The 1916 United States presidential election in Oregon took place on November 7, 1916 as part of the 1916 United States presidential election in which all contemporary forty-eight states participated. Voters chose five electors, or representatives to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
.gif){kind=small} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.jpg)
Oregon had been in the 1900s solidified as a one-party Republican bastion, which it would remain at a Presidential level apart from the 1910s GOP split until Franklin D. Roosevelt rose to power in 1932,[1] and apart from a very short New Deal interlude at state level until the "Revolution of 1954". As of 1916, the state had not elected a Democratic Congressman since 1878, and between 1900 and 1954 Democratic representation in the Oregon legislature would never exceed fifteen percent except during the above-mentioned 1930s interlude,[2] so that Republican primaries would become the chief mode of competition.[3]
In 1912, a split in the Republican Party and the relatively limited appeal of Theodore Roosevelt’s Progressive Party in what was at the time the most Republican of the Pacific States allowed Woodrow Wilson to become only the second Democratic Presidential candidate after Horatio Seymour in 1868 to carry Oregon.[4]
For his 1916 re-election against a United GOP, Wilson campaigned on keeping the United States out of World War I,[5] and upon Progressive Era reforms like the income tax.[6] These reforms were much less popular in Yankee-settled Western Oregon – which had close cultural and political ties to New England – with the result that Oregon voted for the Republican nominee, Supreme Court Justice Charles Evans Hughes of New York, over the Democratic nominee, incumbent President Woodrow Wilson of New Jersey. Hughes won Oregon by a close margin of 2.57%; however, alongside South Dakota, Oregon was the only state that Hughes won in the Great Plains or westward. Wilson’s historically based strength in sparsely populated and Ozark mountaineer-settled Eastern Oregon,[4] like that of William Jennings Bryan in 1896, was inadequate to counter this.
Results
edit| Presidential Candidate | Running Mate | Party | Electoral Vote (EV) | Popular Vote (PV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Evans Hughes of New York | Charles W. Fairbanks | Republican | 5[7] | 126,813 | 48.47% |
| Woodrow Wilson | Thomas R. Marshall | Democratic | 0 | 120,087 | 45.90% |
| Allan L. Benson | George Kirkpatrick | Socialist | 0 | 9,711 | 3.71% |
| Frank Hanly | Ira Landrith | Prohibition | 0 | 4,729 | 1.81% |
| — | — | Progressive | 0 | 310 | 0.12% |
Results by county
edit| County | Charles Evans Hughes Republican |
Thomas Woodrow Wilson Democratic |
Allan Louis Benson Socialist |
James Franklin Hanly Prohibition |
No Candidate Progressive "Bull Moose" |
Margin | Total votes cast[8] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Baker | 2,541 | 37.16% | 3,897 | 56.99% | 324 | 4.74% | 69 | 1.01% | 7 | 0.10% | -1,356 | -19.83% | 6,838 |
| Benton | 2,902 | 50.72% | 2,488 | 43.48% | 120 | 2.10% | 207 | 3.62% | 5 | 0.09% | 414 | 7.24% | 5,722 |
| Clackamas | 6,349 | 50.91% | 5,334 | 42.77% | 556 | 4.46% | 222 | 1.78% | 10 | 0.08% | 1,015 | 8.14% | 12,471 |
| Clatsop | 2,568 | 49.44% | 2,239 | 43.11% | 320 | 6.16% | 65 | 1.25% | 2 | 0.04% | 329 | 6.33% | 5,194 |
| Columbia | 2,023 | 53.95% | 1,451 | 38.69% | 182 | 4.85% | 92 | 2.45% | 2 | 0.05% | 572 | 15.25% | 3,750 |
| Coos | 3,209 | 43.61% | 3,352 | 45.56% | 708 | 9.62% | 74 | 1.01% | 15 | 0.20% | -143 | -1.94% | 7,358 |
| Crook | 1,675 | 36.21% | 2,699 | 58.34% | 209 | 4.52% | 38 | 0.82% | 5 | 0.11% | -1,024 | -22.14% | 4,626 |
| Curry | 541 | 45.62% | 512 | 43.17% | 118 | 9.95% | 8 | 0.67% | 7 | 0.59% | 29 | 2.45% | 1,186 |
| Douglas | 3,922 | 48.16% | 3,679 | 45.18% | 420 | 5.16% | 117 | 1.44% | 5 | 0.06% | 243 | 2.98% | 8,143 |
| Gilliam | 557 | 37.89% | 870 | 59.18% | 25 | 1.70% | 17 | 1.16% | 1 | 0.07% | -313 | -21.29% | 1,470 |
| Grant | 941 | 40.56% | 1,210 | 52.16% | 145 | 6.25% | 17 | 0.73% | 7 | 0.30% | -269 | -11.59% | 2,320 |
| Harney | 872 | 37.52% | 1,239 | 53.31% | 189 | 8.13% | 22 | 0.95% | 2 | 0.09% | -367 | -15.79% | 2,324 |
| Hood River | 1,314 | 48.33% | 1,188 | 43.69% | 158 | 5.81% | 58 | 2.13% | 1 | 0.04% | 126 | 4.63% | 2,719 |
| Jackson | 3,538 | 39.41% | 4,874 | 54.29% | 321 | 3.58% | 230 | 2.56% | 15 | 0.17% | -1,336 | -14.88% | 8,978 |
| Jefferson | 581 | 36.13% | 904 | 56.22% | 62 | 3.86% | 60 | 3.73% | 1 | 0.06% | -323 | -20.09% | 1,608 |
| Josephine | 1,660 | 46.20% | 1,656 | 46.09% | 230 | 6.40% | 42 | 1.17% | 5 | 0.14% | 4 | 0.11% | 3,593 |
| Klamath | 1,631 | 44.37% | 1,853 | 50.41% | 170 | 4.62% | 18 | 0.49% | 4 | 0.11% | -222 | -6.04% | 3,676 |
| Lake | 793 | 41.94% | 971 | 51.35% | 98 | 5.18% | 27 | 1.43% | 2 | 0.11% | -178 | -9.41% | 1,891 |
| Lane | 7,253 | 51.70% | 5,880 | 41.92% | 607 | 4.33% | 261 | 1.86% | 27 | 0.19% | 1,373 | 9.79% | 14,028 |
| Lincoln | 1,167 | 50.87% | 915 | 39.89% | 190 | 8.28% | 17 | 0.74% | 5 | 0.22% | 252 | 10.99% | 2,294 |
| Linn | 4,524 | 46.26% | 4,675 | 47.81% | 318 | 3.25% | 253 | 2.59% | 9 | 0.09% | -151 | -1.54% | 9,779 |
| Malheur | 1,682 | 42.38% | 1,937 | 48.80% | 293 | 7.38% | 54 | 1.36% | 3 | 0.08% | -255 | -6.42% | 3,969 |
| Marion | 8,316 | 55.48% | 5,699 | 38.02% | 473 | 3.16% | 475 | 3.17% | 25 | 0.17% | 2,617 | 17.46% | 14,988 |
| Morrow | 748 | 44.08% | 830 | 48.91% | 92 | 5.42% | 26 | 1.53% | 1 | 0.06% | -82 | -4.83% | 1,697 |
| Multnomah | 41,458 | 51.67% | 35,755 | 44.56% | 1,852 | 2.31% | 1,083 | 1.35% | 87 | 0.11% | 5,703 | 7.11% | 80,235 |
| Polk | 2,899 | 47.89% | 2,844 | 46.98% | 187 | 3.09% | 120 | 1.98% | 4 | 0.07% | 55 | 0.91% | 6,054 |
| Sherman | 717 | 46.86% | 747 | 48.82% | 18 | 1.18% | 48 | 3.14% | 0 | 0.00% | -30 | -1.96% | 1,530 |
| Tillamook | 1,547 | 53.86% | 1,175 | 40.91% | 95 | 3.31% | 53 | 1.85% | 2 | 0.07% | 372 | 12.95% | 2,872 |
| Umatilla | 3,664 | 42.33% | 4,606 | 53.22% | 256 | 2.96% | 122 | 1.41% | 7 | 0.08% | -942 | -10.88% | 8,655 |
| Union | 2,253 | 39.77% | 3,086 | 54.47% | 259 | 4.57% | 63 | 1.11% | 4 | 0.07% | -833 | -14.70% | 5,665 |
| Wallowa | 1,198 | 35.75% | 1,960 | 58.49% | 165 | 4.92% | 20 | 0.60% | 8 | 0.24% | -762 | -22.74% | 3,351 |
| Wasco | 2,243 | 47.53% | 2,287 | 48.46% | 103 | 2.18% | 80 | 1.70% | 6 | 0.13% | -44 | -0.93% | 4,719 |
| Washington | 4,888 | 56.16% | 3,363 | 38.64% | 219 | 2.52% | 222 | 2.55% | 11 | 0.13% | 1,525 | 17.52% | 8,703 |
| Wheeler | 629 | 51.73% | 570 | 46.88% | 10 | 0.82% | 6 | 0.49% | 1 | 0.08% | 59 | 4.85% | 1,216 |
| Yamhill | 4,010 | 49.95% | 3,342 | 41.63% | 219 | 2.73% | 443 | 5.52% | 14 | 0.17% | 668 | 8.32% | 8,028 |
| Totals | 126,813 | 48.47% | 120,087 | 45.90% | 9,711 | 3.71% | 4,729 | 1.81% | 310 | 0.12% | 6,726 | 2.57% | 261,650 |
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Burnham, Walter Dean; 'The System of 1896', in Kleppner, Paul (editor), The Evolution of American Electoral Systems, pp. 176-179 ISBN 0313213798
- ^ Schattschneider, Elmer Eric; The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, pp. 76-84 ISBN 0030133661
- ^ Murray, Keith; ‘Issues and Personalities of Pacific Northwest Politics, 1889-1950’, The Pacific Northwest Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 3 (July 1950), pp. 213-233
- ^ a b Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 483 ISBN 978-0-691-16324-6
- ^ Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, p. 47 ISBN 0786422173
- ^ Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 497
- ^ "1916 Presidential General Election Results – Oregon". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas. Retrieved December 27, 2019.
- ^ Oregon Secretary of State Elections Division; Abstract of Votes Cast in the several counties in the State of Oregon at a General Election held on the Seventh Day of November, A.D. 1916, for Presidential Electors, Representatives in Congress