User talk:Romanm
Hello. I placed your image on the Deletion Request, since I drew a better version at Image:Flag_of_SR_Macedonia.png. If you have any questions, come talk to me, please. Zscout370 (sound off) 21:19, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
Hvala za dodano kategorijo, sem jo spregledal. LP. Janeznovak 03:30, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Hvala za pomoč pri dodatni katregorizaciji. Se malo slabo znajdem v Zbirkinih kategorijah (pa sem - vsaj upam - iz dneva v dan boljši). Problem je moje izredno slabo znaje angleščine, ki jo sicer delno berem, ne znam pa poiskati vseh pojmov. Lep pozdrav! —Janeznovak 13:52, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- Opožam da zelo dobro slediš mojim novim slikam v Zbirki. Hvala. Prosim te za odkrito mneje: ali te slike spdajo v Zbirko? —Janeznovak 16:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:RuneScape Bank.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Thuresson 12:55, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Nesubstituirane predloge
[edit]To lahko narediš tudi sam. Mar ne? --Eleassar my talk 17:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Slike
[edit]Veš v Wikipediji,prosti enciklopediji mislim zbrati vse kapele,zvonike in znamenja v Prekmurju, jim dodati besedilo kolikor mi ga bo uspelo dobiti,ker na tem področju so obdelane samo cerkve. Veš stari ljudje vedo o tem ogromno,na žalost jih je pa iz dneva v dan manj.To je zdaj pod:Kapele in znamenja v Prekmurju.Ja ti pa slikovne datoteke lahko razporediš tako kot misliš,da bo najbolje.Pa lep pozdrav.--Lanfra 18:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Čebela
[edit]Dobra slika kranjske čebele, lp., --Ziga 07:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Šele zdajle sem videl tole. Hvala, Žiga, čeprav sem zdaj zmeden, če je tista žival res čebela (glej naslednjo temo spodaj). Če poznaš kakega žužkoslovca, se priporočam za dokončno klasifikacijo. --romanm (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Wrong honeybee picture - another insect
[edit]Hello Romanm, sorry your picture is not a Apis mellifera. I've removed it from the Apis mellifera carnica article in the english wikipedia. --MikePhobos 21:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hello, Mike! Thank you for noticing it. I took the picture of this insect 2 metres from the apiary with Carnolian honeybees, so I assumed it was one of them (it looked the same as the others to me, but I have to admit that I really do not know anything about insects). I will try to inquire about its classification to correct the error and let you know. --romanm (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Update: User:Dysmachus categorized it as an Eristalis tenax (he also suggested it should be deleted, with which I disagree). --romanm (talk) 22:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Slike dneva
[edit]Hvala za prevod napisov. Prosil bi te samo, da ne uporabljaš pike, ker je pri napisih k slikam, kadar ne gre za več povedi, ne pišemo. --Eleassar my talk 22:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Naslovi slik
[edit]Zdaj sem naložil večino slikovnega materiala v "Churches in Prekmurje". Zdaj na koncu sem že nalagal pravilne naslove slik. So pa slike, ki bi jim bilo potrebno spremeniti naslove:n.pr. Kapela ta in ta spodnja ali zgornja. Se da narediti,da ne bi ponovno nalagal slik.LP--Lanfra 11:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Pa še to:Kako bi v [1]postavil občine po abecedi.LP--Lanfra 12:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Druga povezava pa je na:[2] LP--Lanfra 12:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Slik se žal (kolikor vem) ne da preimenovati: če bi jim želel spremeniti ime, bi jih moral še enkrat naložiti pod spremenjenim imenom, nato pa predlagati brisanje starega.
- Prav tako ni preprostega načina, da urediš galerijo prekmurskih sakralnih objektov po abecedi. Treba jih je urediti ročno, tako da urediš celo stran in premikaš bloke besedila sem in tja.
- V kategoriji prekmurskih sakralnih objektov lahko dosežeš urejanje člankov pod drugo črko, če npr. namesto
- [[Kategorija:Sakralni objekti v Prekmurju]]
- napišeš
- [[Kategorija:Sakralni objekti v Prekmurju|Dolina, leseni vaški zvonik]]
- V tem primeru bo v kategoriji Kategorija:Sakralni objekti v Prekmurju članek Leseni vaški zvonik v Dolini pod črko "D", ne "L".
- --romanm (talk) 21:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Jean-Francois Champollion.jpg
[edit]Meow
In fact, I encountered a problem when mass-uploading file from fr:wp to commons a few days ago, in particulary, it appeared that the pywikipedia bot script didn't recognize a picture being already uploaded with the same name. template:Loveless was added to all the pictures uploaded that daym, but it'll take a few weeks before I've checked all 500 of them.
thank you for your comprehension ^^;
Darkoneko 22:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Slovenske narodne pesmi
[edit]Želel bi, da bi bile tudi tu ohranjene naše čudovite pesmi. Zamislil sem se na tak način. Slika:Iz stolpa sem.png Media:Iz stolpa sem.OGG Ne vem sicer, če je v skladu s pravili - skratka rabim pameten nasvet!LP--Lanfra 20:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Druga varianta :samo besedilo in melodija . LP--Lanfra 20:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Chagall IandTheVillage.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Lupo 08:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Category:Harry Potter has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
-- Bryan (talk to me) 12:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Costumes of Slaves or Serfs from the Sixth to the Twelfth Centuries.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. gildemax 10:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Slovar slovenskega knjiznega jezika 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—Angr 19:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Hapi.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Hapi.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 03:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Needless plant species categories
[edit]Kindly stop producing needless plant species categories but use species articles/galleries instead. There isn't any reason to force users to look at two different places for an image. Keep in mind that with producing plant species categories you're copying a bot's vandalism. The bot has been stopped by many botanist after a so called test run but unfortunately left thousends of plant species categories that now are confusing particularly newer users. If you wonder why the bot's vandalism hasn't been reverted, well, it was an administrator's bot... -- Ies 17:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please allow me to remind you at the reached consensus about categories. To quote the mentioned page:
- Some users are of the opinion that when an image is included in a gallery article, it is sufficient to categorize that article. Others believe that each individual image should be categorized too. The consensus on this issue, as determined by vote, is that both systems are equally valid and should be used concurrently. Do not remove categories just because an image is in a categorized gallery.
- I, for one, find automatic categorization to be superior over articles, but I can also understand that some people like to control image description and sort order, therefore I put all of images from Category:Naše škodljive rastline in both, articles and categories. I can't see how categories can confuse new users, if someone deliberately clicks on category. Please direct me to some talk page about this issue if you disagree. --romanm (talk) 08:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token bef249e895956831d4a69b548edbd7c5
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Image deletion warning | Image:FirstWebServer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kasuga (talk) 10:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Peplis portula L.
[edit]The url that you cited when you moved Lithospermum arvense to Buglossoides arvensis is for Peplis portula L.
When I move it back, you can thank me or something.
Thank you for your contribution. -- carol (talk) 08:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Eh, I was confused. So instead of exchanging thank yous I will apologize. Sorry about the earlier message. I actually have been trying to get rid of redirection pages since the text can be found via search if it is included in the article or in the category. I am also not happy writing about articles here, there are wikipedia's for that and (at least to me) this collection is of media that can further illustrate articles.
- The fact that the link you cited for the venacular name is a problem that is not within my ability to have an opinion on, thankfully :) -- carol (talk) 10:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- No problem with earlier message. However, I disagree about deleting redirection pages. IMHO it is quite useful that such a page exists, since it prohibits creating two pages with roughly the same content. As far as "articles" (galleries, really) are concerned, IMHO they server their purpose on Commons. For my opinion on this, see #Needless plant species categories above. --romanm (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, well -- duplicate images are removed with {{Duplicate}} and articles are on the 'pedias. I made two really nice galleries and well researched galleries, they were invited to be at English wikipedia. The wiki search engine finds text in articles and included with galleries as long as it is spelled correctly before added to the search box. Might I suggest that with the actual existing software, that a series of potential mispellings that are redirection pages to species might be more appropriate and actually work with the existing software and its problems. I do not delete galleries. They seem to be something to keep smaller minds happy with and I regret those days that my actions made gallery makers feel not so enabled. Due to the extraordinary experience I have had here with non-communicative gallery makers for species of plants, allow me to offer what ever help you might need that I can provide. Assistance with how to use search functions at web sites is a difficult thing, but with patience, everyone can learn. Perhaps if you keep working on making the galleries you are interested in nice, your gallery might be invited to go where articles live also! So, keep at it and keep an open mind.... -- carol (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
File:Sergei Eisenstein with skull.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
This is not a Russian photo. It is a Mexican photo by Agustin Jimenez; as such, this will not enter public domain until 100 years after it was first published, which would be around 2033 or later. --Jappalang (talk) 03:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Veniz nedolshnosti 1838.djvu is uncategorized since 29 March 2009.
- Image:SR Serbia flag large.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 21:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Coloana fara sfarsit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Gestumblindi (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Premier_serveur_Web.jpeg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Premier_serveur_Web.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Premier_serveur_Web.jpeg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Map of municipalities
[edit]On 26 February 2011 (today), Mirna became a new municipality of Slovenia (see reference). An update to the file Obcine Slovenija 2006.svg would be needed. Thanks a lot if you will update it and have a nice day, --Eleassar (t/p) 22:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Polikarpow I-153.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 17:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Turganskii ba.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 11:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
File:First Gold Beam-Beam Collision Events at RHIC at 100 100 GeV c per beam recorded by STAR.jpg
[edit]File:First Gold Beam-Beam Collision Events at RHIC at 100 100 GeV c per beam recorded by STAR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bomazi (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Credits for image reproduction - Petroleum coke picture
[edit]Dear Romanm, in order to give you credits for one of your pictures (called petroleum coke), wich I'm using to ilustrate a chaoter of a book, I would like to ask you the way you want to be mentioned close to the picture. If you can, please answer at [email protected]. Thank you.
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Copyright status: File:Jugolira-originalslika-1027036-ko.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jugolira-originalslika-1027036-ko.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Eleassar (t/p) 23:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jugolira-originalslika-1027036.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jugolira-originalslika-1027036.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Eleassar (t/p) 23:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Ilyushin Il-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rd232 (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 12:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 12:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
File:SR Bosnia and Herzegovina coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:23, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:SR Croatia coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:SR Macedonia coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:SR Montenegro coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:31, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:SR Serbia coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:SR Slovenia coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:33, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Rogaska Slatina 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 11:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:SFRY coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 11:14, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Slovar slovenskega knjiznega jezika 3.jpg
- File:Slovar slovenskega knjiznega jezika 4.jpg
- File:Slovar slovenskega knjiznega jezika 5.jpg Eleassar (t/p) 11:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Enciklopedija Slovenije 2.jpg
- File:Enciklopedija Slovenije 3.jpg.JPG
- File:Enciklopedija Slovenije 4.jpg.JPG Eleassar (t/p) 11:23, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Andrew Gray (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hypsugo savii mp 006 popr mala.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hypsugo savii mp 006 popr mala.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hypsugo savii mp 006 popr mala.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- Congratulations on making problem out of nothing where there is none. --romanm (talk) 21:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, the tag has been already removed on these files. I'd recommend nonetheless that you forward the e-mail to the OTRS, if you still keep it. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Koprski zapor IMG 9764.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 12:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:OS Ivana Skvarce Zagorje IMG 8472.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Improvizija.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Improvizija.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Improvizija.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Eleassar (t/p) 19:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Photos by Lidija Maurer
[edit]Hi, could you please send permission by Lidija Maurer for the following images:
- File:Rtice IMG 5748.jpg
- File:Gradnja krozisca Zagorje IMG 7628.jpg
- File:Medija Zagorje IMG 0573.jpg
- File:Zagorje IMG 0511.JPG
- File:Zagorje center ZD IMG 0510.JPG
- File:Zagorsko krozisce IMG 0509.jpg
- File:Zagorje ob Savi.jpg
Please use the form at COM:OTRS/sl. Thank you. P.S: Note that they have not been tagged. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've tagged the files (and the bats - Hypsugo savii) as missing permission. It may seem redundant, but the rules (COM:L) are clear: all files must have an archived permission of the copyright holder that has been sent to the OTRS or another clear evidence that makes the license verifiable. If you keep the permission or can obtain it, please send it to the OTRS. Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 17:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Zihr še znaš slovensko, če se malo potrudiš. --romanm (talk) 21:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- It is not my problem anymore. (P.S.: I would have formulated my response differently if your reply/request was formulated differently.) --Eleassar (t/p) 09:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Dobro veš, da s temi fotografijami ni nič narobe in da si med vsemi ljudmi na svetu edini, ki se spotika ob njih izključno zaradi formalnih razlogov. Ne bom pristal na tvojo igro in (ponovno) nadlegoval ljudi za pisna dovoljenja ali iskal stara sporočila po diskih. Pa bodi znan kot ukinjevalec vsebin iz čistih formalnih razlogov, če te to veseli. Vsak po svoje. --romanm (talk) 21:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- To lahko domnevam, vedeti pa žal ne morem. Pravilo COM:L zahteva formalno dokazilo o prosti licenci in ne pozna izjem. Formalno dokazilo zagotavlja, da so proste licence pravno veljavne in preverljive. Sam kot nekdo, ki mu je bolj mar za projekt kot za svoj renome, zagotovo še naprej nameravam skrbeti za to, da bo vsebina Zbirke čim bolj v skladu z merili o vključitvi v Zbirko, kot jih opisujejo sprejeta pravila. O tem, ali je formalne argumente treba upoštevati ali ne, se lahko sicer pogovoriš tudi na strani Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kanal ob Soci.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kanal ob Soci.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Kal - dom IMG 0951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 18:18, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Mrzlica - dom IMG 0965.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 18:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Flintstone has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Passerose (talk) 14:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
File:SR Croatia flag large.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zoupan (talk) 21:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I changed the name of the file File:Rudbeckia laciniata pollen.jpg to File:Rudbeckia laciniata NRCS-006.jpg because the photograph contains seeds, not pollen. At least that's the English terms. I noticed that you changed the sl description from "Semena deljenolistne rudbekije" to "Pelod deljenolistne rudbekije". Is that still correct, knowing that these are actually seeds? — R. A. Nonenmacher (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you! The correct expression is semena. --romanm (talk) 10:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Charles Pelot Summerall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Petrolkoks IMG 6160.jpg
[edit]I would like to use Petrolkoks for a story I am writing about C-H activation and coking. I would like to ask permission to use the image, adapt it, and give you credit as you would like. Please respond with the appropriate attribution you would like. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harkenrm (talk • contribs) 12:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Feel free to use it, the license is stated on picture's page. --romanm (talk) 18:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Pjankov AlPet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Tscheljuskin-Rettung.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tscheljuskin-Rettung.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Tscheljuskin-Rettung.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Pcr machine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GFJ (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Ox1997cow (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Nanut 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lutheraner (talk) 10:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Zdravo, ali ni ta datoteka "ineligible for copyright"? Morda bi bila bolj primerna licenca {{PD-text}}? Hvala. A09090091 (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Zdravo! Ne vem, mislim, da sem jo takrat samo prenesel iz slovenske Wikipedije, kjer je bila pod licenco GFDL, v Zbirko. Izvirnik je še vedno tule: http://www2.arnes.si/~mpavle1/glago.html --romanm (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Supranational European Bodies.sl.png requires updating
[edit]Hi Romanm,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Supranational European Bodies.sl.png is out of date. United Kingdom is no longer a member of European Union. Could you update it? Thanks again. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Katarina Ivanovic, Autoportret v.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
No.cilepogača (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Župnijska cerkev svete Marije Matere Cerkve Trbovlje 20170128 112135.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 13:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)