Talk:George Jonas

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Added sources needed and contradict templates

edit

The article is sorely in need of sources, and the opening sentence contradicts itself. Is he a conservative or a liberal? Anchoress 05:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

He is a classical liberal, which is well described in the link in the first sentence, which is a species of conservative in the USA.

Source for Vengeance

edit

The citation given, an article by Mr Jonas himself[1], contains this:

The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz floats the canard that my source was revealed to be one "Yuval Aviv" in the late 1980s when I sued him in a contract dispute in New York. The fact is, I've never sued anyone in my life, in New York or anyplace else. Later Ha'aretz retracts the story, but not before it spreads to the Los Angeles Times and some other papers.

Which to my eyes strongly suggests that Mr Jonas is not making the claim that Yuval Aviv is the source for Vengeance. It does leave some wiggle room, but I do think that you cannot use this article to support the controversial claim that Juval Aviv is the source (and Mossad agent Avner) for Vengeance. Perhaps such a source does exist. Perhaps like so many other things in the world of espionage we shall never know for certain. 60.240.207.146 (talk) 13:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Jonas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply