Meeting minutes
Ben: one thing we should add is if there is some sort of menu that structure should be added
+AWK
<Chuck_> User processes do not increase cognitive load
RM: Our subgroup was User processes do not increase cognitive load
User processes do not increase cognitive load subgroup update
RM: looking at personalization to help with user needs
RM: We were looking at an expansion of accessible authentication
… also how to recover from avoiding mistakes, avoid distractions, etc
RM: lots of research needed for different areas
… internationalized research
… discussed needing users to be able to go back to a previous UI design
… conversation around providing instructions for complex processes in text + at least one other way
… research discussed about videos longer than 5 min needing chapters
… discussed cognitive tests
<Zakim> alastairc, you wanted to comment on using cognitive tests more generally
AC: We will need to tweak the cognitive tests in order to use more generally
RM: The thinking was to not lock ppl out
ME: Thought of another resource
… Germany goes beyond 2.1 AA and there are professionals there that we may want to talk with
CA: Any comments on how the subgroups operated - good/bad?
PL: on the structure group
… we had a lot of fundmental discussions
… discussing when things are lists or headings as distinct from what happens when things are
AC: there wasn't much research
… related to the nature of 1.3.1 content area. Lots of WCAG-referring references.
… we moved past research quickly
WF: Feel like 1.3.1 is a huge topic and needs more time
<Patrick__> agree with Wilco. "structure" is a large and fundamental topic that it felt too big to tackle
CA: How well were you able to keep pace?
RM: lunch was longer for in-person PPL
Juanita: Lots of research. We should find more still
… process went well overall
CA: Lesson learned?
Juanita: When writing user needs should they be technology-agnostic?
AC: people were saying that structured content is very wide and we could spend a LOT more time with it
<Zakim> Chuck_, you wanted to ask if that means adding a column
AC: RM: Tried using a table during editing also
ss/..RM: /... RM:
RM: We should make an effort to stay high-level rather than get too deep too soon
<Rachael> +1 to avoiding being tempted to fit this into WCAG 2. We ran into that too
PL: Very hard to not drive to get to the specific outcomes too soon
<Rachael> Capture the deep questions and move on to keep going. :)
<lisa> metal health review https://
Lisa: put two links into IRC above
… did review of research
… it would be interesting to centralize how the different task forces and subgroups handle research
… looking to streamline the research
CA: Sneak peek of what is coming
… two new subgroups
… "text uses appropriate layout and semantics"
<lisa> also note jennie and shawns work at https://
CA: other is "user flexible"
CA: How is it over there? Inquiring minds want to know
WF: (sarcastically) Terrible
CA: Moving to a new 15 minute break
<Jaunita__> Can you send the schedule?
https://
<Jaunita__> Thank you!!
<Zakim> mbgower_, you wanted to say are we supposed to click "Join" breakout room now?
https://