<wendy> agendum 1 = request for WCAG 1.0 interpretation regarding tables for layout. http://tinyurl.com/8drxs

<joeclark> I'll call back.

test

request for WCAG 1.0 interpretation regarding tables for layout. http://tinyurl.com/8drxs

wc: what would happen to our timeline if we ublished a revised WCAG 1.0
... perhaps a subgroup would go away and do a survey and get changes through quickly
... this also relates to mapping,

jc: googles kyn barteltt nov 2003, recommended this...only objection was can't do 2 things at once...but I don't think we can do both in the short time we have, among other reasons

wc: maybe just an errata of 1.0 would be doable

mc: I agree about difficulties in doing it. Charles is looking for an interpretation from the WG. Even if we posted an email to the list with a statement
... if we don't do that credibility will be an issue

<wendy> (an updated errata of wcag 1.0 - http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA

Gian: many organizations have their own erratas...many people expect 2.0 this year...we are holding them back...but an erratta wil give them something to work with....organizaitons are expecting 2.0 any week and are putting off

wc: some are concerned that people might be less likely to move to 2.0 if we do an errata

<wendy> table at: http://www.w3.org/2003/12/wcag10-errata-table.html

wc: 1.0 priority 2 says "use style sheets for layout"

<joeclark> CSS techniques *permit* layout tables if they linearize correctly (an old chestnut, but it is in our techiques): http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-CSS-TECHS/#style-alignment

<wendy> table of possible errata from 2003: http://www.w3.org/2003/12/wcag10-errata-table.html

Mapping of 1.0 to 2.0 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/06/30-mapping.html

no resolusion

resolution: wendy will make a survey

<scribe> ACTION: wc to make survey [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/21-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]

wording for principle 4 "Content is compatible with current user agents." or "Content is compatible with current and future user agents." or ???

tb: asks if mapping includes deprecated items from 1.0
... thnks the word deprecated should be used if it applies

<scribe> scribe: David_

removing [I] and [V] notation http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/0104.html

<wendy> "content is compatible with user agents" ??

<Wonder> This is Gian

<wendy> ACTION: wendy JIS about Robust. forward defn of robust and determine if that helps them determine. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/21-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02]

<wendy> resolution: wac check with JIS if can translate, use (s/tech/user agents) other wise use latest wording on list "compatible with c & f UA"

<wendy> resolution: remove [I] and [V] notation from drafts

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.126  of Date: 2005/05/16 16:49:48  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: David_
Inferring ScribeNick: David_
Default Present: +1.613.482.aaaa, Michael_Cooper, Wendy, Bengt_Farre, David_MacDonald, Ben, Joe_Clark, Tim_Boland, Gian, rellero
Present: +1.613.482.aaaa Michael_Cooper Wendy Bengt_Farre David_MacDonald Ben Joe_Clark Tim_Boland Gian rellero
Regrets: Roberto_Scano Becky_Gibson Gregg_Vanderheiden John_Slatin Sebastiano_Nutarelli Alex_Li Christophe_Strobbe Yvette_Hoitink matt_may yvette_hoitink
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/0169.html
Got date from IRC log name: 21 Jul 2005
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/21-wai-wcag-minutes.html
People with action items: wc wendy

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.