W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG 3.0 Editor's Notes

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2020-12-21 to 2021-01-05.

16 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Editors' note in WCAG 3 FPWD on inclusion
  2. Notable Contributions Section and Editor's Note

1. Editors' note in WCAG 3 FPWD on inclusion

The chairs propose an editor's note in the Background on WCAG 3 section of the FPWD, requesting feedback on how to improve inclusion, with the following text:

W3C strives to be as inclusive as possible, and has actively sought participation and input from a broad range of stakeholder groups. We recognize, however, that there is always room for improvement in practices to support inclusion and representation. As you evaluate this document, please consider whether there are ways the Working Group can better support your review, feedback, or inclusion within the process of creating this standard. We welcome feedback on this question as part of your comments.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Add the editor's note with the current wording 14
Add the editor's note with changes 1
Do not add an editor's note requesting feedback on inclusion
Other

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Editors' note in WCAG 3 FPWD on inclusionComments
Andrew Somers Add the editor's note with the current wording
Laura Carlson Add the editor's note with the current wording
Justine Pascalides Add the editor's note with the current wording
Sukriti Chadha Add the editor's note with the current wording
Jake Abma Add the editor's note with changes
I think the following sentence needs some rewrite as I think this is about ways the WG can improve the document and that is not what is says right now.

"As you evaluate this document, please consider whether there are ways the Working Group can better support your review, feedback, or inclusion within the process of creating this standard."

Reads like:

- consider whether the Working Group can better support your review (it's not about supporting the review, but act upon review comments)
- consider whether the Working Group can better support feedback (it's not about support the feedback, but act upon the feedback)
- consider whether the Working Group can better support your inclusion (don't know what 'support your inclusion' hints at / means?!)

Sarah Horton Add the editor's note with the current wording
John Foliot Add the editor's note with the current wording
Todd Libby Add the editor's note with the current wording
Kim Dirks Add the editor's note with the current wording
Bruce Bailey Add the editor's note with the current wording
Michael Gower Add the editor's note with the current wording
Jeanne F Spellman Add the editor's note with the current wording
Andrew Kirkpatrick Add the editor's note with the current wording
David MacDonald Add the editor's note with the current wording
Alastair Campbell
Janina Sajka Add the editor's note with the current wording

2. Notable Contributions Section and Editor's Note

The chairs propose adding a section to to the Acknowledgment appendix of WCAG 3 FPWD recognizing Participants who made notable contributions to the creation of this document section of the FPWD, requesting feedback on how to objectively identify key contributers, with the following text:

This section will document key contributors. The method of identifying these individuals is in process and a list will be included in the next draft. This list will be updated for each subsequent draft.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Add the section and editor's note with the current wording 11
Add the section and editor's note with changes 3
Do not add the section and editor's note 1
Other 1

Details

Responder Notable Contributions Section and Editor's NoteComments
Andrew Somers Add the section and editor's note with the current wording At the moment, I can see at least four broad categories:

* Major contributors: those that did significant research, authorship, and/or technology development that was used substantially.

* Associate contributors: those that assisted major contributors in a material way, ideally nominated/suggested by the major contributors.

* Administrative contributors, those with the focus of managing goals and resource development.

* Participating contributors: Those that regularly contributed feedback, opinion, or evaluation notes.

A
Laura Carlson Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
Justine Pascalides Add the section and editor's note with changes Consider combining the first and third sentences: This section will document key contributors and it will be updated at each subsequent draft.
Sukriti Chadha Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
Jake Abma Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
Sarah Horton Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
John Foliot Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
Todd Libby Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
Kim Dirks Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
Bruce Bailey Add the section and editor's note with changes Sorry, but I do not agree with the "key" contributors adjective, since that feels very arbitrary to me, and would strongly prefer to have that one word deleted. (i.e., <q>This section will document contributors. The method...</q>)

I would note that recognizing contributions towards *both* WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 also each spanned several years worth of activity. I do not agree that <q>notable contributions</q> for 3.0 needs to be significantly different in format from what we ended up with 1.0 and/or 2.0.

That said, I can live with any of these three options, and would not like to see the FCPWD delayed further.
Michael Gower Other If you don't come up with criteria acceptable to all, you may not be able to proceed. Why not make the language a little softer. "This section is intended to document key contributors...a list should be included...
Jeanne F Spellman Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
Andrew Kirkpatrick Add the section and editor's note with the current wording
David MacDonald Do not add the section and editor's note It's tough to do this well... there are a hundred names on the WCAG 2.1 with no key contributors.
Would key contributors to 2.0 be key contributors to 3.0 since it is built on 2.0, 2.1?
Alastair Campbell Add the section and editor's note with the current wording I've changed my answer from "Do not" to agree with the addition, thanks to Jeanne's comments in the meeting. However, if we don't agree on the criteria, we should have the option to drop the section.
Janina Sajka Add the section and editor's note with changes OK with edits from today's AGWG as recorded in minutes.

More details on responses

  • Andrew Somers: last responded on 3, January 2021 at 19:37 (UTC)
  • Laura Carlson: last responded on 4, January 2021 at 12:00 (UTC)
  • Justine Pascalides: last responded on 4, January 2021 at 16:11 (UTC)
  • Sukriti Chadha: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 00:06 (UTC)
  • Jake Abma: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 09:48 (UTC)
  • Sarah Horton: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 14:18 (UTC)
  • John Foliot: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 14:47 (UTC)
  • Todd Libby: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 14:52 (UTC)
  • Kim Dirks: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 14:53 (UTC)
  • Bruce Bailey: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 15:02 (UTC)
  • Michael Gower: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 15:25 (UTC)
  • Jeanne F Spellman: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 15:32 (UTC)
  • Andrew Kirkpatrick: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 16:07 (UTC)
  • David MacDonald: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 16:16 (UTC)
  • Alastair Campbell: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 16:34 (UTC)
  • Janina Sajka: last responded on 5, January 2021 at 21:09 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Chris Wilson
  3. Lisa Seeman-Horwitz
  4. Janina Sajka
  5. Shawn Lawton Henry
  6. Katie Haritos-Shea
  7. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  8. Chus Garcia
  9. Steve Faulkner
  10. Patrick Lauke
  11. Gez Lemon
  12. Makoto Ueki
  13. Peter Korn
  14. Preety Kumar
  15. Georgios Grigoriadis
  16. Stefan Schnabel
  17. Romain Deltour
  18. Chris Blouch
  19. Jedi Lin
  20. Wilco Fiers
  21. Kimberly Patch
  22. Glenda Sims
  23. Ian Pouncey
  24. Léonie Watson
  25. David Sloan
  26. Mary Jo Mueller
  27. Peter Heery
  28. John Kirkwood
  29. Detlev Fischer
  30. Reinaldo Ferraz
  31. Matt Garrish
  32. Mike Gifford
  33. Loïc Martínez Normand
  34. Mike Pluke
  35. Jon Gibbins
  36. Chris Loiselle
  37. Tzviya Siegman
  38. Jan McSorley
  39. Sailesh Panchang
  40. Cristina Mussinelli
  41. Jonathan Avila
  42. John Rochford
  43. Sujasree Kurapati
  44. Jatin Vaishnav
  45. Sam Ogami
  46. Kevin White
  47. E.A. Draffan
  48. Paul Bohman
  49. JaEun Jemma Ku
  50. 骅 杨
  51. Victoria Clark
  52. Avneesh Singh
  53. Mitchell Evan
  54. biao liu
  55. Scott McCormack
  56. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  57. Francis Storr
  58. David Swallow
  59. Aparna Pasi
  60. Gregorio Pellegrino
  61. Melanie Philipp
  62. Amanda Mace
  63. Nicole Windmann
  64. Oliver Keim
  65. Gundula Niemann
  66. Ruoxi Ran
  67. Wendy Reid
  68. Scott O'Hara
  69. Charles Adams
  70. Muhammad Saleem
  71. Amani Ali
  72. Trevor Bostic
  73. Jamie Herrera
  74. Shinya Takami
  75. Karen Herr
  76. Kathy Eng
  77. Cybele Sack
  78. Audrey Maniez
  79. Jennifer Delisi
  80. Arthur Soroken
  81. Daniel Bjorge
  82. Kai Recke
  83. David Fazio
  84. Daniel Montalvo
  85. Mario Chacón-Rivas
  86. Michael Gilbert
  87. Caryn Pagel
  88. Achraf Othman
  89. Helen Burge
  90. Fernanda Bonnin
  91. Christina Adams
  92. Raja Kushalnagar
  93. Jan Williams
  94. Isabel Holdsworth
  95. Julia Chen
  96. Marcos Franco Murillo
  97. Yutaka Suzuki
  98. Azlan Cuttilan
  99. Jennifer Strickland
  100. Joe Humbert
  101. Ben Tillyer
  102. Charu Pandhi
  103. Poornima Badhan Subramanian
  104. Alain Vagner
  105. Roberto Scano
  106. Rain Breaw Michaels
  107. Kun Zhang
  108. Jaunita George
  109. Regina Sanchez
  110. Shawn Thompson
  111. Thomas Brunet
  112. Kenny Dunsin
  113. Jen Goulden
  114. Mike Beganyi
  115. Ronny Hendriks
  116. Korede Olubowale
  117. Rashmi Katakwar
  118. Julie Rawe
  119. Duff Johnson
  120. Laura Miller
  121. Will Creedle
  122. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  123. Marie Csanady
  124. Meenakshi Das
  125. Perrin Anto
  126. Brian Elton
  127. Rachele DiTullio
  128. Jan Jaap de Groot
  129. Rebecca Monteleone
  130. Ian Kersey
  131. Peter Bossley
  132. Michael Keane
  133. Chiara De Martin
  134. Giacomo Petri
  135. Andrew Barakat
  136. Devanshu Chandra
  137. Xiao (Helen) Zhou
  138. Joe Lamyman
  139. Bryan Trogdon
  140. Mary Ann (MJ) Jawili
  141. 禹佳 陶
  142. 锦澄 王
  143. Stephen James
  144. Jay Mullen
  145. Thorsten Katzmann
  146. Tony Holland
  147. Kent Boucher
  148. Phil Day
  149. Julia Kim
  150. Michelle Lana
  151. David Williams
  152. Mikayla Thompson
  153. Catherine Droege
  154. James Edwards
  155. Eric Hind
  156. Quintin Balsdon
  157. Mario Batušić
  158. David Cox
  159. Sazzad Mahamud
  160. Katy Brickley
  161. Kimberly Sarabia
  162. Corey Hinshaw
  163. Ashley Firth
  164. Daniel Harper-Wain
  165. Kiara Stewart
  166. DJ Chase
  167. Suji Sreerama
  168. Fred Edora
  169. Lori Oakley
  170. David Middleton
  171. Alyssa Priddy
  172. Young Choi
  173. Nichole Bui
  174. Julie Romanowski
  175. Eloisa Guerrero
  176. George Kuan
  177. YAPING LIN
  178. Justin Wilson
  179. Leonard Beasley
  180. Tiffany Burtin
  181. Shane Dittmar
  182. Nayan Padrai
  183. Matt Argomaniz Matthew Argomaniz
  184. Frankie Wolf
  185. Kimberly McGee
  186. Ahson Rana
  187. Carolina Crespo
  188. humor927 humor927
  189. Jackie Fei
  190. Samantha McDaniel
  191. Matthäus Rojek
  192. Phong Tony Le
  193. Bram Janssens
  194. Graham Ritchie
  195. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  196. Jeroen Hulscher
  197. Alina Vayntrub
  198. Marco Sabidussi
  199. John Toles
  200. Jeanne Erickson Cooley
  201. Theo Hale
  202. Paul Adam
  203. Gert-Jan Vercauteren
  204. Karla Rubiano
  205. Aashutosh K
  206. Hidde de Vries
  207. Julian Kittelson-Aldred
  208. Roland Buss
  209. Aditya Surendranath
  210. Elizabeth Patrick
  211. Tj Squires
  212. Nat Tarnoff
  213. Illai Zeevi
  214. Filippo Zorzi
  215. Gleidson Ramos
  216. Mike Pedersen
  217. Rachael Yomtoob
  218. Oliver Habersetzer
  219. Ken Franqueiro
  220. Irfan Mukhtar
  221. Rachel White
  222. Sage Keriazes
  223. Tananda Darling
  224. Nina Krauß
  225. Demelza Feltham
  226. Ragvesh Sharma
  227. Shunguo Yan
  228. Charli Riggle
  229. Nora GOUGANE
  230. Andy Manea
  231. Tim Gravemaker
  232. Roldon Brown
  233. qin guan
  234. Alexandra Yaneva
  235. Carrie Hall
  236. Tanya van Workum
  237. Megan Pletzer
  238. Akash Shukla
  239. Rob Whitaker
  240. Jeremy Katherman
  241. Atya Ratcliff
  242. Nati Elimelech
  243. Noa Nitzan
  244. Jory Cunningham
  245. Imran Ahmed
  246. Ryan Romaine
  247. Casey Smith
  248. Ann Knettler

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.