {{tlit|ja|man'yōgana}}, while {{tlit|ja|hiragana}} were derived from the cursive forms of {{tlit|ja|man'yōgana}} in their entirety. In addition, the {{tlit|ja|hiragana}} and {{tlit|ja|katakana}} for some moras were derived from different {{tlit|ja|man'yōgana}}.{{sfn|Coulmas|1991|pp=129–132}} Characters invented for Japanese-language use are called {{tlit|ja|[[kokuji]]}}. The methods employed to create {{tlit|ja|kokuji}} are equivalent to those used by Chinese-original characters, though most are ideographic compounds. For example, {{lang|ja|峠}} ({{tlit|ja|tōge}}; 'mountain pass') is a compound {{tlit|ja|kokuji}} composed of {{kxr|山}}, {{lang|ja|上}} {{sc|'above'}}, and {{lang|ja|下}} {{sc|'below'}}.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=192–196}}

While characters used to write Chinese are monosyllabic, many kanji have multi-syllable readings. For example, the kanji {{lang|ja|刀}} has a native {{tlit|ja|kun'yomi}} reading of {{tlit|ja|katana}}. In different contexts, it can also be read with the {{tlit|ja|on'yomi}} reading {{tlit|ja|tō}}, such as in the Chinese loanword {{nwr|{{lang|ja|日本刀}}}} ({{tlit|ja|nihontō}}; 'Japanese sword'), with a pronunciation corresponding to that in Chinese at the time of borrowing. Prior to the universal adoption of {{tlit|ja|katakana}}, loanwords were typically written with unrelated kanji with {{tlit|ja|on'yomi}} readings matching the syllables in the loanword. These spellings are called {{tlit|ja|[[ateji]]}}: for example, {{nwr|{{lang|ja|亜米利加}} ({{tlit|ja|Amerika}})}} was the {{tlit|ja|ateji}} spelling of 'America', now rendered as {{lang|ja|アメリカ}}. As opposed to {{tlit|ja|man'yōgana}} used solely for their pronunciation, {{tlit|ja|ateji}} still corresponded to specific Japanese words. Some are still in use: the official list of [[Jōyō kanji|{{tlit|ja|jōyō}} kanji]] includes 106 {{tlit|ja|ateji}} readings.{{sfn|Taylor|Taylor|2014|pp=275–279}}

=== Korean ===
{{Main|Hanja}}
In Korean, Chinese characters are referred to as ''hanja''. Literary Chinese may have been written in Korea as early as the 2nd century&nbsp;BCE. During Korea's [[Three Kingdoms of Korea|Three Kingdoms]] period (57&nbsp;BCE{{snd}}668&nbsp;CE), characters were also used to write {{tlit|ko|[[idu script|idu]]}}, a form of Korean-language literature that mostly made use of [[Sino-Korean vocabulary]]. During the [[Goryeo]] period (918–1392), Korean writers developed a system of phonetic annotations for Literary Chinese called {{tlit|ko|[[gugyeol]]}}, comparable to {{tlit|ja|kundoku}} in Japan, though it only entered widespread use during the later [[Joseon]] period (1392–1897).{{sfn|Li|2020|pp=78–80}} While the [[hangul]] alphabet was invented by the Joseon king [[Sejong]] ({{reign|1418|1450}}) in 1443, it was not adopted by the Korean literati and was relegated to use in glosses for Literary Chinese texts until the late 19th century.{{sfn|Fischer|2004|pp=189–194}}

Much of the Korean lexicon consists of Chinese loanwords, especially technical and academic vocabulary.{{sfnm|1a1=Hannas|1y=1997|1p=49|2a1=Taylor|2a2=Taylor|2y=2014|2p=435}} While hanja were usually only used to write this Sino-Korean vocabulary, there is evidence that vernacular readings were sometimes used.{{sfn|Kornicki|2018|p=168}} Compared to the other written vernaculars, very few characters were invented to write Korean words; these are called ''[[gukja]]''.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=88, 102}} During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Korean was written either using a mixed script of hangul and hanja, or only using hangul.{{sfnm|Handel|2019|1pp=112–113|Hannas|1997|2pp=60–61}} Following the end of the [[Empire of Japan]]'s occupation of Korea in 1945, the total replacement of hanja with hangul was advocated throughout the country as part of a broader "purification movement" of the national language and culture.{{sfn|Hannas|1997|pp=64–66}} However, due to the lack of tones in spoken Korean, there are many Sino-Korean words that are homophones with identical hangul spellings. For example, the phonetic dictionary entry for {{lang|ko|기사}} ({{tlit|ko|rr|gisa}}) yields more than 30 different entries. This ambiguity had historically been resolved by also including the associated hanja. While still sometimes used for Sino-Korean vocabulary, it is much rarer for native Korean words to be written using hanja.{{sfn|Norman|1988|p=79}} When learning new characters, Korean students are instructed to associate each one with both its Sino-Korean pronunciation, as well as a native Korean synonym.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=75–82}} Examples include:

{| class="wikitable"
|+ {{sronly|Example Korean dictionary listings}}
! rowspan="2" scope="col"      | Hanja
! colspan="2" scope="colgroup" | Hangul
! rowspan="2" scope="col"      | Gloss
|-
! scope="col" | Native translation !! scope="col" | Sino-Korean
|-
! scope="row" | {{normal|{{linktext|lang=ko|水}}}}
| {{lang|ko|물}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|mul}}|| {{lang|ko|수}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|su}}|| 'water'
|-
! scope="row" | {{normal|{{linktext|lang=ko|人}}}}
| {{lang|ko|사람}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|saram}}|| {{lang|ko|인}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|in}}|| 'person'
|-
! scope="row" | {{normal|{{linktext|lang=ko|大}}}}
| {{lang|ko|큰}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|keun}}|| {{lang|ko|대}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|dae}}|| 'big'
|-
! scope="row" | {{normal|{{linktext|lang=ko|小}}}}
| {{lang|ko|작을}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|jakeul}}|| {{lang|ko|소}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|so}}|| 'small'
|-
! scope="row" | {{normal|{{linktext|lang=ko|下}}}}
| {{lang|ko|아래}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|arae}}|| {{lang|ko|하}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|ha}}|| 'down'
|-
! scope="row" | {{normal|{{linktext|lang=ko|父}}}}
| {{lang|ko|아비}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|abi}}|| {{lang|ko|부}}; {{tlit|ko|rr|bu}}|| 'father'
|}

=== Vietnamese ===
{{Main|Chữ Hán}}
{{See also|Literary Chinese in Vietnam}}
[[File:Tale of Kieu parallel text.svg|thumb|right|upright=1.1|The first two lines of the 19th-century Vietnamese epic poem ''[[The Tale of Kieu]]'', written in both {{langr|vi|chữ Nôm}} and the Vietnamese alphabet
{{legend|#149f78|Borrowed characters representing Sino-Vietnamese words}}
{{legend|#7671b4|Borrowed characters representing native Vietnamese words}}
{{legend|#da5f00|Invented {{langr|vi|chữ Nôm}} representing native Vietnamese words}}]]
In Vietnamese, Chinese characters are referred to as ''{{langr|vi|[[chữ Hán]]}}'' ({{lang|vi-Hani|𡨸漢}}), ''{{langr|vi|chữ Nho}}'' ({{lang|vi-Hani|𡨸儒}}; '[[Confucian]] characters'), or ''{{langr|vi|Hán tự}}'' ({{lang|vi-Hani|漢字}}). Literary Chinese was used for all formal writing in Vietnam until the modern era,{{sfnm|Handel|2019|1pp=124–126|Kin|2021|2p=XI}} having first acquired official status in 1010. Literary Chinese written by Vietnamese authors is first attested in the late 10th century, though the local practice of writing is likely several centuries older.{{sfn|Hannas|1997|p=73}} Characters used to write Vietnamese called {{langr|vi|[[chữ Nôm]]}} ({{lang|vi-Hani|𡨸喃}}) are first attested in an inscription dated to 1209 made at the site of a pagoda.{{sfn|DeFrancis|1977|pp=23–24}} A mature {{langr|vi|chữ Nôm}} script had likely emerged by the 13th century, and was initially used to record Vietnamese folk literature. Some {{langr|vi|chữ Nôm}} characters are phono-semantic compounds corresponding to spoken Vietnamese syllables.{{sfn|Kornicki|2018|p=63}} Another technique with no equivalent in China created {{langr|vi|chữ Nôm}} compounds using two phonetic components. This was done because Vietnamese phonology included consonant clusters not found in Chinese, and were thus poorly approximated by the sound values of borrowed characters. Compounds used components with two distinct consonant sounds to specify the cluster, e.g. {{lang|vi-Hani|𢁋}} ({{lang|vi|blăng}};{{efn|This is the [[Middle Vietnamese]] pronunciation; the word is pronounced in modern Vietnamese as {{lang|vi|trăng}}.}} 'Moon') was created as a compound of {{lang|vi-Hani|巴}} ({{lang|vi|ba}}) and {{lang|vi-Hani|陵}} ({{lang|vi|lăng}}).{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=145, 150}} As a system, {{langr|vi|chữ Nôm}} was highly complex, and the literacy rate among the Vietnamese population never exceeded 5%.{{sfn|DeFrancis|1977|p=19}} Both Literary Chinese and {{langr|vi|chữ Nôm}} fell out of use during the French colonial period, and were gradually replaced by the Latin-based [[Vietnamese alphabet]]. Following the end of colonial rule in 1954, the Vietnamese alphabet has been sole official writing system in Vietnam, and is used exclusively in Vietnamese-language media.{{sfnm|Coulmas|1991|1pp=113–115|Hannas|1997|2pp=73, 84–87}}

=== Other languages ===
Several minority languages of [[South China|South]] and [[Southwest China]] have been written with scripts using both borrowed and locally created characters. The most well-documented of these is the {{langr|za|[[sawndip]]}} script for the [[Zhuang languages]] of [[Guangxi]]. While little is known about its early development, a tradition of vernacular Zhuang writing likely first emerged during the [[Tang dynasty]] (618–907). Modern scholarship characterises {{langr|za|sawndip}} writing as a network of regional traditions that have mutually influenced one another while maintaining their local characteristics.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=239–240}} Like Vietnamese, some invented Zhuang characters are phonetic–phonetic compounds, though not primarily ones intended to describe consonant clusters.{{sfn|Handel|2019|pp=251–252}} Despite the Chinese government encouraging its replacement with a Latin-based [[Zhuang alphabet]], {{langr|za|sawndip}} remains in use.{{sfnm|Handel|2019|1pp=231, 234–235|Zhou|2003|2pp=140–142, 151}} Other non-Sinitic [[languages of China]] written with Chinese characters include [[Hmongic languages|Miao]], [[Mienic languages|Yao]], [[Bouyei language#Ancient Bouyei script|Bouyei]], [[Bai language|Bai]], and [[Hani language|Hani]]. Each of these languages are now written with Latin-based alphabets in official contexts.{{sfn|Zhou|1991}}

=== Graphically derived scripts ===
{{See also|Transcription into Chinese characters}}
[[File:SecretHistoryMongols1908.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Excerpt from a 1908 edition of the 13th-century ''[[Secret History of the Mongols]]'', featuring Chinese characters used to transcribe Mongolian and glosses to the right of each column]]
Between the 10th and 13th centuries, dynasties founded by non-Han peoples in northern China also created scripts for their languages that were inspired by Chinese characters, but did not use them directly: these included the [[Khitan large script]], [[Khitan small script]], [[Tangut script]], and [[Jurchen script]].{{sfn|Zhou|1991}} This has occurred in other contexts as well: [[Nüshu]] was a script used by [[Yao people|Yao]] women to write the [[Xiangnan Tuhua]] language,{{sfn|Zhao|1998}} and [[bopomofo]] ({{zhi|t=注音符號|s=注音符号|p=zhùyīn fúhào<!-- exception to [[MOS:ZH]] -->}}) is a [[semi-syllabary]] first invented in 1907{{sfn|Kuzuoğlu|2023|p=71}} to represent the sounds of Standard Chinese;{{sfnm|1a1=DeFrancis|1y=1984|1p=242|2a1=Taylor|2a2=Taylor|2y=2014|2p=14|3a1=Li|3y=2020|3p=123}} both use forms graphically derived from Chinese characters. Other scripts within China that have adapted some characters but are otherwise distinct include the [[Geba syllabary]] used to write the [[Naxi language]], [[Sui script|the script]] for the [[Sui language]], [[Yi script|the script]] for the [[Yi languages]], and the syllabary for the [[Lisu language]].{{sfn|Zhou|1991}}

Chinese characters have also been repurposed phonetically to transcribe the sounds of non-Chinese languages. For example, the only manuscripts of the 13th-century ''[[Secret History of the Mongols]]'' that have survived from the medieval era use characters in this manner to write the [[Mongolian language]].{{sfn|Hung|1951|p=481}}

== Literacy and lexicography ==
{{Further|Chinese character education|Literacy in China}}
The memorisation of thousands of different characters is required to achieve literacy in languages written with them, in contrast to the relatively small inventory of graphemes used in phonetic writing.{{sfnm|Demattè|2022|1p=8|2a1=Taylor|2a2=Taylor|2y=2014|2pp=110–111}} Historically, character literacy was often acquired via Chinese primers like the 6th-century ''[[Thousand Character Classic]]'' and 13th-century ''[[Three Character Classic]]'',{{sfn|Kornicki|2018|pp=273–277}} as well as surname dictionaries like the Song-era ''[[Hundred Family Surnames]]''.{{sfn|Yong|Peng|2008|pp=55–58}} Studies of Chinese-language literacy suggest that literate individuals generally have an [[active vocabulary]] of three to four thousand characters; for specialists in fields like literature or history, this figure may be between five and six thousand.{{sfn|Norman|1988|p=73}}

=== Dictionaries ===
{{Main|Chinese dictionaries}}
[[File:Chenzihmyon typefaces.svg|thumb|upright=0.8|The first four characters of the 6th-century ''[[Thousand Character Classic]]'' in different styles. From right to left: seal script, clerical script, regular script, Song type, and sans-serif type.|alt=天地玄黃]]
According to analyses of mainland Chinese, Taiwanese, Hong Kong, Japanese, and Korean sources, the total number of characters in the modern lexicon is around {{val|15000}}.{{sfn|Su|2014|pp=47, 51}} Dozens of schemes have been devised for indexing Chinese characters and arranging them in dictionaries, though relatively few have achieved widespread use. Characters may be ordered according to methods based on their meaning, visual structure, or pronunciation.{{sfnm|Su|2014|1p=183|2a1=Needham|2a2=Harbsmeier|2y=1998|2pp=65–66}}

The ''[[Erya]]'' ({{circa|3rd century&nbsp;BCE|lk=no}}) organised the Chinese lexicon into 16 semantic categories, as well as 3 describing abstract characters such as grammatical particles.{{sfn|Xue|1982|pp=152–153}} The ''Shuowen Jiezi'' ({{circa|100&nbsp;CE|lk=no}}) introduced what would ultimately become the predominant method of organisation used by later character dictionaries, whereby characters are grouped according to certain visually prominent components called ''[[Chinese character radicals|radicals]]'' ({{zhi|c=部首|p=bùshǒu|l=section headers}}). The ''Shuowen Jiezi'' used a system of 540 radicals, while subsequent dictionaries have generally used fewer.{{sfn|Yong|Peng|2008|pp=100–103, 203}} The set of 214 [[Kangxi radicals]] was popularised by the ''[[Kangxi Dictionary]]'' (1716), but originally appeared in the earlier ''[[Zihui]]'' (1615).{{sfnm|Zhou|2003|1p=88|Norman|1988|2pp=170–172|3a1=Needham|3a2=Harbsmeier|3y=1998|3pp=79–80}} Character dictionaries have historically been indexed using [[radical-and-stroke sorting]], where characters are grouped by radical and [[Stroke-based sorting|sorted within each group by stroke number]]. Some modern dictionaries arrange character entries alphabetically according to their pinyin spelling, while also providing a traditional radical-based index.{{sfn|Yong|Peng|2008|pp=145, 400–401}}

Before the invention of romanisation systems for Chinese, the pronunciation of characters was transmitted via [[rhyme dictionaries]]. These used the ''[[fanqie]]'' ({{zhi|c=反切|l=reverse cut}}) method, where each entry lists a common character with the same [[Syllable#Chinese model|initial sound]] as the character in question, alongside one with the same final sound.{{sfn|Norman|1988|pp=27–28}}

=== Neurolinguistics ===
Using [[functional magnetic resonance imaging]] (fMRI), [[neurolinguist]]s have studied the brain activity associated with literacy. Compared to phonetic systems, reading and writing with characters involves additional areas of the brain—including those associated with visual processing.{{sfn|Demattè|2022|p=9}} While the level of memorisation required for character literacy is significant, identification of the phonetic and semantic components in compounds—which constitute the vast majority of characters—also plays a key role in reading comprehension. The ease of recognition for a given character is impacted by how regular the positioning of its components is, as well as how reliable its phonetic component is in indicating a specific pronunciation.{{sfn|Lee|2015b}} Moreover, due to the high level of homophony in Chinese languages and the more irregular correspondences between writing and the sounds of speech, it has been suggested that knowledge of orthography plays a greater role in speech recognition for literate Chinese speakers.{{sfn|Lee|2015a|loc=The Brain Network for Chinese Language Processing}}

[[Developmental dyslexia]] in readers of character-based languages appears to involve independent visuospatial and phonological disorders co-occurring. This seems to be a distinct phenomenon from dyslexia as experienced with phonetic orthographies, which can result from only one of the aforementioned disorders.{{sfnm|1a1=McBride|1a2=Tong|1a3=Mo|1y=2015|1pp=688–690|2a1=Ho|2y=2015|3a1=Taylor|3a2=Taylor|3y=2014|3pp=150–151, 346–349, 393—394}}

== Reform and standardisation ==
{{See also|Simplified Chinese characters|Traditional Chinese characters}}
[[File:ROC24 SC1.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|The first official list of simplified character forms, published in 1935 and including 324 characters{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=153}}]]
Attempts to reform and standardise the use of characters—including aspects of form, stroke order, and pronunciation—have been undertaken by states throughout history. Thousands of [[simplified characters]] were standardised and adopted in mainland China during the 1950s and 1960s, with most either already existing as common variants, or being produced via the systematic simplification of their components.{{sfn|Zhou|2003|pp=60–67}} After World War II, the Japanese government also simplified hundreds of character forms, including some simplifications distinct from those adopted in China.{{sfn|Taylor|Taylor|2014|pp=117–118}} Orthodox forms that have not undergone simplification are referred to as [[traditional characters]]. Across Chinese-speaking polities, mainland China, Malaysia, and Singapore use simplified characters, while Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau use traditional characters.{{sfn|Li|2020|p=136}} In general, Chinese and Japanese readers can successfully identify characters from all three standards.{{sfn|Wang|2016|p=171}}

Prior to the 20th century, reforms were generally conservative and sought to reduce the use of simplified variants.{{sfn|Qiu|2000|p=404}} During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, an increasing number of intellectuals in China began to see both the Chinese writing system and the lack of a national spoken dialect as serious impediments to achieving the mass literacy and mutual intelligibility required for the country's successful modernisation. Many began advocating for the replacement of Literary Chinese with a written language that more closely reflected speech, as well as for a mass simplification of character forms, or even the total [[Romanisation of Chinese|replacement of characters with an alphabet]] tailored to a specific spoken variety. In 1909, the educator and linguist [[Lufei Kui]] (1886–1941) formally proposed the adoption of simplified characters in education for the first time.{{sfnm|Zhou|2003|1pp=xvii–xix|Li|2020|2p=136}}

In 1911, the [[Xinhai Revolution]] toppled the Qing dynasty, and resulted in the establishment of the [[Republic of China (1912–1949)|Republic of China]] the following year. The early Republican era (1912–1949) was characterised by growing social and political discontent that erupted into the 1919 [[May Fourth Movement]], catalysing the replacement of Literary Chinese with [[written vernacular Chinese]] over the subsequent decades. Alongside the corresponding spoken variety now known as [[Standard Chinese]], this written vernacular was promoted by intellectuals and writers such as [[Lu Xun]] (1881–1936) and [[Hu Shih]] (1891–1962).{{sfn|Zhou|2003|pp=xviii–xix}} It was based on the [[Beijing dialect]] of [[Mandarin Chinese|Mandarin]],{{sfn|DeFrancis|1972|pp=11–13}} as well as on the existing body of vernacular literature authored over the preceding centuries, which included [[Classic Chinese Novels|classic novels]] such as ''[[Journey to the West]]'' ({{circa|1592|lk=no}}) and ''[[Dream of the Red Chamber]]'' (mid-18th century).{{sfnm|Zhong|2019|1pp=113–114|Chen|1999|2pp=70–74, 80–82}} At this time, character simplification and phonetic writing were being discussed within both the ruling [[Kuomintang]] (KMT) party, as well as the [[Chinese Communist Party]] (CCP). In 1935, the Republican government published the first official list of simplified characters, comprising 324 forms collated by [[Peking University]] professor [[Qian Xuantong]] (1887–1939). However, strong opposition within the party resulted in the list being rescinded in 1936.{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=150–153}}

=== People's Republic of China ===
{{mim |direction=vertical |width=100px
| image1=們-order.gif |caption1=Traditional ({{zhi|t=們}})
| image2=们-order.gif |caption2=Simplified ({{zhi|s=们}})
| footer=Comparison between character forms, showing systematic simplification of the component {{kxr|gate}}
}}
The project of script reform in China was ultimately inherited by the Communists, who resumed work following the [[proclamation of the People's Republic of China]] in 1949. In 1951, Premier [[Zhou Enlai]] (1898–1976) ordered the formation of a Script Reform Committee, with subgroups investigating both simplification and alphabetisation. The simplification subgroup began surveying and collating simplified forms the following year,{{sfn|Bökset|2006|p=26}} ultimately publishing a [[Chinese Character Simplification Scheme|draft scheme of simplified characters and components]] in 1956. In 1958, Zhou Enlai announced the government's intent to focus on simplification, as opposed to replacing characters with [[Hanyu Pinyin]], which had been introduced earlier that year.{{sfn|Zhong|2019|pp=157–158}} The 1956 scheme was largely ratified by a [[General List of Simplified Chinese Characters|revised list of {{val|2235}} characters]] promulgated in 1964.{{sfn|Li|2020|p=142}} The majority of these characters were drawn from conventional abbreviations or ancient forms with fewer strokes.{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=154–156}} The committee also sought to reduce the total number of characters in use by merging some forms together.{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=154–156}} For example, {{zhc|c=雲|l=cloud}} was written as {{zhi|c=云}} in oracle bone script. The simpler form remained in use as a loangraph meaning 'to say'; it was replaced in its original sense of 'cloud' with a form that added a semantic {{kxr|雨}} component. The simplified forms of these two characters have been merged into {{zhi|s=云}}.{{sfn|Zhou|2003|p=63}}

A [[second round of simplified characters]] was promulgated in 1977, but was poorly received by the public and quickly fell out of official use. It was ultimately formally rescinded in 1986.{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=155–156}} The second-round simplifications were unpopular in large part because most of the forms were completely new, in contrast to the familiar variants comprising the majority of the first round.{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=159–160}} With the rescission of the second round, work toward further character simplification largely came to an end.{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=196–197}} The ''Chart of Generally Utilised Characters of Modern Chinese'' was published in 1988 and included {{val|7000}} simplified and unsimplified characters. Of these, half were also included in the revised ''[[List of Commonly Used Characters in Modern Chinese]]'', which specified {{val|2500}} common characters and {{val|1000}} less common characters.{{sfnm|Zhou|2003|1p=79|Chen|1999|2p=136}} In 2013, the ''[[List of Commonly Used Standard Chinese Characters]]'' was published as a revision of the 1988 lists; it included a total of {{val|8105}} characters.{{sfn|Li|2020|pp=145–146}}

=== Japan ===
{{Main|Japanese script reform}}
{{Further|Differences between Shinjitai and Simplified characters}}
[[File:CJK 次 glyph variants.svg|upright=0.8|thumb|Regional forms of the character {{hani|次}} in the Noto Serif typeface family. From left to right: forms used in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong (top), and in Japan and Korea (bottom)]]
After World War II, the Japanese government instituted its own program of orthographic reforms. Some characters were assigned simplified forms called {{tlit|ja|[[shinjitai]]}}; the older forms were then labelled {{tlit|ja|[[kyūjitai]]}}. Inconsistent use of different variant forms was discouraged, and lists of characters to be taught to students at each grade level were developed. The first of these was the {{val|1850}}-character [[Tōyō kanji|{{tlit|ja|tōyō}} kanji]] list published in 1946, later replaced by the {{val|1945}}-character [[Jōyō kanji|{{tlit|ja|jōyō}} kanji]] list in 1981. In 2010, the {{tlit|ja|jōyō}} kanji were expanded to include a total of {{val|2136}} characters.{{sfn|Taylor|Taylor|2014|p=275}}<ref>{{Cite news |date=24 November 2010 |script-title=ja:改定常用漢字表、30日に内閣告示 閣議で正式決定 |trans-title=The amended list of ''jōyō kanji'' receives cabinet notice on 30th: to be officially confirmed in cabinet meeting |url=http://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXNASDG22043_U0A121C1CR0000/ |work=The Nikkei |language=ja}}</ref> The Japanese government restricts characters that may be used in names to the {{tlit|ja|jōyō}} kanji, plus an additional list of 983 [[Jinmeiyō kanji|{{tlit|ja|jinmeiyō}} kanji]] whose use are historically prevalent in names.<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 September 2017 |script-title=ja:人名用漢字に「渾」追加 司法判断を受け法務省 改正戸籍法施行規則を施行、計863字に |trans-title="渾" added to kanji usable in personal names; Ministry of Justice enacts revised Family Registration Law Enforcement Regulations following judicial ruling, totaling 863 characters |url=https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXLASDG24H0N_U7A920C1000000/ |work=The Nikkei |language=ja}}</ref>{{sfn|Lunde|2008|pp=82–84}}

=== South Korea ===
Hanja are still used in South Korea, though not to the extent that kanji are used in Japan. In general, there is a trend toward the exclusive use of hangul in ordinary contexts.{{sfn|Hannas|1997|p=48}} Characters remain in use in place names, newspapers, and to disambiguate homophones. They are also used in the practice of calligraphy. Use of hanja in education is politically contentious, with official policy regarding the prominence of hanja in curricula having vacillated since the country's independence.{{sfn|Hannas|1997|pp=65–66, 69–72}}{{sfn|Choo|O'Grady|1996|p=ix}} Some support the total abandonment of hanja, while others advocate an increase in use to levels previously seen during the 1970s and 1980s. Students in grades 7–12 are presently taught with a principal focus on simple recognition and attaining sufficient literacy to read a newspaper.{{sfn|Fischer|2004|pp=189–194}} The South Korean Ministry of Education published the ''[[Basic Hanja for Educational Use]]'' in 1972, which specified {{val|1800}} characters meant to be learned by secondary school students.{{sfn|Lunde|2008|p=84}} In 1991, the [[Supreme Court of Korea]] published the ''Table of Hanja for Use in Personal Names'' ({{lang|ko|인명용한자}}; {{tlit|ko|Inmyeong-yong hanja}}), which initially included {{val|2854}} characters.{{sfn|Taylor|Taylor|2014|p=179}} The list has been expanded several times since; {{As of|2022|lc=yes}}, it includes {{val|8319}} characters.<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 December 2021 |script-title=ko:乻(땅이름 늘)·賏(목치장 영)... ‘인명용 한자’ 40자 추가된다 |trans-title=乻 · 賏... 40 ''Hanja for Use in Personal Names'' added |url=https://www.chosun.com/national/court_law/2021/12/26/OZCAQQTHSFANXKF4UU2C7GEBQM |work=The Chosun Ilbo |language=ko}}</ref>

=== North Korea ===
In the years following its establishment, the North Korean government sought to eliminate the use of hanja in standard writing; by 1949, characters had been almost entirely replaced with hangul in North Korean publications.{{sfnm|Handel|2019|1pp=113|Hannas|1997|2pp=66–67}} While mostly unused in writing, hanja remain an important part of North Korean education: a 1971 textbook for university history departments contained {{val|3323}} distinct characters, and in the 1990s North Korean school children were still expected to learn {{val|2000}} characters.{{sfn|Hannas|1997|pp=67–68}} A 2013 textbook appears to integrate the use of hanja in secondary school education.<ref>{{Cite news |date=14 March 2014 |script-title=ko:북한의 한문교과서를 보다 |trans-title=A look at North Korea's "Literary Chinese" textbooks |url=http://nk.chosun.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=155532 |work=Chosun NK |publisher=The Chosun Ilbo |language=ko}}</ref> It has been estimated that North Korean students learn around {{val|3000}} hanja by the time they graduate university.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kim |first=Kim Mi-young |author-mask=Kim Mi-young (김미영) |date=4 June 2001 |script-title=ko:'3000자까지 배우되 쓰지는 마라' |trans-title="Learn up to 3000 characters, but don't write them" |url=https://nk.chosun.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=7252 |work=Chosun NK |publisher=The Chosun Ilbo |language=ko}}</ref>

=== Taiwan ===
The ''[[Chart of Standard Forms of Common National Characters]]'' was published by Taiwan's Ministry of Education in 1982, and lists {{val|4808}} traditional characters.{{sfn|Lunde|2008|p=81}} The Ministry of Education also compiles dictionaries of characters used in [[Taiwanese Hokkien]] and [[Hakka Chinese|Hakka]].{{efn-ua |{{multiref| {{Cite book |url=https://sutian.moe.edu.tw/zh-hant/introduction/ |publisher=Taiwan Ministry of Education |year=2024 |script-title=zh:常用詞辭典 |trans-title=Dictionary of Frequently-Used Taiwan Minnan |chapter=Introduction}} | {{Cite book |url=https://hakkadict.moe.edu.tw/introduction/ |publisher=Taiwan Ministry of Education |year=2023 |script-title=zh:客語辭典 |trans-title=Dictionary of Taiwan Hakka |chapter=Introduction}} }} }}

=== Other regional standards ===
Singapore's Ministry of Education promulgated three successive rounds of simplifications: the first round in 1969 included 502 simplified characters, and the second round in 1974 included {{val|2287}} simplified characters—including 49 that differed from those in the PRC, which were ultimately removed in the final round in 1976. In 1993, Singapore adopted the revisions made in mainland China in 1986.{{sfn|Shang|Zhao|2017|p=320}}

The Hong Kong Education and Manpower Bureau's ''[[List of Graphemes of Commonly-Used Chinese Characters]]'' includes {{val|4762}} traditional characters used in elementary and junior secondary education.{{sfn|Chen|1999|pp=161}}

== Notes ==
{{Notelist|refs=
{{efn|name=lead|{{hani|漢字}}; [[simplified characters|simplified]] as {{lang|und-Hans|汉字}}
* Chinese {{zh|p=Hànzì|w=Han4-tzŭ4|j=Hon3 zi6}}
* Japanese [[Hepburn romanisation|Hepburn]]: {{tlit|ja|kanji}}
* Korean [[Revised Romanisation]]: {{tlit|ko|Hanja}}; [[McCune–Reischauer]]: {{tlit|ko|Hancha}}
* {{langx|vi|Hán tự}}
Also referred to as '''sinographs'''{{sfn|Tam|2020|p=29}} or '''sinograms'''{{sfnm|Fischer|2004|1p=166|DeFrancis|1984|2p=71}}
}}}}

== References ==
=== Citations ===
{{Reflist|colwidth=20em}}

=== Works cited ===
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bachner |first=Andrea |title=Beyond Sinology: Chinese Writing and the Scripts of Culture |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-231-16452-8 |location=New York}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bökset |first=Roar |url=https://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:200810/FULLTEXT01 |title=Long Story of Short Forms: The Evolution of Simplified Chinese Characters |publisher=Stockholm University |year=2006 |isbn=978-91-628-6832-1 |series=Stockholm East Asian Monographs |volume=11 |format=PDF}}
* {{Cite journal |author-link=William G. Boltz |year=1986 |title=Early Chinese Writing |journal=World Archaeology |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=420–436 |doi=10.1080/00438243.1986.9979980 |jstor=124705 |given=William G. |surname=Boltz}}
* {{Cite book |last=Boltz |first=William G. |title=The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System |publisher=American Oriental Society |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-940490-78-9 |location=New Haven, CT |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Boltz |first=William G. |title=The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221&nbsp;BC |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-521-47030-8 |editor-last=Loewe |editor-first=Michael |editor-link=Michael Loewe |pages=106–123 |chapter=Language and Writing |author-mask=3 |editor-last2=Shaughnessy |editor-first2=Edward L. |editor-link2=Edward L. Shaughnessy |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cHA7Ey0-pbEC&pg=PA108 |via=Google Books}} {{DOI|10.1017/CHOL9780521470308.004}}
* {{Cite book |last=Boltz |first=William G. |title=Writing & Literacy in Early China |publisher=University of Washington Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-295-80450-7 |editor-last=Li |editor-first=Feng |pages=51–84 |chapter=Literacy and the Emergence of Writing in China |author-mask=3 |editor-last2=Branner |editor-first2=David Prager}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language |publisher=Routledge |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-317-38249-2 |editor-last=Chan |editor-first=Sin-Wai}}
** {{Harvc|in=Chan |year=2016 |last=Wang |first=William S.-Y. |pages=152–184 |c=Chinese Linguistics |author-link=William Shi-Yuan Wang}}
** {{Harvc|in=Chan |year=2016 |last=Yin |first=John Jing-hua |pages=51–63 |c=Chinese Characters}}
** {{Harvc|in=Chan |year=2016 |last=Zhang |first=Xiaoheng |pages=420–437 |author-mask=Zhang Xiaoheng (张小衡) |c=Computational Linguistics}}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |year=2020 |title=The Three Kingdoms Period |encyclopedia=The Routledge Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Culture |publisher=Routledge |editor-last=Chan |editor-first=Sin-Wai |isbn=978-1-138-21115-5 |editor-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chen |first=Ping |url=https://archive.org/details/modernchinesehis00chen |title=Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-521-64572-0 |edition=4th |author-mask=Chen Ping (陳平) |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chen |first=Zhaorong |publisher=Academia Sinica |year=2003 |isbn=978-957-671-995-0 |language=zh |script-title=zh:秦系文字研究﹕从漢字史的角度考察 |trans-title=Research on the Qin Writing System: Through the Lens of the History of Writing in China |author-mask=Chen Zhaorong (陳昭容)}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Cheung |first=Kwan-hin |last2=Bauer |first2=Robert S. |author-link2=Robert Bauer (linguist) |year=2002 |title=The Representation of Cantonese with Chinese Characters |journal=Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series |issue=18 |issn=2409-2878 |jstor=23826053 |author1-mask=Cheung Kwan-hin (張系顯);}}
* {{Cite book |last=Choo |first=Mi-Ho |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=psO_Oli22m8C&q=sino-korean+words&pg=PR9 |title=Handbook of Korean Vocabulary: A Resource for Word Recognition and Comprehension |last2=O'Grady |first2=William |author-link2=William O'Grady (linguist) |publisher=University of Hawaiʻi Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-8248-1815-9 |location=Honolulu |via=Google Books}}
* {{Cite book |last=Coulmas |first=Florian |author-link=Florian Coulmas |title=The Writing Systems of the World |publisher=Blackwell |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-631-18028-9 |orig-date=1989}}
* {{Cite book |last=Cruttenden |first=Alan |title=Writing Systems and Phonetics |publisher=Routledge |year=2021 |isbn=978-1-000-33404-3 |pages=167–168}}
* {{Cite book |last=DeFrancis |first=John |author-link=John DeFrancis |title=Nationalism and Language Reform in China |publisher=Octagon |year=1972 |isbn=978-0-374-92095-1 |location=New York |orig-date=1950}}
* {{Cite book |last=DeFrancis |first=John |author-link=John DeFrancis |title=Colonialism and Language Policy in Viet Nam |publisher=Mouton |year=1977 |isbn=978-90-279-7643-7 |series=Contributions to the Sociology of Language |volume=19 |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=DeFrancis |first=John |title=The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy |title-link=The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy |publisher=University of Hawaiʻi Press |year=1984 |isbn=978-0-8248-1068-9 |location=Honolulu |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Demattè |first=Paola |title=The Origins of Chinese Writing |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-19-763576-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Denecke |first=Wiebke |title=A Companion to Translation Studies |publisher=Wiley |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-470-67189-4 |editor-last=Bermann |editor-first=Sandra |location=Oxford |pages=204–216 |chapter=Worlds Without Translation: Premodern East Asia and the Power of Character Scripts |editor-last2=Porter |editor-first2=Catherine}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ebrey |first=Patricia Buckley |author-link=Patricia Buckley Ebrey |title=The Cambridge Illustrated History of China |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-521-43519-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Fischer |first=Steven R. |author-link=Steven Roger Fischer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ywo0M9OpbXoC&pg=PA189 |title=A History of Writing |publisher=Reaktion |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-86189-101-3 |location=London |via=Google Books}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gnanadesikan |first=Amalia E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nlEPhP900-UC&pg=PT61 |title=The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet |publisher=Wiley |year=2011 |isbn=978-1-4443-5985-5 |orig-date=2009 |via=Google Books}}
* {{Cite book |publisher=Guangxi Nationalities Publishing House |year=1989 |isbn=978-7-5363-0614-1 |edition=2nd |location=Nanning |language=zh |script-title=zh:古壮字字典 |trans-title=Dictionary of the Old Zhuang Script |ref={{sfnref|Guangxi Nationalities Publishing House|1989}}}}
* {{Cite book |last=Handel |first=Zev |url=https://brill.com/display/title/39284 |title=Sinography: The Borrowing and Adaptation of the Chinese Script |publisher=Brill |year=2019 |isbn=978-90-04-35222-3 |series=Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis |volume=1 |s2cid=189494805}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hannas |first=William C. |title=Asia's Orthographic Dilemma |publisher=University of Hawai‘i Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-8248-1892-0 |location=Honolulu}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Hung |first=William |author-link=William Hung (sinologist) |year=1951 |title=The Transmission of The Book Known as The Secret History of The Mongols |journal=Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies |location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=Harvard–Yenching Institute |volume=14 |issue=3/4 |pages=433–492 |jstor=2718184}}
* {{Cite book |last=Keightley |first=David |author-link=David Keightley |title=Sources of Shang History: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze-Age China |publisher=University of California Press |year=1978 |isbn=978-0-520-02969-9 |location=Berkeley}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kern |first=Martin |author-link=Martin Kern (sinologist) |title=The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, vol I: To 1375 |title-link=The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-521-85558-7 |editor-last=Chang |editor-first=Kang-i Sun |editor-link=Kang-i Sun Chang |pages=1–115 |chapter=Early Chinese Literature, Beginnings through Western Han |doi=10.1017/CHOL9780521855587.003 |editor-last2=Owen |editor-first2=Stephen |editor-link2=Stephen Owen (sinologist)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kin |first=Bunkyō |title=Literary Sinitic and East Asia: A Cultural Sphere of Vernacular Reading |publisher=Brill |year=2021 |isbn=978-90-04-43730-2 |editor-last=King |editor-first=Ross |editor-link=Ross King (academic) |series=Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis |volume=3 |translator-last=King |translator-first=Ross |translator-last2=Burge |translator-first2=Marjorie |translator-last3=Park |translator-first3=Si Nae |translator-last4=Lushchenko |translator-first4=Alexey |translator-last5=Hattori |translator-first5=Mina}}
* {{Cite book |title=Ancient and Early Medieval Chinese Literature: A Reference Guide |publisher=Brill |year=2014 |isbn=978-90-04-19240-9 |editor-last=Knechtges |editor-first=David R. |editor-link=David R. Knechtges |volume=2 |location=Leiden |editor-last2=Chang |editor-first2=Taiping}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kornicki |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Kornicki |title=Languages, Scripts, and Chinese Texts in East Asia |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2018 |isbn=978-0-19-251869-9}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kuzuoğlu |first=Uluğ |title=Codes of Modernity: Chinese Scripts in the Global Information Age |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2023 |isbn=978-0-231-20938-0 |location=New York |doi=10.7312/kuzu20938}}
* {{Cite book |last=Li |first=Dasui |publisher=Peking University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-7-301-21958-4 |edition=3rd |language=zh |script-title=zh:简明实用汉字学 |trans-title=Concise and Practical Chinese Characters |author-mask=Li Dasui (李大遂)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Li |first=Wendan |title=Chinese Writing and Calligraphy |publisher=University of Hawai‘i Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-8248-3364-0 |location=Honolulu}}
* {{Cite book |last=Li |first=Yu |title=The Chinese Writing System in Asia: An Interdisciplinary Perspective |publisher=Routledge |year=2020 |isbn=978-1-138-90731-7}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Liu |first=Kexin |last2=Wu |first2=Xiaohong |last3=Guo |first3=Zhiyu |last4=Yuan |first4=Sixun |last5=Ding |first5=Xingfang |last6=Fu |first6=Dongpo |last7=Pan |first7=Yan |year=2021 |title=Radiocarbon Dating of Oracle Bones of the Late Shang Period in Ancient China |journal=[[Radiocarbon (journal)|Radiocarbon]] |volume=63 |issue=1 |pages=155–175 |bibcode=2021Radcb..63..155L |doi=10.1017/RDC.2020.90 |ref={{sfnref|Liu et al.|2017}} |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite book |last=Liu |first=Li |author-link=Liu Li (archaeologist) |title=The Archaeology of China |last2=Chen |first2=Xingcan |author-link2=Chen Xingcan |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-521-64310-8}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Louis |first=François |year=2003 |title=Written Ornament: Ornamental Writing: Birdscript of the Early Han Dynasty and the Art of Enchanting |journal=Ars Orientalis |volume=33 |pages=18–27 |issn=0571-1371 |jstor=4434272}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lunde |first=Ken |author-link=Ken Lunde |title=CJKV Information Processing |publisher=O'Reilly |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-596-51447-1 |edition=2nd}}
* {{Cite book |last=McBride |first=Catherine |author-link=Catherine McBride |title=The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics |last2=Tong |first2=Xiuhong |last3=Mo |first3=Jianhong |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-19-026684-4 |editor-last=Wang |editor-first=William S.-Y. |chapter=Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese |editor-last2=Sun |editor-first2=Chaofen}}
* {{Cite book |last=Mullaney |first=Thomas S. |author-link=Thomas S. Mullaney |title=The Chinese Typewriter: A History |publisher=MIT Press |year=2017 |isbn=978-0-262-03636-8 |location=Cambridge, MA}}
* {{Cite book |last=Myers |first=James |title=The Grammar of Chinese Characters: Productive Knowledge of Formal Patterns in an Orthographic System |publisher=Routledge |year=2019 |isbn=978-1-138-29081-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nawar |first=Haytham |title=Language of Tomorrow: Towards a Transcultural Visual Communication System in a Posthuman Condition |publisher=Intellect |year=2020 |isbn=978-1-78938-183-2 |pages=130–155 |chapter=Transculturalism and Posthumanism |jstor=j.ctv36xvqb7}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Lx-9mS6Aa4wC |title=Paper and Printing |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-521-08690-5 |editor-last=Needham |editor-first=Joseph |editor-link=Joseph Needham |edition=Reprint |series=Science and Civilisation in China |volume=V:1 |orig-date=1985 |editor-last2=Tsien |editor-first2=Tsuen-hsuin |editor-link2=Tsien Tsuen-hsuin |via=Google Books}}
* {{Cite book |title=Language and Logic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-521-57143-2 |editor-last=Needham |editor-first=Joseph |editor-mask=3 |series=Science and Civilisation in China |volume=VII:1 |editor-last2=Harbsmeier |editor-first2=Christoph |no-tracking=y}}
* {{Cite book |last=Norman |first=Jerry |author-link=Jerry Norman (sinologist) |title=Chinese |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1988 |isbn=978-0-521-29653-3}}
* {{Cite book |publisher=Peking University Modern Chinese Language Teaching and Research Office, The Commercial Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-7-100-00940-9 |language=zh |script-title=zh:现代汉语 |trans-title=Modern Chinese |ref={{sfnref|Peking University|2004}}}}
* {{Cite book |last=Qiu |first=Xigui |author-link=Qiu Xigui |title=Chinese Writing |publisher=Society for the Study of Early China and The Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California |year=2000 |isbn=978-1-55729-071-7 |series=Early China Special Monograph Series |volume=4 |location=Berkeley |translator-last=Mattos |translator-first=Gilbert L. |author-mask=Qiu Xigui |orig-date=1988 |translator-last2=Norman |translator-first2=Jerry}}
* {{Cite book |last=Qiu |first=Xigui |author-link=Qiu Xigui |publisher=The Commercial Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-7-100-09369-9 |edition=2nd |location=Beijing |language=zh |script-title=zh:文字学概要 |trans-title=Chinese Writing |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ramsey |first=S. Robert |title=The Languages of China |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1987 |isbn=978-0-691-01468-5}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Sampson |first=Geoffrey |author-link=Geoffrey Sampson |year=2013 |title=The Reality of Compound Ideographs |journal=Journal of Chinese Linguistics |volume=41 |issue=2 |pages=255–272 |jstor=23754815 |given2=Zhiqun |surname2=Chen |author2-mask=Chen Zhiqun (陳志群)}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Shang |first=Guowen |last2=Zhao |first2=Shouhui |year=2017 |title=Standardising the Chinese language in Singapore: Issues of Policy and Practice |journal=Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=315–329 |doi=10.1080/01434632.2016.1201091 |issn=0143-4632}}
* {{Cite book |last=Shaughnessy |first=Edward L. |author-link=Edward L. Shaughnessy |title=Sources of Western Zhou History: Inscribed Bronze Vessels |publisher=University of California Press |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-520-07028-8 |location=Berkeley}}
* {{Cite book |last=Su |first=Peicheng |publisher=The Commercial Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-7-100-10440-1 |edition=3rd |location=Beijing |language=zh |script-title=zh:现代汉字学纲要 |trans-title=Essentials of Modern Chinese Characters |author-mask=Su Peicheng (苏培成)}}
* {{Cite book |title=Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics Online |publisher=Brill |year=2015 |editor-last=Sybesma |editor-first=Rint |doi=10.1163/2210-7363-ecll-all |issn=2210-7363}}
** {{Harvc |in=Sybesma |year=2015 |last=Ho |first=Connie Suk-Han |c=Dyslexia, Developmental}}
** {{Harvc |in=Sybesma |year=2015 |last=Lee |first=Chia-Ying |c=Neurolinguistics, Overview |anchor-year=2015a}}
** {{Harvc |in=Sybesma |year=2015 |last=Lee |first=Chia-Ying |c=Sublexical Processes for Reading Chinese Characters, Neurolinguistic Studies |author-mask=3 |anchor-year=2015b}}
* {{Cite book |last=Tam |first=Gina Anne |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108776400/type/book |title=Dialect and Nationalism in China, 1860–1960 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2020 |isbn=978-1-108-77640-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Taylor |first=Insup |title=Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese |last2=Taylor |first2=M. Martin |publisher=John Benjamins |year=2014 |isbn=978-90-272-1794-3 |edition=Rev. |series=Studies in Written Language and Literacy |volume=14 |orig-date=1995}}
* {{Cite book |last=Tong |first=Xiuli |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z6d5AgAAQBAJ |title=Contemporary Perspectives on Reading and Spelling |last2=Liu |first2=Phil D. |last3=McBride-Chang |first3=Catherine |publisher=Routledge |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-415-49716-9 |editor-last=Wood |editor-first=Clare Patricia |location=New York |pages=202–221 |chapter=Metalinguistic and Subcharacter Skills in Chinese Literacy Acquisition |editor-last2=Connelly |editor-first2=Vincent |via=Google Books}}
* {{Cite book |last=Vogelsang |first=Kai |title=Introduction to Classical Chinese |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2021 |isbn=978-0-19-883497-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wilkinson |first=Endymion |author-link=Endymion Wilkinson |title=Chinese History: A New Manual |title-link=Chinese History: A New Manual |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-674-06715-8 |series=Harvard–Yenching Institute Monograph Series |volume=85 |location=Cambridge, MA}}
* {{Cite thesis |last=Williams |first=Clay H. |title=Semantic vs. Phonetic Decoding Strategies in Non-Native Readers of Chinese |degree=PhD |url=http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/195163/1/azu_etd_10830_sip1_m.pdf |year=2010 |institution=University of Arizona Graduate College of Second Language Acquisition & Teaching |hdl=10150/195163 |hdl-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Xue |first=Shiqi |year=1982 |title=Chinese Lexicography Past and Present |journal=Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=151–169 |doi=10.1353/dic.1982.0009 |issn=2160-5076}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yang |first=Lihui |title=Handbook of Chinese Mythology |last2=An |first2=Deming |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-19-533263-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yang |first=Runlu |publisher=Beijing Normal University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-7-303-09437-0 |language=zh |script-title=zh:现代汉字学 |trans-title=Modern Chinese Characters |author-mask=Yang Runlu (杨润陆)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yin |first=Jiming |publisher=Fudan University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-7-309-05525-2 |location=Shanghai |language=zh |script-title=zh:现代汉语文字学 |trans-title=Modern Chinese Writing |author-mask=Yin Jiming (殷寄明) |display-authors=et al}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yip |first=Po-ching |title=The Chinese Lexicon: A Comprehensive Survey |publisher=Psychology Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-415-15174-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yong |first=Heming |title=Chinese Lexicography: A History from 1046&nbsp;BC to AD&nbsp;1911 |last2=Peng |first2=Jing |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-19-156167-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Zhang |first=Xiaoheng |last2=Li |first2=Xiaotong |publisher=The Language Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-7-80241-670-3 |location=Beijing |language=zh |script-title=zh:一二三笔顺检字手册 |trans-title=Handbook of the YES Sorting Method |ref={{sfnref|Zhang|2013}} |author-mask=Zhang Xiaoheng (张小衡); |author-mask2=Li Xiaotong (李笑通)}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Zhao |first=Liming |year=1998 |title=Nüshu: Chinese Women's Characters |journal=International Journal of the Sociology of Language |volume=129 |issue=1 |pages=127–137 |doi=10.1515/ijsl.1998.129.127 |issn=0165-2516}}
* {{Cite book |last=Zhong |first=Yurou |title=Chinese Grammatology: Script Revolution and Literary Modernity, 1916–1958 |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-231-54989-9 |location=New York |doi=10.7312/zhon19262}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Zhou |first=Youguang |author-link=Zhou Youguang |author-mask=Zhou Youguang |year=1991 |editor-last=Mair |editor-first=Victor H. |editor-link=Victor H. Mair |title=The Family of Chinese Character-Type Scripts (Twenty Members and Four Stages of Development) |url=http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp028_chinese_scripts.html |journal=Sino-Platonic Papers |volume=28}}
* {{Cite book |last=Zhou |first=Youguang |title=The Historical Evolution of Chinese Languages and Scripts |publisher=National East Asian Languages Resource Center, Ohio State University |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-87415-349-1 |series=Pathways to Advanced Skills |volume=8 |location=Columbus |language=en,zh |translator-last=Zhang |translator-first=Liqing |script-title=zh:中国语文的时代演进 |author-mask=3 |translator-mask=Zhang Liqing (张立青)}}
{{Refend}}

=== Primary and media sources ===
{{Notelist-ua}}

== Further reading ==
{{See also|Bibliography of the Chinese language and writing system}}
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite book |last=DeFrancis |first=John |author-link=John DeFrancis |title=Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems |publisher=University of Hawaiʻi Press |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-8248-1207-2 |location=Honolulu |chapter=Chinese |chapter-url=http://www.pinyin.info/readings/texts/visible/index.html |via=pinyin.info}}
* {{Cite book |last=Galambos |first=Imre |author-link=Imre Galambos |url=http://shahon.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Galambos-2006-Orthography-of-early-Chinese-writing.pdf |title=Orthography of Early Chinese Writing: Evidence from Newly Excavated Manuscripts |publisher=Eötvös Loránd University |year=2006 |isbn=978-963-463-811-7 |location=Budapest}}
* {{Cite book |title=Cosmopolitan and Vernacular in the World of ''Wen 文'' |publisher=Brill |year=2023 |isbn=978-90-04-43769-2 |editor-last=King |editor-first=Ross |series=Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis |volume=5}}
* {{Cite web |last=Mair |first=Victor H. |author-link=Victor H. Mair |date=2 August 2011 |title=Polysyllabic Characters in Chinese Writing |url=https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3330 |website=Language Log}}
* {{Cite book |last=Mullaney |first=Thomas S. |author-link=Thomas S. Mullaney |title=The Chinese Computer: A Global History of the Information Age |publisher=MIT Press |year=2024 |isbn=978-0-262-04751-7 |location=Cambridge, MA}}
* {{Cite book |last=Pulleyblank |first=Edwin G. |author-link=Edwin G. Pulleyblank |title=Middle Chinese: A Study in Historical Phonology |publisher=University of British Columbia Press |year=1984 |isbn=978-0-7748-0192-8 |location=Vancouver}}
* {{Cite book |last=Tsu |first=Jing |title=Kingdom of Characters: The Language Revolution That Made China Modern |publisher=Riverhead |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-7352-1472-9 |location=New York}}
* {{Cite book |title=Studies in Colloquial Chinese and Its History: Dialect and Text |publisher=Hong Kong University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-988-8754-09-0 |editor-last=Simmons |editor-first=Richard VanNess}}
{{Refend}}

== External links ==
{{Sister project links|Chinese characters}}
* [https://www.unicode.org/charts/unihan.html Unihan Database]{{snd}}Reference glyphs, readings, and meanings for characters in ''The Unicode Standard'', with information about the history of Han unification
* [https://ctext.org/dictionary.pl?if=en Chinese Text Project Dictionary]{{snd}}Comprehensive character dictionary, including examples of Classical Chinese usage
* [https://zi.tools/ zi.tools]{{snd}}Character lookup by orthography, phonology, and etymology
* [https://hanziyuan.net/ Chinese Etymology] by Richard Sears

{{Chinese language}}
{{List of writing systems}}
{{Portal bar|Writing|Language|Asia|China}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Chinese characters| ]]
[[Category:Chinese culture]]
[[Category:Culture of East Asia]]
[[Category:East Asia]]
[[Category:Southeast Asia]]
[[Category:Writing systems without word boundaries]]