Talk:White paper
Latest comment: 1 month ago by 103.121.153.75 in topic CrytoMania real or fake
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of historical documents showing white (policy), green (open-ended), yellow (pre-print), and blue (technical) documents with their color-coded covers be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Yellow paper
editIs yellow paper limited to cryptocurrency? I've only seen it in that context. kencf0618 (talk) 17:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is possible. I haven't been able to find a single example of a preprint being called a yellow paper before 2013. However, CERN has published for decades a so-called "Yellow Report", apparently with papers that for some reason or another would not have been appropriate for publishing in a journal(?). Roll 3d6 (talk) 08:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
"A white paper is the first document researchers should read to better understand a core concept or idea."
editI'm not entirely sure about the use of the word "should" here. See the first point under WP:NOTHOW. I would make an edit, but I don't have the subject knowledge to decide what an appropriate replacement would be. AlexGallon (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
CrytoMania real or fake
editTell yes or no 103.121.153.75 (talk) 02:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)