See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 19 July 2012
<greggvanderheiden> ack[m
<greggvanderheiden> ack [m
<David> OK
<scribe> scribe: Andi
RESOLUTION: Accept 1.3.1, 1.4.2, 3.3.2, 3.3.3 as proposed
Leave ARIA questions (1 & 2) to the end or until next week when Loretta is back
RESOLUTION: Accept 1.4.4 as proposed
Note that Christophe's comments have been captured on the 1.4.4 page to be revisted after first public working draft.
<greggvanderheiden> The WCAG2ICT TF either describe what "content" means in the introduction, or remove all of the sentences from the WCAG2ICT TF comments that say " See introduction for the way to interpret content
<greggvanderheiden> FROM WCAG : information and sensory experience to be communicated to the user by means of a user agent, including code or markup that defines the content's structure, presentation, and interactions
<MichaelC> Introduction
<Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to say the introduction only has an @@, which can be the seed of the editorial note, and I don't see anything we're talking about as inconsistent with what's
https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/quick-view
Change bullet 2 to: there may be more than one order that is "correct" according to the WCAG definition
<greggvanderheiden> 1) providing a particular linear order is only required where it affects meaning.
<greggvanderheiden> 2) there may be more than one order that is "correct" (according to the WCAG 2.0 definition)
<greggvanderheiden> 3) only one correct order needs to be provided.
RESOLUTION: Accept 1.3.2 with the Note removed.
RESOLUTION: Add to end of 1.3.2 WCAG 2.0 Intent, "For clarity:", followed by the 3 bullets from the Note, modifying bullet 2 to read "2) there may be more than one order that is "correct" (according to the WCAG 2.0 definition)"
<greggvanderheiden> The WCAG2ICT TF either describe what "content" means in the introduction, or remove all of the sentences from the WCAG2ICT TF comments that say " See introduction for the way to interpret content
<greggvanderheiden> The WCAG2ICT TF either describe what "content" means in the introduction, or remove all of the sentences from the WCAG2ICT TF comments that say " See introduction for the way to interpret content. The definition in 1.3.2 is acceptable to WCAG WG if the task force would like to use it.
RESOLUTION: The WCAG2ICT TF should either describe what "content" means in the introduction, or remove all of the sentences from the WCAG2ICT TF comments that say " See introduction for the way to interpret content. The definition in 1.3.2 is acceptable to WCAG WG if the task force would like to use it.
RESOLUTION: Accept 1.4.3 with the pointer to content in the introduction removed
RESOLUTION: WCAG recommends but does not require that the TF change the term "title attribute" or to clarify that it is meant generically
come back to this one at the end of the meeting
RESOLUTION: Add to 2.4.3 Intent: "For clarity: followed by the three bullets in the note
RESOLUTION: Accept 2.4.3 with note removed
Next survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wCAG2ICT-7/results
RESOLUTION: Accept edits to 3.3.1 WCAG 2.0 intent with the word "software" changed to "system".
RESOLUTION: Accept edits to 3.3.3 WCAG 2.0 intent with the word "software" changed to "system"
<greggvanderheiden> "Note that in software user interfaces, labels and headings are used to describe controls and sections of content respectively."
<korn> Note that in software user interfaces, labels and headings are used to describe controls and sections of content respectively.
<korn> That replaces the existing proposed "Note that in software user interfaces, headings and labels are used to describe blocks of text and controls respectively."
RESOLUTION: Accept reword of 2.4.6 with the "Note that in software user interfaces, headings and labels are used to describe blocks of text and controls respectively." replaced with "Note that in software user interfaces, labels and headings are used to describe controls and sections of content respectively."
<greggvanderheiden> The objective of WCAG2ICT Task Force is to develop documentation describing how to apply WCAG 2.0 and its principles, guidelines, and success criteria to non-Web Information and Communications Technologies (ICT).
<Zakim> jamesn, you wanted to say that if the title were to be changed (and I have no comment on whether it does need to be changed) it needs to come back to survey. We can't agree
<robin> need to drop
RESOLUTION: Accept FRONTMATTER as proposed
<greggvanderheiden> This draft document is intended to help make non-Web ICT more accessible to people with disabilities." -> "This draft document is intended to help clarify how to use WCAG 2.0 to make non-Web ICT more accessible to people with disabilities."
<korn> +1
<greggvanderheiden> "what WCAG 2.0 Conformance means" -> "what WCAG 2.0 Conformance would mean"
<alex> educational/training material should work
<greggvanderheiden> There are many guidelines, application notes, and standards that focus on or include specific accessibility support for file formats, general software concerns, telecommunication, and other electronic technologies that may be of help in that endeavor.
<alex> +1
<korn> +1
<Zakim> Judy, you wanted to express a concern about proposal above
RESOLUTION: Accept Introduction with two edits from Loretta in the survey
RESOLUTION: WCAG WG approves publication of WCAG2ICT as a First Public Working Draft (those parts that have been approved by the WG)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) FAILED: s/Note to WCAG 2.0 intent/Add to the end of 1.3.2 WCAG 2.0 intent "For clarity:" followed by the 3 bullets/ Succeeded: s/definitions/resolutions/ Succeeded: s/clarity:/clarity: followed by the three bullets in the note/ Succeeded: s/Accept edits to 3.3.1 edits to WCAG 2.0 intent /Accept edits to 3.3.1 WCAG 2.0 intent / Found Scribe: Andi Inferring ScribeNick: Andi WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Alex_Li Andi_Snow_Weaver Bruce_Bailey Cherie_Eckholm Cooper David David_MacDonald Gregg_Vanderheiden James_Nurthen Judy MichaelC MichaelC_ MichaelC__ Microsoft Oracle P11 Peter_Korn Robin_Tuttle adam adam_solomon alex already as been comment discussed greggvanderheiden https jamesn jnurthen joined korn like marcjohlic robin something survey that trackbot wai-wcag You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Bruce_Bailey Peter_Korn Loretta_Guarino_Reid Kathleen_Wahlbin Found Date: 19 Jul 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/07/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]