Skip to main content

Fearless journalism needs your support now more than ever

Our mission could not be more clear and more necessary: We have a duty to explain what just happened, and why, and what it means for you. We need clear-eyed journalism that helps you understand what really matters. Reporting that brings clarity in increasingly chaotic times. Reporting that is driven by truth, not by what people in power want you to believe.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Support Vox

Exactly how Trump could ban abortion

Whether the US bans it everywhere could be up to the next president.

Adam Freelander
Adam Freelander is the senior audience video editor on the Vox video team and covers the US.

For decades, the anti-abortion movement in the United States worked toward one major goal: the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that established a federal right to abortion. In 2022, it finally succeeded, and states across the country began banning abortion immediately. Today about half the states either ban or severely restrict abortion. But now the anti-abortion movement is regrouping around a new goal: using the federal government to ban abortion in the rest of the country.

If Republicans take control of Congress in the 2024 election, it’s possible they could pass a national abortion ban law. But experts don’t consider that the most likely way a national abortion ban could come about, for two reasons: polling shows it would be extremely unpopular, and it would require the elimination of the Senate filibuster. Instead, they point to a different branch of the federal government — the president’s office and all the federal agencies it oversees.

In the federal agencies, opponents of abortion could fashion a de facto abortion ban by chipping away at abortion access in numerous ways; for example, limiting access to medication abortion, which now constitutes nearly two-thirds of all abortions in the US. The biggest way that the president’s office could limit abortion is by deciding to enforce something called the Comstock Act: a 150-year-old abortion ban made obsolete by Roe v. Wade but possibly revived by its repeal.

The final way the next president could determine the future of abortion rights is through federal court appointments. The anti-abortion movement’s “next Roe v. Wade” is the national legal recognition of fetal personhood, an idea that would by definition outlaw all abortion. The current Supreme Court isn’t yet right-wing enough to endorse this idea. But after another Trump term, that could change.

Watch the video above for the details of how this all could happen.

More in Video

How Trump’s second term will be differentHow Trump’s second term will be different
Play
Trump 2.0, explained

What Trump’s win means for abortion, immigration, foreign policy, and more.

By Adam Freelander
What polls can actually tell usWhat polls can actually tell us
Play
Video

And why they sometimes surprise us in presidential elections.

By Laura Bult and Coleman Lowndes
Why Red 3 is still in your candyWhy Red 3 is still in your candy
Play
Video

Red 3 has been banned for use in cosmetics and topical drugs since 1990. Why is it still in our food?

By Kim Mas
Ta-Nehisi Coates on complexity, clarity, and truthTa-Nehisi Coates on complexity, clarity, and truth
Play
The Gray Area

What the author saw in Palestine.

By Sean Illing
The real reason cheese is yellowThe real reason cheese is yellow
Play
Video

Cheese is yellow, milk is white. What’s going on here?

By Edward Vega
Can clean energy handle the AI boom?Can clean energy handle the AI boom?
Play
Video

How digital lives are impacting our climate goals.

By Laura Bult