See also: IRC log
<AWK> +AWK
<AWK> +AWK
<interaccess> trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 10 August 2017
<AWK> +AWK
<Alex> scribe: Alex
<AWK> Scribe: Alex
awk please go through the entire survey
awk please use present + at meeting
<AWK> TPAC 6-10 NOVEMBER 2017
<AWK> https://www.w3.org/2017/11/TPAC/
awk please RSVP for TPAC
awk make your hotel booking sooner rather than later
<AWK> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List
awk please sign up for scribing at TPAC
lisa Michael's issues that can be resolve
lisa let's look at AA first
lisa hope Alex will be ok if he sees the technique
josh what do you mean by convention?
lisa button has to have a name that tells when the button does
lisa will help autofill
lisa let's go over the conditional approval comments first
<alastairc> The 2 objections were from MichaelG and Alex, both to do with including a schema/listing with the SC.
jf author is supposed to use a fixed taxonomy
jf you can use many different ways to meet the AA
jf fixed taxonomy is aimed for AAA
josh most comments are concerned about binding nature. A use case would be helpful.
jason this is more about question for the working group. concern about internationalization
jason, would this work for AT?
<Joshue108> thanks for that Alastair.
jason seems more sensible to work on autocomplete
<Zakim> JF, you wanted to address Jason's question
JF having author provide machine readable lookup table is optimal
JF but that is for AAA for now, because tech is not ready
JF use of ARIA is the easiest way to get there
JF since we don't have it, let's get some human readable way to help at AA
josh Mike and Alex have concerns
lisa tried to harmonize and achieve internationalization
<alastairc> I sent some examples which could turn into techniques to the COGA list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2017Aug/0010.html
<JF> Common Concept: (First Name)
<JF> Technique(s) for AA: (using @title) <input type="text" title="ספק את שמך הפרטי"> (Hebrew Example)
lisa we will work on techniques as we go
<JF> (using Microformats) <input type="text" class="fname">
<JF> (using COGA Semantics) <input type="text" coga-field="name">
<JF> of those 3, only the second and third would be sufficient for AAA
lisa let's put it in draft to see how it works for different language
alastair internationalization is an issue for the descriptions, not the tokens
jf we are introduce are things to look at
<Joshue108> AL: I'll have to see the techniques.
<lisa> example using autocorrect for Postal Code: <input name=bp autocomplete="section-blue shipping postal-code">
josh let me take the temperature
jason i partly agree with john
jason the AA SC may present issues with internationalization
<lisa> jason you are arguing over techneuqes
jason prefer to hold off AA and work on the AAA
<lisa> auto corect is one example of what is availible now
jason not sure this is ready for 2.1
<lisa> widely availible
david i see jason's concern but also sees the opposite
jf we have a chicken and egg problem
jf proposing the human readable solution help break the problem
awk support the idea, but the list is really long
<JF> I agree that the list needs to be trimmed significantly
awk can you shorten it
lisa only to include things in autocorrect
<alastairc> I think James asked they align, i.e. if there is overlap then use the HTML term.
josh i'm hearing support. techniques can be added
<AWK> Before I would agree to this going in the draft I would need to see the editor's note that accompanies it
josh i think this is ready
<david-macdonald> BRB I +1 inclusion at AA and AAA with at risk note editor
<JF> +1
<Rachael> +1 I am comfortable with this going forwarrd
<kirkwood> +1
<Glenda> +1
<alastairc> +1
jf will trying to get things ready
<Joshue108> +1 with editors note - and more focussed list
<KimD> 0 I still have concerns about whether it makes sense to be broadly implemented.
awk want to see the editor's note
-1 for now
<alastairc> The techniques are important, but the principle that the techniques follow is that it is feasible at AA, so we don't need to specify techniques first.
<laura> +1 with editor's note
josh we have largely positive
<AWK> +1 assuming editor's note is clarified before the end of the CFC
-1
<chriscm> +1
<lisa> +1
<Joshue108> Is this related to you wishing to Alex.
<Pietro> +1
Alex needs to see techniques
<alastairc> I posted some initial examples, perhaps Alex can look through later?
<lisa> i also posted an example Postal Code: <input name=bp autocomplete="section-blue shipping postal-code">
i will look after the call
<Joshue108> thanks Alex
michael we can pull thing after cfc
michael but we can't add
<chriscm> @Lisa: I think it's really cool that this came together. Good work.
<lisa> thank you Chris, and everyone else who helped
michael please comment on CFC for objection
<alastairc> Lisa, would it be a good idea to put the list of terms in a google doc / sheet for group editing?
jf will have the note for Tuesday
<chriscm> @JF Marty McFly could! Come on man.
RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed for the AA Personalization item, with an objection from Alex.
<JF> @alastair I'm down with that (google doc spreadsheet)
michael we ought to have separate cfc
josh thank you
<alastairc> can we separate? I thought the AAA one needed a bit of change.
<alastairc> ok
lisa can we edit after august
michael yes
<lisa> +1
lisa we can remove region
<JF> +1 as well
<Rachael> +1
alastair can live with it
<AWK> +1
+1 or -1 on AAA going to CFC
<Joshue108> +1
<kirkwood> +1
0
<Pietro> +1
<alastairc> +1
<KimD> 0 same concerns about whether it can be broadly implemented
<Glenda> +1
<laura> +1
<chriscm> +1
<lisa> Thanks all the folks who helped with this
RESOLUTION: presonalization AAA accepted
awk who is caller 3
<laura> SCribe: Laura
Josh: Good discussion on
this.
... Steve has a new wording.
<Zakim> AWK, you wanted to discuss changes
awk: I think all issues are
resolved.
... the word popup is removed.
<Joshue108> AWK updated Popup Visibility in survey.
awk: uses when content
apears.
... triggred by a UI component.
Visible trigger: Either the additional content does not obscure any essential content within the triggering user interface component, or the additional content can be closed or repositioned by the user.
scribe: …we don’t spec how.
alex: agree will most of
this.
... 3rd condition unnecessary.
... 3rd condition unnecessary.
... why wouldn’t 231 apply?
awk: explains.
alex: okay.
david: I don’t mind the extra reminder.
josh: do people feel this is ready?
<alastairc> +1 I suggested a minor wording change, but happy in principle
<gowerm> +1
kim: question custom tooltips
awk: lots of options to dismiss
them.
... shouldn’t be an issue
kim: thinking about the
layers.
... should be okay.
<AWK> Need to indicate in the understanding document that activating a button that triggers a tooltip would be a fine way to dismiss the additional content
mg: understanding docs should mention 321
<alastairc> AWK did you see my most recent suggestion? Starting it "For content that becomes visible"
<AWK> Need to go into detail about where 2.1.1 / 3.2.1 / and this SC interact.
<KimD> +1 ready
josh: hearing no objections.
<gowerm> +1
<david-macdonald> +1
<AWK> +1
<kirkwood> +1
<alastairc> +1
<Alex> +1
<lisa> +1
awk: steve had some objections. But I think he will be ok.
laura: +1
<alastairc> I can help you drop another?
RESOLUTION: Popup Visibility accepted for CFC
<david-macdonald> Chaohai Ding
<AWK> Current SC: Where data can be lost due to timeouts, users are warned at the start of a process about the length of inactivity that generates the timeout, unless the data is preserved for a minimum of 24 hours of user inactivity.
<lisa> he has not been well unfortunatly so I am helping out\
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/timeouts_ISSUE-14/guidelines/sc/21/timeouts.html
awk: AA
... Michael Elledge minor edit and wordsmithing
<JF> +1
MG: for forms time outs may be an
issue
... outside the control of the author.
... worry about how "user inactivity" is measured.
... how does an author tell?
<AWK> Mike: Where data can be lost due to user inactivity, users are warned at the start of a process about the length of inactivity that generates the timeout, unless the data is preserved for a minimum of 24 hours of user inactivity.
MG: rationale for 20 hours in the
current 2.0 spec, that I find it disheartening to talk about
extending it even more. Half of that time would be
reasonable.
... 24 seems abritrary.
lisa: it can easily take people
longer than 24 hours.
... people may need to continue the next day.
... does not require a calculation.
... a lot of COGA rationale for this.
<alastairc> inactivity?
lisa: maybe add the word “Server” to time outs
AC maybe use inactivity.
Lisa: will change to user inactivity.
awk: should write the note for this one too.
JF: have some concerns that we haven’t talked about.
awk: we will talk about this on tuesday.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/alastair internationalization is an issue/alastair internationalization is an issue for the descriptions, not the tokens/ Succeeded: s/we wil talk ablut this on tuesday./we will talk about this on tuesday./ WARNING: Replacing previous Present list. (Old list: (no, one)) Use 'Present+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Present+ AWK Present: AWK KimD alastairc jasonjgw chriscm Joshue108 scott JF Rachael Pietro shadi David-MacDonald Laura lisa kirkwood MikeGower glenda Kim Regrets: Detlev KathyW Mike_Pluke EA_Draffan Found Scribe: Alex Found Scribe: Alex Inferring ScribeNick: Alex Found Scribe: Laura Inferring ScribeNick: laura Scribes: Alex, Laura ScribeNicks: Alex, laura Found Date: 10 Aug 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/08/10-ag-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]